Menu
Home
People
Places
Arts
History
Plants & Animals
Science
Life & Culture
Technology
Reference.org
Side project time
open-in-new
<p>As an <a href="/facts/Employee_benefit/ncKu1HYW">employee benefit</a>, some employers offer a guarantee that employees may work on their personal projects during some part (usually a percentage) of their time at work. Side project time is limited by two stipulations: what the employee works on is the <a href="/facts/Intellectual_property/PqHW9mVP">intellectual property</a> of their employer, and if requested, an explanation must be given as to how the project benefits the company in some way, even tangentially. </p><p><a href="/facts/Google/GT9Sugza">Google</a> is credited for popularizing the practice that 20 percent of an employee's time may be used for side projects. At Google, this led to the development of products such as <a href="/facts/Google_AdSense/ApWGT7cI">AdSense.</a> While <a href="/facts/Gmail/GXU2IQH4">Gmail</a> is frequently described as a 20% project, its creator <a href="/facts/Paul_Buchheit/FfrWcjDe">Paul Buchheit</a> states that it was never one. Though the program's continuity has been questioned, Google stated in 2020 that it remained an active program. </p><p>Other major companies that have at one time or another offered some or all of their employees the benefit include the <a href="/facts/BBC/qFateIz8">BBC</a> (10 percent of employee time), <a href="/facts/Apple_Inc./oTJYta3k">Apple</a> (a few contiguous weeks yearly), and <a href="/facts/Atlassian/VvFyWvdJ">Atlassian</a> (20 percent of employee time). Some companies, such as <a href="/facts/LinkedIn/Iq2IcNMt">LinkedIn</a>, have experimented with more restrictive versions in which employees must first <a href="/facts/Sales_presentation/N9AbGfJo">pitch</a> their projects to receive approval to work on them during company time. </p><p>Side project time has been criticized by some academics, such as <a href="/facts/Queens_College/HArzyImw">Queens College</a> <a href="/facts/Sociology/d2Fd0N87">sociology</a> professor Abraham Walker, as "exploitative" because of how it grants employers the intellectual property rights over the personal business ideas of their employees that the employer would never have requested to be worked on otherwise. </p>