Capability Immaturity Model

Capability Immaturity Model (CIMM) in <a href="/facts/Software_engineering/KX6cE9kz">software engineering</a> is a <a href="/facts/Parody/xDs59sgV">parody</a> <a href="/facts/Acronym/nlHK7aRt">acronym</a>, a semi-serious effort to provide a contrast to the <a href="/facts/Capability_Maturity_Model/PxQXfSYJ">Capability Maturity Model</a> (CMM). The Capability Maturity Model is a five point scale of capability in an organization, ranging from random processes at level 1 to fully defined, managed and optimized processes at level 5. The ability of an organization to carry out its mission on time and within budget is claimed to improve as the CMM level increases.
The "Capability Im-Maturity Model" asserts that organizations can and do occupy levels below CMM level 1. An original article by Capt. Tom Schorsch USAF as part of a graduate project at the <a href="/facts/Air_Force_Institute_of_Technology/8nKNVRug">Air Force Institute of Technology</a> provides the definitions for CIMM. He cites <a href="/facts/Anthony_Finkelstein/DCSKPgN7">Anthony Finkelstein</a>'s ACM paper as an inspiration. The article describes situations that arise in dysfunctional organizations. Such situations are reportedly common in organizations of all kinds undertaking software development, i.e. they are really characterizations of the management of specific projects, since they can occur even in organizations with positive CMM levels.
Kik Piney, citing the original authors, later adapted the model to a somewhat satirical version that attracted a number of followers who felt that it was true to their experience.

Capability Immaturity Model open-in-new

Capability Immaturity Model