Persepolis Administrative Archives

The Persepolis Administrative Archive (also Fortification Archive or Treasury Archive) are two groups of clay administrative archives — sets of records physically stored together – found in <a href="/facts/Persepolis/TmMBrPhX">Persepolis</a> dating to the <a href="/facts/Achaemenid_Persian_Empire/avlzWxF0">Achaemenid Persian Empire</a>. The discovery was made during legal excavations conducted by the archaeologists from the <a href="/facts/Institute_for_the_Study_of_Ancient_Cultures/TtnM5WlX">Oriental Institute</a> of the <a href="/facts/University_of_Chicago/z6zRMUmV">University of Chicago</a> in the 1930s. Hence they are named for their <a href="/facts/In_situ/YolKlaCC">in situ</a> findspot: Persepolis. The <a href="/facts/Archaeological/K3Q5P38R">archaeological</a> excavations at Persepolis for the Oriental Institute were initially directed by <a href="/facts/Ernst_Herzfeld/eaEETboN">Ernst Herzfeld</a> from 1931 to 1934 and carried on from 1934 until 1939 by <a href="/facts/Erich_Schmidt_(archaeologist)/wb5egj4t">Erich Schmidt</a>.
While the political end of the <a href="/facts/Achaemenid_Empire/avlzWxF0">Achaemenid Empire</a> is symbolized by the burning of Persepolis by <a href="/facts/Alexander_the_Great/8N3gLElj">Alexander the Great</a> (dated 330/329 BCE), the fall of Persepolis paradoxically contributed to the preservation of the Achaemenid administrative archives that might have been lost due to passage of time and <a href="/facts/Natural/YVJharv5">natural</a> and <a href="/facts/Man-made/Tl1KAsLR">man-made</a> causes. According to <a href="/facts/Archaeological/K3Q5P38R">archaeological</a> evidence, the partial burning of Persepolis did not affect the Persepolis Fortification Archive tablets, but may have caused the eventual collapse of the upper part of the northern Fortification wall that preserved the tablets until their recovery by the Oriental Institute's archaeologists.
Thousands of clay tablets, fragments and seal impressions in the Persepolis archives are a part of a single administrative system representing continuity of activity and flow of data over more than fifty consecutive years (509 to 457 BCE). These records can throw light on the <a href="/facts/Geography/TRd1Toyo">geography</a>, economy, and <a href="/facts/Administration_(government)/Shlrma7m">administration</a>, as well as the religion and social conditions of the Persepolis region, the heartland of the <a href="/facts/Persian_people/4GhM3jl2">Persian</a> Great Kings from <a href="/facts/Darius_I_the_Great/SnfdjGyK">Darius I the Great</a> to <a href="/facts/Artaxerxes_I/FfKPENFp">Artaxerxes I</a>.
The Persepolis Administrative Archives are the single most important extant <a href="/facts/Primary_source/t1l9U3Sm">primary source</a> for understanding the internal workings of the Persian Achaemenid Empire. But while these archives have the potential for offering the study of the Achaemenid history based on the sole surviving and substantial records from the heartland of the empire, they are still not fully utilized as such by a majority of historians. The reason for the slow adoption of study of Persepolis administrative archives can also be attributed to the administrative nature of the archives, lacking the drama and excitement of narrative history.

Persepolis Administrative Archives open-in-new

Persepolis Administrative Archives