Lorentz ether theory

What is now often called Lorentz <a href="/facts/Luminiferous_aether/UzRf78a2">ether</a> theory (LET) has its roots in <a href="/facts/Hendrik_Lorentz/JbBpKFyr">Hendrik Lorentz</a>'s "theory of electrons", which marked the end of the development of the classical <a href="/facts/Aether_theories/Gqquyhyv">aether theories</a> at the end of the 19th and at the beginning of the 20th century.
Lorentz's initial theory was created between 1892 and 1895 and was based on removing assumptions about aether motion. It explained the failure of the negative aether drift experiments to first order in v/c by introducing an auxiliary variable called "local time" for connecting systems at rest and in motion in the aether. In addition, the negative result of the <a href="/facts/Michelson%E2%80%93Morley_experiment/yyrNEgA4">Michelson–Morley experiment</a> led to the introduction of the hypothesis of <a href="/facts/Length_contraction/4of503Dg">length contraction</a> in 1892. However, other experiments also produced negative results and (guided by <a href="/facts/Henri_Poincar%C3%A9/AazL2j4X">Henri Poincaré</a>'s <a href="/facts/Principle_of_relativity/8I2xlmoP">principle of relativity</a>) Lorentz tried in 1899 and 1904 to expand his theory to all orders in v/c by introducing the <a href="/facts/Lorentz_transformation/jotJL06G">Lorentz transformation</a>. In addition, he assumed that non-electromagnetic forces (if they exist) transform like electric forces. However, Lorentz's expression for charge density and current were incorrect, so his theory did not fully exclude the possibility of detecting the aether. Eventually, it was <a href="/facts/Henri_Poincar%C3%A9/AazL2j4X">Henri Poincaré</a> who in 1905 corrected the errors in Lorentz's paper and actually incorporated non-electromagnetic forces (including <a href="/facts/Gravitation/bqAN7DdQ">gravitation</a>) within the theory, which he called "The New Mechanics". Many aspects of Lorentz's theory were incorporated into <a href="/facts/Special_relativity/vsFFc63E">special relativity</a> (SR) with the works of <a href="/facts/Albert_Einstein/CNTet8qu">Albert Einstein</a> and <a href="/facts/Hermann_Minkowski/tlKrpw69">Hermann Minkowski</a>.
Today LET is often treated as some sort of "Lorentzian" or "neo-Lorentzian" interpretation of special relativity. The introduction of <a href="/facts/Length_contraction/4of503Dg">length contraction</a> and <a href="/facts/Time_dilation/fYj7FYbK">time dilation</a> for all phenomena in a "preferred" <a href="/facts/Frame_of_reference/15yYfB9M">frame of reference</a>, which plays the role of Lorentz's immobile aether, leads to the complete Lorentz transformation (see the <a href="/facts/Test_theories_of_special_relativity/thSg2HGl">Robertson–Mansouri–Sexl test theory</a> as an example), so <a href="/facts/Lorentz_covariance/K5AEuGKg">Lorentz covariance</a> doesn't provide any experimentally verifiable distinctions between LET and SR. The absolute simultaneity in the Mansouri–Sexl test theory formulation of LET implies that a <a href="/facts/One-way_speed_of_light/SjGTcb8X">one-way speed of light</a> experiment could in principle distinguish between LET and SR, but it is now widely held that it is impossible to perform such a test. In the absence of any way to experimentally distinguish between LET and SR, SR is widely preferred over LET, due to the superfluous assumption of an undetectable aether in LET, and the validity of the relativity principle in LET seeming ad hoc or coincidental.

Lorentz ether theory open-in-new

Lorentz ether theory