Type III error

In <a href="/facts/Statistical_hypothesis_testing/yv9RPF6U">statistical hypothesis testing</a>, there are various notions of so-called type III errors (or errors of the third kind), and sometimes type IV errors or higher, by analogy with the <a href="/facts/Type_I_and_type_II_errors/aazbF3fq">type I and type II errors</a> of <a href="/facts/Jerzy_Neyman/L98HnbFN">Jerzy Neyman</a> and <a href="/facts/Egon_Pearson/GaTrAAo9">Egon Pearson</a>. Fundamentally, type III errors occur when researchers provide the right answer to the wrong question, i.e. when the correct hypothesis is rejected but for the wrong reason.
Since the paired notions of type I errors (or "false positives") and type II errors (or "false negatives") that were introduced by Neyman and Pearson are now widely used, their choice of terminology ("errors of the first kind" and "errors of the second kind"), has led others to suppose that certain sorts of mistakes that they have identified might be an "error of the third kind", "fourth kind", etc.
None of these proposed categories have been widely accepted. The following is a brief account of some of these proposals.

Type III error open-in-new

Type III error