Abstract and concrete

In <a href="/facts/Philosophy/zAH5PVD6">philosophy</a> and <a href="/facts/The_arts/kabJ6XX6">the arts</a>, a fundamental distinction exists between abstract and concrete entities. While there is no <a href="/facts/Consensus_decision-making/z965PMKc">universally accepted</a> definition, common examples illustrate the difference: <a href="/facts/Number/auQSAE2m">numbers</a>, <a href="/facts/Set_(mathematics)/BfucfHMq">sets</a>, and <a href="/facts/Idea/zK4ar1yv">ideas</a> are typically classified as abstract objects, whereas <a href="/facts/Plant/X5BMDMvS">plants</a>, <a href="/facts/Dogs/DvQVRVzy">dogs</a>, and <a href="/facts/Planet/rbPjE6Bx">planets</a> are considered concrete objects.
Philosophers have proposed several criteria to define this distinction:

<ol><li>Spatiotemporal existence – Abstract objects exist outside <a href="/facts/Space-time/uRIN1x4b">space-time</a>, while concrete objects exist within space-time.</li>
<li>Causal influence – Concrete objects can cause and be affected by other entities (e.g., a rock breaking a window), whereas abstract objects (e.g., the number 2) lack causal powers and do not cause anything to happen in the physical world.</li>
<li>Metaphysical relation – In <a href="/facts/Metaphysics/fSFt6SHe">metaphysics</a>, concrete objects are specific, individual things (<a href="/facts/Particular/AwbfD8jx">particulars</a>), while abstract objects represent general concepts or categories (<a href="/facts/Universal_(metaphysics)/8cCB0YnK">universals</a>).</li>
<li>Ontological domain – Concrete objects belong to the physical realm (or both the physical and mental realms), whereas abstract objects belong to neither.</li></ol>
Another view is that it is the distinction between contingent existence versus necessary existence; however, philosophers differ on which type of existence here defines abstractness, as opposed to concreteness. Despite this diversity of views, there is broad agreement concerning most objects as to whether they are abstract or concrete, such that most interpretations agree, for example, that rocks are concrete objects while numbers are abstract objects.
Abstract objects are most commonly used in <a href="/facts/Philosophy/zAH5PVD6">philosophy</a>, particularly metaphysics, and <a href="/facts/Semantics/1L4WwLAP">semantics</a>. They are sometimes called abstracta in contrast to concreta. The term abstract object is said to have been coined by <a href="/facts/Willard_Van_Orman_Quine/2RrhATxa">Willard Van Orman Quine</a>. <a href="/facts/Abstract_object_theory/ev5u3gxo">Abstract object theory</a> is a discipline that studies the nature and role of abstract objects. It holds that properties can be related to objects in two ways: through exemplification and through encoding. Concrete objects exemplify their properties while abstract objects merely encode them. This approach is also known as the <a href="/facts/Dual_copula_strategy/HfJtTD6S">dual copula strategy</a>.

Abstract and concrete open-in-new

Abstract and concrete