Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Budget of NASA
Budget allocated to American space agency NASA by the US Congress

As a federal agency, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) receives its funding from the annual federal budget passed by the United States Congress. The following charts detail the amount of federal funding allotted to NASA each year over its history to pursue programs in aeronautics research, robotic spaceflight, technology development, and human space exploration programs.

We don't have any images related to Budget of NASA yet.
We don't have any YouTube videos related to Budget of NASA yet.
We don't have any PDF documents related to Budget of NASA yet.
We don't have any Books related to Budget of NASA yet.

Annual budget

NASA's budget for financial year (FY) 2020 is $22.6 billion.1 It represents 0.48% of the $4.7 trillion the United States plans to spend in the fiscal year.2

Since its inception the United States has spent nearly US$650 billion (in nominal dollars) on NASA.

Calendar YearNACA Budget3
Nominal Dollars (Millions)%of Federal Budget42024 Constant Dollars(Millions)
19150.0050.00%0.128
19160.0050.00%0.119
19170.0880.00%1.770
19180.1120.00%1.920
19190.2050.00%3.067
19200.1750.00%2.265
19210.2000.00%2.892
19220.2000.01%3.081
19230.2260.01%3.414
19240.3070.01%4.646
19250.4700.02%6.951
19260.5340.02%7.808
19270.5130.02%7.630
19280.5500.02%8.324
19290.8370.03%12.665
19301.3000.04%20.147
19311.3210.04%22.493
19321.0510.02%19.856
19330.9200.02%18.316
19340.9540.01%18.419
19351.2560.02%23.723
19362.5440.03%47.366
19371.6310.02%29.306
19381.2810.02%23.510
19394.0640.04%75.669
19404.1800.04%77.274
194111.2000.08%197.2
194219.8660.06%315.4
194325.4290.03%380.4
194438.3920.04%564.6
194540.9420.04%588.7
194624.0520.04%319.2
194730.7130.09%356.4
194843.4490.15%466.6
194948.6520.13%529.1
19501280.30%1,374.6
195163.0680.14%627.8
195269.0000.10%673.9
195366.2860.09%642.5
195462.4390.09%600.7
195555.8600.08%539.4
195672.7000.10%691.7
195776.6770.10%706.2
19581170.14%1,847.3
19591010.11%2,188.8
CalendarYearNASA budget
Nominal Dollars(Millions)% of Fed Budget562024 Constant Dollars(Millions)
1958890.1%970
19591450.2%1,564
19604010.5%4,262
19617440.9%7,829
19621,2571.18%13,066
19632,5522.29%26,211
19644,1713.52%42,287
19655,0924.31%50,807
19665,9334.41%57,498
19675,4253.45%51,159
19684,7222.65%42,697
19694,2512.31%36,450
19703,7521.92%30,379
19713,3821.61%26,258
19723,4231.48%25,731
19733,3121.35%23,460
19743,2551.21%20,753
19753,2690.98%19,103
19763,6710.99%20,285
19774,0020.98%20,766
19784,1640.91%20,074
19794,3800.87%18,976
19804,9590.84%18,925
19815,5370.82%19,150
19826,1550.83%20,055
19836,8530.85%21,635
19847,0550.83%21,353
19857,2510.77%21,199
19867,4030.75%21,236
19877,5910.76%21,010
19889,0920.85%24,173
CalendarYearNASA budget
Nominal Dollars(Millions)% of Fed Budget782024 Constant Dollars(Millions)
198911,0360.96%27,994
199012,4290.99%29,914
199113,8781.05%32,038
199213,9611.01%31,282
199314,3051.01%31,138
199413,6950.94%29,053
199513,3780.88%27,606
199613,8810.89%27,830
199714,3600.90%28,128
199814,1940.86%27,382
199913,6360.80%25,738
200013,4280.75%24,518
200114,0950.76%25,030
200214,4050.72%25,183
200314,6100.68%24,973
200415,1520.66%25,224
200515,6020.63%25,119
200615,1250.57%23,591
200715,8610.58%24,052
200817,8330.60%26,044
200917,78290.57%26,062
201018,724100.52%26,999
201118,448110.51%25,786
201217,770120.50%24,338
201316,865130.49%22,765
201417,647140.50%23,439
201518,010150.49%23,891
201619,300160.50%25,286
201719,508170.47%25,025
201820,736180.50%25,965
201921,500190.47%26,442
202022,629200.48%27,409
202123,271210.49%27,003
202224,0410.50%25,832
202325,3840.52%26,196
202424,8750.50%24,875

Notes for table: Sources for a part of these data:

Cost of Apollo program

Main article: Apollo program § Costs

NASA's budget peaked in 1964–66 when it consumed roughly 4% of all federal spending. The agency was building up to the first Moon landing and the Apollo program was a top national priority, consuming more than half of NASA's budget and driving NASA's workforce to more than 34,000 employees and 375,000 contractors from industry and academia.22

In 1973, NASA submitted congressional testimony reporting the total cost of Project Apollo as $25.4 billion (about $182 billion in 2023 dollars).23

Economic impact of NASA funding

A November 1971 study of NASA released by MRIGlobal (formerly Midwest Research Institute) of Kansas City, Missouri concluded that "the $25 billion in 1958 dollars spent on civilian space R & D during the 1958–1969 period has returned $52 billion through 1971 – and will continue to produce payoffs through 1987, at which time the total pay-off will have been $181 billion. The discounted rate of return for this investment will have been 33 percent."24

Other statistics on NASA's economic impact may be found in the 1976 Chase Econometrics Associates, Inc. reports25 and backed by the 1989 Chapman Research report, which examined 259 non-space applications of NASA technology during an eight-year period (1976–1984) and found more than:

  • $21.6 billion in sales and benefits
  • 352,000 (mostly skilled) jobs created or saved
  • $355 million in federal corporate income taxes

According to a 1992 Nature commentary, these 259 applications represent ". . .only 1% of an estimated 25,000 to 30,000 Space program spin-offs."26

A 2013 report prepared by the Tauri Group for NASA showed that NASA invested nearly $5 billion in U.S. manufacturing in FY 2012, with nearly $2 billion of that going to the technology sector. NASA also develops and commercializes technology, some of which can generate over $1 billion in revenue per year over multiple years27

In 2014, the American Helicopter Society criticized NASA and the government for reducing the annual rotorcraft budget from $50 million in 2000 to $23 million in 2013, impacting commercial opportunities.28

The 2017 Economic Impact Report prepared by NASA for their Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) awards found that for FY 2016, these programs created 2,412 jobs, $474 million in economic output, and $57.3 million in fiscal impact with an initial investment of $172.9 million.29

Public perception

The perceived national security threat posed by early Soviet leads in spaceflight drove NASA's budget to its peak, both in real inflation-adjusted dollars and in a percentage of the total federal budget (4.41% in 1966). But the apparent U.S. victory in the Space Race — landing men on the Moon — erased the perceived threat, and NASA was unable to sustain political support for its vision of an even more ambitious Space Transportation System entailing reusable Earth-to-orbit shuttles, a permanent space station, lunar bases, and a human mission to Mars. Only a scaled-back space shuttle was approved, and NASA's funding leveled off at just under 1% in 1976, then declined to 0.75% in 1986. After a brief increase to 1.01% in 1992, it declined to about 0.5% in 2013.

To help with public perception and to raise awareness regarding the widespread benefits of NASA-funded programs and technologies, NASA instituted the Spinoffs publication. This was a direct offshoot of the Technology Utilization Program Report, a "publication dedicated to informing the scientific community about available NASA technologies, and ongoing requests received for supporting information." according to the NASA Spinoff about page the technologies in these reports created interest in the technology transfer concept, its successes, and its use as a public awareness tool. The reports generated such keen interest by the public that NASA decided to make them into an attractive publication. Thus, the first four-color edition of Spinoff was published in 1976.30

The American public, on average, believes NASA's budget has a much larger share of the federal budget than it actually does. A 1997 poll reported that Americans had an average estimate of 20% for NASA's share of the federal budget, far higher than the actual 0.5% to under 1% that has been maintained throughout the late '90s and first decade of the 2000s.31 It is estimated that most Americans spent less than $9 on NASA through personal income tax in 2009.32

However, there has been a recent movement to communicate discrepancy between perception and reality of NASA's budget as well as lobbying to return the funding back to the 1970–1990 level. The United States Senate Science Committee met in March 2012 where astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson testified that "Right now, NASA's annual budget is half a penny on your tax dollar. For twice that—a penny on a dollar—we can transform the country from a sullen, dispirited nation, weary of economic struggle, to one where it has reclaimed its 20th-century birthright to dream of tomorrow."3334 Inspired by Tyson's advocacy and remarks, the Penny4NASA campaign was initiated in 2012 by John Zeller and advocates the doubling of NASA's budget to one percent of the Federal Budget, or one "penny on the dollar."35

In 2018, Business Insider surveyed approximately 1,000 US residents to determine what they believed was the annual NASA budget. The average respondent estimated that NASA's budget was 6.4% of annual federal spending, when it was actually 0.5%. In a follow-up question, 85% of respondents stated that NASA funding should be increased, despite the majority of responses overestimating NASA's actual budget.36

NASA's cost overruns and time delays have been blamed by some on NASA's usage of cost-plus contracts and avoidance of fixed-price contracts.37

Political opposition to NASA funding

Public opposition to NASA and its budget dates back to the Apollo era. Critics have cited more immediate concerns, like social welfare programs, as reasons to cut funding to the agency.38 Furthermore, they have questioned the return on investment (ROI) feasibility of NASA's research and development. In 1968, physicist Ralph Lapp argued that if NASA really did have a positive ROI, it should be able to sustain itself as a private company, and not require federal funding.39 More recently, critics have faulted NASA for sinking money into the Space Shuttle program, reducing funding available for its long-term missions to Mars and deep space.40 Human missions to Mars have also been denounced for their inefficiency and large cost compared to uncrewed missions.41 In the 2010s, Republicans in Congress increasingly opposed the Earth science aspects of NASA spending, arguing that spending on Earth science programs such as climate research was in pursuit of political agendas.42

See also

References

  1. "NASA's FY 2020 Budget". The Planetary Society. Retrieved 2019-12-31. https://www.planetary.org/get-involved/be-a-space-advocate/become-an-expert/fy2020-nasa-budget.html

  2. White House Office of Management and Budget "Table 1.1—Summary of Receipts, Outlays, and Surpluses or Deficits (-): 1789–2024|language=en-US|access-date=2019-12-31}" https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/hist01z1-fy2020.xlsx%7Ctitle=OMB

  3. The National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics (NACA) was the precursor to NASA. It was subsumed by the new agency under the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958, ceasing on October 1, 1958. /wiki/National_Advisory_Committee_for_Aeronautics

  4. "Appendix C". history.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2021-08-27. https://history.nasa.gov/SP-4103/app-c.htm

  5. % of total federal expenditures from: "NASA budgets: US spending on space travel since 1958 UPDATED". TheGuardian.com. February 2010. Retrieved November 20, 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/feb/01/nasa-budgets-us-spending-space-travel

  6. 1999–2010 based on federal outlays from: Federal budget (United States)#Total outlays in recent budget submissions /wiki/Federal_budget_(United_States)#Total_outlays_in_recent_budget_submissions

  7. % of total federal expenditures from: "NASA budgets: US spending on space travel since 1958 UPDATED". TheGuardian.com. February 2010. Retrieved November 20, 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2010/feb/01/nasa-budgets-us-spending-space-travel

  8. 1999–2010 based on federal outlays from: Federal budget (United States)#Total outlays in recent budget submissions /wiki/Federal_budget_(United_States)#Total_outlays_in_recent_budget_submissions

  9. "2011 Budget Overview" (PDF). nasa.gov. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-02-01. Retrieved 2010-11-15. https://web.archive.org/web/20100201191410/http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/420990main_FY_201_%20Budget_Overview_1_Feb_2010.pdf

  10. Berger, Brian (2011-04-13). "U.S. Budget Compromise Includes $18.5 Billion for NASA". Space.com. Retrieved 30 January 2012. http://www.space.com/11374-nasa-budget-2011-congress-compromise.html

  11. "NASA FY 2013 President's Budget Request Summary" (PDF). NASA. Archived from the original (PDF) on September 6, 2021. Retrieved November 20, 2022. https://web.archive.org/web/20210906010519/https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/632697main_NASA_FY13_Budget_Summary-508.pdf

  12. "NASA FY 2014 President's Budget Request Summary" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved November 20, 2022. https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/750614main_NASA_FY_2014_Budget_Estimates-508.pdf

  13. "NASA FY 2015 President's Budget Request" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved November 20, 2022. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/508_2015_Budget_Estimates.pdf

  14. "2016 NASA Budget Estimates" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved November 20, 2022. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/files/NASA_FY_2016_Budget_Estimates.pdf

  15. Clark, Stephen (2014-12-14). "NASA gets budget hike in spending bill passed by Congress". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 2014-12-15. http://spaceflightnow.com/2014/12/14/nasa-gets-budget-hike-in-spending-bill-passed-by-congress/

  16. "Agency fact sheet: NASA's FY 2017 budget request" (PDF). 2016. Retrieved March 21, 2017. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/fy_2017_nasa_agency_fact_sheet.pdf

  17. "S.442 – National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transition Authorization Act of 2017". Retrieved March 21, 2017. https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/442

  18. "NASA receives $20.7 billion in omnibus appropriations bill". Science News. 22 March 2018. Retrieved 23 March 2018. http://spacenews.com/nasa-receives-20-7-billion-in-omnibus-appropriations-bill/

  19. Smith, Marcia. "NASA's FY 2019 Budget Fact Sheet" (PDF). Space Policy Online. Retrieved 31 December 2019. https://spacepolicyonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/FY2019-nasa-budget-fact-sheet-Feb-25.pdf

  20. "National Aeronautics and Space Administration FY 2021 President's Budget Requests Summary" (PDF). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Retrieved 23 April 2020. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/fy_2021_budget_book_508.pdf

  21. "National Aeronautics and Space Administration FY 2022 President's Budget Requests Summary" (PDF). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Retrieved 16 September 2021. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/fy2022_budget_summary.pdf

  22. Levine, Arnold S. (1983). "Chapter 4: The NASA Acquisition Process: Contracting For Research and Development". Managing NASA in the Apollo era : an administrative history of the U.S. civilian space program, 1958-1969. Scientific and Technical Information Branch, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. OCLC 317074611. /wiki/OCLC_(identifier)

  23. United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science and Astronautics. (1973). 1974 NASA authorization: hearings, Ninety-third Congress, first session, on H.R. 4567. Page 1271. Washington: U.S. Govt. Print. Off. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015084762718&view=1up&seq=1277

  24. "Economic Impact of Stimulated Economic Activity.". nasa.gov. Retrieved 14 Nov. 2018. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19730012250.pdf

  25. "The Economic Impact of NASA R&D Spending: Preliminary Executive Summary.", April 1975. Also: "Relative Impact of NASA Expenditure on the Economy.", March 18, 1975 https://er.jsc.nasa.gov/seh/economics.html

  26. Bezdek, Roger H.; Wendling, Robert M. (January 9, 1992). "Sharing out NASA's spoils". Nature. 355 (6356). Nature Publishing Group: 105–106. Bibcode:1992Natur.355..105B. doi:10.1038/355105a0. S2CID 46464236. /wiki/Nature_(journal)

  27. "NASA Socio-Economic Impacts". Archived 2017-08-01 at the Wayback Machine National Institute of Standards and Technology. Retrieved 14 Nov. 2018. https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/documents/2017/05/09/NASA-Socio-Economic-Impacts-2013_SEINSI.pdf

  28. Hirschberg, Mike. "Investing in Tomorrow's Civil Rotorcraft" American Helicopter Society, July–August 2014. Accessed: 7 October 2014. Archived on 7 October 2014 http://vtol.org/news/commentary-investing-in-tomorrow-s-civil-rotorcraft

  29. "2017 Economic Impact Report". nasa.gov. Retrieved 14 Nov. 2018. https://sbir.gsfc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/2017_NASA_SBIR-STTR_Economic_Impact_Online.pdf

  30. "About Spinoff". NASA. n.d. Archived from the original on 2014-12-08. Retrieved 26 Nov 2014. https://web.archive.org/web/20141208072735/http://spinoff.nasa.gov/spinhist.html

  31. Launius, Roger D. "Public opinion polls and perceptions of US human spaceflight". Division of Space History, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution. https://si.academia.edu/RogerLaunius/Papers/93299/_Public_Opinion_Polls_and_Perceptions_of_US_Human_Spaceflight_

  32. "Personal Income Tax Paid To NASA In 2009 By Income Level". NASACost.com. http://nasacost.com/

  33. "Past, Present, and Future of NASA – U.S. Senate Testimony". Hayden Planetarium. 7 Mar 2012. Retrieved 4 Dec 2012. http://www.haydenplanetarium.org/tyson/read/2012/03/07/past-present-and-future-of-nasa-us-senate-testimony

  34. "Past, Present, and Future of NASA – U.S. Senate Testimony (Video)". Hayden Planetarium. 7 Mar 2012. Retrieved 4 Dec 2012. http://www.haydenplanetarium.org/tyson/watch/2012/03/07/past-present-and-future-of-nasa-us-senate-testimony-video

  35. "Why We Fight – Penny4NASA". Penny4NASA. Retrieved 30 Nov 2012. http://www.penny4nasa.org/why-we-fight/

  36. Mosher, Dave; Lee, Samantha (December 18, 2018). "85% of Americans would give NASA a giant raise, but most don't know how little the space agency gets as a share of the federal budget". Insider. Retrieved September 6, 2022. https://www.businessinsider.com/nasa-budget-estimates-opinions-poll-2018-12

  37. Berger, Eric (27 August 2024). "NASA has to be trolling with the latest cost estimate of its SLS launch tower". Ars Technica. Retrieved 30 August 2024. https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/08/nasas-second-large-launch-tower-has-gotten-stupidly-expensive/

  38. "A Case for Cutting NASA's Budget". The New Republic. Retrieved 2018-12-04. https://newrepublic.com/article/60759/case-cutting-nasas-budget

  39. "A Case for Cutting NASA's Budget". The New Republic. Retrieved 2018-12-04. https://newrepublic.com/article/60759/case-cutting-nasas-budget

  40. "NASA's Shuttle Program Cost $209 Billion — Was it Worth It?". Space.com. Retrieved 2018-12-04. https://www.space.com/12166-space-shuttle-program-cost-promises-209-billion.html

  41. "Should NASA Ditch Manned Missions to Mars?". Space.com. Retrieved 2018-12-04. https://www.space.com/16918-nasa-mars-human-spaceflight-goals.html

  42. Eric Berger (October 29, 2015) Republicans outraged over NASA earth science programs… that Reagan began. Ars Technica https://arstechnica.com/science/2015/10/republicans-outraged-over-nasa-earth-science-programs-that-reagan-began/