Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Ceratioidei
Suborder of fishes

Ceratioidei, the deep-sea anglerfishes or pelagic anglerfishes, is a suborder of marine ray-finned fishes, one of five suborders in the order Lophiiformes, the anglerfishes. These fishes are found in tropical and temperate seas throughout the world, living above the bottom of the deep sea, in the pelagic zone.

The deep-sea anglerfishes exhibit extreme sexual dimorphism; the males are many times smaller than the females. To reproduce, a male seeks out a female, using his sharp teeth-like denticles to clamp onto the female. The details of this sexual parasitism varies between the species; in a number of species the male permanently becomes part of the female, their tissues fusing with each other. This is the only known natural example of a process called parabiosis. The esca, the defining feature of all anglerfish groups, are bioluminescent in the deep-sea anglerfishes, attracting prey in the vast darkness of the bathypelagic zone which they inhabit.

Related Image Collections Add Image
Profiles
1 Image
We don't have any YouTube videos related to Ceratioidei yet.
We don't have any PDF documents related to Ceratioidei yet.
We don't have any Books related to Ceratioidei yet.

Etymology

Ceratioidei takes its name from the genus Ceratias, the type genus of the family Ceratiidae and of the suborder. Ceratias means "horn bearer", an allusion to the esca sticking up from the snout being likened to a horn.1

Taxonomy

Ceratioidei was first proposed as a grouping in 1912 by the English ichthyologist Charles Tate Regan as the division Ceratiformes within the suborder Lophoidea of the order Pediculati, which included the Batrachoididae.2 The Batrachoididae are no longer considered to be closely related to the anglerfishes, which are now included in the order Lophiiformes; within that clade the Ceratioidei are in the same clade as the Chaunacoidei with the Antennarioidei and the Ogcocephaloidei as the sisters of that clade.3 The 5th edition of Fishes of the World treats this grouping as a suborder within the Lophiiformes.4

Classification of this suborder is largely based on characters specific to the females, such as the escal morphology, though some osteological characteristics and meristics are shared between the sexes. Male anglerfish can be identified to the genus level using characteristics of the denticular "teeth"5 and nostril morphology, but species-level identification has not been possible, even when examining parasitic males.678: 194 

Ceratioidei contains the following families:910

Evolution

It is presumed that Ceratioids derive from an ancestor resembling modern Chaunacoids (deep-sea sea toads) or Ogcocephaloids (batfish), which lived in benthic or littoral habitats, which eventually retained the pelagic habits of the Lophiiform larva into adolescence. Monophyly is supported in this group through the shared characters of extreme sexual dimorphism, loss of the ambulatory pelvic fins found in other anglers, relocation of the pectoral fins, and a general reduction in density through the loss of bony parts, decrease in ossification and muscle mass, and the infusion of lipids throughout the body.11: 230 

A 2024 study found that while the Ceratioids likely diverged from the Chaunacidae during the Paleocene, the diversification into their various extant families only occurred throughout the Eocene, following the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. This likely also coincides with their colonization of deep sea habitats. Prior to these radiations, ancestral Ceratioids evolved extreme sexual size dimorphism and independently lost adaptive immune genes such as aicda, which allowed male anglerfishes to fuse with females, ultimately leading to the evolution of their sexual parasitism.121314

One explanation for the evolution of sexual parasitism is that the relative low density of females in deep-sea environments leaves little opportunity for mate choice among anglerfish. Females remained relatively large to improve fecundity: a larger female would be able to have volumetrically larger ovaries and eggs. Males would be expected to shrink to reduce metabolic costs in resource-poor environments and would develop highly specialized female-finding abilities. If a male is able to find mates and permanently associate with them (eventually leading to the development of fusion), then it is ultimately more likely to improve lifetime fitness relative to free living males, particularly when the prospect of finding future mates is poor; as an attached male is always available to the female for mating, he can potentially participate in multiple fertilization events, ensuring paternity for every such event where he is attached. Comversely, higher probabilities of male-female encounters within a habitat might correlate with species that demonstrate facultative parasitism or a more traditional temporary contact mating.1516

Owing to the extreme environments they inhabit, fossil remains of deep-sea anglerfishes are very rare in the geologic record. Only a few formations worldwide preserve them, which tend to have been deposited in tectonically active regions where deep-sea sediments could be uplifted to the surface. These include the Puente Formation of California, USA, and the Kurasi Formation of Sakhalin Island, Russia. These formations date to the mid-late Miocene, and specimens recovered from them are assigned to extant genera.17181920

Sexual parasitism

Sexual parasitism is a mode of sexual reproduction unique to the Ceratioidei facilitated by their extreme sexual dimorphism. The core of the behavior is the physical attachment of the males onto the female's body for reproduction, which is further separated into three categories: obligatory parasitism, where the males need to permanently attach to the females and fuse their tissues together; temporary nonparasitic attachment, in which males are able to live independently; and facultative parasitism, where both parasitic attachment and independent males occur. The term "sexual parasitism" is used because the males in the obligate-parasitic species are incapable of feeding after metamorphosis, and must latch onto the female to acquire nutrition, akin to an ectoparasite. If they don't find a mate, the males are presumed to die. Furthermore, sexual maturation in these species is triggered by the attachment of the male to the female. This behavior has evolved multiple times within the group, having developed independently 3 to 5 times; the diversity in the nature and location of the males' attachment being evidence of independent evolution.2122232425

Generally, the males locate their mates through a combination of visual and olfactory means, though some species are thought to specialize in one sense at the cost of the other: with some relying solely on vision, possessing an unusually wide binocular field of vision to detect bioluminescent caruncles on the dorsum of females (Ceratiidae), or exceptionally developed olfactory structures within their nostrils to detect female pheromones (Gigantactinidae). In some families, such as Centrophrynids and Neoceratiids, the methods males use to locate females remain unclear.26: 229, 232 

In obligate parasitic species, the male bites into the female's skin using the "denticular apparatus",27 beginning the process of fusion and eventually receiving nutrients via their connected circulatory systems,28 though he retains functional gills and provides for his own oxygen needs; the male's attachment point, an outgrowth of the female's tissue resembling a nipple or a stalk, often leaves a gap where water can flow through his mouth and out the gills. In the toothed seadevil, where the males were observed to attach so completely that they often lacked any remaining oral opening, respiration is thought to occur through pumping water in and out of the opercular openings, as the gills remain well-developed.29: 225  After fusion, males increase in volume and often become much larger relative to free-living males of the species, and the longer a male is attached, the more atrophied his body becomes. Though sensory organs like the eyes and nostrils degenerate, the hearts, gills, and fin rays of males are retained.30: 226 31

This parasitism has developed to the point that, at least in Ceratiids and some leftvents, both sexes never mature (their gonads do not ripen) before fusion takes place.32: 229  After fusion, they live and remain reproductively functional as long as the female stays alive, and can take part in multiple spawning events; this union of the female and male has been referred to as a single hermaphroditic organism.3334 Multiple males can be incorporated into a single individual female, with up to eight males attaching almost anywhere on the body in the triplewart seadevil, though some taxa appear to have a strict one male per female rule, such as Linophryne spp., where males almost always attach to the ventral midline, in front of the female's genital opening.35 This method ensures that when the female is ready to spawn, she has a mate immediately available,36 which was surmised by Charles Tate Regan;

Subsequent studies discovered that the sexes of even the smallest larvae (2-3 mm in total length) can be determined through the early development of the illicium, appearing as a small undifferentiated papilla on the snout of female larvae;37 thus the idea of sex being determined through attachment and non-attachment is unfounded.38

In non-parasitic species, so far including black seadevils, footballfishes, double anglers, whipnose angler, and most genera of dreamers; both sexes mature independently, without requiring fusion, with the males attaching temporarily. Indeed, there is no evidence of sexual parasitism, and where males of the black seadevils were observed to attach firmly to their mates, there was no evidence of fusion. The denticular apparatus in these males enable them to attach to the females and presumably to capture prey items as well, as food has been found in some males of these species,39 and they continue to grow after metamorphosis40 even after depleting the energy stores within their livers. It is probable that these males only attach to females once they are ready to spawn.41: 230 42: 195, 291, 305–306 43

Facultative parasitism is known in fanfins and the plainchin dreamarms and Bertella, the latter pair being Oneirodids. This method is an intermediate between non-parasitism and obligate; both sexes mature independently, but males attach regardless of the female's maturity. If both are sexually mature, they spawn, fertilization occurs, and the male presumably detaches to recover, feed, and search for another mate. If either partner aren't ready to spawn, the male attaches until they are ready; the longer he remains attached, the greater the chances are of him fusing and becoming a sexual parasite.44: 230 45: 91, 130, 195, 305–306 46

The effective loss of certain aspects of ceratioid immune systems, such as the adaptive immune system, is a key factor in allowing the fusion between the sexes.47484950 It is assumed they have evolved new immune strategies which compensate for the loss of B and T lymphocyte functions found in animals with an adaptive immune system.51

Phylogeny

The phylogenetic tree below is based on Pietsch & Orr (2007);52

Lophiiformes

Lophioidei

Antennarioidei

Chaunacoidei

Ogcocephaloidei

Ceratioidei
Centrophrynidae

Centrophryne

Ceratiidae

Ceratias

Cryptopsaras

Himantolophidae

Himantolophus

Diceratiidae

Diceratias

Bufoceratias

Melanocetidae

Melanocetus

Thaumatichthyidae

Lasiognathus

Thaumatichthys

Oneirodidae

Lophodolos

Pentherichthys

Chaenophryne

Oneirodes

Spiniphryne

Danaphryne

Microlophichthys

Phyllorhinichthys

Dolopichthys

Bertella

Puck

Leptacanthichthys

Chirophryne

Caulophrynidae

Caulophryne

Neoceratiidae

Neoceratias

Gigantactinidae

Gigantactis

Rhynchactis

Linophrynidae

Photocorynus

Haplophryne

Borophryne

Linophryne

Notes

References

  1. Christopher Scharpf (18 October 2022). "Order LOPHIIFORMES (part 2): Families CAULOPHRYNIDAE, NEOCERATIIDAE, MELANOCETIDAE, HIMANTOLOPHIDAE, DICERATIIDAE, ONEIRODIDAE, THAUMATICHTHYIDAE, CENTROPHRYNIDAE, CERATIIDAE, GIGANTACTINIDAE and LINOPHRYNIDAE". The ETYFish Project Fish Name Etymology Database. Christopher Scharpf. Retrieved 1 May 2024. https://etyfish.org/lophiiformes21/ ↩

  2. Regan, C.T. (1912). "The classification of the teleostean fishes of the order Pediculati". Annals and Magazine of Natural History Series. 8 & 9. 9 (51): 277–289. doi:10.1080/00222931208693132. /wiki/Charles_Tate_Regan ↩

  3. Arnold, Rachel J. (2014). Evolutionary Relationships of the Enigmatic Anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes): Can Nuclear DNA Provide Resolution for Conflicting Morphological and Mitochondrial Phylogenies? (PhD thesis). University of Washington. /wiki/University_of_Washington ↩

  4. Nelson, J.S.; Grande, T.C.; Wilson, M.V.H. (2016). Fishes of the World (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 508–518. doi:10.1002/9781119174844. ISBN 978-1-118-34233-6. LCCN 2015037522. OCLC 951899884. OL 25909650M. 978-1-118-34233-6 ↩

  5. Not true teeth, being formed by the fusion of modified dermal spinules anterior (forward) of the premaxillae and dentaries, which are the bones bearing true teeth in all bony fish[5]: 190, 279 /wiki/Dermis ↩

  6. Bertelsen, E (1984). Ceratioidei: development and relationships. In: Moser HG, Richards WJ, Cohen DM, Fahay MP, Kendall AW Jr, Richardson SL (eds) Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. Lawrence, KS: American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists. pp. 325–334. /wiki/Lawrence,_KS ↩

  7. Pietsch, Theodore W. (August 2005). "Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes)". Ichthyological Research. 52 (3): 207–236. Bibcode:2005IchtR..52..207P. doi:10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2. ISSN 1341-8998. Retrieved 1 March 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2 ↩

  8. Pietsch, Theodore W. (2009). Oceanic anglerfishes: extraordinary diversity in the deep sea. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-94255-4. OCLC 1298208235. 978-0-520-94255-4 ↩

  9. Nelson, J.S.; Grande, T.C.; Wilson, M.V.H. (2016). Fishes of the World (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 508–518. doi:10.1002/9781119174844. ISBN 978-1-118-34233-6. LCCN 2015037522. OCLC 951899884. OL 25909650M. 978-1-118-34233-6 ↩

  10. Richard van der Laan; William N. Eschmeyer & Ronald Fricke (2014). "Family-group names of recent fishes". Zootaxa. 3882 (2): 1–230. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3882.1.1. PMID 25543675. https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3882.1.1/10480 ↩

  11. Pietsch, Theodore W. (August 2005). "Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes)". Ichthyological Research. 52 (3): 207–236. Bibcode:2005IchtR..52..207P. doi:10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2. ISSN 1341-8998. Retrieved 1 March 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2 ↩

  12. Brownstein, Chase D.; Zapfe, Katerina L.; Lott, Spencer; Harrington, Richard; Ghezelayagh, Ava; Dornburg, Alex; Near, Thomas J. (2024). "Synergistic innovations enabled the radiation of anglerfishes in the deep open ocean". Current Biology. 34 (11): 2541–2550.e4. Bibcode:2024CBio...34.2541B. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.04.066. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 38788708. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.cub.2024.04.066 ↩

  13. Thorsberg, Christian. "Bizarre Sex Helped Anglerfish Diversify and Dominate the Deep Sea, Study Suggests". smithsonianmag.com. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 24 March 2025. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/bizarre-sex-helped-anglerfish-diversify-and-dominate-the-deep-sea-study-suggests-180984449/ ↩

  14. Cummings, Mike. "Sea of love: Behind the unusual sexual parasitism of deep-water anglerfish". news.yale.edu. Yale University. Retrieved 24 March 2025. https://news.yale.edu/2024/05/23/sea-love-behind-unusual-sexual-parasitism-deep-water-anglerfish ↩

  15. Miya, Masaki; Pietsch, Theodore W; Orr, James W; Arnold, Rachel J; Satoh, Takashi P; Shedlock, Andrew M; Ho, Hsuan-Ching; Shimazaki, Mitsuomi; Yabe, Mamoru; Nishida, Mutsumi (1 January 2010). "Evolutionary history of anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes): a mitogenomic perspective". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 10 (1): 58. Bibcode:2010BMCEE..10...58M. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-58. PMC 2836326. PMID 20178642. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2836326 ↩

  16. Cummings, Mike. "Sea of love: Behind the unusual sexual parasitism of deep-water anglerfish". news.yale.edu. Yale University. Retrieved 24 March 2025. https://news.yale.edu/2024/05/23/sea-love-behind-unusual-sexual-parasitism-deep-water-anglerfish ↩

  17. "PBDB Taxon". paleobiodb.org. Retrieved 2024-11-29. https://paleobiodb.org/classic/basicTaxonInfo?taxon_no=165053 ↩

  18. Carnevale, Giorgio; Pietsch, Theodore W.; Takeuchi, Gary T.; Huddleston, Richard W. (2008). "Fossil ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes) from the Miocene of the Los Angeles Basin, California". Journal of Paleontology. 82 (5): 996–1008. Bibcode:2008JPal...82..996C. doi:10.1666/07-113.1. ISSN 0022-3360. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-paleontology/article/abs/fossil-ceratioid-anglerfishes-teleostei-lophiiformes-from-the-miocene-of-the-los-angeles-basin-california/C6972CFD2A32C7BF8183B16879F712ED ↩

  19. Carnevale, Giorgio; Pietsch, Theodore W. (2009-06-12). "The deep-sea anglerfish genus Acentrophryne (Teleostei, Ceratioidei, Linophrynidae) in the Miocene of California". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 29 (2): 372–378. Bibcode:2009JVPal..29..372C. doi:10.1671/039.029.0232. ISSN 0272-4634. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1671/039.029.0232 ↩

  20. Nazarkin, Mikhail V.; Pietsch, Theodore W. (2020). "A fossil dreamer of the genus Oneirodes (Lophiiformes: Ceratioidei) from the Miocene of Sakhalin Island, Russia". Geological Magazine. 157 (8): 1378–1382. Bibcode:2020GeoM..157.1378N. doi:10.1017/S0016756820000588. ISSN 0016-7568. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/geological-magazine/article/abs/fossil-dreamer-of-the-genus-oneirodes-lophiiformes-ceratioidei-from-the-miocene-of-sakhalin-island-russia/830C25FDF91ADFAE8CF8C4B0817A7E0D ↩

  21. Pietsch, Theodore W. (August 2005). "Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes)". Ichthyological Research. 52 (3): 207–236. Bibcode:2005IchtR..52..207P. doi:10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2. ISSN 1341-8998. Retrieved 1 March 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2 ↩

  22. Bertelsen, E (1984). Ceratioidei: development and relationships. In: Moser HG, Richards WJ, Cohen DM, Fahay MP, Kendall AW Jr, Richardson SL (eds) Ontogeny and systematics of fishes. Lawrence, KS: American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists. pp. 325–334. /wiki/Lawrence,_KS ↩

  23. "16.4: Parasitism". bio.libretexts.org. LibreTexts Biology. Retrieved 24 March 2025. https://bio.libretexts.org/Courses/Gettysburg_College/01:_Ecology_for_All/16:_Antagonistic_Interactions/16.04:_Parasitism ↩

  24. Thorsberg, Christian. "Bizarre Sex Helped Anglerfish Diversify and Dominate the Deep Sea, Study Suggests". smithsonianmag.com. Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 24 March 2025. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/bizarre-sex-helped-anglerfish-diversify-and-dominate-the-deep-sea-study-suggests-180984449/ ↩

  25. Cummings, Mike. "Sea of love: Behind the unusual sexual parasitism of deep-water anglerfish". news.yale.edu. Yale University. Retrieved 24 March 2025. https://news.yale.edu/2024/05/23/sea-love-behind-unusual-sexual-parasitism-deep-water-anglerfish ↩

  26. Pietsch, Theodore W. (August 2005). "Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes)". Ichthyological Research. 52 (3): 207–236. Bibcode:2005IchtR..52..207P. doi:10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2. ISSN 1341-8998. Retrieved 1 March 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2 ↩

  27. Not true teeth, being formed by the fusion of modified dermal spinules anterior (forward) of the premaxillae and dentaries, which are the bones bearing true teeth in all bony fish[5]: 190, 279 /wiki/Dermis ↩

  28. Cummings, Mike. "Sea of love: Behind the unusual sexual parasitism of deep-water anglerfish". news.yale.edu. Yale University. Retrieved 24 March 2025. https://news.yale.edu/2024/05/23/sea-love-behind-unusual-sexual-parasitism-deep-water-anglerfish ↩

  29. Pietsch, Theodore W. (August 2005). "Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes)". Ichthyological Research. 52 (3): 207–236. Bibcode:2005IchtR..52..207P. doi:10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2. ISSN 1341-8998. Retrieved 1 March 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2 ↩

  30. Pietsch, Theodore W. (August 2005). "Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes)". Ichthyological Research. 52 (3): 207–236. Bibcode:2005IchtR..52..207P. doi:10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2. ISSN 1341-8998. Retrieved 1 March 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2 ↩

  31. Even in the aforementioned toothed seadevil (Neoceratias spinifer), where the males in an advanced state of fusion appear as if "embedded in or absorbed by the female", these organs are retained, suggesting that he is not reliant on his mate for respiration.[5]: 279, 298 /wiki/Respiration_(physiology) ↩

  32. Pietsch, Theodore W. (August 2005). "Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes)". Ichthyological Research. 52 (3): 207–236. Bibcode:2005IchtR..52..207P. doi:10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2. ISSN 1341-8998. Retrieved 1 March 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2 ↩

  33. "Animal Sex: How Anglerfish Do It". www.livescience.com. LiveScience. 6 January 2015. Retrieved 6 March 2025. https://www.livescience.com/49330-animal-sex-anglerfish.html ↩

  34. "Small tale: Parasitic anglerfish takes size prize, prof says". www.washington.edu. University of Washington. Retrieved 6 March 2025. https://www.washington.edu/news/2006/02/02/small-tale-parasitic-anglerfish-takes-size-prize-prof-says/ ↩

  35. Pietsch, Theodore W. (August 2005). "Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes)". Ichthyological Research. 52 (3): 207–236. Bibcode:2005IchtR..52..207P. doi:10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2. ISSN 1341-8998. Retrieved 1 March 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2 ↩

  36. Theodore W. Pietsch (July 1975). "Precocious sexual parasitism in the deep sea ceratioid anglerfish, Cryptopsaras couesi Gill". Nature. 256 (5512): 38–40. Bibcode:1975Natur.256...38P. doi:10.1038/256038a0. S2CID 4226567. /wiki/Bibcode_(identifier) ↩

  37. Bertelsen, E (1951). "The ceratioid fishes. Ontogeny, taxonomy, distribution and biology". Dana Rep. 39: 1–276. ↩

  38. Pietsch, Theodore W. (August 2005). "Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes)". Ichthyological Research. 52 (3): 207–236. Bibcode:2005IchtR..52..207P. doi:10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2. ISSN 1341-8998. Retrieved 1 March 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2 ↩

  39. The prey being chaetognaths and small crustaceans, though in some species these may remain from feedings prior to full metamorphosis[5]: 263, 291 /wiki/Chaetognatha ↩

  40. Males increase in length by 6.5–12 millimetres (0.26–0.47 in), significant when the largest individuals of these males are 16.5–39 millimetres (0.65–1.54 in) long[5]: 68, 291, 295, 333, 337 ↩

  41. Pietsch, Theodore W. (August 2005). "Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes)". Ichthyological Research. 52 (3): 207–236. Bibcode:2005IchtR..52..207P. doi:10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2. ISSN 1341-8998. Retrieved 1 March 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2 ↩

  42. Pietsch, Theodore W. (2009). Oceanic anglerfishes: extraordinary diversity in the deep sea. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-94255-4. OCLC 1298208235. 978-0-520-94255-4 ↩

  43. Cummings, Mike. "Sea of love: Behind the unusual sexual parasitism of deep-water anglerfish". news.yale.edu. Yale University. Retrieved 24 March 2025. https://news.yale.edu/2024/05/23/sea-love-behind-unusual-sexual-parasitism-deep-water-anglerfish ↩

  44. Pietsch, Theodore W. (August 2005). "Dimorphism, parasitism, and sex revisited: modes of reproduction among deep-sea ceratioid anglerfishes (Teleostei: Lophiiformes)". Ichthyological Research. 52 (3): 207–236. Bibcode:2005IchtR..52..207P. doi:10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2. ISSN 1341-8998. Retrieved 1 March 2025. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10228-005-0286-2 ↩

  45. Pietsch, Theodore W. (2009). Oceanic anglerfishes: extraordinary diversity in the deep sea. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-94255-4. OCLC 1298208235. 978-0-520-94255-4 ↩

  46. Cummings, Mike. "Sea of love: Behind the unusual sexual parasitism of deep-water anglerfish". news.yale.edu. Yale University. Retrieved 24 March 2025. https://news.yale.edu/2024/05/23/sea-love-behind-unusual-sexual-parasitism-deep-water-anglerfish ↩

  47. Swann, Jeremy B.; Holland, Stephen J.; Petersen, Malte; Pietsch, Theodore W.; Boehm, Thomas (30 July 2020). "The immunogenetics of sexual parasitism". Science. 369 (6511): 1608–1615. Bibcode:2020Sci...369.1608S. doi:10.1126/science.aaz9445. PMID 32732279. Retrieved 5 March 2025. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aaz9445 ↩

  48. Bordon, Yvonne (18 August 2020). "Loss of immunity lets a sexual parasite hold on tight". Nature Reviews Immunology. 20 (10): 590–591. doi:10.1038/s41577-020-00435-5. PMID 32811995. Retrieved 5 March 2025. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41577-020-00435-5 ↩

  49. Swann, Jeremy B (30 July 2020). "The immunogenetics of sexual parasitism". Science. 369 (6511): 1608–1615. Bibcode:2020Sci...369.1608S. doi:10.1126/science.aaz9445. hdl:21.11116/0000-0006-CE67-F. PMID 32732279. S2CID 220893482. https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aaz9445 ↩

  50. Cummings, Mike. "Sea of love: Behind the unusual sexual parasitism of deep-water anglerfish". news.yale.edu. Yale University. Retrieved 24 March 2025. https://news.yale.edu/2024/05/23/sea-love-behind-unusual-sexual-parasitism-deep-water-anglerfish ↩

  51. Isakov, Noah (2022). "Histocompatibility and Reproduction: Lessons from the Anglerfish". Life. 12 (1): 113. Bibcode:2022Life...12..113I. doi:10.3390/life12010113. ISSN 2075-1729. PMC 8780861. PMID 35054506. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8780861 ↩

  52. Pietsch, Theodore W.; Orr, James (February 28, 2007). "Phylogenetic Relationships of Deep-sea Anglerfishes of the Suborder Ceratioidei (Teleostei: Lophiiformes) Based on Morphology". Copeia. 1: 1–34. doi:10.1643/0045-8511(2007)7[1:PRODAO]2.0.CO;2. Retrieved 19 March 2025. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253207883 ↩