Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Cork taint
Wine fault due to aroma-intense compounds present in the cork

Cork taint is a common wine fault caused primarily by the compound 2,4,6-Trichloroanisole (TCA), which arises from fungi interacting with antimicrobial agents used in cork processing. This fault transfers unpleasant odors, often described as moldy newspaper or damp basement, into the wine after bottling, reducing its native aromas. While other factors like storage conditions and wooden barrels can contribute, the cork stopper remains the usual culprit. TCA is detectable at extremely low levels, with a variable human sensitivity and rapid olfactory habituation, making cork taint a significant concern in wine aging and enjoyment.

Related Image Collections Add Image
We don't have any YouTube videos related to Cork taint yet.
We don't have any PDF documents related to Cork taint yet.
We don't have any Books related to Cork taint yet.

Precursor

The primary chemical precursor to TCA is TCP (2,4,6-trichlorophenol), a solvent used for industrial cleaning.4 Bacteria are able to de-toxify TCP, notably Pseudomonas and Stenotrophomonas, but both strains cannot de-toxify the TCP without the other. [better source needed]5 Chlorinated phenols can form chemically when hypochlorous acid (HOCl, one of the active forms of chlorine) or chlorine radicals come in contact with wood (untreated, such as barrels or pallets). The use of chlorine or other halogen-based sanitizing agents is being phased out of the wine industry in favor of peroxide or peracetic acid preparations. Chlorine dioxide has not been shown to produce these spontaneous chlorophenols. Chlorine dioxide is a relatively new agent being used in the wine industry due to its obvious advantages, having shown no evidence of the possibility of TCA formation.

Production

The production of TCA in cork or its transfer by other means into wine is complex, but most results when naturally occurring airborne fungi are presented with chlorophenol compounds, which they then convert into chlorinated anisole derivatives. Chlorophenols taken up by cork trees are an industrial pollutant found in many pesticides and wood preservatives, which may mean that the incidence of cork taint has risen in modern times. Chlorophenols can also be a product of the chlorine bleaching process used to sterilize corks (not in use anymore); this has led to the increasing adoption of methods such as peroxide bleaching.

TCA and TBA are responsible for the vast majority of cases of cork taint, but other less common and less known compounds that can cause different varieties of cork taint include guaiacol, geosmin, 2-methylisoborneol (MIB), octen-3-ol and also octen-3-one, each with its own particular aroma, but all considered objectionable in wine.

Estimated occurrence and industry response

The cork-industry group APCOR cites a study showing a 0.7–1.2% taint rate. In a 2005 study of 2800 bottles tasted at the Wine Spectator blind-tasting facilities in Napa, California, 7% of the bottles were found to be tainted.6

In 2013, the Cork Quality Council ran over 25 thousand tests. The results, compared with data from eight years ago, show a sharp reduction in TCA levels, of around 81 percent. In the last test, 90 percent of samples of natural cork stopper shipments showed values of under 1.0 ppt and only 7 percent showed results of 1.0–2.0 ppt.7

Improvements in cork and winemaking methodology continue to strive to lower the incidence, but the media attention given to cork taint has created a controversy in the winemaking community, with traditional cork growers on one side and the makers of newer synthetic closures and screw caps on the other. Screw caps and synthetic corks, however, are thought to be prone to another aroma taint: sulphidisation. This may arise from the reduced oxygen supply which concentrates sulphurous smells arising from wines with universal preservatives, however it is more likely that these wines contain excessive/imbalanced amounts of sulphite based preservatives to begin with.8

Systemic TCA

Systemic TCA tainting occurs when TCA has infiltrated a winery via means other than cork and can affect the entire production of wine instead of just a few bottles.9[better source needed] This occurs when wine barrels, drain pipes, wooden beams in the cellars, or rubber hoses are tainted by TCA.10[better source needed] Sometimes entire cellars have to be rebuilt in order to eliminate all potential systemic TCA culprits.11[better source needed][verification needed]

Rubber hoses or gaskets have a high affinity for TCA and therefore concentrate TCA from the atmosphere; wine or water that subsequently passes through infected hoses can become tainted with TCA. Another possible means of TCA contamination is through the use of bentonite, a swelling clay preparation (smectite) used in treating wine for heat stability; bentonite has a high affinity for TCA and will absorb TCA and related chemicals in the atmosphere, so if an open bag of bentonite is stored in an environment with a high (1–2 ng/g or ppb) TCA concentration, TCA will be absorbed in the bentonite and transferred to the wine lot to which the bentonite is added.

It is notable that this systemic TCA will often impart a trace (1–2 ng/L or ppt) to the wine, which itself is not detected by most consumers.[according to whom?] However, with this high baseline level of TCA in bottled wine, even the additional contribution of a relatively clean cork can elevate the TCA level in the wine above threshold levels (4–6 ng/L or ppt), rendering the wine "corked".

Wine Spectator has reported that such California wineries as Pillar Rock Vineyard, Beaulieu Vineyard, and E & J Gallo Winery have had trouble with systemic TCA.12[verification needed]

Treatment

Filtration and purification systems now exist that attempt to remove the TCA from corked wine to make it drinkable again, though there are few means of reducing the level of TCA in tainted wine that are approved by the TTB (formerly BATF).

One method of removing TCA from tainted wine is to soak polyethylene (a plastic used for applications such as milk containers and plastic food wrap) in the affected wine; the non-polar TCA molecule has a high affinity for the polyethylene molecule, thereby removing the taint from the wine. The surface area of polyethylene needed to reduce the taint to sub-threshold levels is based on the TCA level in the affected wine, temperature, and the alcohol level of the wine.

Some vintners have used the so-called half and half mix of milk and cream to remove TCA from wine (the TCA in the wine is sequestered by the butterfat in half and half). The French company Embag markets a product called "Dream Taste", which uses a copolymer shaped like a cluster of grapes that is designed to remove the TCA taint from wine.

As advocated by Andrew Waterhouse, professor of wine chemistry at University of California, Davis, this can be done at home by pouring the wine into a bowl with a sheet of polyethylene plastic wrap; for ease of pouring, a pitcher, measuring cup, or decanter can be used instead, and the 2,4,6-trichloroanisole will stick to the plastic in a process effective within a few minutes.13

See also

  • Wine portal

Further reading

References

  1. A wine fault is a sensory-associated (organoleptic) characteristic of a wine that is unpleasant, and may include elements of taste, smell, or appearance, elements that arise from a "chemical or a microbial origin", where particular sensory experiences (e.g., an off-odor) might arise from more than one wine fault. See Watrelot, Aude; Savits, Jennie & Moroney, Maureen (2020). "Wine Fault Series" (PDF). ISU Extension and Outreach (Extension.IAState.edu). Ames, IA: Iowa State University (ISU). Retrieved June 26, 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) See also Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Organoleptic. In Merriam-Webster.com dictionary. Retrieved June 26, 2023, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/organoleptic. /wiki/Organoleptic

  2. Sefton & Simpson 2005, p. 227. - Sefton, Mark A.; Simpson, Robert F. (2005). "Compounds causing cork taint and the factors affecting their transfer from natural cork closures to wine – a review". Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 11 (2): 226–240. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00290.x. ISSN 1322-7130. Retrieved 2025-07-03. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00290.x

  3. Sefton & Simpson 2005, p. 227. - Sefton, Mark A.; Simpson, Robert F. (2005). "Compounds causing cork taint and the factors affecting their transfer from natural cork closures to wine – a review". Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research. 11 (2): 226–240. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00290.x. ISSN 1322-7130. Retrieved 2025-07-03. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00290.x

  4. "Technical Fact Sheet – 1,2,3-Trichloropropane (TCP)" (PDF). Environmental Protection Agency. January 2014. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 September 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20210905225225/https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-03/documents/ffrrofactsheet_contaminant_tcp_january2014_final.pdf

  5. Gallego, Alfredo; Gemini, Virginia; Rossi, Susana; Fortunato, María S.; Planes, Estela; Gómez, Carlos E.; Korol, Sonia E. (2009-12-01). "Detoxification of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol by an indigenous bacterial community". International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 63 (8): 1073–1078. doi:10.1016/j.ibiod.2009.09.002. ISSN 0964-8305. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830509001589

  6. Laube, James, Wine Spectator (March 31, 2006) "Changing With the Times" Archived 2006-03-14 at the Wayback Machine http://www.winespectator.com/Wine/Archives/Show_Article/0,1275,5398,00.html

  7. "CQC Audit Results". corkqc.com. CQC. March 2014. Archived from the original on 2014-09-26. Retrieved 2014-08-05. https://web.archive.org/web/20140926221927/http://www.corkqc.com/newsandpress/cnews2.htm

  8. Heald, Claire, BBC News Magazine (January 17, 2007). "Put a stop in it" http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6267079.stm

  9. J. Laube Taint Misbehavin Wine Spectator pg 43 March 31st, 2007.

  10. J. Laube Taint Misbehavin Wine Spectator pg 43 March 31st, 2007.

  11. J. Laube Taint Misbehavin Wine Spectator pg 43 March 31st, 2007.

  12. J. Laube Taint Misbehavin Wine Spectator pg 43 March 31st, 2007.

  13. McGee, Harold, The New York Times: The Curious Cook (January 13, 2009). "For a Tastier Wine, the Next Trick Involves ..." The New York Times.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/14/dining/14curi.html?pagewanted=all