Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Dixon's factorization method
Application of the square factoring method

In number theory, Dixon's factorization method (also Dixon's random squares method or Dixon's algorithm) is a general-purpose integer factorization algorithm; it is the prototypical factor base method. Unlike for other factor base methods, its run-time bound comes with a rigorous proof that does not rely on conjectures about the smoothness properties of the values taken by a polynomial.

The algorithm was designed by John D. Dixon, a mathematician at Carleton University, and was published in 1981.

We don't have any images related to Dixon's factorization method yet.
We don't have any YouTube videos related to Dixon's factorization method yet.
We don't have any PDF documents related to Dixon's factorization method yet.
We don't have any Books related to Dixon's factorization method yet.
We don't have any archived web articles related to Dixon's factorization method yet.

Basic idea

Dixon's method is based on finding a congruence of squares modulo the integer N which is intended to factor. Fermat's factorization method finds such a congruence by selecting random or pseudo-random x values and hoping that the integer x2 mod N is a perfect square (in the integers):

x 2 ≡ y 2 ( mod  N ) , x ≢ ± y ( mod  N ) . {\displaystyle x^{2}\equiv y^{2}\quad ({\hbox{mod }}N),\qquad x\not \equiv \pm y\quad ({\hbox{mod }}N).}

For example, if N = 84923, (by starting at 292, the first number greater than √N and counting up) the 5052 mod 84923 is 256, the square of 16. So (505 − 16)(505 + 16) = 0 mod 84923. Computing the greatest common divisor of 505 − 16 and N using Euclid's algorithm gives 163, which is a factor of N.

In practice, selecting random x values will take an impractically long time to find a congruence of squares, since there are only √N squares less than N.

Dixon's method replaces the condition "is the square of an integer" with the much weaker one "has only small prime factors"; for example, there are 292 squares smaller than 84923; 662 numbers smaller than 84923 whose prime factors are only 2,3,5 or 7; and 4767 whose prime factors are all less than 30. (Such numbers are called B-smooth with respect to some bound B.)

If there are many numbers a 1 … a n {\displaystyle a_{1}\ldots a_{n}} whose squares can be factorized as a i 2 mod N = ∏ j = 1 m b j e i j {\displaystyle a_{i}^{2}\mod N=\prod _{j=1}^{m}b_{j}^{e_{ij}}} for a fixed set b 1 … b m {\displaystyle b_{1}\ldots b_{m}} of small primes, linear algebra modulo 2 on the matrix e i j {\displaystyle e_{ij}} will give a subset of the a i {\displaystyle a_{i}} whose squares combine to a product of small primes to an even power — that is, a subset of the a i {\displaystyle a_{i}} whose squares multiply to the square of a (hopefully different) number mod N.

Method

Suppose the composite number N is being factored. Bound B is chosen, and the factor base is identified (which is called P), the set of all primes less than or equal to B. Next, positive integers z are sought such that z2 mod N is B-smooth. Therefore we can write, for suitable exponents ai,

z 2  mod  N = ∏ p i ∈ P p i a i {\displaystyle z^{2}{\text{ mod }}N=\prod _{p_{i}\in P}p_{i}^{a_{i}}}

When enough of these relations have been generated (it is generally sufficient that the number of relations be a few more than the size of P), the methods of linear algebra, such as Gaussian elimination, can be used to multiply together these various relations in such a way that the exponents of the primes on the right-hand side are all even:

z 1 2 z 2 2 ⋯ z k 2 ≡ ∏ p i ∈ P p i a i , 1 + a i , 2 + ⋯ + a i , k   ( mod N ) ( where  a i , 1 + a i , 2 + ⋯ + a i , k ≡ 0 ( mod 2 ) ) {\displaystyle {z_{1}^{2}z_{2}^{2}\cdots z_{k}^{2}\equiv \prod _{p_{i}\in P}p_{i}^{a_{i,1}+a_{i,2}+\cdots +a_{i,k}}\ {\pmod {N}}\quad ({\text{where }}a_{i,1}+a_{i,2}+\cdots +a_{i,k}\equiv 0{\pmod {2}})}}

This yields a congruence of squares of the form a2 ≡ b2 (mod N), which can be turned into a factorization of N, N = gcd(a + b, N) × (N/gcd(a + b, N)). This factorization might turn out to be trivial (i.e. N = N × 1), which can only happen if a ≡ ±b (mod N), in which case another try must be made with a different combination of relations; but if a nontrivial pair of factors of N is reached, the algorithm terminates.

Pseudocode

This section is taken directly from Dixon(1981).

Dixon's Algorithm

Initialization. Let L be a list of integers in the range [1, n], and let P = {p₁, ..., pₕ} be the list of the h primes ≤ v. Let B and Z be initially empty lists (Z will be indexed by B).

Step 1. If L is empty, exit (algorithm unsuccessful). Otherwise, take the first term z from L, remove it from L, and proceed to Step 2.

Step 2. Compute w as the least positive remainder of z² mod n. Factor w as:

w = w ′ ∏ i p i a i {\displaystyle w=w'\prod _{i}p_{i}^{a_{i}}}

where w′ has no factor in P. If w′ = 1, proceed to Step 3; otherwise, return to Step 1.

Step 3. Let a ← (a₁, ..., aₕ). Add a to B and z to Z. If B has at most h elements, return to Step 1; otherwise, proceed to Step 4.

Step 4. Find the first vector c in B that is linearly dependent (mod 2) on earlier vectors in B. Remove c from B and z c {\displaystyle z_{c}} from Z. Compute coefficients f b {\displaystyle f_{b}} such that:

c ≡ ∑ b ∈ B f b b ( mod 2 ) {\displaystyle \mathbf {c} \equiv \sum _{b\in B}f_{b}\mathbf {b} {\pmod {2}}}

Define:

d = ( d 1 , … , d n ) ← 1 2 ( c + ∑ f b b ) {\displaystyle \mathbf {d} =(d_{1},\dots ,d_{n})\gets {\frac {1}{2}}\left(\mathbf {c} +\sum f_{b}\mathbf {b} \right)}

Proceed to Step 5.

Step 5. Compute:

x ← z c ∏ b z b f b , y ← ∏ i p i d i {\displaystyle x\gets z_{c}\prod _{b}z_{b}^{f_{b}},\quad y\gets \prod _{i}p_{i}^{d_{i}}}

so that:

x 2 ≡ ∏ i p i 2 d i = y 2 mod n . {\displaystyle x^{2}\equiv \prod _{i}p_{i}^{2d_{i}}=y^{2}\mod n.}

If x ≡ y {\displaystyle x\equiv y} or x ≡ − y ( mod n ) {\displaystyle x\equiv -y{\pmod {n}}} , return to Step 1. Otherwise, return:

gcd ( n , x + y ) {\displaystyle \gcd(n,x+y)}

which provides a nontrivial factor of n, and terminate successfully.

Step-by-step example : factorizing ( n = 84923) using Dixon’s Algorithm

This example is lifted directly from the LeetArxiv substack.3 Credit is given to the original author.

  • Initialization:
    • Define a list of numbers L, ranging from 1 to 84923:
L = { 1 , … , 84923 } {\displaystyle L=\{1,\dots ,84923\}}
  • Define a value v, which is the smoothness factor:
v = 7 {\displaystyle v=7}
  • Define a list P containing all the prime numbers less than or equal to v:
P = 2 , 3 , 5 , 7 {\displaystyle P={2,3,5,7}}
  • Define B and Z, two empty lists. B is a list of powers, while Z is a list of accepted integers:
B = [ ] {\displaystyle B=[]} Z = [ ] {\displaystyle Z=[]}
  • Step 1: Iterating z {\displaystyle z} values
    • Write a for loop that indexes the list L {\displaystyle L} . Each element in L {\displaystyle L} is indexed as z {\displaystyle z} . The for loop exits at the end of the list.
int n = 84923; for(int i = 1; i <= n; i++) { int z = i; }
  • Step 2: Computing z 2 mod n {\displaystyle z^{2}\mod n} and v-smooth Prime Factorization
    • To proceed, compute z 2 mod 84923 {\displaystyle z^{2}\mod 84923} for each z, then express the result as a prime factorization.
1 2 mod 84923 ≡ 1 mod 84923 = 2 0 ⋅ 3 0 ⋅ 5 0 ⋅ 7 0 mod 84923 {\displaystyle 1^{2}\mod 84923\equiv 1\mod 84923=2^{0}\cdot 3^{0}\cdot 5^{0}\cdot 7^{0}\mod 84923} ⋮ {\displaystyle \vdots } 513 2 mod 84923 = 8400 mod 84923 = 2 4 ⋅ 3 1 ⋅ 5 2 ⋅ 7 1 mod 84923 {\displaystyle 513^{2}\mod 84923=8400\mod 84923=2^{4}\cdot 3^{1}\cdot 5^{2}\cdot 7^{1}\mod 84923} ⋮ {\displaystyle \vdots } 537 2 mod 84923 = 33600 mod 84923 = 2 6 ⋅ 3 1 ⋅ 5 2 ⋅ 7 1 mod 84923 {\displaystyle 537^{2}\mod 84923=33600\mod 84923=2^{6}\cdot 3^{1}\cdot 5^{2}\cdot 7^{1}\mod 84923} 538 2 mod 84923 = 34675 mod 84923 = 5 2 ⋅ 19 1 ⋅ 73 1 mod 84923 {\displaystyle 538^{2}\mod 84923=34675\mod 84923=5^{2}\cdot 19^{1}\cdot 73^{1}\mod 84923} This step continues for all values of z in the range.
  • Step 3: If z 2 mod 84923 {\displaystyle z^{2}\mod 84923} is 7-smooth, then append its powers to list B {\displaystyle B} and append z {\displaystyle z} to list Z {\displaystyle Z} .
Z = { 1 , 513 , 537 } {\displaystyle Z=\{1,513,537\}} B = { [ 0 , 0 , 0 , 0 ] , [ 4 , 1 , 2 , 1 ] , [ 6 , 1 , 2 , 1 ] } {\displaystyle B=\{[0,0,0,0],[4,1,2,1],[6,1,2,1]\}}
  • Step 4: This step is split into two parts.
Part 1: Find B {\displaystyle B} modulo 2. B = ( 0 0 0 0 4 1 2 1 6 1 2 1 ) mod 2 ≡ B = ( 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 ) {\displaystyle B={\begin{pmatrix}0&0&0&0\\4&1&2&1\\6&1&2&1\end{pmatrix}}\mod 2\equiv B={\begin{pmatrix}0&0&0&0\\0&1&0&1\\0&1&0&1\end{pmatrix}}} Part 2: Check if any row combinations of B {\displaystyle B} sum to even numbers For example, summing Row 2 {\displaystyle 2} and Row 3 {\displaystyle 3} gives us a vector of even numbers. R 2 = { 0 , 1 , 0 , 1 } {\displaystyle R_{2}=\{0,1,0,1\}} and R 3 = { 0 , 1 , 0 , 1 } {\displaystyle R_{3}=\{0,1,0,1\}} then R 2 + R 3 = { 0 , 1 , 0 , 1 } + { 0 , 1 , 0 , 1 } {\displaystyle R_{2}+R_{3}=\{0,1,0,1\}+\{0,1,0,1\}} R 2 + R 3 = { 0 , 2 , 0 , 2 } {\displaystyle R_{2}+R_{3}=\{0,2,0,2\}} .
  • Step 5 : This step is split into four parts.
    • Part 1. (Finding x): Multiply the corresponding z {\displaystyle z} values for the rows found in Step 4. Then find the square root. This gives us x {\displaystyle x} .
      • For Row 2, we had 2 4 ∗ 3 1 ∗ 5 2 ∗ 7 1 {\displaystyle 2^{4}*3^{1}*5^{2}*7^{1}} .
      • For Row 3, we had 2 6 ∗ 3 1 ∗ 5 2 ∗ 7 1 {\displaystyle 2^{6}*3^{1}*5^{2}*7^{1}} .
      • Thus, we find x {\displaystyle x}  :
( 513 ⋅ 537 ) 2 mod 84923 = y 2 where x 2 mod 84923 = ( 513 ⋅ 537 ) 2 mod 84923 thus x = ( 513 ⋅ 537 ) mod 84923 so x = 275481 mod 84923 Finally x = 20712 mod 84923 {\displaystyle {\begin{array}{ll}(513\cdot 537)^{2}\mod 84923=y^{2}\\\\{\text{where}}\quad x^{2}\mod 84923=(513\cdot 537)^{2}\mod 84923\\\\{\text{thus}}\quad x=(513\cdot 537)\mod 84923\\\\{\text{so}}\quad x=275481\mod 84923\\\\{\text{Finally}}\quad x=20712\mod 84923\\\end{array}}}
  • Part 2. (Finding y): Multiply the corresponding smooth factorizations for the rows found in Step 4. Then find the square root. This gives us y {\displaystyle y} .
y 2 = ( 2 4 ⋅ 3 1 ⋅ 5 2 ⋅ 7 1 ) × ( 2 6 ⋅ 3 1 ⋅ 5 2 ⋅ 7 1 ) By the multiplication law of exponents, y 2 = 2 ( 4 + 6 ) ⋅ 3 ( 1 + 1 ) ⋅ 5 ( 2 + 2 ) ⋅ 7 ( 1 + 1 ) Thus, y 2 = 2 10 ⋅ 3 2 ⋅ 5 4 ⋅ 7 2 Taking square roots on both sides gives y = 2 5 ⋅ 3 1 ⋅ 5 2 ⋅ 7 1 Therefore, y = 32 × 3 × 25 × 7 Finally, y = 16800 {\displaystyle {\begin{array}{ll}y^{2}=(2^{4}\cdot 3^{1}\cdot 5^{2}\cdot 7^{1})\times (2^{6}\cdot 3^{1}\cdot 5^{2}\cdot 7^{1})\\\\{\text{By the multiplication law of exponents,}}\\y^{2}=2^{(4+6)}\cdot 3^{(1+1)}\cdot 5^{(2+2)}\cdot 7^{(1+1)}\\\\{\text{Thus,}}\\y^{2}=2^{10}\cdot 3^{2}\cdot 5^{4}\cdot 7^{2}\\\\{\text{Taking square roots on both sides gives}}\\y=2^{5}\cdot 3^{1}\cdot 5^{2}\cdot 7^{1}\\\\{\text{Therefore,}}\\y=32\times 3\times 25\times 7\\\\{\text{Finally,}}\\y=16800\end{array}}}
  • Part 3. (Find x + y and x - y) where x = 20712 and y = 16800.
x + y = 20712 + 16800 = 37512 {\displaystyle x+y=20712+16800=37512} x − y = 20712 − 16800 = 3912 {\displaystyle x-y=20712-16800=3912}
  • Part 4. Compute GCD(x+y, n) and GCD(x-y, n), where n = 84923, x+y = 292281 and x-y = 258681
gcd ( 37512 , 84923 ) = 521 gcd ( 3912 , 84923 ) = 163 {\displaystyle {\begin{array}{ll}\gcd(37512,84923)=521\\\gcd(3912,84923)=163\end{array}}}

Quick check shows 84923 = 521 × 163 {\displaystyle 84923=521\times 163} .

Optimizations

The quadratic sieve is an optimization of Dixon's method. It selects values of x close to the square root of N such that x2 modulo N is small, thereby largely increasing the chance of obtaining a smooth number.

Other ways to optimize Dixon's method include using a better algorithm to solve the matrix equation, taking advantage of the sparsity of the matrix: a number z cannot have more than log 2 ⁡ z {\displaystyle \log _{2}z} factors, so each row of the matrix is almost all zeros. In practice, the block Lanczos algorithm is often used. Also, the size of the factor base must be chosen carefully: if it is too small, it will be difficult to find numbers that factorize completely over it, and if it is too large, more relations will have to be collected.

A more sophisticated analysis, using the approximation that a number has all its prime factors less than N 1 / a {\displaystyle N^{1/a}} with probability about a − a {\displaystyle a^{-a}} (an approximation to the Dickman–de Bruijn function), indicates that choosing too small a factor base is much worse than too large, and that the ideal factor base size is some power of exp ⁡ ( log ⁡ N log ⁡ log ⁡ N ) {\displaystyle \exp \left({\sqrt {\log N\log \log N}}\right)} .

The optimal complexity of Dixon's method is

O ( exp ⁡ ( 2 2 log ⁡ n log ⁡ log ⁡ n ) ) {\displaystyle O\left(\exp \left(2{\sqrt {2}}{\sqrt {\log n\log \log n}}\right)\right)}

in big-O notation, or

L n [ 1 / 2 , 2 2 ] {\displaystyle L_{n}[1/2,2{\sqrt {2}}]}

in L-notation.

References

  1. Kleinjung, Thorsten; et al. (2010). "Factorization of a 768-Bit RSA Modulus". Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 6223. pp. 333–350. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14623-7_18. ISBN 978-3-642-14622-0. S2CID 11556080. 978-3-642-14622-0

  2. Dixon, J. D. (1981). "Asymptotically fast factorization of integers" (PDF). Math. Comp. 36 (153): 255–260. doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-1981-0595059-1. JSTOR 2007743. /w/index.php?title=John_D._Dixon&action=edit&redlink=1

  3. Kibicho, Murage (2025). Hand-Written Paper Implementation: Asymptotically Fast Factorization of Integers. https://leetarxiv.substack.com/p/hand-written-paper-implementation