Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Normal function
Function of ordinals in mathematics

In axiomatic set theory, a function f : Ord → Ord is called normal (or a normal function) if it is continuous (with respect to the order topology) and strictly monotonically increasing. This is equivalent to the following two conditions:

  1. For every limit ordinal γ (i.e. γ is neither zero nor a successor), it is the case that f (γ) = sup{f (ν) : ν < γ}.
  2. For all ordinals α < β, it is the case that f (α) < f (β).
We don't have any images related to Normal function yet.
We don't have any YouTube videos related to Normal function yet.
We don't have any PDF documents related to Normal function yet.
We don't have any Books related to Normal function yet.
We don't have any archived web articles related to Normal function yet.

Examples

A simple normal function is given by f (α) = 1 + α (see ordinal arithmetic). But f (α) = α + 1 is not normal because it is not continuous at any limit ordinal; that is, the inverse image of the one-point open set {λ + 1} is the set {λ}, which is not open when λ is a limit ordinal. If β is a fixed ordinal, then the functions f (α) = β + α, f (α) = β × α (for β ≥ 1), and f (α) = βα (for β ≥ 2) are all normal.

More important examples of normal functions are given by the aleph numbers f ( α ) = ℵ α {\displaystyle f(\alpha )=\aleph _{\alpha }} , which connect ordinal and cardinal numbers, and by the beth numbers f ( α ) = ℶ α {\displaystyle f(\alpha )=\beth _{\alpha }} .

Properties

If f is normal, then for any ordinal α,

f (α) ≥ α.1

Proof: If not, choose γ minimal such that f (γ) < γ. Since f is strictly monotonically increasing, f (f (γ)) < f (γ), contradicting minimality of γ.

Furthermore, for any non-empty set S of ordinals, we have

f (sup S) = sup f (S).

Proof: "≥" follows from the monotonicity of f and the definition of the supremum. For "≤", set δ = sup S and consider three cases:

  • if δ = 0, then S = {0} and sup f (S) = f (0);
  • if δ = ν + 1 is a successor, then there exists s in S with ν < s, so that δs. Therefore, f (δ) ≤ f (s), which implies f (δ) ≤ sup f (S);
  • if δ is a nonzero limit, pick any ν < δ, and an s in S such that ν < s (possible since δ = sup S). Therefore, f (ν) < f (s) so that f (ν) < sup f (S), yielding f (δ) = sup {f (ν) : ν < δ} ≤ sup f (S), as desired.

Every normal function f has arbitrarily large fixed points; see the fixed-point lemma for normal functions for a proof. One can create a normal function f ′ : Ord → Ord, called the derivative of f, such that f ′(α) is the α-th fixed point of f.2 For a hierarchy of normal functions, see Veblen functions.

Notes

References

  1. Johnstone 1987, Exercise 6.9, p. 77 - Johnstone, Peter (1987), Notes on Logic and Set Theory, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-33692-5 https://archive.org/details/notesonlogicsett0000john

  2. Johnstone 1987, Exercise 6.9, p. 77 - Johnstone, Peter (1987), Notes on Logic and Set Theory, Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-33692-5 https://archive.org/details/notesonlogicsett0000john