Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Self-contained system (software)

In computing, self-contained system (SCS) is a software architecture approach that focuses on a separation of the functionality into many independent systems, making the complete logical system a collaboration of many smaller software systems.

We don't have any images related to Self-contained system (software) yet.
We don't have any YouTube videos related to Self-contained system (software) yet.
We don't have any PDF documents related to Self-contained system (software) yet.
We don't have any Books related to Self-contained system (software) yet.
We don't have any archived web articles related to Self-contained system (software) yet.

Self-contained system characteristics

SCSs have certain characteristics:

  1. Each SCS is an autonomous web application.
  2. Each SCS is owned by one team.
  3. Communication with other SCSs or third-party systems is asynchronous wherever possible.
  4. An SCS can have an optional service API.
  5. Each SCS must include data and logic.
  6. An SCS should make its features usable to end-users by its own UI.
  7. To avoid tight coupling an SCS should share no business code with other SCSs.
  8. Shared infrastructure should be reduced to increase availability and decrease coupling.

Implementations2 create larger systems using this approach – in particular web applications. There are many case studies3 and further links available.4

Self-contained systems and microservices

While self-contained systems are similar to microservices there are differences: A system will usually contain fewer SCS than microservices. Also microservices can communicate with other microservices – even synchronously. SCS prefer no communication or asynchronous communication. Microservices might also have a separate UI unlike the SCS that include a UI.5

Self-contained systems and Vertical Slice Architecture

Self-contained systems and vertical slice architecture have similarities but also decisive differences. Both approaches divide a system into smaller, manageable units. Vertical slices are cut on the basis of features, Self-contained systems along the boundaries of functional domains. They also differ in the strictness with which they attempt to encapsulate and isolate specialized logic.6

Usage

There are quite a few known usages of SCS – e.g. at Otto,7 Galeria Kaufhof,8 and Kühne+Nagel.9

References

  1. "Self-contained Systems Website". http://scs-architecture.org/ ↩

  2. "Codecentric Blog". 12 January 2015. https://blog.codecentric.de/en/2015/01/self-contained-systems-roca-complete-example-using-spring-boot-thymeleaf-bootstrap/ ↩

  3. "Case Studies on the SCS website". scs-architecture.org. Retrieved 2023-08-01. https://scs-architecture.org/case-studies.html ↩

  4. "Links on the SCS website". http://scs-architecture.org/links.html ↩

  5. "Self-contained Systems Website: SCS vs. Microservices". http://scs-architecture.org/vs-ms.html ↩

  6. Asel, Tom. "Self-contained System vs. Vertical Slice Architecture". tangible concepts Blog.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) https://tangible-concepts.de/self-contained-system-vs-vertical-slice-architecture_en ↩

  7. "Architecture principles (used to develop the Otto shop)". https://www.otto.de/jobs/en/technology/techblog/blogpost/architecture-principles-2013-04-15.php ↩

  8. "Kaufhof Blog". https://galeria-kaufhof.github.io/general/2015/12/15/architektur-und-organisation-im-galeria-de-produktmanagement ↩

  9. "From Monolith to Microservices". kuehne-nagel.github.io. Retrieved 2023-08-01. https://kuehne-nagel.github.io/monolith-to-microservices/ ↩