Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Small Arms Protective Insert
American military ballistic protection system

The Small Arms Protective Insert (SAPI) is a ceramic ballistic plate used by the United States Armed Forces. It was first used in the Ranger Body Armor and Interceptor Body Armor, both are ballistic vests. It is now also used in the Improved Outer Tactical Vest as well as the Modular Tactical Vest, in addition to commercially available "plate carriers". The Kevlar Interceptor vest itself is designed to stop projectiles up to and including 9×19mm Parabellum submachine gun rounds, in addition to fragmentation. To protect against higher-velocity rifle rounds, SAPI plates are needed.

Related Image Collections Add Image
Profiles
1 Image
We don't have any YouTube videos related to Small Arms Protective Insert yet.
We don't have any PDF documents related to Small Arms Protective Insert yet.
We don't have any Books related to Small Arms Protective Insert yet.
We don't have any archived web articles related to Small Arms Protective Insert yet.

ESAPI

In May 2005, the U.S. Armed Forces began replacing the standard Small Arms Protective Insert plates with the Enhanced Small Arms Protective Insert (ESAPI).12 An ESAPI provides protection from .30-06 Springfield M2 armor-piercing (AP) with a steel34 penetrator in accordance with the NIJ Level IV standard, but costs about $600 per plate, 50% more than SAPI plates.5 They are produced by Ceradyne, BAE Systems, and ArmorWorks Enterprises.6 Newer revisions are also produced by CW Security Solutions, CW Armor, Point Blank Enterprises and Leading Technology Composites.

XSAPI

A call for a next generation plate, to stop even greater velocity threats than the ESAPI plate was issued by the U.S. Army in 2008.7 The X Threat Small Arms Protective Insert plates are specifically allowed scalar or flexible systems, and asked for better coverage, with less than a pound of additional weight.89 XSAPI did in fact offer slightly better protection, at the cost of more weight and thicker armor profile.10

The XSAPI is intended to protect against an "X-Threat",11 which is able to be inferred from another source to be the M993 7.62 NATO armor piercing tungsten carbide projectile.12 In addition, there is record of the FBI utilizing the plate for their purposes in May 2011.13

The plates were developed in response to a perceived threat of AP projectiles in Iraq and Afghanistan. Over 120,000 inserts were procured; however, the AP threats they were meant to stop never materialized, and the plates were put into storage.

Materials and capabilities

The standard plate for the Interceptor body armor is made of boron carbide14 or silicon carbide ceramic.15 The standard plates are not given an NIJ rating, as they are tested in accordance with specific protocols for the military and not the NIJ's testing. Military testing calls for survivability of three hits from the round marked on the plate - for standard SAPI, of a caliber up to 7.62 NATO M80 ball and of a muzzle velocity up to 2,750 ft (230 m)/s (840 m/s). For ESAPI, a .30-06 Springfield M2 armor-piercing (AP) (.30-06 black-tip armor-piercing) cartridge. This performance is only assured when backed by the soft armor of the OTV (or any soft armor which meets military requirements for protection). The ceramic plate is backed with a shield made of Spectra, a material up to 40% stronger than Kevlar,16 to trap any fragments of either plate or projectile and prevent them from injuring the wearer.

Sizes and weights

SAPI plates meant for body armor come in front and back plates which are identical, and smaller side plates. The front and back plates come in five sizes. Their dimensions are the following:1718

Front and back SAPI plates:

  • Extra Small - 1.27 kg (2.8 lb) | 184 mm × 292 mm (7.2 in × 11.5 in)
  • Small - 1.59 kg (3.5 lb) | 222 mm × 298 mm (8.7 in × 11.7 in)
  • Medium - 1.82 kg (4.0 lb) | 241 mm × 318 mm (9.5 in × 12.5 in)
  • Large - 2.09 kg (4.6 lb) | 260 mm × 337 mm (10.2 in × 13.3 in)
  • Extra Large 2.40 kg (5.3 lb) | 280 mm × 356 mm (11.0 in × 14.0 in)

ESAPI plates are the same size but greater in weight.19

  • Extra Small - 1.70 kg (3.7 lb)
  • Small - 2.08 kg (4.6 lb)
  • Medium - 2.50 kg (5.5 lb)
  • Large - 2.85 kg (6.3 lb)
  • Extra Large - 3.25 kg (7.2 lb)

Side SAPI (SSAPI, S-SAPI) torso side plates are only in 6 in × 8 in (150 mm × 200 mm) size, and weigh around 1 kg (2.2 lb).20 The replacement for the S-SAPI in U.S. Army, the Enhanced Side Ballistic Inserts (ESBI, E-SBI), originally had only the 7 in × 8 in (180 mm × 200 mm) size, Small and medium were added later on.21 The counterpart of the ESBI used by the U.S. Marines is called Enhanced Side Small Arms Protective Inserts (Enhanced S‐SAPI, Side ESAPI).22 The Enhanced S‐SAPIs have only 6 in × 8 in (150 mm × 200 mm) size as the S-SAPIs.23 ESBI or Enhanced S-SAPI plates can be replaced with size X-Small ESAPI plates (by unfolding an extension built into the bottom of the ESBI Carrier assembly for the U.S. Army and the S-SAPI Carrier assembly for U.S. Marines for OTVs), if permitted by the unit commander.2425

ESBI plates:

  • Small - 0.75 kg (1.65 lb) | 152 x 152 mm (6 x 6 in)
  • Medium - 1 kg (2.19 lb) | 152 x 203 mm (6 x 8 in)26
  • Large - 1.15 kg (2.53 lb) | 178 x 203 mm (7 x 8 in)

Physics

The mechanism of effect lies in absorbing and dissipating the projectile's kinetic energy in local shattering of the ceramic plate and blunting the bullet material on the hard ceramic. The Spectra backing then spreads the energy of the impact to a larger area and stops the fragments, reducing the likelihood of fatal injury to the wearer. The same principle is used for the ceramic tiles used for the armored cockpits of some military airplanes, and the anti-spallation liners used in modern armored personnel carriers.

It is a false assumption that eliminating the penetration of a projectile into the body by using a personal armor system ensures that the wearer will not experience serious injury or death. Blunt force trauma can cause fatal damage to internal organs.27

See also

References

  1. "Interceptor Body Armor". GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved 2008-11-10. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/interceptor.htm ↩

  2. "Up to $160M for Enhanced Interceptor Vest Protection (Updated)". Defense Industry Daily. Defense Industry Daily, LLC. 2005-08-23. Retrieved 2008-11-10. http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/up-to-160m-for-enhanced-interceptor-vest-protection-updated-0986 ↩

  3. "Pew Pew Tactical, M2AP chart". Jan 17, 2021. https://www.pewpewtactical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/M2-AP-Penetrator-768x403.png ↩

  4. "AmmoChannel M2AP Core makeup". Jan 17, 2021. https://www.ammochannel.com/30-06-30-cal-m2-ap-armor-piercing/ ↩

  5. "Up to $160M for Enhanced Interceptor Vest Protection (Updated)". Defense Industry Daily. Defense Industry Daily, LLC. 2005-08-23. Retrieved 2008-11-10. http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/up-to-160m-for-enhanced-interceptor-vest-protection-updated-0986 ↩

  6. "Plate Inserts for US Body Armor". Defense Industry Daily. Defense Industry Daily, LLC. 2008-10-19. Retrieved 2008-11-10. http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/plate-inserts-for-us-body-armor-04416/ ↩

  7. "Plate Inserts for US Body Armor". Defense Industry Daily. Defense Industry Daily, LLC. 2008-10-19. Retrieved 2008-11-10. http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/plate-inserts-for-us-body-armor-04416/ ↩

  8. Lowe, Christian (2007-06-27). "Army Seeks Body Armor for New Threat". Defense Tech. Archived from the original on October 5, 2008. Retrieved 2008-11-10. https://web.archive.org/web/20081005143752/http://www.defensetech.org/archives/003567.html ↩

  9. army.mil[dead link] https://acquisition.army.mil/asfi/upload/W91CRB07R0041/Atch02-REVXSAPI-PD_A_.pdf ↩

  10. Burton, Scott (February 5, 2009). "Better Body Armor Means More Weight For Troops". Fox News. http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_wires/2009Feb05/0,4675,BodyArmor,00.html ↩

  11. "XSAPI documentation, Ciehub" (PDF). Ciehub. https://ciehub.info/spec/PD/FQ-PD-07-03D.pdf ↩

  12. "X-Threat documentation, Pg 6". Scribd, document from Sjold. November 25, 2019. https://www.scribd.com/document/117033869/NFM-Armour-Sjold ↩

  13. "FBO Daily XSAPI record". FBO Daily. http://www.fbodaily.com/archive/2011/05-May/07-May-2011/FBO-02441210.htm ↩

  14. "StackPath" (PDF). www.co.washington.wi.us. Archived from the original (PDF) on October 11, 2007. https://web.archive.org/web/20071011124611/http://www.co.washington.wi.us/washington/Pubs/VET_BodyArmorFacts.pdf ↩

  15. "Interceptor Body Armor". GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved 2008-11-10. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/interceptor.htm ↩

  16. "Interceptor Body Armor". GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved 2008-11-10. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/interceptor.htm ↩

  17. "Interceptor Body Armor". GlobalSecurity.org. Retrieved 2008-11-10. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/interceptor.htm ↩

  18. "Hard Body Armor Insert Plates" (PDF). BAE Systems. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-08-04. Retrieved 2008-11-11. https://web.archive.org/web/20080804230459/http://www.baesystems.com/BAEProd/groups/public/documents/bae_publication/bae_pdf_mps_indv_hard_armor.pdf ↩

  19. "Hard Body Armor Insert Plates" (PDF). BAE Systems. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-08-04. Retrieved 2008-11-11. https://web.archive.org/web/20080804230459/http://www.baesystems.com/BAEProd/groups/public/documents/bae_publication/bae_pdf_mps_indv_hard_armor.pdf ↩

  20. "Hard Body Armor Insert Plates" (PDF). BAE Systems. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-08-04. Retrieved 2008-11-11. https://web.archive.org/web/20080804230459/http://www.baesystems.com/BAEProd/groups/public/documents/bae_publication/bae_pdf_mps_indv_hard_armor.pdf ↩

  21. "Enhanced Side Ballistic Insert and Ballistic Carrier". CIE Hub. https://ciehub.info/equipment/protective/IBA/SAPI/ESBI.html ↩

  22. "Enhanced Side Small Arms Protective Inserts and Ballistic Carriers". CIE Hub. https://ciehub.info/equipment/protective/IBA/SAPI/EnhancedSideSAPI.html ↩

  23. "Enhanced Side Ballistic Insert and Ballistic Carrier". CIE Hub. https://ciehub.info/equipment/protective/IBA/SAPI/ESBI.html ↩

  24. "Enhanced Side Small Arms Protective Inserts and Ballistic Carriers". CIE Hub. https://ciehub.info/equipment/protective/IBA/SAPI/EnhancedSideSAPI.html ↩

  25. "Interceptor SAPI / ESAPI". olive-drab.com. Archived from the original on 2019-08-27. Retrieved 2019-08-27. https://web.archive.org/web/20190827153419/https://olive-drab.com/od_soldiers_gear_body_armor_sapi.php ↩

  26. "8470-01-616-6647 (AR/PD 11-06) Data". ParTarget. https://www.parttarget.com/8470-01-616-6647_8470016166647_AR-PD-11-06.html ↩

  27. Cannon, L. (2001). "Behind Armour Blunt Trauma - an emerging problem". Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps. 147 (1): 87–96. doi:10.1136/jramc-147-01-09. PMID 11307682. S2CID 6186824. https://doi.org/10.1136%2Fjramc-147-01-09 ↩