Army Futures Command was established by Secretary of the Army Mark Esper to improve Army acquisition by creating better requirements and reducing the time to develop a system to meet them. Between 1995 and 2009, the Army spent $32 billion on programs such as the Future Combat System that were later cancelled with no harvestable content. As of 2021, the Army had not fielded a new combat system in decades.
Over his tenure as Army Secretary, Esper led a process known as "night court", working with other top service officials, to free up and shift billions of dollars into modernization programs and based the new command in Austin, Texas, an area known for its innovative, technology-focused workforce. The Army gave the command's chief and the leaders of new groups, dubbed "§ cross-functional teams", the authority to manage requirements and the leeway to direct dollars.
At its founding, Futures Command was focused on six priorities: Long-range precision fires, Next Generation Combat Vehicle, Future Vertical Lift platforms, a mobile & expeditionary Army network, air and missile defense capabilities, and soldier lethality.
Murray announced plans to stand up an Army Applications Lab to accelerate acquisition and deployment of materiel to the soldiers, including by using artificial intelligence (AI).
A fundamental strategy was formulated, involving simultaneous integrated operations across domains. This strategy involves pushing adversaries to standoff, by presenting them with multiple simultaneous dilemmas. A goal is that by 2028, the ability to project rapid, responsive power across domains will have become apparent to potential adversaries.
AFC declared its full operational capability in July 2019, after an initial one-year period. The FY2020 military budget allocated $30 billion for the top six modernization priorities over next five years. The $30 billion came from $8 billion in cost avoidance and $22 billion in terminations. More than 30 projects were envisioned to become the materiel basis needed for overmatching any potential competitors in the 'continuum of conflict' over the next ten years in multi-domain operations (MDO).
From an initial 12 people at its headquarters in 2018, AFC grew to more than 17,000 people across 25 states and 15 countries in 2019. research facilities and personnel (including ARCIC and RDECOM) moved from other commands and parts of the Army such as the United States Army Research Laboratory.
On 13 October 2021, Army officials said most of AFC's 31 signature systems, and the four rapid capability projects of the Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office would be fielded by fiscal year 2023.
In 2022, Army leaders projected that 24 of the top-35 priority modernization programs would be deployed by fiscal 2023.
In October 2022, Wormuth assigned AFC to work on "Army of 2040" concepts.: minute 51:00 Two months later, Futures Command hosted a conference with representatives from AMC, TRADOC, FORSCOM, and Headquarters Department of the Army. AFC is leading the development of a new Army Operating Concept (v. 1.0) for the Army of 2030 to 2040.
The 'All-domain sensing cross-functional team' (CFT) is standing up to support the plethora of data coming from data sources across the joint and combined services, allies, and partners. This CFT is built from the existing PNT (positioning, navigation, and tracking) CFT. See Combined JADC2. The contested logistics CFT was stood up in 2023.
The commanding general is assisted by three deputy commanders.
When AFC was created in 2018, it was given eight cross-functional teams, or CFTs: one for each of the Army's six modernization priorities, and two others for broader capabilities. These teams are Long-Range Precision Fires, Next-Generation Combat Vehicles, Future Vertical Lift, the Network to include Precision Navigation and Timing, Air-and-Missile Defense, Soldier Lethality and Synthetic Training Environment.
In 2023, the Army announced that it would create a ninth team, for Contested Logistics. The 2023 exercises for IndoPacom will test its prepositioned stocks. The CG of Army Materiel Command is taking the lead for contested logistics.
In 2018, McCarthy characterized a CFT as a team of teams, led by a requirements leader, program manager, sustainer and tester. Some CFTs also have representatives of U.S. allies. Each CFT lead is mentored by a 4-star general. Each CFT can have a Capability Development Integration Directorate. For example, the Aviation Center of Excellence at Fort Rucker, in coordination with the Aviation Program Executive Officer (PEO), contains the Vertical Lift CFT and the Aviation CDID. "We were never above probably a total of eight people", the Aviation CFT's Brigadier General Wally Rugen said in 2018. Four of the eight CFT leads have now shifted from dual-hat jobs to full-time status.
Each CFT must strike a balance amid constraints—the realms of requirements, acquisition, science and technology, test, resourcing, costing, and sustainment—to produce a realizable concept before a competitor achieves it.
AFC and the CFTs are expected to unify control of the Army' s $30 billion modernization budget.
AFC has given research funding to more than 300 colleges and universities with one-year program cycles. "We will come to you. You don't have to come to us," Murray said on 24 August 2018",: minute 6:07
Multiple incubator tech hubs are available in Austin, especially Capital Factory, with offices of Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) and AFWERX (USAF tech hub).
AFC will work with other organizations such as Defense Innovation Unit Experimental (DIUx) as needed.
AFC personnel also operate in and from dozens of military installations around the country, including:
In 2018, the Army secretary ordered AFC to draft an execution order to create an Army AI Task Force (A-AI TF) to support the DoD Joint AI center. The Army AI task force establish scalable machine learning projects at Carnegie Mellon University.
That same year, the Army Applications Laboratory was established along with AFC to help connect Army-future efforts and commercial products and ideas.
In 2022, DEVCOM Analysis Center (DAC) signed a cooperative agreement with Northeastern University's Kostas Research Institute (KRI) to build on KRI's analytic framework, with six other universities on artificial intelligence and assistive automation (AI/AA), to further Army sub-goals ("mission effectiveness analysis, ontology for decision making, automatic target recognition, human systems integration, cyber resilience/electronic warfare threat defense, and assessing autonomous maneuver/mobility").
Futures Command was to stand up Army Software Factory in August 2021, to immerse soldiers and Army civilians of all ranks in modern software development, in Austin. Like the Training with Industry program, participants are expected to take these practices back with them, to influence other Army people in their future assignments, and to build up the Army's capability in software development. The training program lasts three years, and will produce skill sets for trainees as product managers, user experience and user interface designers, software engineers, or platform engineers. The Al Work Force Development program and this Software Factory will complement the Artificial Intelligence Task Force. The Army has identified soldiers who can already code at Ph.D.-level, but who are in unexpected MOSs. In March 2023 the Marine Corps moved its software factory to the Army's software factory in Austin, Texas.
Data
The Army looks for ideas from defense contractors In 2018, for example, the Network CFT and the Program Executive Office Command, Control, Communications—Tactical (PEO C3T) hosted a forum so vendors could learn what products might soon work as testable or deployable systems. Vendors submitted hundreds of white papers; ones with "very mature ideas" were passed to the Army's acquisition community and to the Communications-Electronics Research, Development and Engineering Center (CERDEC).
The Army is interested in ways to accelerate acquisition programs. For example, this was an explicit request in the 2019 solicitation for requests for information about Future Vertical Lift. In January 2020, the optionally manned fighting vehicle solicitation was cancelled when its requirements added up to an unobtainable project;
Robotic combat vehicles
By October 2021, experiments with a company-sized tele-operated / unmanned formation were underway at Camp Grayling, Michigan. The 18 light and medium robotic combat vehicles (RCV), in concert with surrogate heavy RCVs (modified M113 armored personnel carriers), proxy manned control vehicles (MET-Ds), and drones for intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR), were to complete ATEC (Army Test and Evaluation Command) safety testing in May 2022 and live-fire drills in August 2022.
By June 2022, Army RCVs had demonstrated some disruptive capabilities, in preparation for Project Convergence 2022. At PC22, resupply by unmanned helicopters and other autonomous capabilities were demonstrated by systems from the US, Australia, and UK.: min 25:30
In May 2023, Army Futures Command disclosed concepts for robotic combat platoons, akin to the collaborative combat aircraft (CCA) of the Air Force.
The PEOs work closely with their respective CFTs. Operationally, the CFTs reduce degrees of separation between Army echelons, and provide a point of contact for Army reformers.
The development process will consist of one or more cycles (prototype, demonstration/testing, and evaluation,) meant to find and discard unrealistic requirements before a project becomes a program. "Our new approach is really to prototype as much as we can to help us identify requirements, so our reach doesn't exceed our grasp. ... A good example is Future Vertical Lift: The prototyping has been exceptional," Esper said in 2019.
AFC activities include at least one cross-functional team, its capability development integration directorate (CDID),: Para. 2b and the associated Battle Lab,: Para. 2b for each Army Center of Excellence. Each CDID and associated Battle Lab work with their CFT to develop operational experiments and prototypes to test.
ASA(ALT), in coordination with AFC, has dotted-line relationships between its PEOs and the CFTs. In particular, the Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office of ASA(ALT) has a PEO to develop experimental prototype "units of action" for rapid fielding. In June 2019, the prototypes were for long-range hypersonic weapons, high-energy laser defense, and space, The Army tripled its spending on speed and range capabilities from 2017 to 2019.
CCDC, now called DEVCOM (formerly RDECOM, at APG) includes the several Army research laboratory locations, as well as research, development and engineering centers listed:
Acquisition specialists are being encouraged to accept lateral transfers to RDECs where their skills are needed: Ground Vehicle Systems Center (formerly TARDEC, at Detroit Arsenal. Michigan), Aviation and Missile Center (formerly AMRDEC, at Redstone Arsenal), C5ISR Center (formerly CERDEC, at Aberdeen Proving Ground), Soldier Center (formerly NSRDEC, Natick, Massachusetts), and Armaments Center (formerly ARDEC, at Picatinny Arsenal) listed below.
Esper said AFC will reduce the time needed to define requirements for a new program from 60 to 12 months. Requirements may be reduced to "a simple statement of a problem.": minute 41:50 : minute 11:00 The development process will consist of repeated prototyping, demonstration/testing, and evaluation, designed to find and eliminated unrealistic requirements. ASA(ALT) Bruce Jette says the acquisition community should seek to fail and find a new solution rather than commit a program to a drawn-out failure.
Esper scrubbed through 800 modernization programs to reprioritize funding for the top six modernization priorities, which will consume 80% of the modernization funding, of 18 systems. His "night court" budget review process shifted $2.4 billion for modernization from programs that were not tied to modernization or to the 2018 National Defense Strategy.
Budgets will likely restrict the fielding of new materiel to one Armor BCT per year; at that rate, updates would take decades.
In February 2020, the Army vice chief of staff said Army modernization was perceptibly speeding up.
This Life Cycle Management (formulated in 2004) was intended to exert the kind of operational control (OPCON) needed just for the sustainment function (AMC's need for Readiness today), rather than for its relevance to modernization for the future. AFC now serves as the deciding authority when moving a project in its Life Cycle, out of the Acquisition phase and into the Sustainment phase.
The CFTs must balance requirements, acquisition, science and technology, test, resourcing, costing, and sustainment.
The plan is to have an MDO-capable Army by 2028 and an MDO-ready Army by 2035.
Congress has given the Army Other Transaction Authority (OTA), which allows the PEOs to enter into Full Rate Production quicker by permitting the services to control their own programs of record, rather than DoD. This strips out one layer of bureaucracy.
Middle tier acquisition authority is another tool.
In 2019, Futures Command was formulating multiyear enterprise campaign plans. The planning process includes Army Test and Evaluation Command (ATEC), AFC's cross-functional teams (CFTs), Futures and Concepts (FCC), Combat Capabilities Development Command (CCDC), and Army Reserve's Houston-based 75th Innovation Command. Pne goal is to formulate the plans in simple, coherent language which nests within the national security strategic documents.
By October 2022 Field Manual 3-0 said "Multi-domain Operations are at the root of all Army operations".: § 1-11, p.1-3 : minute 28:09 to 36:00
Planning for the Army of 2040 is underway.
In February 2024 the department of the Air Force announced its intention to create the Space Futures Command. The US Air Force is seeking to launch Integrated Capabilities Command by year-end 2024 to set future requirements for the USAF.
The CG,AFC is responsible for Force design (in the style of TRADOC's G357,[418] but applied to Force modernization, rather than training).[156] The Army's Force management model begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment, and the time available to bring the Current army to bear on the situation.[419] The AROC serves as a discussion forum of these factors.[156]
The Army G-8 and G-3/5/7 sit on the Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC), chaired by the Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA).[420]: diagram on p.559 [156][419]
The relevant strategy is provided by the Army's leadership to guide Army staff.[420]
The resources are "dictated by Congress".[419]
A DOTMLPF analysis models the factors necessary to change the Current force into a relevant Future force.[421]
A JCIDS/ACIDS[422] process identifies the gaps in capability between Current and Future force.
A Force design to meet the materiel gaps is underway.
An organization with the desired capabilities (manpower, materiel, training) is brought to bear on each gap.
AR 5-22(pdf) lists the Force modernization proponent for each Army branch, which can be a CoE or Branch proponent leader.
Staff uses Synchronization meetings[423]: minute 8:29 before seeking approval —HTAR Force Management 3-2b: "Managing change in any large, complex organization requires the synchronization of many interrelated processes".[420]: p.3-1
A budget request is submitted to Congress.
Approved requests then await resource deliveries which then become available to the combatant commanders.
https://www.tradoc.army.mil/g357/
US Army "Army announces Austin as the home of new Army Futures Command". C-SPAN. 13 July 2018. Archived from the original on 17 July 2018. Retrieved 17 July 2018. https://www.army.mil/article/208477/army_announces_austin_as_the_home_of_new_army_futures_command
"Organization". Organization | The United States Army. Archived from the original on 8 July 2003. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://www.army.mil/organization/
Army Commands, Army Service Component Commands, and Direct Reporting Units ARN2541_AR10-87_WEB_Final.pdf section 20-2a, p.27
"The number one priority: An interview with Gen. Mark Milley". www.army.mil. Archived from the original on 1 April 2019. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://www.army.mil/article/219028/the_number_one_priority_an_interview_with_gen_mark_milley
"Multi-Domain Battle The Advent of Twenty-First Century War". www.armyupress.army.mil. Archived from the original on 6 September 2018. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/November-December-2017/Multi-Domain-Battle-The-Advent-of-Twenty-First-Century-War/
Sébastien Roblin (11 Oct. 2019) China's stealth drones and hypersonic missiles surpass—and threaten—the U.S. Archived 12 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine
Binkov (11 Oct 2019) New game changing weapons shown at Chinese military parade; October 2019 Archived 13 January 2020 at the Wayback Machine Binkov explains and animates Hypersonic glide trajectories for under-the-radar operation; Binkov estimates which weapons displays are mockups; Compares and contrasts Chinese, Russian, and US capabilities
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/china-s-stealth-drones-hypersonic-missiles-surpass-threaten-u-s-ncna1064841
Lauren C. Williams (14 Sep 2018) Army Futures Command to set up DIU-like innovation lab Archived 17 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine
Ronald Sega, CTO for AFC, Starts 1 July 2019 Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine
Ronald "Ron" Michael Sega Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine Ronald M. Sega
https://fcw.com/articles/2018/09/14/futures-command-innovation-lab.aspx
Army Directive 2018-15 (U.S. Army Futures Command Relationship With the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) Archived 31 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine and DCS G-8, 27 August 2018 https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN12786_AD2018-15_Web_Final.pdf
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. Army Applications Lab Archived 9 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine: (23 October 2018) Army Futures Command Wants YOU (To Innovate) Archived 24 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine
—Adam Jay Harrison's list for types of Funding Authority
https://aal.army/
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (25 October 2017). "Can The Pentagon Protect Young Innovators?". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2017/10/can-the-pentagon-protect-young-innovators/
"75th Innovation Command Page - About Us". US Army Reserve. Archived from the original on 20 April 2021. Retrieved 12 February 2021. https://www.usar.army.mil/Commands/Functional/75th-Innovation-CMD/About-Us/
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (7 May 2018). "Permanent Evolution: SecArmy Esper On Futures Command (EXCLUSIVE)". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 8 March 2024. Retrieved 26 November 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2018/05/permanent-evolution-secarmy-esper-on-futures-command-exclusive/
Barone, Chelsea (7 August 2018). "The Army Futures Command Finds a Home in Austin, TX". Modern Battlespace. Archived from the original on 26 November 2023. Retrieved 26 November 2023. https://modernbattlespace.com/2018/08/07/army-futures-command-finds-home-in-austin/
"Authority Transfers Begin to Army Futures Command". AUSA. 14 June 2018. Archived from the original on 3 October 2023. Retrieved 26 November 2023. https://www.ausa.org/news/authority-transfers-begin-army-futures-command
Cox, Matthew (13 July 2018). "It's Official: Austin Is Home of New Army Futures Command". Military.com. Archived from the original on 27 August 2023. Retrieved 26 November 2023. https://www.military.com/dodbuzz/2018/07/13/its-official-austin-home-new-army-futures-command.html
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (8 August 2014) Pentagon Struggles To Get Small-Biz Tech Archived 22 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine: FCS misuse of OTA, other acquisition issues. https://breakingdefense.com/2014/08/pentagon-struggles-to-get-small-biz-tech/
Dan Lamothe Washington Post (2018-07-12) Army to unveil details about new Futures Command in biggest reorganization in 45 years Archived 5 October 2023 at the Wayback Machine https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2018/07/12/army-to-unveil-details-about-new-futures-command-in-biggest-reorganization-in-45-years/
"Thomas E. Ricks (MARCH 2, 2015)Why hasn't the Army's regular acquisition process produced anything in decades? --Future of War conference". Archived from the original on 5 September 2018. Retrieved 5 September 2018. https://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/02/why-hasnt-the-armys-regular-acquisition-process-produced-anything-in-decades/
Matthew Cox (28 April 2018) How Future Combat Systems Failed Archived 11 July 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/04/28/could-armys-quest-leap-ahead-technologies-be-its-undoing.html
Arpi Dilanian and Matthew Howard Army.mil (6 September 2018) Safer, smarter, faster: An interview with Gen. James McConville Archived 7 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.militarynews.com/peninsula-warrior/features/army_features/safer-smarter-faster-an-interview-with-gen-james-mcconville/article_6af79dce-b16d-11e8-9c32-17be6e92ab04.html
""US edge has eroded to a dangerous degree"". CBS News. Archived from the original on 15 November 2018. Retrieved 15 November 2018. https://www.cbsnews.com/live/video/20181114222400-the-u-s-could-lose-the-next-war-it-fights-after-appearing-to-lose-its-military-edge/?ftag=CNM15cf32c
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (14 March 2019) Army 'Big Six' Ramp Up in 2021: Learning From FCS Archived 3 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2019/03/army-big-six-ramp-up-in-2021-learning-from-fcs/
Jaspreet Gill (4 May 2022) EXCLUSIVE: New Army directive shakes up modernization enterprise Archived 5 May 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2022/05/exclusive-new-army-directive-shakes-up-modernization-enterprise/
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (24 August 2018). "How McCain & Milley Created Army Futures Command: It Almost Didn't Happen". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 8 March 2024. Retrieved 12 June 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2018/08/how-mccain-milley-created-army-futures-command-it-almost-didnt-happen/
Carlson, Kara "'Modernizing is key': Austin-based Army Futures Command continues to grow, adapt". Austin-American Statesman. 11 May 2021. Archived from the original on 15 May 2022. Retrieved 18 March 2022. https://www.statesman.com/story/business/2021/05/11/austin-based-army-futures-command-continues-grow-adapt/5042406001/
The CG,AFC is responsible for Force design (in the style of TRADOC's G357,[418] but applied to Force modernization, rather than training).[156] The Army's Force management model begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment, and the time available to bring the Current army to bear on the situation.[419] The AROC serves as a discussion forum of these factors.[156]
The Army G-8 and G-3/5/7 sit on the Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC), chaired by the Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA).[420]: diagram on p.559 [156][419]
The relevant strategy is provided by the Army's leadership to guide Army staff.[420]
The resources are "dictated by Congress".[419]
A DOTMLPF analysis models the factors necessary to change the Current force into a relevant Future force.[421]
A JCIDS/ACIDS[422] process identifies the gaps in capability between Current and Future force.
A Force design to meet the materiel gaps is underway.
An organization with the desired capabilities (manpower, materiel, training) is brought to bear on each gap.
AR 5-22(pdf) lists the Force modernization proponent for each Army branch, which can be a CoE or Branch proponent leader.
Staff uses Synchronization meetings[423]: minute 8:29 before seeking approval —HTAR Force Management 3-2b: "Managing change in any large, complex organization requires the synchronization of many interrelated processes".[420]: p.3-1
A budget request is submitted to Congress.
Approved requests then await resource deliveries which then become available to the combatant commanders.
https://www.tradoc.army.mil/g357/
Jen Judson (28 Aug 2018) Can Austin make the Army weird? Archived 8 March 2024 at the Wayback Machine https://www.defensenews.com/land/2018/08/28/can-austin-make-the-army-weird/
Judson, Jen (9 October 2018). "Army's 'night court' finds $25 billion to reinvest in modernization priorities". Defense News. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 26 November 2023. https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/ausa/2018/10/08/armys-night-court-finds-25-billion-to-reinvest-in-modernization-priorities/
"Back to the (Army's) Future: A Conversation with Secretary of the Army Mark Esper". American Enterprise Institute - AEI. Archived from the original on 26 November 2023. Retrieved 26 November 2023. https://www.aei.org/events/back-to-the-armys-future-a-conversation-with-secretary-of-the-army-mark-esper/
Beinart, Matthew (8 February 2019). "Esper: Army Cut $25 Billion From Low-Tier Programs To Fund Modernization Priorities". Defense Daily. Archived from the original on 26 November 2023. Retrieved 26 November 2023. https://www.defensedaily.com/esper-army-cut-25-billion-low-tier-programs-fund-modernization-priorities/army/
The capabilities as prioritized by the Chief of Staff, will use subject-matter experts (SMEs) in the realms of requirements, acquisition, science and technology, test, resourcing, costing, and sustainment, using CFTs for:
Improved long-range precision fires (artillery):—(Fort Sill, Oklahoma) Lead: BG John Rafferty ... PEO Ammunition (AMMO)
Next Generation Combat Vehicle—(Detroit Arsenal, Warren, Michigan) Lead: BG Geoffrey Norman Archived 1 July 2022 at the Wayback Machine ... PEO Ground Combat Systems (GCS)
Vertical lift platforms—(Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, Alabama) Lead: BG Wally Rugen ... PEO Aviation (AVN)
Mobile and expeditionary (usable in ground combat) communications network (Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland)
Network Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence—Lead: BG Jeth Rey ... PEO Command Control Communications Tactical (C3T)
Assured Position Navigation and Timing—(Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, Alabama) Lead: William B. Nelson, SES
Air and missile defense—(Fort Sill, Oklahoma) Lead: BG Brian Gibson, ... PEO Missiles and Space (M&S)
Soldier lethality
Soldier Lethality—(Fort Moore, Georgia) Lead: BG Larry Q. Burris, Jr. ... PEO Soldier
Synthetic Training Environment—(Orlando, Florida) Lead: BG William Glaser ... PEO Simulation, Training, & Instrumentation (STRI)
Contested logistics—(Huntsville, Alabama) Lead: Army Materiel Command (AMC) stood up in 2023
Above, 'dotted line' relationship (i.e., coordination) is denoted by a ' ... '
/wiki/Subject-matter_expert
MG Cedric T. Wins (09.10.2019) CCDC'S road map to modernizing the Army: air and missile defense Archived 15 September 2019 at the Wayback Machine DVIDS release
(10 September 2019) Archived 20 September 2019 at the Wayback Machine Same CCDC text but with 3 more images. Fifth in a series.
/wiki/Cedric_T._Wins
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. Army Applications Lab Archived 9 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine: (23 October 2018) Army Futures Command Wants YOU (To Innovate) Archived 24 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine
—Adam Jay Harrison's list for types of Funding Authority
https://aal.army/
Army AI task force Army Directive 2018-18 (Army Artificial Intelligence Task Force in Support of the Department of Defense Joint Artificial Intelligence Center) Archived 31 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine 2 October 2018 https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN13011_AD2018_18_Final.pdf
Kelley M. Sayler, CRS (10 Nov 2020) Artificial Intelligence and National Security Archived 27 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine R45178 https://sgp.fas.org/crs/natsec/R45178.pdf
Lauren C. Williams (14 Sep 2018) Army Futures Command to set up DIU-like innovation lab Archived 17 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine
Ronald Sega, CTO for AFC, Starts 1 July 2019 Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine
Ronald "Ron" Michael Sega Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine Ronald M. Sega
https://fcw.com/articles/2018/09/14/futures-command-innovation-lab.aspx
C5ISR "Army leaders get firsthand look at C5ISR Center research, development projects". www.army.mil. 7 November 2019. Archived from the original on 23 November 2019. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/229590/army_leaders_get_firsthand_look_at_c5isr_center_research_development_projects
TRADOC Pamphlet 525-3-1 (6 December 2018) The U.S. Army in Multi-Domain Operations 2028 Archived 28 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine "describes how US Army forces, as part of the Joint Force, will militarily compete, penetrate, dis-integrate, and exploit our adversaries in the future." Link moved here Archived 19 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://www.tradoc.army.mil/Portals/14/Documents/MDO/TP525-3-1_30Nov2018.pdf
"The U.S. Army Modernization Strategy". APG News. 13 June 2018. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://apgnews.com/community-news/news-briefs/the-u-s-army-modernization-strategy/
In standoff,[41] adversaries attempt to project protected areas against each other.[42] Within these protected areas, friends are deemed safe, but foes who attempt penetration are endangered by the capabilities of the allies arrayed against them. Outside these protected areas, adversaries compete for control, by projecting their power. /wiki/File:Army_ccdc_domes_of_protection_0.jpg
CRS Insight (IN11019) (17 January 2019) The U.S. Army and Multi-Domain Operations Archived 26 July 2020 at the Wayback Machine Congressional Research Service (CRS)
Todd South (11 August 2019) This 3-star Army general explains what multi-domain operations mean for you Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine "think, assess and employ all domains when necessary"—General Wesley
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/IN11019.pdf
Yasmin Tadjdeh (10/10/2018) Army to Focus on Defeating Enemies' Standoff Capabilities Archived 24 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine Summary of standoff https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2018/10/10/army-to-focus-on-defeating-enemies-standoff-capabilities
Sydney Freedberg, Jr. (14 January 2020) Army Chief Seeks 'Minimally Manned' Vehicles, Joint C2 Archived 15 January 2020 at the Wayback Machine LRPF, ITN, IBCS, FARA, FLRAA, and "We need a joint command and control system" —Army Chief of Staff James C. McConville https://breakingdefense.com/2020/01/army-chief-seeks-minimally-manned-vehicles-joint-c2/
Sydney Freedberg, Jr. (2021) Army Chief To Navy, Air Force: We've Got 'Speed & Range' Archived 26 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine "The future is all about range and speed" —Gen. McConville https://breakingdefense.com/2021/02/army-chief-to-navy-air-force-weve-got-speed-range/
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (November 22, 2019) SecArmy's Multi-Domain Kill Chain: Space-Cloud-AI Army Multi-Domain Operations Concept, December 2018 slide from TRADOC pamphlet 525-3-1 (Dec 2018).
Multi-domain operations (MDO) span multiple domains: cislunar space, land, air, maritime, cyber, and populations.
In September 2020 an ABMS Onramp demonstrated a specific scenario, which can be illustrated by the 5 red numbered bullet points from the slide in TRADOC pamphlet 525-3-1:
Competition— No overt hostilities are yet detected. Blue bar (force projection) is in standoff against red bar (threat).
Strategic Support area— National assets (blue) detect breaching of standoff by adversary (in red).
Close area support— blue assets hand-off to the combatant commands, who are to create effects visible to the adversary (in red).
Deep maneuver— blue combatant actions dis-integrate adversary efforts (per TRADOC pamphlet 525-3-1: "militarily compete, penetrate, dis-integrate, and exploit" the adversary); —Operational and Strategic deep fires create effects on the adversary. Adversary is further subject to defeat in detail, until adversaries perceive they are overmatched (no more red assets to expend).
Adversary retreats to standoff. The populations perceive that the adversary is defeated, for now. (Compare to Perkins' cycle, 'return to competition', in which deterrence has succeeded in avoiding a total war, in favor of pushing an adversary back to standoff (the red threat bar). Blue force projection still has overmatched red threat.)
https://breakingdefense.com/2019/11/secarmys-multi-domain-kill-chain-space-to-cloud-to-ai/
Chief of Staff paper #1, Headquarters, Department of the Army (16 March 2021) Army Multi-Domain Transformation: Ready to Win in Competition and Conflict Archived 16 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine Unclassified version by 40th Chief of Staff of the Army, Gen. James C. McConville https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/2021/03/23/eeac3d01/20210319-csa-paper-1-signed-print-version.pdf
Chief of Staff paper #2 (1 March 2021) The Army in Military Competition Archived 2 June 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/2021/03/29/bf6c30e6/csa-paper-2-the-army-in-military-competition.pdf
As informed by lessons learned in light of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine /wiki/2022_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine
Sydney Freedberg, Jr. (26 March 2018) Army Outlines Futures Command; Org Chart In Flux Archived 26 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2018/03/army-outlines-futures-command-org-chart-in-flux/
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (25 October 2017). "Can The Pentagon Protect Young Innovators?". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2017/10/can-the-pentagon-protect-young-innovators/
Sydney Freedberg, Jr. (26 March 2018) Army Outlines Futures Command; Org Chart In Flux Archived 26 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2018/03/army-outlines-futures-command-org-chart-in-flux/
Lt. Col. Thomas "Bull" Holland, PhD, U.S. Army (15 January 2019) Proposed Army Futures Command Process Tenets Archived 3 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine
'Scientific research is a fundamentally different activity than technology development';
Incorporate 'scientific research into "Appendix C: Functional Concepts" and specify pathways for technology development';
Buy into the 'fail fast' mentality;
'6.3-funded projects to produce knowledge (technical data) that can be consumed by requirements developers as opposed to PMs';
Use 'evidence-based requirements process' (early hypothesis testing) with citations for evidence:
All projects will be executed in no less than two increments.
No new requirements once an increment is started.
Summary: 'advances on the battlefield requires comprehensive, coordinated changes in the entire acquisition system';
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2019-OLE/Jan/Army-Futures/
The RAND Corporation (2000) Discovery and Innovation: Federal Research and Development in the Fifty States, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico RAND MR1194 Appendix B: Government-Wide and DOD Definitions of R&D Archived 6 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine See Appendix B p.615 for DOD Financial Management Regulation (Volume 2B, Chapter 5) https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1194/MR1194.appb.pdf
The CG,AFC is responsible for Force design (in the style of TRADOC's G357,[418] but applied to Force modernization, rather than training).[156] The Army's Force management model begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment, and the time available to bring the Current army to bear on the situation.[419] The AROC serves as a discussion forum of these factors.[156]
The Army G-8 and G-3/5/7 sit on the Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC), chaired by the Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA).[420]: diagram on p.559 [156][419]
The relevant strategy is provided by the Army's leadership to guide Army staff.[420]
The resources are "dictated by Congress".[419]
A DOTMLPF analysis models the factors necessary to change the Current force into a relevant Future force.[421]
A JCIDS/ACIDS[422] process identifies the gaps in capability between Current and Future force.
A Force design to meet the materiel gaps is underway.
An organization with the desired capabilities (manpower, materiel, training) is brought to bear on each gap.
AR 5-22(pdf) lists the Force modernization proponent for each Army branch, which can be a CoE or Branch proponent leader.
Staff uses Synchronization meetings[423]: minute 8:29 before seeking approval —HTAR Force Management 3-2b: "Managing change in any large, complex organization requires the synchronization of many interrelated processes".[420]: p.3-1
A budget request is submitted to Congress.
Approved requests then await resource deliveries which then become available to the combatant commanders.
https://www.tradoc.army.mil/g357/
Lt. Col. Thomas "Bull" Holland, PhD, U.S. Army (15 January 2019) Proposed Army Futures Command Process Tenets Archived 3 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine
'Scientific research is a fundamentally different activity than technology development';
Incorporate 'scientific research into "Appendix C: Functional Concepts" and specify pathways for technology development';
Buy into the 'fail fast' mentality;
'6.3-funded projects to produce knowledge (technical data) that can be consumed by requirements developers as opposed to PMs';
Use 'evidence-based requirements process' (early hypothesis testing) with citations for evidence:
All projects will be executed in no less than two increments.
No new requirements once an increment is started.
Summary: 'advances on the battlefield requires comprehensive, coordinated changes in the entire acquisition system';
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2019-OLE/Jan/Army-Futures/
The RAND Corporation (2000) Discovery and Innovation: Federal Research and Development in the Fifty States, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico RAND MR1194 Appendix B: Government-Wide and DOD Definitions of R&D Archived 6 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine See Appendix B p.615 for DOD Financial Management Regulation (Volume 2B, Chapter 5) https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1194/MR1194.appb.pdf
Neil Hollenbeck and Benjamin Jensen (6 December 2017) Why the Army needs a Futures Command Archived 5 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine Enable a culture of experimentation, and develop concepts and technology together. https://warontherocks.com/2017/12/army-needs-futures-command/
Andrew Eversden (17 Dec 2021) Here's the Army's 24 programs in soldiers' hands by 2023
Precision Strike Missile (§ PrSM)
Extended Range Cannon Artillery (ERCA)
Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW) will not deploy by 1 Oct 2023.[76]
Mid-range capability (§ MRC) missile, also called Strategic Mid-Range Fires (SMRF)[77]
Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV)
Robotic Combat Vehicle (§ RCV)
Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF)
Future Unmanned Aircraft Systems/ Future Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System (FUAS)/(FTUAS)[78][79]
Integrated Tactical Network (§ ITN) unified with § echelons above brigade, and the multi-domain task forces
Common Operating Environment: Command Post Computing Environment[80]/Mounted Computed Environment (CPCE)/(MCE) See Common operational picture
Command Post Integrated Infrastructure (CPI2)
Mounted Assured Positioning, Navigation, and Timing System (MAPS)[81][82]
Dismounted Assured Positioning, Navigation, and Timing System (DAPS)[81]
Maneuver-Short Range Air Defense (M-SHORAD) using high-energy lasers
Indirect Fires Protection Capability: Iron Dome
Lower Tier Air and Missile Defense Sensor ([[Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System
Lower Tier Air and Missile Defense Sensor|§ LTAMDS]])[83] - Patriot radar replacement
Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense (§ IBCS)
Directed Energy Maneuver-Short Range Air Defense (DE M-SHORAD)[84] High energy lasers
Next Generation Squad Weapon (NGSW)
Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS)
Enhanced Night Vision Goggle – Binocular (ENVG-B)
Reconfigurable Virtual Collective Trainer (RVCT) - Synthetic training environment
IVAS Squad Immersive Virtual Trainer (SiVT) - Synthetic training environment
One World Terrain/ Training Management Tools/ Training Simulation Software (OWT) / (TMT) / (TSS) - Synthetic training environment,[85]
[74][75][86]
[87][88]
https://breakingdefense.com/2021/12/heres-the-armys-24-programs-in-soldiers-hands-by-2023/
In Future Vertical Lift, FARA and FLRAA are projected to be prototyped by 2028, with fielding by 2030.[89][90] The OMFV prototype is projected for 2025.[91]
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (13 Sep 2018) Futures Command Won't Hurt Oversight, Army Tells Congress Archived 14 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2018/09/futures-command-wont-hurt-oversight-army-tells-congress/
ASA(ALT) Weapon Systems Handbook 2018 update
/wiki/ASA(ALT)
ASA(ALT) (2018) Weapon Systems Handbook update Page 32 lists how the Weapon Systems Handbook is organized. 440 pages.
By Modernization priority
By Acquisition or Business System category (ACAT or BSC). The Weapon systems in each ACAT are sorted alphabetically by Weapon system name. Each weapon system might also be in several variants (Lettered); a weapon system's variants might be severally and simultaneously in the following phases of its Life Cycle, namely—°Materiel Solution Analysis; °Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction; °Engineering & Manufacturing Development; °Production & Deployment; °Operations & Support
ACAT I, II, III, IV are defined on page 404.[52][27][54][55][41]
/wiki/ASA(ALT)
The Army's unclassified Multi-Domain Operations (MDO) concept is "the combined arms employment of capabilities from all domains that create and exploit relative advantages to defeat enemy forces, achieve objectives and consolidate gains during competition, crisis, and armed conflict".[56] /wiki/Reorganization_plan_of_United_States_Army#Competition
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (7 May 2018) Permanent Evolution: SecArmy Esper On Futures Command Archived 5 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2018/05/permanent-evolution-secarmy-esper-on-futures-command-exclusive/
JP-1 Archived 26 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine p.xxi has the definition of operational control (OPCON). Note that "command authority may not be delegated" (COCOM being command authority). p.xxii has the definition of administrative control (ADCON): one application being coordinating authority.
see also C. Berry (3 May 2010) Understanding OPCON Archived 9 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine. (COCOM is the legal authority of a combatant commander (CCDR).) OPCON, on the other hand, "is derived from the authorities of COCOM and delineated in JP-1".
http://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp1_ch1.pdf
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (7 May 2018) Permanent Evolution: SecArmy Esper On Futures Command Archived 5 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2018/05/permanent-evolution-secarmy-esper-on-futures-command-exclusive/
Scott Maucione (19 July 2019) Army Futures Command fully operational, dinged by GAO on announcement Archived 3 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://federalnewsnetwork.com/army/2019/07/army-futures-command-fully-operational-dinged-by-gao-on-announcement/
Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (11 July 2019) "Embracing a new culture at Army Futures Command". www.army.mil. 11 July 2019. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/224201/embracing_a_new_culture_at_army_futures_command
"Army Futures Command Press Conference". DVIDS. Archived from the original on 27 August 2018. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://www.dvidshub.net/video/621108/army-futures-command-press-conference
Devon L. Suits, Army News Service Army (26 February 2019) FY20 budget proposal realigns $30 billion Archived 28 February 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/217813/army_fy20_budget_proposal_realigns_30_billion
Devon L. Suits, Army News Service Army (26 February 2019) FY20 budget proposal realigns $30 billion Archived 28 February 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/217813/army_fy20_budget_proposal_realigns_30_billion
Sydney J Freedberg Jr (29 May 2019) Army Big 6 Gets $10B More Over 2021-2025 Archived 29 May 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2019/05/army-big-6-gets-10b-more-over-2021-2025/
Michael A. Grinston, James C. McConville, and Ryan McCarthy(2019) 2019 Army Modernization Strategy Archived 30 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine revision 7, CFTs' 31 signature efforts /wiki/Michael_A._Grinston
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (19 September 2019) Can Army Control Costs Of Its New Weapons? Archived 20 September 2019 at the Wayback Machine Currently the Army has 692 programs of record https://breakingdefense.com/2019/09/can-army-control-costs-of-its-new-weapons/
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (14 March 2019) Army 'Big Six' Ramp Up in 2021: Learning From FCS Archived 3 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2019/03/army-big-six-ramp-up-in-2021-learning-from-fcs/
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (11 January 2019) 12 Moments Of Truth For Army Modernization In 2019 Archived 16 January 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2019/01/2019-forecast-12-moments-of-truth-for-army-modernization/
MDO Challenge (15 May 2019) *Start here* MDO 101 Archived 15 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine General explanation of multi-domain operations (MDO) for the layman https://community.apan.org/wg/aucoi/multi-domain-operations-in-education/w/wiki/25794/start-here---mdo-101/
America's Future Series (April 2023) GEN Mike Murray - Army Futures Command "What we got right" Archived 31 October 2023 at the Wayback Machine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4aXM4TjrduA
Sean Kimmons In first year, Futures Command grows from 12 to 24,000 personnel, Army News Service, 19 July 2019, archived from the original on 8 April 2023, retrieved 7 February 2024 https://www.army.mil/article/224744/in_first_year_futures_command_grows_from_12_to_24000_personnel
Freedberg Jr, Sydney J. (13 September 2018), Futures Command Won't Hurt Oversight, Army Tells Congress, Breakingdefense.com, archived from the original on 14 September 2018, retrieved 14 September 2018 https://breakingdefense.com/2018/09/futures-command-wont-hurt-oversight-army-tells-congress/
Futures Command (2022) xTechSearch Archived 3 August 2022 at the Wayback Machine The Army's ongoing search for capabilities https://www.arl.army.mil/xtechsearch/xtechsearch.html
The 2020 xTechSearch top ten semifinalists (who will each receive $120,000) are:[72]
Bounce Imaging, for a tactical throwable camera (self-orienting, pointable camera)
GeneCapture, for deployable medical tests
Inductive Ventures, for magnetic braking of helicopters
IoT/AI, for hardware IoT AI devices
LynQ Technologies, for a GPS beacon
KeriCure, for wound care
MEI Micro, for Micro Electronic-Mechanical System Inertial Measurement Unit (assured position, navigation, and timing—A-PNT)
Multiscale Systems, for meta-material
Novaa, for single-aperture antennas ( multi-band rather than 1 dedicated antenna per application)
Vita Inclinata, stabilized anti-spin hoisting for pulling injured people on a stretcher into a hovering helicopter
[71] /w/index.php?title=XTechSearch&action=edit&redlink=1
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (13 April 2020) COVID-19: Army Tries Prizes To Get Ventilator Tech ASAP Archived 14 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine breakingdefense.com https://breakingdefense.com/2020/04/covid-19-army-offers-prizes-for-new-ventilator-tech-asap/
Grinston, McConville, and McCarthy (2019) 2019 Army Modernization Strategy: Investing in the future Archived 30 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine 7 —Figure 3. Current Cross Functional Teams and Signature Efforts https://www.army.mil/e2/downloads/rv7/2019_army_modernization_strategy_final.pdf
"Chief of staff: Most signature systems to be fielded by 2023, people still No. 1". www.army.mil. 13 October 2021. Archived from the original on 16 October 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/251126/chief_of_staff_most_signature_systems_to_be_fielded_by_2023_people_still_no_1_priority
Andrew Eversden (17 Dec 2021) Here's the Army's 24 programs in soldiers' hands by 2023
Precision Strike Missile (§ PrSM)
Extended Range Cannon Artillery (ERCA)
Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon (LRHW) will not deploy by 1 Oct 2023.[76]
Mid-range capability (§ MRC) missile, also called Strategic Mid-Range Fires (SMRF)[77]
Armored Multi-Purpose Vehicle (AMPV)
Robotic Combat Vehicle (§ RCV)
Mobile Protected Firepower (MPF)
Future Unmanned Aircraft Systems/ Future Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System (FUAS)/(FTUAS)[78][79]
Integrated Tactical Network (§ ITN) unified with § echelons above brigade, and the multi-domain task forces
Common Operating Environment: Command Post Computing Environment[80]/Mounted Computed Environment (CPCE)/(MCE) See Common operational picture
Command Post Integrated Infrastructure (CPI2)
Mounted Assured Positioning, Navigation, and Timing System (MAPS)[81][82]
Dismounted Assured Positioning, Navigation, and Timing System (DAPS)[81]
Maneuver-Short Range Air Defense (M-SHORAD) using high-energy lasers
Indirect Fires Protection Capability: Iron Dome
Lower Tier Air and Missile Defense Sensor ([[Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System
Lower Tier Air and Missile Defense Sensor|§ LTAMDS]])[83] - Patriot radar replacement
Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense (§ IBCS)
Directed Energy Maneuver-Short Range Air Defense (DE M-SHORAD)[84] High energy lasers
Next Generation Squad Weapon (NGSW)
Integrated Visual Augmentation System (IVAS)
Enhanced Night Vision Goggle – Binocular (ENVG-B)
Reconfigurable Virtual Collective Trainer (RVCT) - Synthetic training environment
IVAS Squad Immersive Virtual Trainer (SiVT) - Synthetic training environment
One World Terrain/ Training Management Tools/ Training Simulation Software (OWT) / (TMT) / (TSS) - Synthetic training environment,[85]
[74][75][86]
[87][88]
https://breakingdefense.com/2021/12/heres-the-armys-24-programs-in-soldiers-hands-by-2023/
In Future Vertical Lift, FARA and FLRAA are projected to be prototyped by 2028, with fielding by 2030.[89][90] The OMFV prototype is projected for 2025.[91]
Judson, Jen (6 September 2022). "Futures Command faces identity crisis as Army shifts mission". Defense News. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 12 June 2023. https://www.defensenews.com/land/2022/09/06/futures-command-faces-identity-crisis-as-army-shifts-mission/
Andrew Eversden (15 Sep 2022) Wormuth: Here are the 6 areas the Army must be prepared for in 2030 Archived 15 September 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2022/09/wormuth-here-are-the-6-areas-the-army-must-be-prepared-for-in-2030/
Christine Wormuth, 25th Secretary of the Army (10 Oct 2022) AUSA 2022 Opening Ceremony Archived 9 May 2023 at the Wayback Machine hour 0:37:50 to 1:05:41 /wiki/Christine_Wormuth
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (November 22, 2019) SecArmy's Multi-Domain Kill Chain: Space-Cloud-AI Army Multi-Domain Operations Concept, December 2018 slide from TRADOC pamphlet 525-3-1 (Dec 2018).
Multi-domain operations (MDO) span multiple domains: cislunar space, land, air, maritime, cyber, and populations.
In September 2020 an ABMS Onramp demonstrated a specific scenario, which can be illustrated by the 5 red numbered bullet points from the slide in TRADOC pamphlet 525-3-1:
Competition— No overt hostilities are yet detected. Blue bar (force projection) is in standoff against red bar (threat).
Strategic Support area— National assets (blue) detect breaching of standoff by adversary (in red).
Close area support— blue assets hand-off to the combatant commands, who are to create effects visible to the adversary (in red).
Deep maneuver— blue combatant actions dis-integrate adversary efforts (per TRADOC pamphlet 525-3-1: "militarily compete, penetrate, dis-integrate, and exploit" the adversary); —Operational and Strategic deep fires create effects on the adversary. Adversary is further subject to defeat in detail, until adversaries perceive they are overmatched (no more red assets to expend).
Adversary retreats to standoff. The populations perceive that the adversary is defeated, for now. (Compare to Perkins' cycle, 'return to competition', in which deterrence has succeeded in avoiding a total war, in favor of pushing an adversary back to standoff (the red threat bar). Blue force projection still has overmatched red threat.)
https://breakingdefense.com/2019/11/secarmys-multi-domain-kill-chain-space-to-cloud-to-ai/
Patrick Tucker (14 Sep 2022) Ukraine War Offers Clues to Future War, Joint Chiefs Chairman Says Archived 17 September 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2022/09/ukraine-war-offers-clues-future-war-joint-chiefs-chairman-says/377150/
The Economist (30 Nov 2022) What is the war in Ukraine teaching Western armies? Archived 7 October 2023 at the Wayback Machine "It shows the importance of dispersal, firepower and stockpiles" https://www.economist.com/europe/2022/11/30/what-is-the-war-in-ukraine-teaching-western-armies?
Gen. David Goldfein and Gen. Jay Raymond (28 Feb 2020) America's future battle network is key to multidomain defense JADC2: " We cannot yet share data in a seamless and simultaneous way between the Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps or the Space Force" https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2020/02/27/americas-future-battle-network-is-key-to-multidomain-defense/
Colin Clark (18 Feb 2020) Gen. Hyten On The New American Way of War: All-Domain Operations (ADO)
"A computer-coordinated fight": in the air, land, sea, space, cyber, and the electromagnetic spectrum (EMS)
"forces from satellites to foot soldiers to submarines sharing battle data at machine-to-machine speed"
"it's the ability to integrate and effectively command and control all domains in a conflict or in a crisis seamlessly"—Gen. Hyten, Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs
All-Domain Operations (ADO) use global capabilities: "space, cyber, deterrent [the nuclear triad (for mutually assured destruction in the Cold War, an evolving concept in itself)], transportation, electromagnetic spectrum operations, missile defense"
https://breakingdefense.com/2020/02/gen-hyten-on-the-new-american-way-of-war-all-domain-operations/
Andrew Eversden (15 Sep 2022) Wormuth: Here are the 6 areas the Army must be prepared for in 2030 Archived 15 September 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2022/09/wormuth-here-are-the-6-areas-the-army-must-be-prepared-for-in-2030/
Joe Lacdan, Army News Service (24 Oct 2022) Army of 2030: Collaboration key to Army modernization Archived 26 October 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/261388/army_of_2030_collaboration_key_to_army_modernization
Chief of Staff paper #1, Headquarters, Department of the Army (16 March 2021) Army Multi-Domain Transformation: Ready to Win in Competition and Conflict Archived 16 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine Unclassified version by 40th Chief of Staff of the Army, Gen. James C. McConville https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/2021/03/23/eeac3d01/20210319-csa-paper-1-signed-print-version.pdf
Chief of Staff paper #2 (1 March 2021) The Army in Military Competition Archived 2 June 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/2021/03/29/bf6c30e6/csa-paper-2-the-army-in-military-competition.pdf
US Army Public Affairs (10 Oct 2022) AUSA Contemporary Military Forum: Army 2030 - Preparing Today for Tomorrow's Fight Archived 11 October 2022 at the Wayback Machine Gen. McConville, Gen.(Ret) Perkins, DepUnderSec Diaz, Gen. Rainey, LTG Beagle, Prof. Greer (SAMS) https://www.dvidshub.net/video/860148/ausa-contemporary-military-forum-army-2030-preparing-today-tomorrows-fight
Caitlin Kenny (10 Oct 2022) Divisions, Corps to Replace Brigades As Army's Wartime Formation Of Choice Archived 28 May 2023 at the Wayback Machine "Brigades that operated largely independently in Iraq and Afghanistan will fight as part of larger units in future conflicts, officials said". https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2022/10/divisions-corps-replace-brigades-armys-wartime-formation-choice/378234/
Jen Judson (29 Mar 2023) US Army has a 'gigantic problem' with logistics in the Indo-Pacific Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine AMC is lead, AFC sets requirements https://www.defensenews.com/land/2023/03/29/us-army-has-a-gigantic-problem-with-logistics-in-the-indo-pacific/
TRADOC (13 Apr 2022) The Operational Environment and the Changing Character of Warfare Archived 28 February 2022 at the Wayback Machine TP 525-92 https://adminpubs.tradoc.army.mil/pamphlets/TP525-92.pdf
Colin Demarest (21 Oct 2022) Project Convergence shows JADC2 alignment, leaders from 3 services say Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine Interoperations "show the services are aligned and not disjointed". https://www.defensenews.com/battlefield-tech/it-networks/2022/10/21/project-convergence-shows-jadc2-alignment-leaders-from-3-services-say/
Jason Cutshaw (5 Dec 2022) Experiment demos Army space capabilities Archived 5 October 2023 at the Wayback Machine to test 300 technologies https://www.army.mil/article/262533/experiment_demos_army_space_capabilities
Megan Eckstein and Colin Demarest (8 Dec 2022) Project Overmatch: US Navy preps to deploy secretive multidomain tech Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine https://www.defensenews.com/outlook/2022/12/05/project-overmatch-us-navy-preps-to-deploy-secretive-multidomain-tech/
Jen Judson (7 Feb 2023) Army sets sights on 2024 for next Project Convergence Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine https://www.defensenews.com/land/2023/02/07/army-sets-sights-on-2024-for-next-project-convergence/
Ashley Roque (8 Feb 2023) No Convergence in 2023: Army deliberating the path ahead for signature JADC2 exercise Archived 10 November 2023 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2023/02/no-convergence-in-2023-army-deliberating-the-path-ahead-for-signature-jadc2-exercise/
The CG,AFC is responsible for Force design (in the style of TRADOC's G357,[418] but applied to Force modernization, rather than training).[156] The Army's Force management model begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment, and the time available to bring the Current army to bear on the situation.[419] The AROC serves as a discussion forum of these factors.[156]
The Army G-8 and G-3/5/7 sit on the Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC), chaired by the Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA).[420]: diagram on p.559 [156][419]
The relevant strategy is provided by the Army's leadership to guide Army staff.[420]
The resources are "dictated by Congress".[419]
A DOTMLPF analysis models the factors necessary to change the Current force into a relevant Future force.[421]
A JCIDS/ACIDS[422] process identifies the gaps in capability between Current and Future force.
A Force design to meet the materiel gaps is underway.
An organization with the desired capabilities (manpower, materiel, training) is brought to bear on each gap.
AR 5-22(pdf) lists the Force modernization proponent for each Army branch, which can be a CoE or Branch proponent leader.
Staff uses Synchronization meetings[423]: minute 8:29 before seeking approval —HTAR Force Management 3-2b: "Managing change in any large, complex organization requires the synchronization of many interrelated processes".[420]: p.3-1
A budget request is submitted to Congress.
Approved requests then await resource deliveries which then become available to the combatant commanders.
https://www.tradoc.army.mil/g357/
Signal (10 Oct 2022) The Army Takes an Extended View to 2040 Archived 28 October 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://www.afcea.org/signal-media/army-takes-extended-view-2040
Christine Wormuth, 25th Secretary of the Army (10 Oct 2022) AUSA 2022 Opening Ceremony Archived 9 May 2023 at the Wayback Machine hour 0:37:50 to 1:05:41 /wiki/Christine_Wormuth
Joe Lacdan, Army News Service (24 Oct 2022) Army of 2030: Collaboration key to Army modernization Archived 26 October 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/261388/army_of_2030_collaboration_key_to_army_modernization
Jaspreet Gill (19 Oct 2022) As Project Convergence tries new 'tech gateways', 2 AI algorithms to transition to programs of record Archived 23 October 2022 at the Wayback Machine Todd Army 2040 https://breakingdefense.com/2022/10/with-new-tech-gateways-army-identifies-promising-ai-algorithms-at-project-convergence/
Parth Satam (15 Nov 2022) Decoding HIMARS' 'Design Philosophy', Latest Images Show Russia Could Be Analyzing Deadly US Rockets Archived 15 November 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://eurasiantimes.com/decoding-himars-design-philosophy-latest-images-show-russia-could-be-analyzing-deadly-us-rockets/
Maureena Thompson, Army Futures Command (3 January 2023) AFC hosts inaugural Army Future Readiness Conference Archived 5 January 2023 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/263056/afc_hosts_inaugural_army_future_readiness_conference
Jen Judson (8 Feb 2023) New Futures Command chief shifts main effort to designing Army of 2040 Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine https://www.defensenews.com/land/2023/02/08/new-futures-command-chief-shifts-main-effort-to-designing-army-of-2040/
John Ferrari (2 Mar 2023) Congress can put Army modernization back on track Archived 29 June 2023 at the Wayback Machine "AEI's John Ferrari asks five important questions that the Army needs to answer before committing to high-dollar procurments [sic] during its modernization push". https://breakingdefense.com/2023/03/congress-can-put-army-modernization-back-on-track/
Jen Judson (4 Apr 2023) The US Army moves to tweak its formations for future conflicts Archived 5 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine AFC to work with TRADOC https://news.yahoo.com/us-army-moves-tweak-formations-195558014.html
Jen Judson (31 July 2023) Army Futures Command drafting next operating concept Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine https://www.defensenews.com/land/2023/07/31/army-futures-command-drafting-next-operating-concept/
Joe Lacdan, Army News Service (19 May 2023) LANPAC 2023: Army faces most 'disruptive' period since World War II Archived 2 October 2023 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/266836/lanpac_2023_army_faces_most_disruptive_period_since_world_war_ii
The CG,AFC is responsible for Force design (in the style of TRADOC's G357,[418] but applied to Force modernization, rather than training).[156] The Army's Force management model begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment, and the time available to bring the Current army to bear on the situation.[419] The AROC serves as a discussion forum of these factors.[156]
The Army G-8 and G-3/5/7 sit on the Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC), chaired by the Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA).[420]: diagram on p.559 [156][419]
The relevant strategy is provided by the Army's leadership to guide Army staff.[420]
The resources are "dictated by Congress".[419]
A DOTMLPF analysis models the factors necessary to change the Current force into a relevant Future force.[421]
A JCIDS/ACIDS[422] process identifies the gaps in capability between Current and Future force.
A Force design to meet the materiel gaps is underway.
An organization with the desired capabilities (manpower, materiel, training) is brought to bear on each gap.
AR 5-22(pdf) lists the Force modernization proponent for each Army branch, which can be a CoE or Branch proponent leader.
Staff uses Synchronization meetings[423]: minute 8:29 before seeking approval —HTAR Force Management 3-2b: "Managing change in any large, complex organization requires the synchronization of many interrelated processes".[420]: p.3-1
A budget request is submitted to Congress.
Approved requests then await resource deliveries which then become available to the combatant commanders.
https://www.tradoc.army.mil/g357/
Ashley Rocque ( Army creates new 'All-Domain Sensing' cross-functional team out of 'success' of PNT team https://breakingdefense.com/2024/03/army-creates-new-all-domain-sensing-cross-functional-team-out-of-success-of-pnt-team/
Ashley Rocque ( Army creates new 'All-Domain Sensing' cross-functional team out of 'success' of PNT team https://breakingdefense.com/2024/03/army-creates-new-all-domain-sensing-cross-functional-team-out-of-success-of-pnt-team/
Ashley Rocque (9 Oct 2023) Army’s contested logistics team close to ‘fully’ operational: General Rainey https://breakingdefense.com/2024/03/army-creates-new-all-domain-sensing-cross-functional-team-out-of-success-of-pnt-team/
Jen Judson (29 Mar 2023) US Army has a 'gigantic problem' with logistics in the Indo-Pacific Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine AMC is lead, AFC sets requirements https://www.defensenews.com/land/2023/03/29/us-army-has-a-gigantic-problem-with-logistics-in-the-indo-pacific/
Army Futures Command YouTube clip (7 December 2018) ARCIC Transition of Authority Ceremony 7 Dec 2018 Archived 19 September 2019 at the Wayback Machine to Futures and Concepts Center, AFC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDTizak7Ja0
Army Futures Command FCC Leadership (20 February 2020). "Futures and Concepts Center". Futures and Concepts Center. Archived from the original on 9 May 2019. Retrieved 20 February 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20190509025829/https://futuresconcepts.army.mil/
US Army (15 August 2018) Army Futures Command aims to tap into innovative culture in Austin and beyond Archived 16 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/209932/army_futures_command_aims_to_tap_into_innovative_culture_in_austin_and_beyond
Federal News Radio Army has picked a location for its new Futures Command, but now comes the hard part Archived 2 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://federalnewsradio.com/on-dod/2018/08/the-army-has-picked-a-location-for-its-new-futures-command-but-now-comes-the-hard-part/
Lt. Col. Thomas "Bull" Holland, PhD, U.S. Army (15 January 2019) Proposed Army Futures Command Process Tenets Archived 3 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine
'Scientific research is a fundamentally different activity than technology development';
Incorporate 'scientific research into "Appendix C: Functional Concepts" and specify pathways for technology development';
Buy into the 'fail fast' mentality;
'6.3-funded projects to produce knowledge (technical data) that can be consumed by requirements developers as opposed to PMs';
Use 'evidence-based requirements process' (early hypothesis testing) with citations for evidence:
All projects will be executed in no less than two increments.
No new requirements once an increment is started.
Summary: 'advances on the battlefield requires comprehensive, coordinated changes in the entire acquisition system';
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2019-OLE/Jan/Army-Futures/
The RAND Corporation (2000) Discovery and Innovation: Federal Research and Development in the Fifty States, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico RAND MR1194 Appendix B: Government-Wide and DOD Definitions of R&D Archived 6 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine See Appendix B p.615 for DOD Financial Management Regulation (Volume 2B, Chapter 5) https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1194/MR1194.appb.pdf
Scott McKean (14 Jul 2021) AFC Pamphlet 71-20-9 Army Futures Command Concept for Command and Control - Pursuing decision dominance AFCC-C2 is the future communications network. 14 Jul 2021 see: FUTURES AND CONCEPTS CENTER resources /wiki/Scott_McKean
As an example, any number of effects can be weaponized (see p.1 The New York Times 2 September 2018 "Invisible strikes may be cause of envoy's ills", describing the Microwave auditory effect), or else countered. Hypersonic vehicles are a countermeasure to ballistic missiles. /wiki/Microwave_auditory_effect
BETSY WOODRUFF SWAN, ANDREW DESIDERIO, LARA SELIGMAN and ERIN BANCO (22 Apr 2021) Pentagon investigated suspected Russian directed-energy attacks on U.S. troops Archived 5 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://www.politico.com/news/2021/04/22/pentagon-russia-attacks-us-troops-484150
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (25 October 2017). "Can The Pentagon Protect Young Innovators?". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2017/10/can-the-pentagon-protect-young-innovators/
TRADOC Analysis Center. Combined Arms training center. Fort Leavenworth Archived 2 June 2018 at the Wayback Machine http://www.trac.army.mil/MS_TRAC.html
"Mission Command Battle Lab (MCBL)". usacac.army.mil. US Army Combined Arms Center. Archived from the original on 15 January 2018. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20180115054501/http://usacac.army.mil/organizations/mccoe/cdid/mcbl
CRS Insight (IN11019) (17 January 2019) The U.S. Army and Multi-Domain Operations Archived 26 July 2020 at the Wayback Machine Congressional Research Service (CRS)
Todd South (11 August 2019) This 3-star Army general explains what multi-domain operations mean for you Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine "think, assess and employ all domains when necessary"—General Wesley
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/IN11019.pdf
Argie Sarantinos-Perrin, CCDC HQ Public Affairs (31 January 2019) RDECOM transitions to Army Futures Command Archived 1 February 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/216858/rdecom_transitions_to_army_futures_command
Sydney Freedberg (10 Dec 2018) US Army's Brain Transplant: Futurists Move To Futures Command Archived 11 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2018/12/us-armys-brain-transplant-futurists-move-to-futures-command/
Army Futures Command YouTube clip (7 December 2018) ARCIC Transition of Authority Ceremony 7 Dec 2018 Archived 19 September 2019 at the Wayback Machine to Futures and Concepts Center, AFC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDTizak7Ja0
The capabilities as prioritized by the Chief of Staff, will use subject-matter experts (SMEs) in the realms of requirements, acquisition, science and technology, test, resourcing, costing, and sustainment, using CFTs for:
Improved long-range precision fires (artillery):—(Fort Sill, Oklahoma) Lead: BG John Rafferty ... PEO Ammunition (AMMO)
Next Generation Combat Vehicle—(Detroit Arsenal, Warren, Michigan) Lead: BG Geoffrey Norman Archived 1 July 2022 at the Wayback Machine ... PEO Ground Combat Systems (GCS)
Vertical lift platforms—(Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, Alabama) Lead: BG Wally Rugen ... PEO Aviation (AVN)
Mobile and expeditionary (usable in ground combat) communications network (Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland)
Network Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence—Lead: BG Jeth Rey ... PEO Command Control Communications Tactical (C3T)
Assured Position Navigation and Timing—(Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, Alabama) Lead: William B. Nelson, SES
Air and missile defense—(Fort Sill, Oklahoma) Lead: BG Brian Gibson, ... PEO Missiles and Space (M&S)
Soldier lethality
Soldier Lethality—(Fort Moore, Georgia) Lead: BG Larry Q. Burris, Jr. ... PEO Soldier
Synthetic Training Environment—(Orlando, Florida) Lead: BG William Glaser ... PEO Simulation, Training, & Instrumentation (STRI)
Contested logistics—(Huntsville, Alabama) Lead: Army Materiel Command (AMC) stood up in 2023
Above, 'dotted line' relationship (i.e., coordination) is denoted by a ' ... '
/wiki/Subject-matter_expert
"TRAC makes official move to Futures Command". www.army.mil. 6 December 2018. Archived from the original on 9 December 2018. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/214721/trac_makes_official_move_to_futures_command
TRADOC Analysis Center. Combined Arms training center. Fort Leavenworth Archived 2 June 2018 at the Wayback Machine http://www.trac.army.mil/MS_TRAC.html
Lea, Maj. Brett (5 September 2018), "Army establishes Futures Command; U.S. Army JMC at Fort Bliss is operational arm", Fort Bliss Bugle
"Multi-Domain Battle The Advent of Twenty-First Century War". www.armyupress.army.mil. Archived from the original on 6 September 2018. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/November-December-2017/Multi-Domain-Battle-The-Advent-of-Twenty-First-Century-War/
US Army (4 Sep 2018) U.S. Army Pacific Commander Gen. Robert Brown: State of the Pacific Archived 20 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZ9e38B4sxQ
Argie Sarantinos-Perrin, CCDC HQ Public Affairs (31 January 2019) RDECOM transitions to Army Futures Command Archived 1 February 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/216858/rdecom_transitions_to_army_futures_command
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (8 February 2019). "Army R&D Chief: 'I Don't Think We Went Far Enough' – But Futures Command Can". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2019/02/army-rd-chief-i-dont-think-we-went-far-enough-but-futures-command-can/
Freedberg, Jr. (31 Jan 2019) Army Completes Biggest Reorg In 45 Years: Can Futures Command End Weapons Disasters? Archived 12 February 2019 at the Wayback Machine "... another thing we've not done very well—is doing the prototyping and experimentation with soldiers from the beginning, so we got soldier input into a program before it ever becomes a program of record" —Gen. 'Mike' Murray https://breakingdefense.com/2019/01/can-futures-command-end-acquisition-disasters-as-army-completes-biggest-reorg-since-1973
CCDC Army Research Laboratory Public Affairs (29 April 2019) Army selects senior research scientist for terminal ballistics Archived 22 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine Fewer than 50 STs across the Army: An ST is a general-officer equivalent
U.S. Army CCDC Army Research Laboratory (18 September 2019) Army research uncovers law-like progression of weapons technologies--from a crossbowman to a tank Archived 1 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine
Jerome Aliotta (TARDEC) (6 September 2019) Army demos prototype manned fighting vehicle teamed with robotic combat vehicle platoon Archived 1 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine
Argie R. Sarantinos Perrin, CCDC (30 September 2019) Army reform drives innovation at CCDC Archived 1 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine
https://www.army.mil/article/221048/army_selects_senior_research_scientist_for_terminal_ballistics
Lt. Col. Thomas "Bull" Holland, PhD, U.S. Army (15 January 2019) Proposed Army Futures Command Process Tenets Archived 3 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine
'Scientific research is a fundamentally different activity than technology development';
Incorporate 'scientific research into "Appendix C: Functional Concepts" and specify pathways for technology development';
Buy into the 'fail fast' mentality;
'6.3-funded projects to produce knowledge (technical data) that can be consumed by requirements developers as opposed to PMs';
Use 'evidence-based requirements process' (early hypothesis testing) with citations for evidence:
All projects will be executed in no less than two increments.
No new requirements once an increment is started.
Summary: 'advances on the battlefield requires comprehensive, coordinated changes in the entire acquisition system';
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2019-OLE/Jan/Army-Futures/
The RAND Corporation (2000) Discovery and Innovation: Federal Research and Development in the Fifty States, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico RAND MR1194 Appendix B: Government-Wide and DOD Definitions of R&D Archived 6 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine See Appendix B p.615 for DOD Financial Management Regulation (Volume 2B, Chapter 5) https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1194/MR1194.appb.pdf
The Combat Systems Directorate[128] was to be led by the ASA(ALT)'s Principal Military Deputy [135][136] (Principal Military Deputy (PMILDEP) to the ASA(ALT)) [14]: AD2018-15, 6b:PMILDEP will additionally be AFC director, Combat Systems [137] who will produce those developed solutions and seek feedback.[52][138] In 2022, AD2018-15 was rescinded by Army Directive AD2022-07,[139] which in turn is subject to rescission 180 days after passage of FY2023 NDAA.[140][141]
The CG,AFC is responsible for Force design (in the style of TRADOC's G357,[418] but applied to Force modernization, rather than training).[156] The Army's Force management model begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment, and the time available to bring the Current army to bear on the situation.[419] The AROC serves as a discussion forum of these factors.[156]
The Army G-8 and G-3/5/7 sit on the Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC), chaired by the Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA).[420]: diagram on p.559 [156][419]
The relevant strategy is provided by the Army's leadership to guide Army staff.[420]
The resources are "dictated by Congress".[419]
A DOTMLPF analysis models the factors necessary to change the Current force into a relevant Future force.[421]
A JCIDS/ACIDS[422] process identifies the gaps in capability between Current and Future force.
A Force design to meet the materiel gaps is underway.
An organization with the desired capabilities (manpower, materiel, training) is brought to bear on each gap.
AR 5-22(pdf) lists the Force modernization proponent for each Army branch, which can be a CoE or Branch proponent leader.
Staff uses Synchronization meetings[423]: minute 8:29 before seeking approval —HTAR Force Management 3-2b: "Managing change in any large, complex organization requires the synchronization of many interrelated processes".[420]: p.3-1
A budget request is submitted to Congress.
Approved requests then await resource deliveries which then become available to the combatant commanders.
https://www.tradoc.army.mil/g357/
Myers (27 March 2018) Abrams: Army units will be tasked to work on each of Futures Command's priorities Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2018/03/27/abrams-army-units-will-be-tasked-to-work-on-each-of-futures-commands-priorities/
Arpi Dilanian and Matthew Howard (18 July 2019) The Cheese Has Moved: An Interview With Lt. Gen. Paul Ostrowski Archived 21 July 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/223739/the_cheese_has_moved_an_interview_with_lt_gen_paul_ostrowski
"Ft Meade Soundoff! (19 July 2018) New site for Army Futures Command". Archived from the original on 6 September 2018. Retrieved 6 September 2018. https://ftmeadesoundoff.com/communitynews/news/new-site-army-futures-command/
Judson, Jen (29 March 2023). "US Army forms new modernization team to tackle contested logistics". Defense News. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://www.defensenews.com/land/2023/03/29/us-army-forms-new-modernization-team-to-tackle-contested-logistics/
Jen Judson (29 Mar 2023) US Army has a 'gigantic problem' with logistics in the Indo-Pacific Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine AMC is lead, AFC sets requirements https://www.defensenews.com/land/2023/03/29/us-army-has-a-gigantic-problem-with-logistics-in-the-indo-pacific/
Ashley Rocque (7 Aug 2023) From petroleum pipes to pest problems, what a US Army 2-star learned from Talisman Sabre 23 Archived 7 August 2023 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2023/08/from-petroleum-pipes-to-pest-problems-what-a-us-army-2-star-learned-from-talisman-sabre-23/
Ashley Roque (31 Mar 2023) Army to use Pacific Pathways to test assumptions about ‘contested logistics,’ prepositioned stocks Archived 1 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2023/03/army-to-use-pacific-pathways-to-test-assumptions-about-contested-logistics-prepositioned-stocks/
Jen Judson (31 Mar 2023) Army Materiel Command boss says logistics are key to future warfare Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/global-force-symposium/2023/03/31/army-materiel-command-boss-says-logistics-are-key-to-future-warfare/
Scott Maucione (14 Sep 2018) Army leaders ask for trust in lieu of metrics for Futures Command Archived 17 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://federalnewsradio.com/army/2018/09/army-leaders-ask-for-trust-in-lieu-of-metrics-for-futures-command/
"Allies to join Army Futures Command". www.army.mil. 8 April 2019. Archived from the original on 8 April 2019. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/219670/allies_to_join_army_futures_command
Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (11 July 2019) "Embracing a new culture at Army Futures Command". www.army.mil. 11 July 2019. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/224201/embracing_a_new_culture_at_army_futures_command
Freedberg Jr, Sydney (14 August 2018). "Inside Army Futures Command: CFT Chiefs Take Charge". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2018/08/inside-army-futures-command-cross-functional-teams-take-root/
The capabilities as prioritized by the Chief of Staff, will use subject-matter experts (SMEs) in the realms of requirements, acquisition, science and technology, test, resourcing, costing, and sustainment, using CFTs for:
Improved long-range precision fires (artillery):—(Fort Sill, Oklahoma) Lead: BG John Rafferty ... PEO Ammunition (AMMO)
Next Generation Combat Vehicle—(Detroit Arsenal, Warren, Michigan) Lead: BG Geoffrey Norman Archived 1 July 2022 at the Wayback Machine ... PEO Ground Combat Systems (GCS)
Vertical lift platforms—(Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, Alabama) Lead: BG Wally Rugen ... PEO Aviation (AVN)
Mobile and expeditionary (usable in ground combat) communications network (Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland)
Network Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence—Lead: BG Jeth Rey ... PEO Command Control Communications Tactical (C3T)
Assured Position Navigation and Timing—(Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, Alabama) Lead: William B. Nelson, SES
Air and missile defense—(Fort Sill, Oklahoma) Lead: BG Brian Gibson, ... PEO Missiles and Space (M&S)
Soldier lethality
Soldier Lethality—(Fort Moore, Georgia) Lead: BG Larry Q. Burris, Jr. ... PEO Soldier
Synthetic Training Environment—(Orlando, Florida) Lead: BG William Glaser ... PEO Simulation, Training, & Instrumentation (STRI)
Contested logistics—(Huntsville, Alabama) Lead: Army Materiel Command (AMC) stood up in 2023
Above, 'dotted line' relationship (i.e., coordination) is denoted by a ' ... '
/wiki/Subject-matter_expert
Freedberg Jr, Sydney (14 August 2018). "Inside Army Futures Command: CFT Chiefs Take Charge". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2018/08/inside-army-futures-command-cross-functional-teams-take-root/
US Army (6 Oct 2017) Army Directive 2017-24 (Cross-Functional Team Pilot In Support of Materiel Development) Archived 27 July 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN6101_AD2017-24_Web_Final.pdf
The CG,AFC is responsible for Force design (in the style of TRADOC's G357,[418] but applied to Force modernization, rather than training).[156] The Army's Force management model begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment, and the time available to bring the Current army to bear on the situation.[419] The AROC serves as a discussion forum of these factors.[156]
The Army G-8 and G-3/5/7 sit on the Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC), chaired by the Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA).[420]: diagram on p.559 [156][419]
The relevant strategy is provided by the Army's leadership to guide Army staff.[420]
The resources are "dictated by Congress".[419]
A DOTMLPF analysis models the factors necessary to change the Current force into a relevant Future force.[421]
A JCIDS/ACIDS[422] process identifies the gaps in capability between Current and Future force.
A Force design to meet the materiel gaps is underway.
An organization with the desired capabilities (manpower, materiel, training) is brought to bear on each gap.
AR 5-22(pdf) lists the Force modernization proponent for each Army branch, which can be a CoE or Branch proponent leader.
Staff uses Synchronization meetings[423]: minute 8:29 before seeking approval —HTAR Force Management 3-2b: "Managing change in any large, complex organization requires the synchronization of many interrelated processes".[420]: p.3-1
A budget request is submitted to Congress.
Approved requests then await resource deliveries which then become available to the combatant commanders.
https://www.tradoc.army.mil/g357/
Headquarters, Department of the Army (29 Jun 2021) Army Regulation 71–9 Force Management. Warfighting Capabilities Determination Archived 23 October 2022 at the Wayback Machine °1-6c, p.1) tasks for CG,AFC; °2-24 p.13) CG,AFC is a principal member of AROC, with 43 duties a through qq; °3-1 ch.3 pp20-21) AROC is a forum for requirements decisions (RDF); °4-1 p.24) CG,AFC is responsible for force design; °6-4 p39) figure 6-1 Deliberate staffing and review process; figures for more staffing and review processes follow. https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN31331-AR_71-9-000-WEB-1.pdf
Research, Development, and Acquisition AR 71–9 (2009) Warfighting Capabilities Determination Archived 22 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine Aug 15, 2019 update https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN11041_AR71-9_FINAL.pdf
HQDA (3 May 2022) Army Directive 2022-07 (Army Modernization Roles and Responsibilities) Archived 7 July 2022 at the Wayback Machine AD2022-07 is 6 pages https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN35370-ARMY_DIR_2022-07-000-WEB-1.pdf
Research, Development, and Acquisition (22 Jul 2011) Army Acquisition Policy Archived 22 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine AR 70-1 https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/ccap/cc/jcchb/Files/FormsPubsRegs/Pubs/Army%20Regulation%2070-1.pdf
Jared Serbu (11 Mar 2016) Army puts its chief of staff 'at the center' of acquisition decisions Archived 22 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://federalnewsnetwork.com/army/2016/03/army-puts-chief-staff-center-acquisition-decisions/
USAASC, Army ALT Magazine, Best Practices (16 February 2018) A Model and Process for Transitioning Urgent Acquisition Archived 22 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine - USAASC (United States Army Acquisition Corps) https://asc.army.mil/web/news-a-model-and-process-for-transitioning-urgent-acquisition/
Lt. Col. Thomas "Bull" Holland, PhD, U.S. Army (15 January 2019) Proposed Army Futures Command Process Tenets Archived 3 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine
'Scientific research is a fundamentally different activity than technology development';
Incorporate 'scientific research into "Appendix C: Functional Concepts" and specify pathways for technology development';
Buy into the 'fail fast' mentality;
'6.3-funded projects to produce knowledge (technical data) that can be consumed by requirements developers as opposed to PMs';
Use 'evidence-based requirements process' (early hypothesis testing) with citations for evidence:
All projects will be executed in no less than two increments.
No new requirements once an increment is started.
Summary: 'advances on the battlefield requires comprehensive, coordinated changes in the entire acquisition system';
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2019-OLE/Jan/Army-Futures/
The RAND Corporation (2000) Discovery and Innovation: Federal Research and Development in the Fifty States, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico RAND MR1194 Appendix B: Government-Wide and DOD Definitions of R&D Archived 6 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine See Appendix B p.615 for DOD Financial Management Regulation (Volume 2B, Chapter 5) https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1194/MR1194.appb.pdf
Jen Judson (6 Sep 2022) Futures Command faces identity crisis as Army shifts mission Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine https://www.defensenews.com/land/2022/09/06/futures-command-faces-identity-crisis-as-army-shifts-mission/
Andrew Eversden (24 Jun 2022) House lawmakers ask Army: Who's in charge of massive modernization program? Archived 7 September 2022 at the Wayback Machine 180 day timer after FY2023 NDAA takes effect, could trigger rescission of AD2022-07. To find an Army document, enter the pub form identifier, such as "ar 71-9" in the menu: ARMY PUBLISHING INDEX Archived 16 November 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2022/06/house-lawmakers-ask-army-whos-in-charge-of-massive-modernization-program/
Judson, Jen (6 September 2022). "Army's next Futures Command leader could come 'in short order'". Defense News. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://www.defensenews.com/land/2022/09/06/armys-next-futures-command-leader-could-come-in-short-order/
Eversden, Andrew (7 September 2022). "After months of delay, Army nominates new commander for Futures Command". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2022/09/after-months-of-delay-army-nominates-new-commander-for-futures-command/
"Army announces new Futures Command leader as Texas senator calls for clarity on innovating force". Stars and Stripes. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://www.stripes.com/branches/army/2022-09-08/army-futures-command-ndaa-texas-7260624.html
Sydney Freedberg (29 August 2018) Army Futures Command: $100M, 500 Staff, & Access To Top Leaders Archived 31 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2018/08/army-futures-command-100m-500-staff-access-to-top-leaders/
Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (11 July 2019) "Embracing a new culture at Army Futures Command". www.army.mil. 11 July 2019. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/224201/embracing_a_new_culture_at_army_futures_command
Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (11 July 2019) "Embracing a new culture at Army Futures Command". www.army.mil. 11 July 2019. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/224201/embracing_a_new_culture_at_army_futures_command
SARA ARL (29 Jun 2021) Army program introduces new software for robot autonomy Archived 1 July 2021 at the Wayback Machine AIMM ERP (Artificial Intelligence for Maneuver and Mobility Essential Research Program) https://www.army.mil/article/247978/army_program_introduces_new_software_for_robot_autonomy
"Army Futures Command Press Conference". DVIDS. Archived from the original on 27 August 2018. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://www.dvidshub.net/video/621108/army-futures-command-press-conference
Sean Kimmons "Army Futures Command aims to tap into innovative culture in Austin and beyond", Army News Service, 15 August 2018, archived from the original on 16 August 2018, retrieved 16 August 2018 https://www.army.mil/article/209932/army_futures_command_aims_to_tap_into_innovative_culture_in_austin_and_beyond
Lamothe, Dan (14 July 2018), "Why the Army decided to put its new high-tech Futures Command in Texas", Washington Post, archived from the original on 5 September 2018, retrieved 5 September 2018 https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2018/07/14/understanding-the-armys-reasons-for-putting-its-new-high-tech-futures-command-in-texas/
Lea, Maj. Brett (5 September 2018), "Army establishes Futures Command; U.S. Army JMC at Fort Bliss is operational arm", Fort Bliss Bugle
US Army (15 August 2018) Army Futures Command aims to tap into innovative culture in Austin and beyond Archived 16 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/209932/army_futures_command_aims_to_tap_into_innovative_culture_in_austin_and_beyond
Technology Review (19 December 2016) The Pentagon's Innovation Experiment Archived 19 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.technologyreview.com/s/603084/the-pentagons-innovation-experiment/
Sean Kimmons "Army Futures Command aims to tap into innovative culture in Austin and beyond", Army News Service, 15 August 2018, archived from the original on 16 August 2018, retrieved 16 August 2018 https://www.army.mil/article/209932/army_futures_command_aims_to_tap_into_innovative_culture_in_austin_and_beyond
University of Texas System (13 July 2018) University of Texas System to serve as home base for U.S. Army Futures Command Archived 19 July 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.utsystem.edu/news/2018/07/13/university-texas-system-serve-home-base-us-army-futures-command
Ralph K.M. Haurwitz - American-Statesman Staff (10 August 2018) UT regents give Army's Futures Command free use of space temporarily Archived 10 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.mystatesman.com/news/local/regents-give-army-futures-command-free-use-space-temporarily/Vg3OqBPmFazj5LXcNrgkHK/
Lt. Col. Thomas "Bull" Holland, PhD, U.S. Army (15 January 2019) Proposed Army Futures Command Process Tenets Archived 3 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine
'Scientific research is a fundamentally different activity than technology development';
Incorporate 'scientific research into "Appendix C: Functional Concepts" and specify pathways for technology development';
Buy into the 'fail fast' mentality;
'6.3-funded projects to produce knowledge (technical data) that can be consumed by requirements developers as opposed to PMs';
Use 'evidence-based requirements process' (early hypothesis testing) with citations for evidence:
All projects will be executed in no less than two increments.
No new requirements once an increment is started.
Summary: 'advances on the battlefield requires comprehensive, coordinated changes in the entire acquisition system';
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2019-OLE/Jan/Army-Futures/
The RAND Corporation (2000) Discovery and Innovation: Federal Research and Development in the Fifty States, District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico RAND MR1194 Appendix B: Government-Wide and DOD Definitions of R&D Archived 6 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine See Appendix B p.615 for DOD Financial Management Regulation (Volume 2B, Chapter 5) https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1194/MR1194.appb.pdf
Army Futures Command YouTube clip (7 December 2018) ARCIC Transition of Authority Ceremony 7 Dec 2018 Archived 19 September 2019 at the Wayback Machine to Futures and Concepts Center, AFC https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDTizak7Ja0
Lea, Maj. Brett (5 September 2018), "Army establishes Futures Command; U.S. Army JMC at Fort Bliss is operational arm", Fort Bliss Bugle
"Team White Sands Organizations". www.wsmr.army.mil. Archived from the original on 3 December 2019. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20191203200750/https://www.wsmr.army.mil/testcenter/twso/Pages/default.aspx
"Locations and Facilities – DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory". www.arl.army.mil. Archived from the original on 25 December 2021. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://arl.devcom.army.mil/who-we-are/
"TRAC makes official move to Futures Command". www.army.mil. 6 December 2018. Archived from the original on 9 December 2018. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/214721/trac_makes_official_move_to_futures_command
"DoD (16 May 2018) Army Officials Testify on FY 2019 Budget Request". YouTube. 16 May 2018. Archived from the original on 6 June 2019. Retrieved 9 March 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIhC4zswW8I
"Mission Command Battle Lab (MCBL)". usacac.army.mil. US Army Combined Arms Center. Archived from the original on 15 January 2018. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20180115054501/http://usacac.army.mil/organizations/mccoe/cdid/mcbl
Judson, Jen (26 February 2018). "US Army's war-gaming is under-resourced, three-star says". Defense News. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://www.defensenews.com/land/2018/02/26/armys-conceptual-experimentation-is-under-resourced-three-star-says/
Maj. Chris Parker, Dr. Paul Reese, Director, Fielded Force Integration Division, COL E.J. Karlberg, Director, Combined Arms Integration Directorate, and Mr. Rich Creed, Director, Combined Arms Doctrine Directorate, Breaking Doctrine podcast at Fort Leavenworth (2020) Breaking Doctrine: Episode 14 - Transitioning the Army to MDO Archived 12 November 2022 at the Wayback Machine 1:02:44 How a Concept becomes Doctrine at TRADOC Combined Arms Center, Fort Leavenworth DOTMLPF-P https://podcast.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/cadd/Episode%2014/BREAKING%20DOCTRINE%20-%20Transitioning%20the%20Army%20to%20MDO.mp3
Headquarters, Dept of the Army (July 2019) ADP 6-0 Mission Command: Command and Control of Army Forces Archived 12 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine 4 chapters. See also ADP 3-0; ADP 6-22; FM 6-22; ADP 1-1; and ADP 5-0 https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN18314_ADP%206-0%20FINAL%20WEB.pdf
Todd South (13 September 2019) Massive simulation shows the need for speed in multi-domain ops Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine "400 participants working with 55 formations, 64 concepts and 150 capabilities" https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2019/09/12/massive-simulation-shows-the-need-for-speed-in-multi-domain-ops/
"Mission Command Center Of Excellence (MC-CoE CDID)". Archived from the original on 8 February 2018. Retrieved 6 September 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20180208184338/http://usacac.army.mil/organizations/mccoe/cdid
"TRAC makes official move to Futures Command". www.army.mil. 6 December 2018. Archived from the original on 9 December 2018. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/214721/trac_makes_official_move_to_futures_command
TRADOC Analysis Center. Combined Arms training center. Fort Leavenworth Archived 2 June 2018 at the Wayback Machine http://www.trac.army.mil/MS_TRAC.html
Maj. Gen. Maria R. Gervais (31 August 2018) The Synthetic Training Environment revolutionizes sustainment training Archived 11 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine /wiki/Maria_R._Gervais
Jacqueline M. Hames and Margaret C. Roth (14 January 2019) Virtual battlefield represents future of training Archived 15 January 2019 at the Wayback Machine Training as a service; more content at scale needed. https://www.army.mil/article/216068/virtual_battlefield_represents_future_of_training
Army ALT Magazine (29 January 2019) THEN AND NOW: TRAINING FOR THE FUTURE Archived 3 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine critique https://asc.army.mil/web/news-alt-jfm19-then-and-now-training-for-the-future/
"STE CFT Cuts Ribbon in Orlando". www.army.mil. 18 March 2019. Archived from the original on 25 March 2019. Retrieved 14 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/218753/ste_cft_cuts_ribbon_in_orlando
"Army pursuing improved realism in live and virtual training". www.army.mil. 4 December 2019. Archived from the original on 5 December 2019. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/230567/army_pursuing_improved_realism_in_live_and_virtual_training
Jen Judson (17 May 2019) US Army's jumping to the next level in virtual training Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine reconfigurable virtual collective trainers (RVCTs) https://www.defensenews.com/land/2019/05/17/us-armys-jumping-to-next-level-in-virtual-training-world/
ASA(ALT) Weapon Systems Handbook 2018 update
/wiki/ASA(ALT)
ASA(ALT) (2018) Weapon Systems Handbook update Page 32 lists how the Weapon Systems Handbook is organized. 440 pages.
By Modernization priority
By Acquisition or Business System category (ACAT or BSC). The Weapon systems in each ACAT are sorted alphabetically by Weapon system name. Each weapon system might also be in several variants (Lettered); a weapon system's variants might be severally and simultaneously in the following phases of its Life Cycle, namely—°Materiel Solution Analysis; °Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction; °Engineering & Manufacturing Development; °Production & Deployment; °Operations & Support
ACAT I, II, III, IV are defined on page 404.[52][27][54][55][41]
/wiki/ASA(ALT)
"Cyber CoE - (its CDID)". Archived from the original on 9 August 2020. Retrieved 5 September 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20200809223923/https://cybercoe.army.mil/index.php/direct-reporting-units/cdid
David Vergun (29 March 2018) Army network modernization efforts spearheaded by new Cross-Functional Teams. The Army conducts a network demonstration at Fort Bliss, Texas. The Army is pursuing network modernization through Cross-Functional Teams. Archived 11 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine http://apgnews.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf-light-viewer/6613-pdfs/page-00013.pdf
"Maneuver CoE - (its CDID and Battle Lab)". Archived from the original on 5 September 2018. Retrieved 5 September 2018. https://www.benning.army.mil/MCoE/
"Bob Purtiman, NGCV Cross-Functional Team (17 September 2018) Preparing for future battlefields: The Next Generation Combat Vehicle". 17 September 2018. Archived from the original on 19 September 2018. Retrieved 18 September 2018. https://www.army.mil/article/211236/preparing_for_future_battlefields_the_next_generation_combat_vehicle
"Aviation CoE - (its CDID)". Archived from the original on 15 October 2018. Retrieved 5 September 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20181015100751/http://www.rucker.army.mil/usaace/directorates/cdid/index.html
"Aviation Industry Days: Army Aviation aims for more lethal Multi-Domain Operations capability". www.army.mil. August 2019. Archived from the original on 6 August 2019. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/225269/aviation_industry_days_army_aviation_aims_for_more_lethal_multi_domain_operations_capability
Matthew Murch, Futures and Concepts Center (30 Jan 2023) Fires CDID: Supporting war-winning future readiness Archived 2 February 2023 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/263570/fires_cdid_supporting_war_winning_future_readiness
"Fires CoE - (its CDID and Battle Lab)". Archived from the original on 24 August 2018. Retrieved 5 September 2018. https://sill-www.army.mil/cdid/index.html
Col. Yi Se Gwon, Fort Sill Fires Bulletin (September–October 2018) The Army Multi-Domain Targeting Center
Army Multi-Domain Targeting Center (16 July 2019) Target Mensuration Only Archived 25 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine TMO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4PHht7nSsk
Maj. Anthony Clas, 3rd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Armored Division Public Affairs: (SEPTEMBER 4, 2019) Target Mensuration course: Bulldog Brigade trains target acquisition with precision Target Mensuration Only (TMO) Including TMO in a unit training plan
Maj. Anthony Clas (28 August 2019) Bulldog Brigade Trains Target Acquisition with Precision
https://www.army.mil/article/226393/bulldog_brigade_trains_target_acquisition_with_precision
Mitch Meador, Fort Sill Tribune (August 27, 2020) Lawton Fort Sill welcomes 'Fires Five,' families Archived 29 October 2020 at the Wayback Machine
DOTMLPF-P formulated at Fort Sill—Mitch Meador, Fort Sill Tribune (August 13, 2020) Ceremony recognizes new Air Defense Artillery capability manager Archived 29 November 2020 at the Wayback Machine
https://www.army.mil/article/238566/lawton_fort_sill_welcomes_fires_five_families
"Karen Flowers, Fort Sill Tribune (4 September 2020) Air defense Army Capability Manager gets new director". 4 September 2020. Archived from the original on 16 September 2020. Retrieved 17 September 2020. https://www.army.mil/article/238797/air_defense_army_capability_manager_gets_new_director
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (11 September 2018) Aiming The Army's Thousand-Mile Missiles Multi-domain Ft Sill https://breakingdefense.com/2018/09/aiming-the-armys-thousand-mile-missiles/
Col. Yi Se Gwon, Fort Sill Fires Bulletin (September–October 2018) The Army Multi-Domain Targeting Center
"Intelligence CoE - no information on its CDID". 14 July 2017. Archived from the original on 5 September 2018. Retrieved 5 September 2018. https://www.army.mil/article/190910/usaicoe_fort_huachuca_command_changes_hands
"Maneuver Support CoE - (its CDID and Battle Lab)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 February 2017. Retrieved 17 September 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20170209171036/https://www.wood.army.mil/newweb/documents/cdid2012.pdf
Sustainment CoE CDID not found https://cascom.army.mil/s_staff/cpg/
APG Guide (12 January 2019) Aberdeen Proving Ground 2019 Your road map to the 'Home of Innovation' Archived 7 June 2019 at the Wayback Machine with more than 90 tenant organizations https://www.apgnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/APG-Guide-January-10-2019-1.pdf
PEO Command Control Communications - Tactical (PEO C3T) (12 September 2018) ASA(ALT) MilDep talks APG's role in Futures Command Archived 18 February 2019 at the Wayback Machine Paul Ostrowski is PMILDEP to ASA(ALT) http://apgnews.com/inside-the-innovation/asaalt-mildep-talks-apgs-role-in-futures-command/
Argie Sarantinos-Perrin, CCDC HQ Public Affairs (31 January 2019) RDECOM transitions to Army Futures Command Archived 1 February 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/216858/rdecom_transitions_to_army_futures_command
Suits, Devon L. (22 August 2019), Army showcases new electronic warfare tech, Army News Service, archived from the original on 26 August 2019, retrieved 26 August 2019 https://www.army.mil/article/226082/army_showcases_new_electronic_warfare_tech
Caitlin O'Neill, PM PNT staff writer (17 November 2017) Army's PNT programs transition to PEO IEW&S Archived 24 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/197066/armys_pnt_programs_transition_to_peo_iews
Dan Lafontaine, C5ISR Center Public Affairs (19 November 2019) C5ISR Center hosts CCDC commander for town hall, lab tours Archived 23 November 2019 at the Wayback Machine "a renewed emphasis on collaboration across CCDC's eight research centers" https://www.army.mil/article/230030/c5isr_center_hosts_ccdc_commander_for_town_hall_lab_tours
Suits, Devon L. (22 August 2019), Army showcases new electronic warfare tech, Army News Service, archived from the original on 26 August 2019, retrieved 26 August 2019 https://www.army.mil/article/226082/army_showcases_new_electronic_warfare_tech
Andrew Eversden (25 Oct 2021) Army Seeks 'Cutting Edge' Network-Aided PNT Technologies For Battle Archived 8 December 2023 at the Wayback Machine
Army Applications Lab (19 Oct 2021) Broad Agency Announcement Special Notice W911NF-19-S-0004 Network Aided Position Navigation and Timing solutions for dismounted Soldiers Archived 5 October 2023 at the Wayback Machine
https://breakingdefense.com/2021/10/army-seeks-cutting-edge-network-aided-pnt-technologies-for-battle/
Theresa Hitchens (1 Nov 2021) Sandia's Atomic 'Avocado' Could Allow GPS-Free PNT Archived 5 October 2023 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2021/11/sandias-atomic-avocado-could-allow-gps-free-pnt/
Tobias Naegele (27 Nov 2022) Q&A: The New Chief of Space Operations on Empowering the Force Archived 29 November 2022 at the Wayback Machine "one B-2 hits 80 independent targets because of GPS".—Gen. B.Chance Saltzman, Space Force https://www.airandspaceforces.com/qa-the-new-chief-of-space-operations-on-empowering-the-force/
APG Guide (12 January 2019) Aberdeen Proving Ground 2019 Your road map to the 'Home of Innovation' Archived 7 June 2019 at the Wayback Machine with more than 90 tenant organizations https://www.apgnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/APG-Guide-January-10-2019-1.pdf
Maj. Gen. Cedric T. Wins, CG RDECOM (25 September 2018) RDECOM's road map to modernizing the Army: Long-range precision fires Archived 6 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine First in a series /wiki/Cedric_T._Wins
RCCTO is located in Huntsville (26 August 2019): RCCTO- About us Archived 24 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine
Tolson, Amy (10 December 2019), CCDC commanding general pays first visit to Aviation, Missile Center, Aviation & Missile Center Public Affairs, archived from the original on 30 April 2023, retrieved 20 December 2019
Lee Roop (17 Sep 2019) Lockheed Martin opens plant to test hypersonics in Alabama Archived 20 September 2019 at the Wayback Machine
https://rapidcapabilitiesoffice.army.mil/about/
Thomas Brading, Army News Service (23 August 2019) Soldiers 'at the heart of' modernizing warfighter gear Archived 26 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/226075/soldiers_at_the_heart_of_modernizing_warfighter_gear
Army Research Laboratory Public Affairs (25 February 2019) Army-funded researcher wins Nobel Prize Archived 6 March 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/217754/army_funded_researcher_wins_nobel_prize
Argie Sarantinos-Perrin, CCDC (21 August 2019) Army develops cold spray technology to repair Bradley gun mounts Archived 29 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/225994/army_begins_transitioning_cold_spray_technology_for_bradley_turret_gun_mount_repairs
Army Research Laboratory (ARL) "Army releases top 10 list of coolest science, technology advances". www.army.mil. 23 December 2019. Archived from the original on 24 December 2019. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20191224162040/https://www.army.mil/article/231039/army_releases_top_10_list_of_coolest_science_technology_advances
U.S. Army CCDC Army Research Laboratory Public Affairs (3 February 2020) Army develops big data approach to neuroscience Archived 11 February 2020 at the Wayback Machine Dr. Jonathan Touryan, co-author
The Cognition and Neuroergonomics Collaborative Technology Alliance
Automated EEG mega-analysis I: Spectral and amplitude characteristics across studies NeuroImage Volume 20, 15 February 2020, 116361
(19 Sep 2018) Automated EEG mega-analysis II: Cognitive aspects of event related features Archived 6 February 2020 at the Wayback Machine
https://www.army.mil/article/232275/army_develops_big_data_approach_to_neuroscience
"STE CFT Cuts Ribbon in Orlando". www.army.mil. 18 March 2019. Archived from the original on 25 March 2019. Retrieved 14 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/218753/ste_cft_cuts_ribbon_in_orlando
"Army pursuing improved realism in live and virtual training". www.army.mil. 4 December 2019. Archived from the original on 5 December 2019. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/230567/army_pursuing_improved_realism_in_live_and_virtual_training
ASA(ALT) Weapon Systems Handbook 2018 update
/wiki/ASA(ALT)
ASA(ALT) (2018) Weapon Systems Handbook update Page 32 lists how the Weapon Systems Handbook is organized. 440 pages.
By Modernization priority
By Acquisition or Business System category (ACAT or BSC). The Weapon systems in each ACAT are sorted alphabetically by Weapon system name. Each weapon system might also be in several variants (Lettered); a weapon system's variants might be severally and simultaneously in the following phases of its Life Cycle, namely—°Materiel Solution Analysis; °Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction; °Engineering & Manufacturing Development; °Production & Deployment; °Operations & Support
ACAT I, II, III, IV are defined on page 404.[52][27][54][55][41]
/wiki/ASA(ALT)
LATechdigest.com (15 April 2016) US Army Research Lab Opens at USC ICT in Playa Vista Archived 9 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine http://latechdigest.com/us-army-research-lab-opens-at-usc-ict-in-playa-vista/
Defense.gov (12 February 2019) SUMMARY OF THE 2018 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE STRATEGY Archived 13 February 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://media.defense.gov/2019/Feb/12/2002088963/-1/-1/1/SUMMARY-OF-DOD-AI-STRATEGY.PDF
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (8 February 2019). "Army R&D Chief: 'I Don't Think We Went Far Enough' – But Futures Command Can". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2019/02/army-rd-chief-i-dont-think-we-went-far-enough-but-futures-command-can/
Defense.gov (12 February 2019) SUMMARY OF THE 2018 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE STRATEGY Archived 13 February 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://media.defense.gov/2019/Feb/12/2002088963/-1/-1/1/SUMMARY-OF-DOD-AI-STRATEGY.PDF
Ashton Carter (2012-11-21) Autonomy in Weapon Systems Archived 7 March 2019 at the Wayback Machine Most recent DoD guideline: 2012 https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodd/300009p.pdf
Army AI task force Army Directive 2018-18 (Army Artificial Intelligence Task Force in Support of the Department of Defense Joint Artificial Intelligence Center) Archived 31 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine 2 October 2018 https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN13011_AD2018_18_Final.pdf
Terri Moon Cronk "Artificial intelligence experts address getting capabilities to warfighters", army.mil, 13 December 2018, archived from the original on 15 December 2018, retrieved 13 December 2018 https://www.army.mil/article/215029/artificial_intelligence_experts_address_getting_capabilities_to_warfighters
Carnegie Mellon University (1 February 2019) Carnegie Mellon Hosts Activation of U.S. Army AI Task Force Archived 1 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine. Brigadier General Matt Easley is Director of Army Artificial Intelligence task force (A-AI TF) https://www.cmu.edu/news/stories/archives/2019/february/army-ai-task-force.html
Gary Sheftick (13 August 2019) AI Task Force taking giant leaps forward Archived 14 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine Coordinating with: NREC, Talent management task force, the CFTs, and DOD's Joint AI Center https://www.army.mil/article/225642/ai_task_force_taking_giant_leaps_forward
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. Army Applications Lab Archived 9 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine: (23 October 2018) Army Futures Command Wants YOU (To Innovate) Archived 24 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine
—Adam Jay Harrison's list for types of Funding Authority
https://aal.army/
Douglas Scott (6 August 2019) New wearable authentication more than a "token" gesture Archived 6 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine Tactical Identity and Access Management (TIDAM) see Army AI task force (A-AI TF) https://www.army.mil/article/225197/new_wearable_authentication_more_than_a_token_gesture
U.S. Army CCDC Army Research Laboratory Public Affairs (27 February 2020) Army researchers enhance AI critical to Soldier-machine teamwork Archived 29 February 2020 at the Wayback Machine Explainability & tellability: coalition situational understanding (CSU) & human-agent knowledge fusion (HAKF)
Alun Preece, Dave Braines, Federico Cerutti, Tien Pham (16 Oct 2019) Explainable AI for Intelligence Augmentation in Multi-Domain Operations Archived 29 February 2020 at the Wayback Machine
https://www.army.mil/article/233174/army_researchers_enhance_ai_critical_to_soldier_machine_teamwork
RDECOM Research Laboratory Public Affairs (18 December 2018) Black Hawk helicopter pilot interns with Army researchers Archived 21 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/215291/black_hawk_helicopter_pilot_interns_with_army_researchers
"Army aligning modernization programs with other services". www.army.mil. 12 February 2019. Archived from the original on 12 February 2019. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/217305/army_aligning_modernization_programs_with_other_services
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (11 September 2020) JAIC Wants AI 'Victory Gardens' Across DoD Archived 12 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2020/09/jaic-wants-ai-victory-gardens-across-dod/
Kaylan Hutchison, DAC Strategic Communications (22 Jun 2022) Collaborative agreement propels Army analysis of artificial intelligence Archived 27 June 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/257531/collaborative_agreement_propels_army_analysis_of_artificial_intelligence
Eversden, Andrew "Army Software Factory experiments with a new culture to unleash coders in its ranks". C4ISRNet. 14 April 2021. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield-tech/it-networks/2021/04/14/army-software-factory-experiments-with-a-new-culture-to-unleash-coders-in-its-ranks/
Army Futures Command "STAND-TO!". www.army.mil. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 15 December 2021. Army Software Factory https://www.army.mil/standto/archive/2020/08/21/
Katie Davis Skelley, DEVCOM Aviation & Missile Center Public Affairs (27 May 2022) Software Factory helps transform Army from industrial to information age Archived 12 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine 16-week boot camp. Four different tracks (platform engineer, software developer, product manager and designer). Anyone (soldier or Army civilian) can submit a problem to the Factory; A team interviews the problem, performs an initial scoping, and then decides whether to accept the problem to work on. https://www.army.mil/article/256990/software_factory_helps_transform_army_from_industrial_to_information_age
Lindsay Grant (25 May 2022) New Army application enhances equipment readiness Archived 12 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine PMCS app developed by first cohort in ASF; allows soldiers to gain access to field manuals without a CAC card, using only a cell phone. https://www.army.mil/article/256992/new_army_application_enhances_equipment_readiness
USAF Assistant Secretary of Acquisition, Chief Software Office (19 Dec 2019) SpaceCAMP Archived 24 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine USAF Software Factory https://software.af.mil/softwarefactory/spacecamp/
Eversden, Andrew "Army Software Factory experiments with a new culture to unleash coders in its ranks". C4ISRNet. 14 April 2021. Archived from the original on 14 April 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield-tech/it-networks/2021/04/14/army-software-factory-experiments-with-a-new-culture-to-unleash-coders-in-its-ranks/
Army Futures Command "STAND-TO!". www.army.mil. Archived from the original on 20 September 2020. Retrieved 15 December 2021. Army Software Factory https://www.army.mil/standto/archive/2020/08/21/
AI TF Artificial Intelligence Task Force Archived 24 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine
US Army Army Artificial Intelligence Task Force (31 August 2020) AFC: Growing an AI-ready workforce Archived 16 September 2020 at the Wayback Machine
U.S. ARMY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TASK FORCE (Nov 2019) U.S. ARMY FUTURES COMMAND, AREAS OF INTEREST Archived 18 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine
https://armyfuturescommand.com/aitf/?standto
Colin Clark (8 Aug 2021) Wormuth Hints At Cuts To 35 Core Army Modernization Programs Archived 20 September 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2021/09/wormuth-hints-at-cuts-to-35-core-army-modernization-programs/
Jaspreet Gill (10 March 2023) Marines teaming with Army on 3-year software factory pilot Archived 11 March 2023 at the Wayback Machine technical accelerator; 3 year pilot is to build applications; at least 50 Marines; 8 to enter the technical accelerator every 6 months; each of them in a program to accelerate modernization as product managers, designers, or software developers. The teams will learn baseline skillsets using pair programming for one-on-one mentoring, and utilization. https://breakingdefense.com/2023/03/marines-teaming-with-army-on-three-year-software-factory-pilot/
David Vergun (29 March 2018) Army network modernization efforts spearheaded by new Cross-Functional Teams. The Army conducts a network demonstration at Fort Bliss, Texas. The Army is pursuing network modernization through Cross-Functional Teams. Archived 11 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine http://apgnews.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf-light-viewer/6613-pdfs/page-00013.pdf
US Army (27 June 2018) U.S. Army to host tactical Cloud computing industry forum Archived 9 July 2018 at the Wayback Machine army.mil https://www.army.mil/article/207797/us_army_to_host_tactical_cloud_computing_industry_forum
Kathryn Bailey, PEO C3T Public Affairs (26 November 2019) The Army gathers industry to inspire network modernization Archived 5 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine Network Cross-Functional Team (N-CFT) and PEO C3T hosted 670 industry partners at the Technical Exchange Meeting (TEM) 4, Capability Set (CS) 23. www.army.mil https://www.army.mil/article/230394/the_army_gathers_industry_to_inspire_network_modernization
Nathan Strout (30 Nov 2019) Can hundreds of unrelated satellites create a GPS backup? Archived 6 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield-tech/c2-comms/2019/11/29/can-hundreds-of-unrelated-satellites-create-a-gps-backup/
Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (3 August 2018) Army leveraging industry ideas to modernize network Archived 6 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/209394/army_leveraging_industry_ideas_to_modernize_network
Jen Judson (4 April 2019) US Army plans to field a future long-range assault helicopter by 2030 Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine FLRAA
RFI posted on the Federal Business Opportunities, 4 April
Contract award: fourth quarter of FY21
preliminary design review (PDR) second quarter of FY23
first flight in the third quarter of FY24
critical design review (CDR) in the fourth quarter of FY24
fielding to first unit in second quarter of FY30
https://www.defensenews.com/land/2019/04/04/us-army-plans-to-field-a-future-long-range-assault-helicopter-by-2030/
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (21 January 2020) Army 'Fully Committed To Replacing The Bradley': Gen. McConville Archived 22 January 2020 at the Wayback Machine Bradley fighting vehicle replacement is still a project
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (23 January 2020) Bradley Replacement: Did Army Ask For 'Unobtainium'? Archived 24 January 2020 at the Wayback Machine
U.S. Army Public Affairs (16 January 2020) Army decides to cancel current OMFV solicitation Archived 14 February 2020 at the Wayback Machine
U.S. Army Public Affairs (7 February 2020) Army aggressively moves forward on OMFV, seeks industry input on path forward Archived 18 February 2020 at the Wayback Machine "We are not releasing a prescribed set of requirements -- we are describing the problem set and giving industry the freedom to be creative and innovative in their approach" —Gen. John (Mike) Murray
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (26 February 2020) OMFV: Army Seeks Industry Advice On Bradley Replacement Archived 26 February 2020 at the Wayback Machine
https://breakingdefense.com/2020/01/army-fully-committed-to-replacing-the-bradley-gen-mcconville/
Andrew Eversden (22 Nov 2021) Robotic vehicles, drones coordinate recon at Army's Project Convergence 21 Archived 27 September 2023 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2021/11/robotic-vehicles-drones-coordinate-recon-at-armys-project-convergence-21/
Andrew Eversden (21 Oct 2022) 'Lightning in a bottle': Inside the 'Origin' of the Army's future robotic fleet Archived 26 October 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2022/10/lightning-in-a-bottle-inside-the-origin-of-the-armys-future-robotic-fleet/
Ben Watson (6 May 2022) Defense One Radio, Ep. 99: The role of drones in Russia's Ukraine invasion Archived 9 October 2023 at the Wayback Machine https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2022/05/defense-one-radio-ep-99-role-drones-russias-ukraine-invasion/366577/
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (19 Mar 2021) Army Outlines Ambitious Schedule For Robots, Armor Archived 19 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2021/03/army-outlines-ambitious-schedule-for-robots-armor/
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (19 Mar 2021) Army Outlines Ambitious Schedule For Robots, Armor Archived 19 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2021/03/army-outlines-ambitious-schedule-for-robots-armor/
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (19 Mar 2021) Army Outlines Ambitious Schedule For Robots, Armor Archived 19 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2021/03/army-outlines-ambitious-schedule-for-robots-armor/
Army.mil "Robotic combat vehicles could change way Army looks, fights". www.army.mil. 26 June 2019. Archived from the original on 26 June 2019. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/223657/robotic_combat_vehicles_could_change_way_army_looks_fights
Andrew Eversden (24 Aug 2022) Army's robotic vehicle slipped behind 'enemy' lines in European exercise Archived 25 August 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2022/08/armys-robotic-vehicle-slipped-behind-enemy-lines-in-european-exercise/
Defense One staff (9 Sep 2022) The Army's top officer discusses the future of the force and how the six-month-old Ukraine invasion is evolving. Archived 12 September 2022 at the Wayback Machine LTG Scott McKean https://www.stitcher.com/show/defense-one-radio/episode/what-lies-ahead-for-the-u-s-army-206584046
Army Futures Command (19 Sep 2022) Project Convergence 2022 to demonstrate futuristic joint, multinational warfighting technologies Archived 22 September 2022 at the Wayback Machine inaugural PC22 Technology Gateway https://www.army.mil/article/260345/project_convergence_2022_to_demonstrate_futuristic_joint_multinational_warfighting_technologies
Joe Lacdan, Army News Service (21 Sep 2022) Army to test robotic vehicles on land and sea during PC 22 Archived 5 October 2023 at the Wayback Machine AFC's McKean: JADC2 experiment to reach from continental US to Pacific: 1) establish an IAMD; 2) use Joint offensive fires; 3) examine which authorities and policies hinder the mission https://www.army.mil/article/260402/army_to_test_robotic_vehicles_on_land_and_sea_during_pc_22
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (14 Nov 2022) Can the Army's robotics programs build AI the Silicon Valley way? RCV navigation: "DIU has brokered a potentially groundbreaking contract between the Army's Robotic Combat Vehicle program and a small California firm that trains AI algorithms to navigate off-road". https://breakingdefense.com/2022/11/can-the-armys-robotics-programs-build-ai-the-silicon-valley-way/
Max Boot (28 May 2023) Opinion: An Army command like no other seeks to master the future of war Archived 31 August 2023 at the Wayback Machine https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/05/28/army-futures-command-war-innovation
AUSA 2023 Warriors Corner: BG Stephanie Ahern, moderator (9 Oct 2023) Human Machine Integrated Formations panel Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine First fielding 2028 https://www.bitchute.com/video/6XmSOC1qKbiS/
Ms. Karen Diane Kurtz (ASA (ALT)) and Steven Y. Lusher (JPEO CBRND PAO) (8 October 2018) ASA(ALT) Participates in U.S. Army Futures Command Panel at AUSA Archived 10 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/212178/asaalt_participates_in_us_army_futures_command_panel_at_ausa
Matthew Cox (14 Sep 2018) Head of Army Futures Command Fields Tough Questions From Congress Archived 14 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/09/14/head-army-futures-command-fields-tough-questions-congress.html
Army Directive 2018-15 (U.S. Army Futures Command Relationship With the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) Archived 31 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine and DCS G-8, 27 August 2018 https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN12786_AD2018-15_Web_Final.pdf
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (13 Sep 2018) Futures Command Won't Hurt Oversight, Army Tells Congress Archived 14 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2018/09/futures-command-wont-hurt-oversight-army-tells-congress/
Jaspreet Gill (4 May 2022) EXCLUSIVE: New Army directive shakes up modernization enterprise Archived 5 May 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2022/05/exclusive-new-army-directive-shakes-up-modernization-enterprise/
Richard Simonetti (23 April 2018) "US Army turns to new technologies" Archived 25 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine linkedin.com https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/us-army-turns-new-technologies-richard-simonetti
"Acquisition process: Materiel development decision (MDD)". Archived from the original on 18 September 2018. Retrieved 14 September 2018. http://acqnotes.com/acqnote/acquisitions/materiel-development-decision
"Acquisition process: Materiel development decision (MDD)". Archived from the original on 18 September 2018. Retrieved 14 September 2018. http://acqnotes.com/acqnote/acquisitions/materiel-development-decision
Army Directive 2018-15 (U.S. Army Futures Command Relationship With the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) Archived 31 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine and DCS G-8, 27 August 2018 https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN12786_AD2018-15_Web_Final.pdf
Richard Simonetti (23 April 2018) "US Army turns to new technologies" Archived 25 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine linkedin.com https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/us-army-turns-new-technologies-richard-simonetti
Lt. Col. Thomas "Bull" Holland, PhD, U.S. Army (15 January 2019) Proposed Army Futures Command Process Tenets Archived 3 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine
'Scientific research is a fundamentally different activity than technology development';
Incorporate 'scientific research into "Appendix C: Functional Concepts" and specify pathways for technology development';
Buy into the 'fail fast' mentality;
'6.3-funded projects to produce knowledge (technical data) that can be consumed by requirements developers as opposed to PMs';
Use 'evidence-based requirements process' (early hypothesis testing) with citations for evidence:
All projects will be executed in no less than two increments.
No new requirements once an increment is started.
Summary: 'advances on the battlefield requires comprehensive, coordinated changes in the entire acquisition system';
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2019-OLE/Jan/Army-Futures/
"(24 October 2019) Army Pushes 600 Programs From Acquisition To Sustainment". 24 October 2019. Archived from the original on 24 October 2019. Retrieved 24 October 2019. https://breakingdefense.com/2019/10/army-pushes-600-programs-from-acquisition-to-sustainment/
"(24 October 2019) Army Pushes 600 Programs From Acquisition To Sustainment". 24 October 2019. Archived from the original on 24 October 2019. Retrieved 24 October 2019. https://breakingdefense.com/2019/10/army-pushes-600-programs-from-acquisition-to-sustainment/
"(24 October 2019) Army Pushes 600 Programs From Acquisition To Sustainment". 24 October 2019. Archived from the original on 24 October 2019. Retrieved 24 October 2019. https://breakingdefense.com/2019/10/army-pushes-600-programs-from-acquisition-to-sustainment/
"(24 October 2019) Army Pushes 600 Programs From Acquisition To Sustainment". 24 October 2019. Archived from the original on 24 October 2019. Retrieved 24 October 2019. https://breakingdefense.com/2019/10/army-pushes-600-programs-from-acquisition-to-sustainment/
"USArmy tweet: Futures Command will have the overarching objective to achieve clear overmatch in future conflicts, making Soldiers and units more lethal to win the nation's wars, then return home safely". Archived from the original on 8 April 2023. Retrieved 23 August 2018. https://twitter.com/USArmy/status/1012863317088653318
Anthony Small Futures Command Deputy Commanding General talks the U.S. Army's Future at South by Southwest, US Army, 13 March 2019, archived from the original on 21 May 2020, retrieved 17 March 2019 https://www.army.mil/article/218531/futures_command_highlights_changes_new_structure_at_sxsw
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (25 October 2017). "Can The Pentagon Protect Young Innovators?". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2017/10/can-the-pentagon-protect-young-innovators/
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) ASA(ALT) Archived 18 March 2020 at the Wayback Machine—Org Chart as of May 2020 Archived 12 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine see also February 2020 Archived 12 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine, and 11/5/19 , as well as Org Chart as of 11/26/18
https://www.asaalt.army.mil/
Mr. Craig A. Spisak, Director, Acquisition Career Management (3 October 2018) A vigorous talent management strategy keeps the acquisition workforce prepared for threats Archived 10 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/211985/a_vigorous_talent_management_strategy_keeps_the_acquisition_workforce_prepared_for_threats
Jacqueline M. Hames, U.S. Army Acquisition Support Center (31 January 2020) TWI: worth it Archived 21 October 2020 at the Wayback Machine Training with Industry: a work-experience program for Army Acquisition officers (from captain to lieutenant colonel). "After their TWI rotation, officers are expected to identify industry best practices and implement them at their next duty station" https://www.army.mil/article/232270/twi_worth_it
A sample career path here: Aviation Engineering director to SES Archived 12 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/208101/new_aviation_engineering_director_appointed_as_ses
"(1 Aug 2018) Military (Officer) Corner: Army Acquisition Centralized Selection List". Archived from the original on 5 April 2023. Retrieved 13 September 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20230405162253/https://asc.army.mil/web/news-military-career-corner-dacm-july-2018/
"(29 Apr 2015) Army Acquisition Corps Recognized". 30 April 2015. Archived from the original on 14 September 2018. Retrieved 14 September 2018. https://www.army.mil/article/147519/army_acquisition_corps_recognized
Richard Simonetti (23 April 2018) "US Army turns to new technologies" Archived 25 April 2023 at the Wayback Machine linkedin.com https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/us-army-turns-new-technologies-richard-simonetti
Army Directive 2018-15 (U.S. Army Futures Command Relationship With the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) Archived 31 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine and DCS G-8, 27 August 2018 https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN12786_AD2018-15_Web_Final.pdf
Ms. Audra Calloway (Picatinny) (19 September 2018) With new Army Futures Command, senior acquisition leader discusses role of Program Executive Offices Archived 10 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/211337/with_new_army_futures_command_senior_acquisition_leader_discusses_role_of_program_executive_offices
Sydney Freedberg, Jr. (26 March 2018) Army Outlines Futures Command; Org Chart In Flux Archived 26 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2018/03/army-outlines-futures-command-org-chart-in-flux/
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) ASA(ALT) Archived 18 March 2020 at the Wayback Machine—Org Chart as of May 2020 Archived 12 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine see also February 2020 Archived 12 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine, and 11/5/19 , as well as Org Chart as of 11/26/18
https://www.asaalt.army.mil/
Freedberg Jr, Sydney (14 August 2018). "Inside Army Futures Command: CFT Chiefs Take Charge". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2018/08/inside-army-futures-command-cross-functional-teams-take-root/
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (25 October 2017). "Can The Pentagon Protect Young Innovators?". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2017/10/can-the-pentagon-protect-young-innovators/
Freedberg Jr, Sydney (14 August 2018). "Inside Army Futures Command: CFT Chiefs Take Charge". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2018/08/inside-army-futures-command-cross-functional-teams-take-root/
Gary Sheftick, Army News Service (3 April 2019) Army 'Shark Tank' enabling quick prototyping of new systems Archived 4 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/219667/army_shark_tank_enabling_quick_prototyping_of_new_systems
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (6 June 2019). "Army Fields Anti-Jam GPS In Germany This Fall". Breaking Defense. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2019/06/army-fields-anti-jam-gps-to-germany-this-fall/
Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (11 July 2019) "Embracing a new culture at Army Futures Command". www.army.mil. 11 July 2019. Archived from the original on 11 July 2019. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/224201/embracing_a_new_culture_at_army_futures_command
Jaspreet Gill (4 May 2022) EXCLUSIVE: New Army directive shakes up modernization enterprise Archived 5 May 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2022/05/exclusive-new-army-directive-shakes-up-modernization-enterprise/
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (24 January 2019) Bell V-280 Flies 322 MPH: Army Secretary Praises Program Archived 25 January 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2019/01/bell-v-280-flies-322-mph-army-secretary-praises-program/
In Future Vertical Lift, FARA and FLRAA are projected to be prototyped by 2028, with fielding by 2030.[89][90] The OMFV prototype is projected for 2025.[91]
Secretary of the Army, Mark T. Esper, ESTABLISHMENT OF UNITED STATES ARMY FUTURES COMMAND Army General order G.O.2018-10 Archived 3 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN11199_GO1810_FINAL.pdf
Secretary of the Army, Mark T. Esper, ESTABLISHMENT OF UNITED STATES ARMY FUTURES COMMAND Army General order G.O.2018-10 Archived 3 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN11199_GO1810_FINAL.pdf
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (8 February 2019). "Army R&D Chief: 'I Don't Think We Went Far Enough' – But Futures Command Can". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2019/02/army-rd-chief-i-dont-think-we-went-far-enough-but-futures-command-can/
Nancy Jones-Bonbrest, Army Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office (14 June 2019) Partnering for speed: Army rapid prototyping office hosts industry open house Archived 27 July 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/223154/partnering_for_speed_army_rapid_prototyping_office_hosts_industry_open_house
Clark, Colin (2019-05-24) Army Moves Out On Lasers, Hypersonics: Lt. Gen. Thurgood Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2019/05/army-moves-out-on-lasers-hypersonics-lt-gen-thurgood/
Jen Judson (13 March 2019) Army Rapid Capabilities Office is getting a new name and mission Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine https://www.defensenews.com/land/2019/03/13/army-rapid-capabilities-office-is-getting-a-new-name-and-mission/
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (22 August 2018) Army Warhead Is Key To Joint Hypersonics
https://breakingdefense.com/2018/08/army-warhead-is-key-to-joint-hypersonics/
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (11 September 2018) Aiming The Army's Thousand-Mile Missiles Multi-domain Ft Sill https://breakingdefense.com/2018/09/aiming-the-armys-thousand-mile-missiles/
Judson, Jen (5 June 2019). "Coming soon to the US Army: Combat-capable hypersonic and laser weapons". C4ISRNet. Archived from the original on 7 June 2019. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://www.c4isrnet.com/land/2019/06/05/coming-soon-to-the-us-army-combat-capable-hypersonic-and-laser-weapons/
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (19 March 2019) Army Sets 2023 Hypersonic Flight Test; Strategic Cannon Advances https://breakingdefense.com/2019/03/army-sets-2023-hypersonic-flight-test-strategic-cannon-advances/
Sydney J Freedberg (2 Oct 2020) Army Tripled OTA Prototyping To $4.8B In Just 3 Years: GAO Archived 5 October 2020 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2020/10/army-tripled-prototyping-to-4-8b-in-just-3-years-gao/
"Team White Sands Organizations". www.wsmr.army.mil. Archived from the original on 3 December 2019. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20191203200750/https://www.wsmr.army.mil/testcenter/twso/Pages/default.aspx
Army Commands, Army Service Component Commands, and Direct Reporting Units ARN2541_AR10-87_WEB_Final.pdf section 20-2a, p.27
For example,
Request for ATEC Acquisition Support Form Archived 27 December 2016 at the Wayback Machine
or Rapid evaluation of a capability
or Private industry test
https://www.atec.army.mil/downloads/RFAS%20Acquisition%20Form%20(Help).pdf
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (8 February 2019). "Army R&D Chief: 'I Don't Think We Went Far Enough' – But Futures Command Can". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2019/02/army-rd-chief-i-dont-think-we-went-far-enough-but-futures-command-can/
"(January 2011) Implementing Acquisition Reform: The Decker-Wagner Army Acquisition Review". Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 17 March 2019. https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA546200
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (8 February 2019). "Army R&D Chief: 'I Don't Think We Went Far Enough' – But Futures Command Can". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2019/02/army-rd-chief-i-dont-think-we-went-far-enough-but-futures-command-can/
"U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (4 February 2019) CCDC Research Laboratory". Archived from the original on 21 September 2021. Retrieved 17 February 2019. https://www.army.mil/article/157850/ccdc_research_laboratory
Secretary of the Army, Mark T. Esper, ESTABLISHMENT OF UNITED STATES ARMY FUTURES COMMAND Army General order G.O.2018-10 Archived 3 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN11199_GO1810_FINAL.pdf
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (8 February 2019). "Army R&D Chief: 'I Don't Think We Went Far Enough' – But Futures Command Can". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2019/02/army-rd-chief-i-dont-think-we-went-far-enough-but-futures-command-can/
Army Directive 2017-33 (Enabling the Army Modernization Task Force) (7 November 2017) Archived 3 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine References Decker-Wagner 2011 https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN6391_AD2017-33_Web_Final.pdf
Maj. Gen. Cedric T. Wins, CG RDECOM (25 September 2018) RDECOM's road map to modernizing the Army: Long-range precision fires Archived 6 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine First in a series /wiki/Cedric_T._Wins
Maj. Gen. Cedric T. Wins, CG RDECOM (25 September 2018) RDECOM's road map to modernizing the Army: Long-range precision fires Archived 6 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine First in a series /wiki/Cedric_T._Wins
"Argie Sarantinos-Perrin (17 October 2018) RDECOM at the forefront of creating a more modern, lethal Army". Archived from the original on 19 October 2018. Retrieved 18 October 2018. https://www.army.mil/article/212548/rdecom_at_the_forefront_of_creating_a_more_modern_lethal_army
Freedberg, Jr. (31 Jan 2019) Army Completes Biggest Reorg In 45 Years: Can Futures Command End Weapons Disasters? Archived 12 February 2019 at the Wayback Machine "... another thing we've not done very well—is doing the prototyping and experimentation with soldiers from the beginning, so we got soldier input into a program before it ever becomes a program of record" —Gen. 'Mike' Murray https://breakingdefense.com/2019/01/can-futures-command-end-acquisition-disasters-as-army-completes-biggest-reorg-since-1973
Army Directive 2017-33 (Enabling the Army Modernization Task Force) (7 November 2017) Archived 3 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine References Decker-Wagner 2011 https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN6391_AD2017-33_Web_Final.pdf
"Get that moving truck ready". www.army.mil. 11 October 2018. Archived from the original on 14 October 2018. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/212251/get_that_moving_truck_ready
"US Army Futures Command to reform modernization, says secretary of the Army". www.army.mil. 26 March 2018. Archived from the original on 2 April 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/197886/us_army_futures_command_to_reform_modernization_says_secretary_of_the_army
"The number one priority: An interview with Gen. Mark Milley". www.army.mil. Archived from the original on 1 April 2019. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://www.army.mil/article/219028/the_number_one_priority_an_interview_with_gen_mark_milley
JP-1 Archived 26 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine p.xxi has the definition of operational control (OPCON). Note that "command authority may not be delegated" (COCOM being command authority). p.xxii has the definition of administrative control (ADCON): one application being coordinating authority.
see also C. Berry (3 May 2010) Understanding OPCON Archived 9 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine. (COCOM is the legal authority of a combatant commander (CCDR).) OPCON, on the other hand, "is derived from the authorities of COCOM and delineated in JP-1".
http://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp1_ch1.pdf
AUSA 2018 CMF #1: Army Futures Command Unifies Force Modernization Archived 11 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine DVIDS video of panelists Gen. Murray, Sec. McCarthy, Dr. Jette, and Trae Stephens https://www.dvidshub.net/video/631508/ausa-2018-cmf-1-army-futures-command-unifies-force-modernization
Trae Stephens (6 Jun 2022) Rebooting the arsenal of democracy Archived 6 June 2022 at the Wayback Machine 4 principles for the new defense companies https://warontherocks.com/2022/06/rebooting-the-arsenal-of-democracy/
"Army Futures Command Press Conference". DVIDS. Archived from the original on 27 August 2018. Retrieved 25 December 2021. https://www.dvidshub.net/video/621108/army-futures-command-press-conference
Federal News Radio Army has picked a location for its new Futures Command, but now comes the hard part Archived 2 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://federalnewsradio.com/on-dod/2018/08/the-army-has-picked-a-location-for-its-new-futures-command-but-now-comes-the-hard-part/
Association of the United States Army (AUSA): Scott R. Gourley (Friday, 13 January 2017) CLOSING THE CAPABILITIES GAP: SEVEN THINGS THE ARMY NEEDS FOR A WINNING FUTURE Archived 15 March 2019 at the Wayback Machine /wiki/Association_of_the_United_States_Army
Army Directive 2017-33 (Enabling the Army Modernization Task Force) (7 November 2017) Archived 3 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine References Decker-Wagner 2011 https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN6391_AD2017-33_Web_Final.pdf
Lt. Col. Thomas "Bull" Holland, PhD, U.S. Army (15 January 2019) Proposed Army Futures Command Process Tenets Archived 3 April 2019 at the Wayback Machine
'Scientific research is a fundamentally different activity than technology development';
Incorporate 'scientific research into "Appendix C: Functional Concepts" and specify pathways for technology development';
Buy into the 'fail fast' mentality;
'6.3-funded projects to produce knowledge (technical data) that can be consumed by requirements developers as opposed to PMs';
Use 'evidence-based requirements process' (early hypothesis testing) with citations for evidence:
All projects will be executed in no less than two increments.
No new requirements once an increment is started.
Summary: 'advances on the battlefield requires comprehensive, coordinated changes in the entire acquisition system';
https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/Online-Exclusive/2019-OLE/Jan/Army-Futures/
United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) Report: GAO-17-457 (Jun 2017) ARMY CONTRACTING Leadership Lacks Information Needed to Evaluate and Improve Operations Archived 10 January 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.gao.gov/assets/690/685425.pdf
"Building the Army of the future". www.army.mil. 11 July 2018. Archived from the original on 23 August 2018. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://www.army.mil/article/208403/building_the_army_of_the_future
Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition, Logistics and Technology) ASA(ALT) Archived 18 March 2020 at the Wayback Machine—Org Chart as of May 2020 Archived 12 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine see also February 2020 Archived 12 August 2021 at the Wayback Machine, and 11/5/19 , as well as Org Chart as of 11/26/18
https://www.asaalt.army.mil/
Hannah Wiley (6 April 2018) Program cuts likely under Army secretary's new Futures Command Archived 7 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.upi.com/Program-cuts-likely-under-Army-secretarys-new-Futures-Command/6821522958394/
Jen Judson (17 July 2018) US Army asks Congress to shift millions in FY18 dollars. What's behind the request? Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine https://www.defensenews.com/land/2018/07/17/army-asks-congress-to-shift-millions-in-fy18-dollars-to-pay-for-big-modernization-efforts/
Sydney Freedberg (29 August 2018) Army Futures Command: $100M, 500 Staff, & Access To Top Leaders Archived 31 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2018/08/army-futures-command-100m-500-staff-access-to-top-leaders/
David Vergun (5 September 2018) Richardson confirmed as Futures Command deputy commander Archived 31 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/210734/richardson_confirmed_as_futures_command_deputy_commander
David Vergun (5 September 2018) Richardson confirmed as Futures Command deputy commander Archived 31 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/210734/richardson_confirmed_as_futures_command_deputy_commander
FY2021 budget request: Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (13 February 2020) Army budget request eyes $2B boost for modernization Archived 13 February 2020 at the Wayback Machine
$10.6 billion for modernization in 2021 request, up from $8.5 billion in 2020
LRPF: $1700 million
FVL: $514 million
OMFV: $328 million
MPF: $135 million
LTAMDS: $376 million
IFPC $236 million
https://www.army.mil/article/232642/army_budget_request_eyes_2b_boost_for_modernization
Todd South, Military Times (8 May 2019) 4 things the general in charge of the Army's newest command says are needed to win the wars of the future https://www.businessinsider.com/army-futures-command-general-4-things-needed-to-win-future-wars-2019-5#4-the-armys-culture-of-risk-aversion-needs-to-change-4
Todd South, Military Times (8 May 2019) 4 things the general in charge of the Army's newest command says are needed to win the wars of the future https://www.businessinsider.com/army-futures-command-general-4-things-needed-to-win-future-wars-2019-5#4-the-armys-culture-of-risk-aversion-needs-to-change-4
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (15 January 2020) Army To Navy: Hey, We Already Get Less $$ Than You Archived 16 January 2020 at the Wayback Machine Army: 26.6%; Navy: 28.7%; Air Force: 28.5%; Other: 16.3% https://breakingdefense.com/2020/01/army-to-navy-hey-we-already-get-less-than-you/
Scott Maucione (19 July 2019) Army Futures Command fully operational, dinged by GAO on announcement Archived 3 August 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://federalnewsnetwork.com/army/2019/07/army-futures-command-fully-operational-dinged-by-gao-on-announcement/
Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (7 February 2020) Vice chief of staff: Speed of modernization no longer at 'glacial pace' Archived 9 February 2020 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/232408/vice_chief_of_staff_speed_of_modernization_no_longer_at_glacial_pace
Kern Life Cycle Management Command (LCMC) 2004 Archived 30 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/2005/050100-management.htm
Ed Worley (1 October 2018) Two contracting centers achieve full operational capability Archived 10 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/211858/two_contracting_centers_achieve_full_operational_capability
JP-1 Archived 26 August 2018 at the Wayback Machine p.xxi has the definition of operational control (OPCON). Note that "command authority may not be delegated" (COCOM being command authority). p.xxii has the definition of administrative control (ADCON): one application being coordinating authority.
see also C. Berry (3 May 2010) Understanding OPCON Archived 9 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine. (COCOM is the legal authority of a combatant commander (CCDR).) OPCON, on the other hand, "is derived from the authorities of COCOM and delineated in JP-1".
http://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/pubs/jp1_ch1.pdf
United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) Report: GAO-17-457 (Jun 2017) ARMY CONTRACTING Leadership Lacks Information Needed to Evaluate and Improve Operations Archived 10 January 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.gao.gov/assets/690/685425.pdf
"(24 October 2019) Army Pushes 600 Programs From Acquisition To Sustainment". 24 October 2019. Archived from the original on 24 October 2019. Retrieved 24 October 2019. https://breakingdefense.com/2019/10/army-pushes-600-programs-from-acquisition-to-sustainment/
Jaspreet Gill (4 May 2022) EXCLUSIVE: New Army directive shakes up modernization enterprise Archived 5 May 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2022/05/exclusive-new-army-directive-shakes-up-modernization-enterprise/
The CG,AFC is responsible for Force design (in the style of TRADOC's G357,[418] but applied to Force modernization, rather than training).[156] The Army's Force management model begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment, and the time available to bring the Current army to bear on the situation.[419] The AROC serves as a discussion forum of these factors.[156]
The Army G-8 and G-3/5/7 sit on the Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC), chaired by the Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA).[420]: diagram on p.559 [156][419]
The relevant strategy is provided by the Army's leadership to guide Army staff.[420]
The resources are "dictated by Congress".[419]
A DOTMLPF analysis models the factors necessary to change the Current force into a relevant Future force.[421]
A JCIDS/ACIDS[422] process identifies the gaps in capability between Current and Future force.
A Force design to meet the materiel gaps is underway.
An organization with the desired capabilities (manpower, materiel, training) is brought to bear on each gap.
AR 5-22(pdf) lists the Force modernization proponent for each Army branch, which can be a CoE or Branch proponent leader.
Staff uses Synchronization meetings[423]: minute 8:29 before seeking approval —HTAR Force Management 3-2b: "Managing change in any large, complex organization requires the synchronization of many interrelated processes".[420]: p.3-1
A budget request is submitted to Congress.
Approved requests then await resource deliveries which then become available to the combatant commanders.
https://www.tradoc.army.mil/g357/
Jon Harper (3 April 2020) COVID-19 NEWS: Army Trying to Mitigate Disruptions for Top Modernization Programs Archived 7 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine
Devon Suits, Army News Service (7 April 2020) Army looks to keep critical modernization programs on schedule Archived 12 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine "800 acquisition, logistics, and technology-related programs and nearly 35 key modernization priorities"
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (23 April 2020) COVID-19 Won't Slow New Army Weapons: McCarthy, Murray, Jette Archived 27 April 2020 at the Wayback Machine Subcontractors are holding to their schedules when making up for COVID-19 shutdowns
https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2020/4/3/army-trying-to-mitigate-disruptions-for-top-modernization-programs
US Army (6 Oct 2017) Army Directive 2017-24 (Cross-Functional Team Pilot In Support of Materiel Development) Archived 27 July 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN6101_AD2017-24_Web_Final.pdf
Scott Maucione (14 Sep 2018) Army leaders ask for trust in lieu of metrics for Futures Command Archived 17 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://federalnewsradio.com/army/2018/09/army-leaders-ask-for-trust-in-lieu-of-metrics-for-futures-command/
The capabilities as prioritized by the Chief of Staff, will use subject-matter experts (SMEs) in the realms of requirements, acquisition, science and technology, test, resourcing, costing, and sustainment, using CFTs for:
Improved long-range precision fires (artillery):—(Fort Sill, Oklahoma) Lead: BG John Rafferty ... PEO Ammunition (AMMO)
Next Generation Combat Vehicle—(Detroit Arsenal, Warren, Michigan) Lead: BG Geoffrey Norman Archived 1 July 2022 at the Wayback Machine ... PEO Ground Combat Systems (GCS)
Vertical lift platforms—(Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, Alabama) Lead: BG Wally Rugen ... PEO Aviation (AVN)
Mobile and expeditionary (usable in ground combat) communications network (Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland)
Network Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence—Lead: BG Jeth Rey ... PEO Command Control Communications Tactical (C3T)
Assured Position Navigation and Timing—(Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, Alabama) Lead: William B. Nelson, SES
Air and missile defense—(Fort Sill, Oklahoma) Lead: BG Brian Gibson, ... PEO Missiles and Space (M&S)
Soldier lethality
Soldier Lethality—(Fort Moore, Georgia) Lead: BG Larry Q. Burris, Jr. ... PEO Soldier
Synthetic Training Environment—(Orlando, Florida) Lead: BG William Glaser ... PEO Simulation, Training, & Instrumentation (STRI)
Contested logistics—(Huntsville, Alabama) Lead: Army Materiel Command (AMC) stood up in 2023
Above, 'dotted line' relationship (i.e., coordination) is denoted by a ' ... '
/wiki/Subject-matter_expert
"The number one priority: An interview with Gen. Mark Milley". www.army.mil. Archived from the original on 1 April 2019. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://www.army.mil/article/219028/the_number_one_priority_an_interview_with_gen_mark_milley
"Connie Lee (3/26/2019) NEWS FROM AUSA GLOBAL: Army Fleshing Out Updated Modernization Strategy". Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2019. http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2019/3/26/army-looks-to-modernize-dotmlpf-in-modernization-strategy
As informed by lessons learned in light of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine /wiki/2022_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine
"Connie Lee (3/26/2019) NEWS FROM AUSA GLOBAL: Army Fleshing Out Updated Modernization Strategy". Archived from the original on 28 March 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2019. http://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2019/3/26/army-looks-to-modernize-dotmlpf-in-modernization-strategy
"Readiness for the 21st Century: An interview with retired Gen. David McKiernan". www.army.mil. 23 August 2018. Archived from the original on 27 October 2018. Retrieved 14 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/210106/readiness_for_the_21st_century_an_interview_with_retired_gen_david_mckiernan
"Lauren C. Williams (21 Aug 2018) PEO structure survives Army Futures reorg, for now". Archived from the original on 1 September 2018. Retrieved 1 September 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20180901182610/https://fcw.com/articles/2018/08/21/peo-futures-command-williams.aspx
Secretary of the Army, Mark T. Esper, ESTABLISHMENT OF UNITED STATES ARMY FUTURES COMMAND Army General order G.O.2018-10 Archived 3 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/ARN11199_GO1810_FINAL.pdf
Matthew Cox (14 Sep 2018) Head of Army Futures Command Fields Tough Questions From Congress Archived 14 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.military.com/daily-news/2018/09/14/head-army-futures-command-fields-tough-questions-congress.html
Jaspreet Gill (4 May 2022) EXCLUSIVE: New Army directive shakes up modernization enterprise Archived 5 May 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2022/05/exclusive-new-army-directive-shakes-up-modernization-enterprise/
Sydney Freeberg (6 September 2018) 'A Little Bit Disruptive': Murray & McCarthy On Army Futures Command
https://breakingdefense.com/2018/09/a-little-bit-disruptive-murray-mccarthy-on-army-futures-command/
Acqnote AcqNotes (17 Jan 2017) Other Transaction Authority (OTA) Guide – 17 Jan 2017
http://acqnotes.com/acqnote/careerfields/other-transaction-authority-ota
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. Army Applications Lab Archived 9 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine: (23 October 2018) Army Futures Command Wants YOU (To Innovate) Archived 24 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine
—Adam Jay Harrison's list for types of Funding Authority
https://aal.army/
Ms. Audra Calloway (Picatinny) (19 September 2018) With new Army Futures Command, senior acquisition leader discusses role of Program Executive Offices Archived 10 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/211337/with_new_army_futures_command_senior_acquisition_leader_discusses_role_of_program_executive_offices
Ms. Audra Calloway (Picatinny) (19 September 2018) With new Army Futures Command, senior acquisition leader discusses role of Program Executive Offices Archived 10 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://www.army.mil/article/211337/with_new_army_futures_command_senior_acquisition_leader_discusses_role_of_program_executive_offices
Paul McCleary (31 December 2018) Amidst Turmoil, Pentagon Persists On Acquisition Reform: Ellen Lord https://breakingdefense.com/2018/12/amidst-turmoil-pentagon-persists-on-acquisition-reform-ellen-lord/
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (30 August 2019) Hypersonics: Army Awards $699M To Build First Missiles For A Combat Unit prototypes—Dynetics: Common hypersonic glide body (C-HGB); Lockheed: Long range hypersonic weapon (LRHW)
Nancy Jones-Bonbrest, U.S. Army RCCTO (30 August 2019) Army awards hypersonic weapon system contracts
https://breakingdefense.com/2019/08/hypersonics-army-awards-699m-to-build-first-missiles-for-a-combat-unit/
Mr. Kinsey Kiriakos (ASA (ALT)) (20 November 2019) Army Acquisition Leaders Must "Speak Truth To Power" MTA and OTA https://www.army.mil/article/230122/army_acquisition_leaders_must_speak_truth_to_power
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (27 Feb 2023) Rapid updates, flexible authorities key for modern combat, says Army acquisition chief Use DOD Instruction 5000.87 for Software Pathway (SWP) acquisition process, under middle tier acquisition authority. https://breakingdefense.com/2023/02/rapid-updates-flexible-authorities-key-for-modern-combat-says-army-acquisition-chief/
Jen Judson (26 March 2018) The next Army program executive office will be the Rapid Capabilities Office https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/global-force-symposium/2018/03/26/the-next-army-program-executive-office-will-be-the-rapid-capabilities-office/
Jen Judson (7 Oct 2018) Army Rapid Capabilities Office realigned to focus on top modernization priorities https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/ausa/2018/10/07/army-rapid-capabilities-office-realigned-to-focus-on-top-modernization-priorities/
RCO RCCTO (2019) Army Rapid Capabilities and Critical Technologies Office https://archive.today/20210601024446/https://rapidcapabilitiesoffice.army.mil/
Phil Fountain, U.S. Army Futures Command (7 August 2019) Army Futures Command charts a campaign plan No uniforms https://www.army.mil/article/225458/army_futures_command_charts_a_campaign_plan
Judson, Jen (26 February 2018). "US Army's war-gaming is under-resourced, three-star says". Defense News. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://www.defensenews.com/land/2018/02/26/armys-conceptual-experimentation-is-under-resourced-three-star-says/
Phil Fountain, U.S. Army Futures Command (7 August 2019) Army Futures Command charts a campaign plan No uniforms https://www.army.mil/article/225458/army_futures_command_charts_a_campaign_plan
Gen. David Goldfein and Gen. Jay Raymond (28 Feb 2020) America's future battle network is key to multidomain defense JADC2: " We cannot yet share data in a seamless and simultaneous way between the Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps or the Space Force" https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2020/02/27/americas-future-battle-network-is-key-to-multidomain-defense/
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (14 Oct 2020) Army Seeks Open Architecture For All Air & Ground Systems: Jette In the spirit of MOSA, JADC2, & Project convergence:
Army Common Operating Environment (COE)
C5ISR/EW Modular Open Suite of Standards (CMOSS)
Future Air-Borne Capability Environment (FACE)
Integrated Sensor Architecture (ISA)
Sensor Open Systems Architecture (SOSA)
Vehicle Integration for C4ISR/EW Interoperability (VICTORY)
https://breakingdefense.com/2020/10/army-seeks-open-architecture-for-all-air-ground-systems-jette/
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (14 Nov 2022) Can the Army's robotics programs build AI the Silicon Valley way? RCV navigation: "DIU has brokered a potentially groundbreaking contract between the Army's Robotic Combat Vehicle program and a small California firm that trains AI algorithms to navigate off-road". https://breakingdefense.com/2022/11/can-the-armys-robotics-programs-build-ai-the-silicon-valley-way/
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (13 Nov 2020) QinetiQ Delivers Armed Scout Robot To Army: RCV-L uses UGV Interoperability Profile https://breakingdefense.com/2020/11/qinetiq-delivers-armed-scout-robot-to-army-rcv-l/
Katherine Spivey and Wendy Wagner-Smith (19 May 2021) Positioning Yourself as a Plain Language Editor https://digital.gov/event/2021/05/19/positioning-yourself-as-a-plain-language-editor/
Headquarters, Department of the Army (1 October 2022) FM 3-0 OPERATIONS 280 pages https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/ARN36290-FM_3-0-000-WEB-1.pdf
AUSA 2022 (10 Oct 2022) AUSA Contemporary Military Forum: Army 2030 - Preparing Today for Tomorrow's Fight Office of the Chief of Public Affairs https://www.dvidshub.net/video/860148/ausa-contemporary-military-forum-army-2030-preparing-today-tomorrows-fight
"Multi-Domain Battle The Advent of Twenty-First Century War". www.armyupress.army.mil. Archived from the original on 6 September 2018. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/November-December-2017/Multi-Domain-Battle-The-Advent-of-Twenty-First-Century-War/
Andrew Feickert, Specialist in Military Ground Forces, Congressional Research Service (CRS) (31 May 2022) The Army's Multi-Domain Task Force (MDTF) report IF11797 https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11797
Christine Wormuth (10.11.2021) AUSA 2021 /wiki/Christine_Wormuth
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (November 22, 2019) SecArmy's Multi-Domain Kill Chain: Space-Cloud-AI Army Multi-Domain Operations Concept, December 2018 slide from TRADOC pamphlet 525-3-1 (Dec 2018).
Multi-domain operations (MDO) span multiple domains: cislunar space, land, air, maritime, cyber, and populations.
In September 2020 an ABMS Onramp demonstrated a specific scenario, which can be illustrated by the 5 red numbered bullet points from the slide in TRADOC pamphlet 525-3-1:
Competition— No overt hostilities are yet detected. Blue bar (force projection) is in standoff against red bar (threat).
Strategic Support area— National assets (blue) detect breaching of standoff by adversary (in red).
Close area support— blue assets hand-off to the combatant commands, who are to create effects visible to the adversary (in red).
Deep maneuver— blue combatant actions dis-integrate adversary efforts (per TRADOC pamphlet 525-3-1: "militarily compete, penetrate, dis-integrate, and exploit" the adversary); —Operational and Strategic deep fires create effects on the adversary. Adversary is further subject to defeat in detail, until adversaries perceive they are overmatched (no more red assets to expend).
Adversary retreats to standoff. The populations perceive that the adversary is defeated, for now. (Compare to Perkins' cycle, 'return to competition', in which deterrence has succeeded in avoiding a total war, in favor of pushing an adversary back to standoff (the red threat bar). Blue force projection still has overmatched red threat.)
https://breakingdefense.com/2019/11/secarmys-multi-domain-kill-chain-space-to-cloud-to-ai/
Jen Judson (31 July 2023) Army Futures Command drafting next operating concept Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine https://www.defensenews.com/land/2023/07/31/army-futures-command-drafting-next-operating-concept/
The CG,AFC is responsible for Force design (in the style of TRADOC's G357,[418] but applied to Force modernization, rather than training).[156] The Army's Force management model begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment, and the time available to bring the Current army to bear on the situation.[419] The AROC serves as a discussion forum of these factors.[156]
The Army G-8 and G-3/5/7 sit on the Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC), chaired by the Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA).[420]: diagram on p.559 [156][419]
The relevant strategy is provided by the Army's leadership to guide Army staff.[420]
The resources are "dictated by Congress".[419]
A DOTMLPF analysis models the factors necessary to change the Current force into a relevant Future force.[421]
A JCIDS/ACIDS[422] process identifies the gaps in capability between Current and Future force.
A Force design to meet the materiel gaps is underway.
An organization with the desired capabilities (manpower, materiel, training) is brought to bear on each gap.
AR 5-22(pdf) lists the Force modernization proponent for each Army branch, which can be a CoE or Branch proponent leader.
Staff uses Synchronization meetings[423]: minute 8:29 before seeking approval —HTAR Force Management 3-2b: "Managing change in any large, complex organization requires the synchronization of many interrelated processes".[420]: p.3-1
A budget request is submitted to Congress.
Approved requests then await resource deliveries which then become available to the combatant commanders.
https://www.tradoc.army.mil/g357/
U.S. Department of Defense (28 Aug 2023) Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks Keynote Address: 'The Urgency to Innovate' (As Delivered) Replicator, introduced at the "NDIA Emerging Technologies for Defense Conference"— Replicator is meant to overcome PRC's mass with AI en masse
Brandi Vincent (28 Aug 2023) Hicks unveils DOD's new 'Replicator' initiative to counter China via autonomous tech
https://www.defense.gov/News/Speeches/Speech/Article/3507156/deputy-secretary-of-defense-kathleen-hicks-keynote-address-the-urgency-to-innov/
Munitions such as PrSM will need to fire and then move, at targets on the move.[331][332]
Breaking Defense A series on: Army Strategic Fires https://breakingdefense.com/tag/army-strategic-fires/
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (28 May 2019) Beyond INF: An Affordable Arsenal Of Long-Range Missiles? INF Treaty likely to expire in August 2019 https://breakingdefense.com/2019/05/beyond-inf-an-affordable-arsenal-of-long-range-missiles/
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (22 August 2018) Army Warhead Is Key To Joint Hypersonics
https://breakingdefense.com/2018/08/army-warhead-is-key-to-joint-hypersonics/
Loren Thompson (7 Aug 2020) Army breakthroughs in Long-range fires raise novel questions about targeting, organization, and command about SLRC, a long-barrelled cannon which uses GPS-guided munitions https://www.forbes.com/sites/lorenthompson/2020/08/07/army-breakthroughs-in-long-range-fires-raise-novel-questions-about-targeting-organization--command/#565a921b6d7b
Matthew Cox (14 September 2018) The Army is developing a new strategic cannon to devastate targets over 1,000 miles away https://www.businessinsider.com/army-seeks-strategic-cannon-that-can-fire-a-round-over-1000-miles-2018-9
Sean Gallagher (10/15/2019) Bringing in the big gun: Army paves way for "strategic cannon"
Defense Updates (4 Feb 2019) U.S ARMY'S SUPER GUN - STRATEGIC LONG RANGE CANNON (SLRC) Smaller GPS-enabled shells.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/10/army-aims-to-test-extreme-long-range-strategic-cannon/
Sean Gallagher (10/15/2019) Bringing in the big gun: Army paves way for "strategic cannon"
Defense Updates (4 Feb 2019) U.S ARMY'S SUPER GUN - STRATEGIC LONG RANGE CANNON (SLRC) Smaller GPS-enabled shells.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2019/10/army-aims-to-test-extreme-long-range-strategic-cannon/
Judson, Jen (15 October 2019). "Strategic, long-range cannon preps to jump its first tech hurdle". Defense News. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/ausa/2019/10/16/strategic-long-range-cannon-preps-to-jump-its-first-tech-hurdle/
Jen Judson (23 Mar 2022) US Army terminates science and technology effort for strategic long-range cannon https://www.defensenews.com/land/2022/05/23/us-army-terminates-strategic-long-range-cannon-science-and-technology-effort/
Eric Kowal (August 27, 2020) By Improving Artillery Shells, Picatinny Engineers Seek to Greatly Extend Range of Cannon Artillery https://www.army.mil/article/238532/by_improving_artillery_shells_picatinny_engineers_seek_to_greatly_extend_range_of_cannon_artillery
Richard P. Hansen, Scranton Army Ammunition Plant (August 19, 2020) Scranton Army Ammunition Plant Manufactures and Ships Large-Caliber Ammunition Metal Parts https://www.army.mil/article/238269/scranton_army_ammunition_plant_manufactures_and_ships_large_caliber_ammunition_metal_parts
Ashley Rocque (11 Mar 2024) Army’s $186B budget request shuffles artillery, aviation plans https://breakingdefense.com/2024/03/army-budget-request-2025-biden-pentagon-how-much-does-the-army-spend/
Ashley Rocque (26 Mar 2024) Towed artillery has reached 'end of the effectiveness', Army four-star declares Rainey https://breakingdefense.com/2024/03/towed-artillery-has-reached-end-of-the-effectiveness-army-four-star-declares/
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (19 March 2019) Army Sets 2023 Hypersonic Flight Test; Strategic Cannon Advances https://breakingdefense.com/2019/03/army-sets-2023-hypersonic-flight-test-strategic-cannon-advances/
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (11 September 2018) Aiming The Army's Thousand-Mile Missiles Multi-domain Ft Sill https://breakingdefense.com/2018/09/aiming-the-armys-thousand-mile-missiles/
Maj. Anthony Clas, 3rd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 1st Armored Division Public Affairs: (SEPTEMBER 4, 2019) Target Mensuration course: Bulldog Brigade trains target acquisition with precision Target Mensuration Only (TMO) Including TMO in a unit training plan
Maj. Anthony Clas (28 August 2019) Bulldog Brigade Trains Target Acquisition with Precision
https://www.army.mil/article/226393/bulldog_brigade_trains_target_acquisition_with_precision
Lacdan, Joe (19 June 2019). "Army leaders say service must shore up its space defense" (PDF). Army News Service. I Corps has I2CEWS Battalion or Intelligence, Information, Cyber, Electronic Warfare and Space Battalion. Archived from the original on 23 June 2019. Retrieved 30 September 2023. (Fyi: the "original" link at "fortblissbugle.com" is now a gaming site. Only use the archive link.) https://web.archive.org/web/20190623002507/http://fortblissbugle.com/2019/06june/062019/pdf/062019part1b.pdf
Jason Cutshaw (SMDC/ARSTRAT) (21 February 2019) SMDC supports the development of I2CEWS battalions for multi-domain operations
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (24 Jan 2019) Hack, Jam, Sense & Shoot: Army Creates 1st Multi-Domain Unit an MDO BN for Targeting, I Corps
https://www.army.mil/article/217620/smdc_supports_the_development_of_i2cews_battalions_for_multi_domain_operations
Monica K. Guthrie, LRPF communications director (9 October 2019) Army Futures Command gains new general https://www.army.mil/article/228330/army_futures_command_gains_new_general
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (11 September 2018) Aiming The Army's Thousand-Mile Missiles Multi-domain Ft Sill https://breakingdefense.com/2018/09/aiming-the-armys-thousand-mile-missiles/
Daniel Cebul (8 Oct 2018) Army looks to a future of integrated fire https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/ausa/2018/10/08/army-looks-to-a-future-of-integrated-fire/
Sean Kimmons, Army News Service (24 October 2019) TITAN system being developed to tie 'deep sensing' to long-range fires For use in I2CEWS battalion of a Multi-domain task force https://www.army.mil/article/228867/titan_system_being_developed_to_tie_deep_sensing_to_long_range_fires
Sandra Erwin (19 April 2021) U.S. Army approves plans for a future 'tactical space layer' "tactical space layer will be integrated with an existing ground station called Tactical Intelligence Targeting Access Node (TITAN)" https://spacenews.com/u-s-army-approves-plans-for-a-future-tactical-space-layer/
Scott McKean (14 Jul 2021) AFC Pamphlet 71-20-9 Army Futures Command Concept for Command and Control - Pursuing decision dominance AFCC-C2 is the future communications network. 14 Jul 2021 see: FUTURES AND CONCEPTS CENTER resources /wiki/Scott_McKean
TRADOC Pamphlet 525-3-1 (6 December 2018) The U.S. Army in Multi-Domain Operations 2028 Archived 28 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine "describes how US Army forces, as part of the Joint Force, will militarily compete, penetrate, dis-integrate, and exploit our adversaries in the future." Link moved here Archived 19 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://www.tradoc.army.mil/Portals/14/Documents/MDO/TP525-3-1_30Nov2018.pdf
Todd South, Military Times (8 May 2019) 4 things the general in charge of the Army's newest command says are needed to win the wars of the future https://www.businessinsider.com/army-futures-command-general-4-things-needed-to-win-future-wars-2019-5#4-the-armys-culture-of-risk-aversion-needs-to-change-4
Office of the Chief of Public Affairs (10.16.2019) 2019 AUSA Warriors Corner - TacticalSpace: Delivering Future Force Space Capabilities
Assured Positioning, Navigation and Timing
Tactical Space: SDA is structuring a multi-layer satellite system:
Backbone layer for data transport downward to the long-range precision fires
Custody layer for missiles' trajectories, whether friendly or threat
Tracking layer for hypersonic glide vehicles which represent threats to the multi-layer satellite system
Space situational awareness for cis-lunar trajectories,
NavWar
https://www.dvidshub.net/video/715345/2019-ausa-warriors-corner-tacticalspace-delivering-future-force-space-capabilities
ARL Public Affairs (16 October 2018) Researchers develop technique to locate robots, Soldiers in GPS-challenged environments https://www.army.mil/article/212459/researchers_develop_technique_to_locate_robots_soldiers_in_gps_challenged_environments
Joe Lacdan, Army News Service (10 June 2019) Army leaders: Space tech crucial to future combat https://www.army.mil/article/222936/army_leaders_space_tech_crucial_to_future_combat
ASA(ALT) Weapon Systems Handbook 2018 update
/wiki/ASA(ALT)
ASA(ALT) (2018) Weapon Systems Handbook update Page 32 lists how the Weapon Systems Handbook is organized. 440 pages.
By Modernization priority
By Acquisition or Business System category (ACAT or BSC). The Weapon systems in each ACAT are sorted alphabetically by Weapon system name. Each weapon system might also be in several variants (Lettered); a weapon system's variants might be severally and simultaneously in the following phases of its Life Cycle, namely—°Materiel Solution Analysis; °Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction; °Engineering & Manufacturing Development; °Production & Deployment; °Operations & Support
ACAT I, II, III, IV are defined on page 404.[52][27][54][55][41]
/wiki/ASA(ALT)
"Assured Positioning, Navigation and Timing Cross Functional Team Assessment Exercise, 1-16 Aug 2019, WSMR". rfpdb.com. http://www.rfpdb.com/view/document/name/Assured-Positioning%2C-Navigation-and-Timing-Cross-Functional-Team-Assessment-Exercise_PNT%7CASSESSMENT%7CEXERCISE
Positioning, Navigation and Timing Assessment Exercise (PNTAX)
Koester, Jonathan (4 September 2019). "Army, JMC assess new navigation, positioning systems. Wearable A-PN". fortissbugle.com. Joint Modernization Command Public Affairs. Archived from the original on 4 September 2019. Retrieved 30 September 2023. (Fyi: the "original" link at "fortblissbugle.com" is now a gaming site. Only use the archive link.) https://web.archive.org/web/20190904235349/https://fortblissbugle.com/2019/09/04/army-jmc-assess-new-navigation-positioning-systems/
ASA(ALT) Weapon Systems Handbook 2018 update
/wiki/ASA(ALT)
ASA(ALT) (2018) Weapon Systems Handbook update Page 32 lists how the Weapon Systems Handbook is organized. 440 pages.
By Modernization priority
By Acquisition or Business System category (ACAT or BSC). The Weapon systems in each ACAT are sorted alphabetically by Weapon system name. Each weapon system might also be in several variants (Lettered); a weapon system's variants might be severally and simultaneously in the following phases of its Life Cycle, namely—°Materiel Solution Analysis; °Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction; °Engineering & Manufacturing Development; °Production & Deployment; °Operations & Support
ACAT I, II, III, IV are defined on page 404.[52][27][54][55][41]
/wiki/ASA(ALT)
Mark Pomerleau (28 March 2019) If GPS goes out, the Army now has a requirement for that https://www.c4isrnet.com/c2-comms/2019/03/29/if-gps-goes-out-the-army-now-has-a-requirement-for-that/
Caitlin O'Neill, APNT CFT Public Affairs (23 August 2019) APNT CFT Hosts First Annual Assessment Exercise https://www.army.mil/article/226186/apnt_cft_hosts_first_annual_assessment_exercise
Jr, Sydney J. Freedberg (6 June 2019). "Army Fields Anti-Jam GPS In Germany This Fall". Breaking Defense. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2019/06/army-fields-anti-jam-gps-to-germany-this-fall/
Thomas Brading, Army News Service (7 October 2019) Army fields anti-jam GPS, plans for thousands more by 2028 https://www.army.mil/article/228236/army_fields_anti_jam_gps_plans_for_thousands_more_by_2028
Dan Lafontaine, CCDC C5ISR Center Public Affairs (17 June 2019) Futures Command looks to enable plug-and-play PNT across Army platforms https://www.army.mil/article/223236/futures_command_looks_to_enable_plug_and_play_pnt_across_army_platforms
Theresa Hitchens and Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (7 August 2019) Army Seeks Small Satellites To Support Ground Troops 3 programs: Gunsmoke, Lonestar and Polaris.
Theresa Hitchens (12 October 2020) SMDC Pushes For New PNT, Tracking Sat Payloads In addition to the 3 LEO satellite programs mentioned above, SMDC's technical center is working on project TITAN (Tactical Intelligence Targeting Access Node), a "common, mobile ground station" for the Army's tactical needs.
https://breakingdefense.com/2019/08/army-seeks-small-satellites-to-support-ground-troops/
Nathan Strout (30 Nov 2019) Can hundreds of unrelated satellites create a GPS backup? Archived 6 December 2019 at the Wayback Machine https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield-tech/c2-comms/2019/11/29/can-hundreds-of-unrelated-satellites-create-a-gps-backup/
Gary Sheftick, Army News Service (10 March 2020) Army looks to leverage 'low Earth orbit' satellites: LEO satellites orbit 100-1200 miles above Earth https://www.army.mil/article/233587/army_looks_to_leverage_low_earth_orbit_satellites
CCDC Army Research Laboratory (29 August 2019) Army scientists discover a new way for robots to exchange directed messages https://www.army.mil/article/226447/army_scientists_discover_a_new_way_for_robots_to_exchange_directed_messages
Kim, M., Pallecchi, E., Ge, R. et al. (2020) Analogue switches made from boron nitride monolayers for application in 5G and terahertz communication systems. Nature Electron https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-020-0416-x
U.S. Army CCDC Army Research Laboratory Public Affairs (May 26, 2020) New 5G switch provides 50 times more energy efficiency than currently exists
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-020-0416-x
Todd South (20 Nov 2020) New Army research breakthrough could lead to more powerful lasers
David J. Pine is investigator for ARO, using colloids of microscopic spheres which can assemble bottom-up into promising structures.
Mingxin He, Johnathon P. Gales, Étienne Ducrot, Zhe Gong, Gi-Ra Yi, Stefano Sacanna, & David J. Pine (23 Sep 2020) Colloidal diamond
https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2020/11/20/new-army-research-breakthrough-could-lead-to-more-powerful-lasers/
Michael Howard (11 September 2020) Technology Providing Navigation in GPS-Denied Environment wins Grand Prize in xTechSearch Competition https://www.army.mil/article/238979/technology_providing_navigation_in_gps_denied_environment_wins_grand_prize_in_xtechsearch_competition
Sydney J. Freedberg, Jr. (28 May 2019) Beyond INF: An Affordable Arsenal Of Long-Range Missiles? INF Treaty likely to expire in August 2019 https://breakingdefense.com/2019/05/beyond-inf-an-affordable-arsenal-of-long-range-missiles/
Lacdan, Joe (19 June 2019). "Army leaders say service must shore up its space defense" (PDF). Army News Service. I Corps has I2CEWS Battalion or Intelligence, Information, Cyber, Electronic Warfare and Space Battalion. Archived from the original on 23 June 2019. Retrieved 30 September 2023. (Fyi: the "original" link at "fortblissbugle.com" is now a gaming site. Only use the archive link.) https://web.archive.org/web/20190623002507/http://fortblissbugle.com/2019/06june/062019/pdf/062019part1b.pdf
Jason Cutshaw (SMDC/ARSTRAT) (21 February 2019) SMDC supports the development of I2CEWS battalions for multi-domain operations
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (24 Jan 2019) Hack, Jam, Sense & Shoot: Army Creates 1st Multi-Domain Unit an MDO BN for Targeting, I Corps
https://www.army.mil/article/217620/smdc_supports_the_development_of_i2cews_battalions_for_multi_domain_operations
Sydney J Freedberg Jr.Iron Dome Doesn't Work For Army: Gen. Murray: Interoperability with IBCS is critical, breakingdefense.com, 5 March 2020 https://breakingdefense.com/2020/03/iron-dome-doesnt-work-for-army-gen-murray/
Jen Judson (27 March 2019) Army debuts missile defense framework in move to counter drones, hypersonic threats https://www.defensenews.com/digital-show-dailies/global-force-symposium/2019/03/27/army-debuts-new-missile-defense-strategy-to-address-emerging-threats/
Paul McLeary (17 January 2019) Missile Defense Review a Multi-Billion IOU to White House https://breakingdefense.com/2019/01/missile-defense-review-a-multi-billion-iou-to-white-house/
Miles Brown (5 July 2019) Aviation, missile commander addresses workforce CG Todd Royar's statement of his expectations
Lisa Simanuci, Aviation and Missile Command Public Affairs (27 Nov 2019) Field grade officers hear general's perspective —Maj. Gen. Todd Royar's talk at the Command and General Staff School
https://www.army.mil/article/224156/aviation_missile_commander_addresses_workforce
PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE MISSILES AND SPACE (2018) Army Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) Program Overview Archived 23 December 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://www.msl.army.mil/Documents/Briefings/IAMD/AIAMD%20Web%20Brief.pdf
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (1 October 2018) Army Awards Northrop $289M For IBCS Missile Defense Network
https://breakingdefense.com/2018/10/army-gives-northrop-289m-for-ibcs-missile-defense-network/
Lacdan, Joe (19 June 2019). "Army leaders say service must shore up its space defense" (PDF). Army News Service. I Corps has I2CEWS Battalion or Intelligence, Information, Cyber, Electronic Warfare and Space Battalion. Archived from the original on 23 June 2019. Retrieved 30 September 2023. (Fyi: the "original" link at "fortblissbugle.com" is now a gaming site. Only use the archive link.) https://web.archive.org/web/20190623002507/http://fortblissbugle.com/2019/06june/062019/pdf/062019part1b.pdf
Jason Cutshaw (SMDC/ARSTRAT) (21 February 2019) SMDC supports the development of I2CEWS battalions for multi-domain operations
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (24 Jan 2019) Hack, Jam, Sense & Shoot: Army Creates 1st Multi-Domain Unit an MDO BN for Targeting, I Corps
https://www.army.mil/article/217620/smdc_supports_the_development_of_i2cews_battalions_for_multi_domain_operations
Gary Sheftick, Army News Service (13 March 2019) FY20 budget to boost air & missile defense https://www.army.mil/article/218504/fy20_budget_to_boost_air_missile_defense
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (30 August 2019) Hypersonics: Army Awards $699M To Build First Missiles For A Combat Unit prototypes—Dynetics: Common hypersonic glide body (C-HGB); Lockheed: Long range hypersonic weapon (LRHW)
Nancy Jones-Bonbrest, U.S. Army RCCTO (30 August 2019) Army awards hypersonic weapon system contracts
https://breakingdefense.com/2019/08/hypersonics-army-awards-699m-to-build-first-missiles-for-a-combat-unit/
Sean Kimmons, Army News Service "Joint hypersonic weapon tests to start next year". www.army.mil. 8 October 2019. Retrieved 15 December 2021. https://www.army.mil/article/222617/joint_hypersonic_weapon_tests_to_start_next_year
Gary Sheftick, Army News Service (9 September 2019) Smart sensor network helps redirect missile The GBU-69 was redirected; FARA is slated to replace AH-64 in subsequent A3I experiments https://www.army.mil/article/226890/smart_sensor_network_helps_redirect_missile
Dan Gouré (20 Mar 2020) SOCOM Has Solved the Military's 'Tower of Babel' Problem https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2020/03/20/socom_has_solved_the_militarys_tower_of_babel_problem_115132.html
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (25 February 2020) Future Vertical Lift: Army's Aerial Vanguard LRPF will be the prime customer for the AI targeting data provided via FVL. The Joint force is also a consumer of this data, provided by FVL's manned or unmanned missions. https://breakingdefense.com/2020/02/future-vertical-lift-armys-aerial-vanguard/
Claire Heininger (9 August 2018) Army, Air Force team on sensor to shooter prototype for multi-domain battle https://www.army.mil/article/209672/army_air_force_team_on_sensor_to_shooter_prototype_for_multi_domain_battle
Mark Pomerleau (11 April 2018) In the move to multi-domain operations, what gets lost? The space, cyber, and information domains transcend geographic AoRs https://www.c4isrnet.com/c2-comms/2018/04/11/in-the-move-to-multi-domain-operations-what-gets-lost/
Dan Gouré (2 August 2019) Army Futures Command's Report Card After Its First Year Need: MDO doctrine in DoD, Two theater operation at island & continent, augment BCTs with higher echelon capability https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2019/08/02/army_futures_commands_report_card_after_its_first_year_114632.html
ARL (24 September 2018) New Army technology guides Soldiers in complete darkness https://www.army.mil/article/211492/new_army_technology_guides_soldiers_in_complete_darkness
Andrew Eversden (18 Oct 2021) Army Says Next-Gen AR Goggles Delayed Over Field Of View Issues https://breakingdefense.com/2021/10/army-says-next-gen-ar-goggles-delayed-over-field-of-view-issues/
Joe Lacdan (13 May 2019) Augmented reality training on the horizon to give Soldiers edge in combat allows repetition, for training https://www.army.mil/article/221766/augmented_reality_training_on_the_horizon_to_give_soldiers_edge_in_combat
Tom McKay (6 April 2019) The Army Just Gave a Press Demo of Microsoft's HoloLens 2 Military Prototype https://gizmodo.com/the-army-just-gave-a-press-demo-of-microsofts-hololens-1833863938
Bridgett Siter (19 November 2019) Soldiers test new IVAS technology, capabilities with hand-on exercises IVAS: 1 Soldier Touchpoint (STP) STP is becoming rapid acquisitions methodology for AFC https://www.army.mil/article/230034/soldiers_test_new_ivas_technology_capabilities_during_hand_on_exercises
Kathryn Bailey, PEO C3T Public Affairs (19 November 2019) The Army's tactical network empowers advanced goggle platform IVAS is under STP 2-- "In July 2020, STP 3 will fully integrate the ITN with IVAS" https://www.army.mil/article/230047/the_armys_tactical_network_empowers_advanced_goggle_platform
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (13 December 2019) Soldiers, Coders Surprise Army Brass By Changing IVAS Goggles FOV is turning out to be more important to the infantrymen than the range of the goggles https://breakingdefense.com/2019/12/soldiers-coders-surprise-army-brass-changing-ivas-goggles/
Devon L. Suits, Army News Service (9 December 2019) Third IVAS evaluation slated for July Soldier Touchpoint successfully increased IVAS FOV to 80 degrees while range of the goggles was still at 900 meters, from thermal nightsight capability https://www.army.mil/article/230765/third_ivas_evaluation_slated_for_july
Thomas Brading, Army News Service (10 February 2020) New technology recognizes faces in the dark, far away Combines night vision with facial recognition https://www.army.mil/article/232503/new_technology_recognizes_faces_in_the_dark_far_away
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (5 October 2020) From 'Frankengoggle' To Battle-Ready: Army IVAS waterproof IVAS https://breakingdefense.com/2020/10/from-frankengoggle-to-battle-ready-army-ivas/
Adam Stone (30 Sep 2021) US Army makes headway on Synthetic Training Environment https://www.defensenews.com/training-sim/2021/09/30/us-army-makes-headway-on-synthetic-training-environment/
Andrew Eversden (1 Dec 2021) Wormuth: Here's the Army's role in a Pacific fight https://breakingdefense.com/2021/12/heres-what-the-army-would-do-in-a-pacific-fight-wormuth/
Immersive Ops (15 Nov 2021) Immersive Wisdom briefs Secretary of the Army at Project Convergence '21 on future of Army operations centers 3D Virtual Operations Center software platform https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/immersive-wisdom-briefs-secretary-of-the-army-at-project-convergence-21-on-future-of-army-operations-centers-301423723.html
Caitlin M Kenney (1 Dec 2021) Army Would Have 5 'Core Tasks' in a Pacific Conflict https://www.defenseone.com/policy/2021/12/army-would-have-5-core-tasks-pacific-conflict/187212/
Ashley Rocque (15 May 2024) If Army's IVAS doesn't ace upcoming test, it could become bill payer: Rainey https://breakingdefense.com/2024/05/if-armys-ivas-doesnt-ace-upcoming-test-it-could-become-bill-payer-rainey/
Thomas Brading, Army News Service (6 February 2020) Army scientists on verge of nearly unbreakable battery First announced in 2015 https://www.army.mil/article/232406/army_scientists_on_verge_of_nearly_unbreakable_battery
U.S. Army CCDC Research Laboratory Public Affairs (5 February 2020) Army scientists look inside batteries with a molecular eye CCDC ARL "teamed with researchers from the U.S. Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory" (PNNL)
Nature Nanotechnology (27 January 2020) Real-time mass spectrometric characterization of the solid–electrolyte interphase of a lithium-ion battery
https://www.army.mil/article/232404/army_scientists_look_inside_batteries_with_a_molecular_eye
CCDC Army Research Laboratory March 2020) Researchers imagine devices without cords or batteries[dead link] Molybdenum disulphide https://www.army.mil/article/233325/researchers_imagine_devices_without_cords_or_batteries(3
Dan Lafontaine, C5ISR Center Public Affairs (4 May 2020) In modernization push, Army researches integrated power cables for Soldiers uses technology from Foreign Comparative Testing program (FCT) https://www.army.mil/article/235248/in_modernization_push_army_researches_integrated_power_cables_for_soldiers
Dan Lafontaine, C5ISR Center Public Affairs (17 Jan 2020) Army boosts Soldier battery power for greater lethality, mobility by using silicon-based anodes https://www.army.mil/article/224879
U.S. Army CCDC Army Research Laboratory Public Affairs (25 February 2020) Additive manufacturing to provide Soldiers with cutting-edge munitions They "printed the world's first 3-D hybrid microcontroller circuit on a hemisphere that survived high G environments". https://www.army.mil/article/233054/additive_manufacturing_to_provide_soldiers_with_cutting_edge_munitions
NSRDEC Public Affairs (15 October 2018) Natick's exoskeleton work is a powerful step toward the future of Soldier lethality https://www.army.mil/article/212426/naticks_exoskeleton_work_is_a_powerful_step_toward_the_future_of_soldier_lethality
RDECOM Soldier Center, Public Affairs Office (23 January 2019) Soldier Center partners with industry experts to advance exoskeleton technologies https://www.army.mil/article/216423/army_looks_at_more_advanced_exoskeleton_technologies_options
Harvard (17 Sep 2018) Multi-joint Personalized Exosuit Breaks New Ground video clip https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N28bttqLoZE
David Roza (26 Aug 2022) The Army wants exoskeletons so soldiers can defeat their worst enemy: Lower back pain Assistive technology adds 3 pounds of equipment, but stabilizes lower back https://taskandpurpose.com/news/army-tests-exoskeleton/
Jerilyn Coleman (28 Apr 2022) DEVCOM teams explore low-cost, lightweight sensors for warfighter use Chem Bio Center (CBC) sensors to detect possible hazardous contamination https://www.army.mil/article/256202/devcom_teams_explore_low_cost_lightweight_sensors_for_warfighter_use
Thomas Brading, Army News Service (29 August 2019) Army closer to delivering new infantry squad vehicle (ISV)
9 Soldiers of an infantry squad will maneuver in an ISV
Plans to purchase 649 prototypes were approved in February 2019
3 industry leaders have been named (23 Aug. 2019), to deliver ISV prototypes
Oshkosh Defense/Flyer,
GM Defense, and
SAIC/Polaris
Prototypes are due for initial assessment at Aberdeen Test Center 13 November 2019 through December 2019
At Fort Bragg a second round of operational testing by Soldiers will be performed on the candidate ISV prototypes
Downselect to one vendor is expected 2nd Quarter of FY2020
https://www.army.mil/article/226439/army_closer_to_delivering_new_infantry_squad_vehicle
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (8 October 2019) Who Will Build 651 Parachuting Trucks For The Army? 2 air-drop-able prototypes from each vendor due 13 November 2019, https://breakingdefense.com/2019/10/who-will-build-651-of-the-armys-parachuting-truck/
Kyle Mizokami (13 Oct 2019) Meet the Army's New Airborne Trucks https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a29432268/meet-the-armys-new-airborne-trucks/
GM Defense LLC (8 Aug 2020) US Army Selects GM Design for Infantry Squad Vehicle
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (27 October 2020) GM Defense Delivers 1st Air-Droppable Trucks Cybersecurity is part of ISV electronics
Kyle Mizokami (29 Oct 2020) Here It Is: the Army's New Infantry Squad Vehicle
Janes (21 Oct 2019) AUSA 2019: GM Defense's Infantry Squad Vehicle (ISV) for U.S. Army Youtube clip, 9:27. No armor, has Roll bars.
https://euro-sd.com/2020/08/articles/18215/us-army-selects-gm-design-for-infantry-squad-vehicle/
Ashley Roque (5 Apr 2023) US Army waves green flag for Infantry Squad Vehicle full-rate production https://breakingdefense.com/2023/04/us-army-waves-green-flag-for-infantry-squad-vehicle-full-rate-production/
Koester, Jonathan (4 September 2019). "Army, JMC assess new navigation, positioning systems. Wearable A-PN". fortissbugle.com. Joint Modernization Command Public Affairs. Archived from the original on 4 September 2019. Retrieved 30 September 2023. (Fyi: the "original" link at "fortblissbugle.com" is now a gaming site. Only use the archive link.) https://web.archive.org/web/20190904235349/https://fortblissbugle.com/2019/09/04/army-jmc-assess-new-navigation-positioning-systems/
ASA(ALT) Weapon Systems Handbook 2018 update
/wiki/ASA(ALT)
ASA(ALT) (2018) Weapon Systems Handbook update Page 32 lists how the Weapon Systems Handbook is organized. 440 pages.
By Modernization priority
By Acquisition or Business System category (ACAT or BSC). The Weapon systems in each ACAT are sorted alphabetically by Weapon system name. Each weapon system might also be in several variants (Lettered); a weapon system's variants might be severally and simultaneously in the following phases of its Life Cycle, namely—°Materiel Solution Analysis; °Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction; °Engineering & Manufacturing Development; °Production & Deployment; °Operations & Support
ACAT I, II, III, IV are defined on page 404.[52][27][54][55][41]
/wiki/ASA(ALT)
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (19 December 2019) AI & Robots Crush Foes In Army Wargame
PM ITE (October 2019) ONE SEMI-AUTOMATED FORCES (OneSAF)
Roger Smith (2008) OneSAF: Next Generation Wargame Model pdf
https://breakingdefense.com/2019/12/ai-robots-crush-foes-in-army-wargame/
Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. (19 December 2019) AI & Robots Crush Foes In Army Wargame
PM ITE (October 2019) ONE SEMI-AUTOMATED FORCES (OneSAF)
Roger Smith (2008) OneSAF: Next Generation Wargame Model pdf
https://breakingdefense.com/2019/12/ai-robots-crush-foes-in-army-wargame/
Michael Marrow and Theresa Hitchens (12 February 2024) Air Force launches reorganization, as Kendall warns 'We are out of time' to match China https://breakingdefense.com/2024/02/air-force-reorganization-frank-kendall-china/
Unshin Lee Harpley (12 February 2024) Saltzman Announces Fourth Space Force Field Command: Space Futures Command https://www.airandspaceforces.com/space-force-fourth-field-command-space-futures-command/
Stephen Losey (3 May 2024) US Air Force eyes deadline to launch new command Integrated Capabilities Command up and running by year-end 2024; responsible for future requirements for USAF. https://www.defensenews.com/air/2024/05/03/us-air-force-eyes-deadline-to-launch-new-command/
Sean Kimmons "Army Futures Command aims to tap into innovative culture in Austin and beyond", Army News Service, 15 August 2018, archived from the original on 16 August 2018, retrieved 16 August 2018 https://www.army.mil/article/209932/army_futures_command_aims_to_tap_into_innovative_culture_in_austin_and_beyond
Austin gets its general; Army Futures Command leader confirmed https://www.bizjournals.com/austin/news/2018/08/22/austin-gets-its-general-army-futures-command.html
"PN2622—Lt. Gen. John M. Murray—Army". U.S. Congress. 16 July 2018. Retrieved 17 July 2018. https://www.congress.gov/nomination/115th-congress/2262
Jen Judson (12 Jul 2021) Army Futures Command chief on what his team got right — and wrong — since its founding https://www.defensenews.com/interviews/2021/07/12/army-futures-command-chief-on-what-his-team-got-right-and-wrong-since-its-founding/
Jen Judson (6 Sep 2022) Futures Command faces identity crisis as Army shifts mission Archived 7 February 2024 at the Wayback Machine https://www.defensenews.com/land/2022/09/06/futures-command-faces-identity-crisis-as-army-shifts-mission/
Andrew Eversden (24 Jun 2022) House lawmakers ask Army: Who's in charge of massive modernization program? Archived 7 September 2022 at the Wayback Machine 180 day timer after FY2023 NDAA takes effect, could trigger rescission of AD2022-07. To find an Army document, enter the pub form identifier, such as "ar 71-9" in the menu: ARMY PUBLISHING INDEX Archived 16 November 2022 at the Wayback Machine https://breakingdefense.com/2022/06/house-lawmakers-ask-army-whos-in-charge-of-massive-modernization-program/
Marcus Weisgerber (10 Nov 2022) Defense Business Brief: What a split Congress means for defense spending;... Archived 15 November 2022 at the Wayback Machine "on the lame-duck Congress' to-do list: Pass the fiscal 2023 defense appropriation by December and the National Defense Authorization Act". Passage of the NDAA starts the 180-day timer on AD 2022-07. https://www.defenseone.com/business/2022/11/defense-business-brief-november-10-2022/379640/
Judson, Jen (6 September 2022). "Army's next Futures Command leader could come 'in short order'". Defense News. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://www.defensenews.com/land/2022/09/06/armys-next-futures-command-leader-could-come-in-short-order/
Eversden, Andrew (7 September 2022). "After months of delay, Army nominates new commander for Futures Command". Breaking Defense. Archived from the original on 7 February 2024. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://breakingdefense.sites.breakingmedia.com/2022/09/after-months-of-delay-army-nominates-new-commander-for-futures-command/
"Army announces new Futures Command leader as Texas senator calls for clarity on innovating force". Stars and Stripes. Archived from the original on 10 September 2022. Retrieved 3 October 2023. https://www.stripes.com/branches/army/2022-09-08/army-futures-command-ndaa-texas-7260624.html
"Promotion Ceremony iho LTG James E. Rainey". DVIDS. 7 October 2022. Retrieved 13 October 2022. https://www.dvidshub.net/video/860079/promotion-ceremony-iho-ltg-james-e-rainey
The CG,AFC is responsible for Force design (in the style of TRADOC's G357,[418] but applied to Force modernization, rather than training).[156] The Army's Force management model begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure, physical environment, and the time available to bring the Current army to bear on the situation.[419] The AROC serves as a discussion forum of these factors.[156]
The Army G-8 and G-3/5/7 sit on the Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC), chaired by the Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA).[420]: diagram on p.559 [156][419]
The relevant strategy is provided by the Army's leadership to guide Army staff.[420]
The resources are "dictated by Congress".[419]
A DOTMLPF analysis models the factors necessary to change the Current force into a relevant Future force.[421]
A JCIDS/ACIDS[422] process identifies the gaps in capability between Current and Future force.
A Force design to meet the materiel gaps is underway.
An organization with the desired capabilities (manpower, materiel, training) is brought to bear on each gap.
AR 5-22(pdf) lists the Force modernization proponent for each Army branch, which can be a CoE or Branch proponent leader.
Staff uses Synchronization meetings[423]: minute 8:29 before seeking approval —HTAR Force Management 3-2b: "Managing change in any large, complex organization requires the synchronization of many interrelated processes".[420]: p.3-1
A budget request is submitted to Congress.
Approved requests then await resource deliveries which then become available to the combatant commanders.
https://www.tradoc.army.mil/g357/