Hydrogen embrittlement is a complex process involving a number of distinct contributing micro-mechanisms, not all of which need to be present. The mechanisms include the formation of brittle hydrides, the creation of voids that can lead to high-pressure bubbles, enhanced decohesion at internal surfaces and localised plasticity at crack tips that assist in the propagation of cracks.23 There is a great variety of mechanisms that have been proposed24 and investigated as to the cause of brittleness once diffusible hydrogen has been dissolved into the metal.25 In recent years, it has become widely accepted that HE is a complex process dependent on material and environment so that no single mechanism applies exclusively.26
Hydrogen embrittles a variety of metals including steel,3334 aluminium (at high temperatures only35), and titanium.36 Austempered iron is also susceptible, though austempered steel (and possibly other austempered metals) displays increased resistance to hydrogen embrittlement.37 NASA has reviewed which metals are susceptible to embrittlement and which only prone to hot hydrogen attack: nickel alloys, austenitic stainless steels, aluminium and alloys, copper (including alloys, e.g. beryllium copper).38 Sandia has also produced a comprehensive guide.39
Steel with an ultimate tensile strength of less than 1000 MPa (~145,000 psi) or hardness of less than HRC 32 on the Hardness Rockwell Scale is not generally considered susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement. As an example of severe hydrogen embrittlement, the elongation at failure of 17-4PH precipitation hardened stainless steel was measured to drop from 17% to only 1.7% when smooth specimens were exposed to high-pressure hydrogen40
As the strength of steels increases, the fracture toughness decreases, so the likelihood that hydrogen embrittlement will lead to fracture increases. In high-strength steels, anything above a hardness of HRC 32 may be susceptible to early hydrogen cracking after plating processes that introduce hydrogen. They may also experience long-term failures any time from weeks to decades after being placed in service due to accumulation of hydrogen over time from cathodic protection and other sources. Numerous failures have been reported in the hardness range from HRC 32-36 and above; therefore, parts in this range should be checked during quality control to ensure they are not susceptible.
Testing the fracture toughness of hydrogen-charged, embrittled specimens is complicated by the need to keep charged specimens very cold, in liquid nitrogen, to prevent the hydrogen diffusing away.41
Copper alloys which contain oxygen can be embrittled if exposed to hot hydrogen. The hydrogen diffuses through the copper and reacts with inclusions of Cu2O, forming 2 metallic Cu atoms and H2O, which then forms pressurized bubbles of steam at the grain boundaries. This process can force the grains of the crystal lattice away from each other, in a process known as steam embrittlement.
Alloys of vanadium, nickel, and titanium have a high hydrogen solubility, and can therefore absorb significant amounts of hydrogen. This can lead to hydride formation, resulting in irregular volume expansion and reduced ductility (because metallic hydrides are fragile ceramic materials). This is a particular issue when looking for non-palladium-based alloys for use in hydrogen separation membranes.42
While most failures in practice have been through fast failure, there is experimental evidence that hydrogen also affects the fatigue properties of steels. This is entirely expected given the nature of the embrittlement mechanisms proposed for fast fracture.4344 In general hydrogen embrittlement has a strong effect on high-stress, low-cycle fatigue and very little effect on high-cycle fatigue.4546
Hydrogen embrittlement is a volume effect: it affects the volume of the material. Environmental embrittlement47 is a surface effect where molecules from the atmosphere surrounding the material under test are adsorbed onto the fresh crack surface. This is most clearly seen from fatigue measurements where the measured crack growth rates48 can be an order of magnitude higher in hydrogen than in air. That this effect is due to adsorption, which saturates when the crack surface is completely covered, is understood from the weak dependence of the effect on the pressure of hydrogen.49
Environmental embrittlement is also observed to reduce fracture toughness in fast fracture tests, but the severity is much reduced compared with the same effect in fatigue.50
Hydrogen embrittlement occurs when a previously embrittled material has low fracture toughness regardless of the atmosphere in which it is tested. Environmental embrittlement occurs when the low fracture toughness is only observed in that atmosphere.
During manufacture, hydrogen can be dissolved into the component by processes such as phosphating, pickling, electroplating, casting, carbonizing, surface cleaning, electrochemical machining, welding, hot roll forming, and heat treatments.
During service use, hydrogen can be dissolved into the metal from wet corrosion or through misapplication of protection measures such as cathodic protection.51 In one case of failure during construction of the San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge galvanized (i.e. zinc-plated) rods were left wet for 5 years before being tensioned. The reaction of the zinc with water introduced hydrogen into the steel.525354
A common case of embrittlement during manufacture is poor arc welding practice, in which hydrogen is released from moisture, such as in the coating of welding electrodes or from damp welding rods.5556 To avoid atomic hydrogen formation in the high temperature plasma of the arc, welding rods have to be perfectly dried in an oven at the appropriate temperature and duration before use. Another way to minimize the formation of hydrogen is to use special low-hydrogen electrodes for welding high-strength steels.
Apart from arc welding, the most common problems are from chemical or electrochemical processes which, by reduction of hydrogen ions or water, generate hydrogen atoms at the surface, which rapidly dissolve in the metal. One of these chemical reactions involves hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in sulfide stress cracking (SSC), a significant problem for the oil and gas industries.57
After a manufacturing process or treatment which may cause hydrogen ingress, the component should be baked to remove or immobilize the hydrogen.58
Hydrogen embrittlement can be prevented through several methods, all of which are centered on minimizing contact between the metal and hydrogen, particularly during fabrication and the electrolysis of water. Embrittling procedures such as acid pickling should be avoided, as should increased contact with elements such as sulfur and phosphate.
If the metal has not yet started to crack, hydrogen embrittlement can be reversed by removing the hydrogen source and causing the hydrogen within the metal to diffuse out through heat treatment. This de-embrittlement process, known as low hydrogen annealing or "baking", is used to overcome the weaknesses of methods such as electroplating which introduce hydrogen to the metal, but is not always entirely effective because a sufficient time and temperature must be reached.59 Tests such as ASTM F1624 can be used to rapidly identify the minimum baking time (by testing using careful design of experiments, a relatively low number of samples can be used to pinpoint this value). Then the same test can be used as a quality control check to evaluate if baking was sufficient on a per-batch basis.
In the case of welding, often pre-heating and post-heating the metal is applied to allow the hydrogen to diffuse out before it can cause any damage. This is specifically done with high-strength steels and low alloy steels such as the chromium/molybdenum/vanadium alloys. Due to the time needed to re-combine hydrogen atoms into the hydrogen molecules, hydrogen cracking due to welding can occur over 24 hours after the welding operation is completed.
Another way of preventing this problem is through materials selection. This will build an inherent resistance to this process and reduce the need for post-processing or constant monitoring for failure. Certain metals or alloys are highly susceptible to this issue, so choosing a material that is minimally affected while retaining the desired properties would also provide an optimal solution. Much research has been done to catalogue the compatibility of certain metals with hydrogen.60 Tests such as ASTM F1624 can also be used to rank alloys and coatings during materials selection to ensure (for instance) that the threshold of cracking is below the threshold for hydrogen-assisted stress corrosion cracking. Similar tests can also be used during quality control to more effectively qualify materials being produced in a rapid and comparable manner.
Coatings act as a barrier between the metal substrate and the surrounding environment, hindering the ingress of hydrogen atoms. Various techniques can be used to apply coatings, such as electroplating, chemical conversion coatings, or organic coatings. The choice of coating depends on factors such as the type of metal, the operating environment, and the specific requirements of the application.
Electroplating is a commonly used method to deposit a protective layer onto the metal surface. This process involves immersing the metal substrate into an electrolyte solution containing metal ions. By applying an electric current, the metal ions are reduced and form a metallic coating on the substrate. Electroplating can provide an excellent protective layer that enhances corrosion resistance and reduces the susceptibility to hydrogen embrittlement.
Chemical conversion coatings are another effective method for surface protection. These coatings are typically formed through chemical reactions between the metal substrate and a chemical solution. The conversion coating chemically reacts with the metal surface, resulting in a thin, tightly adhering protective layer. Examples of conversion coatings include chromate, phosphate, and oxide coatings. These coatings not only provide a barrier against hydrogen diffusion but also enhance the metal's corrosion resistance.
Organic coatings, such as paints or polymer coatings, offer additional protection against hydrogen embrittlement. These coatings form a physical barrier between the metal surface and the environment. They provide excellent adhesion, flexibility, and resistance to environmental factors. Organic coatings can be applied through various methods, including spray coating, dip coating, or powder coating. They can be formulated with additives to further enhance their resistance to hydrogen ingress.
Thermally sprayed coatings offer several advantages in the context of hydrogen embrittlement prevention. The coating materials used in this process are often composed of materials with excellent resistance to hydrogen diffusion, such as ceramics or cermet alloys. These materials have a low permeability to hydrogen, creating a robust barrier against hydrogen ingress into the metal substrate.61
Most analytical methods for hydrogen embrittlement involve evaluating the effects of (1) internal hydrogen from production and/or (2) external sources of hydrogen such as cathodic protection. For steels, it is important to test specimens in the lab that are at least as hard (or harder) as the final parts will be. Ideally, specimens should be made of the final material or the nearest possible representative, as fabrication can have a profound impact on resistance to hydrogen-assisted cracking.
There are numerous ASTM standards for testing for hydrogen embrittlement:
There are many other related standards for hydrogen embrittlement:
Lynch, S. P. (2011-01-01), Raja, V. S.; Shoji, Tetsuo (eds.), "2 - Hydrogen embrittlement (HE) phenomena and mechanisms", Stress Corrosion Cracking, Woodhead Publishing Series in Metals and Surface Engineering, Woodhead Publishing, pp. 90–130, ISBN 978-1-84569-673-3, retrieved 2022-06-10 978-1-84569-673-3 ↩
Lee, Jonathan A. (April 2016). "Hydrogen Embrittlement" (PDF). NASA. Archived from the original (PDF) on Feb 5, 2021. Retrieved 18 December 2020 – via CORE. https://web.archive.org/web/20210205082611/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84914440.pdf ↩
Jewett, R. P.; Walter, R. J.; Chandler, W. T.; Frohmberg, R. P. (1973-03-01). "Hydrogen environment embrittlement of metals". NTRS. NASA. Archived from the original on May 25, 2024. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19730012717 ↩
Safety Standard for Hydrogen and Hydrogen Systems: Guidelines for Hydrogen System Design, Materials Selection, Operations, Storage, and Transportation (PDF). Washington, DC: Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 1997-10-29. p. A-93. NSS 1740.16. Retrieved 2022-06-27. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/03/f11/871916.pdf ↩
Johnson, William H. (31 December 1875). "II. On some remarkable changes produced in iron and steel by the action of hydrogen and acids". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 23 (156–163): 168–179. doi:10.1098/rspl.1874.0024. eISSN 2053-9126. ISSN 0370-1662. JSTOR 113285. S2CID 97579399. https://doi.org/10.1098%2Frspl.1874.0024 ↩
Bhadhesia, Harry. "Prevention of Hydrogen Embrittlement in Steels" (PDF). Phase Transformations & Complex Properties Research Group, Cambridge University. Retrieved 17 December 2020. https://www.phase-trans.msm.cam.ac.uk/2016/preventing_hydrogen.pdf ↩
"What is hydrogen embrittlement? – Causes, effects and prevention". TWI - The Welding Institute. Retrieved 18 December 2020. https://www.twi-global.com/technical-knowledge/faqs/what-is-hydrogen-embrittlement ↩
Oriani, R A (August 1978). "Hydrogen Embrittlement of Steels". Annual Review of Materials Science. 8 (1): 327–357. Bibcode:1978AnRMS...8..327O. doi:10.1146/annurev.ms.08.080178.001551. ISSN 0084-6600. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.ms.08.080178.001551 ↩
"Hydrogen Embrittlement". Metallurgy for Dummies. Retrieved 18 December 2020. https://www.metallurgyfordummies.com/hydrogen-embrittlement.html ↩
Louthan, M. R. (2008-06-01). "Hydrogen Embrittlement of Metals: A Primer for the Failure Analyst". Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention. 8 (3): 289–307. doi:10.1007/s11668-008-9133-x. ISSN 1864-1245. S2CID 51738408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-008-9133-x ↩
Li, Hanyu; Niu, Ranming; Li, Wei; Lu, Hongzhou; Cairney, Julie; Chen, Yi-Sheng (September 2022). "Hydrogen in pipeline steels: Recent advances in characterization and embrittlement mitigation". Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 105: 104709. Bibcode:2022JNGSE.10504709L. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104709. S2CID 250713252. /wiki/Bibcode_(identifier) ↩
TWI – The Welding Institute. "What is high temperature hydrogen attack (HTHA) / hot hydrogen attack?". TWI - The Welding Institute. Retrieved 16 December 2020. https://www.twi-global.com/technical-knowledge/faqs/what-is-high-temperature-hydrogen-attack-htha-hot-hydrogen-attack ↩
Barnoush, Afrooz. "Hydrogen embrittlement revisited by in situ electrochemical nanoindentations" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-05-18. Retrieved 18 December 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20110518222127/http://www.uni-saarland.de/fak8/wwm/research/phd_barnoush/hydrogen.pdf ↩
Robertson, Ian M.; Sofronis, P.; Nagao, A.; Martin, M. L.; Wang, S.; Gross, D. W.; Nygren, K. E. (2015). "Hydrogen Embrittlement Understood". Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 46A (6): 2323–2341. Bibcode:2015MMTA...46.2323R. doi:10.1007/s11661-015-2836-1. S2CID 136682331. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11661-015-2836-1 ↩
Haiyang Yu (February 2009). "Discrete dislocation plasticity HELPs understand hydrogen effects in bcc materials". Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids. 123: 41–60. arXiv:1807.05101. doi:10.1016/j.jmps.2018.08.020. S2CID 56081700. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jmps.2018.08.020 ↩
Vergani, Laura; Colombo, Chiara; et al. (2014). "Hydrogen effect on fatigue behavior of a quenched and tempered steel". Procedia Engineering. 74 (XVII International Colloquium on Mechanical Fatigue of Metals (ICMFM17)): 468–71. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.06.299. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.proeng.2014.06.299 ↩
Song, Jun (11 November 2012). "Atomic mechanism and prediction of hydrogen embrittlement in iro". Nature Materials. 12 (2): 145–151. doi:10.1038/nmat3479. PMID 23142843. Retrieved 22 December 2020. https://www.nature.com/articles/nmat3479 ↩
Dolan, Michael D.; Kochanek, Mark A.; Munnings, Christopher N.; McLennan, Keith G.; Viano, David M. (February 2015). "Hydride phase equilibria in V–Ti–Ni alloy membranes". Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 622: 276–281. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.10.081. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Djukic, M.B.; et al. (2014). "Hydrogen embrittlement of low carbon structural steel". Procedia Materials Science. 3 (20th European Conference on Fracture): 1167–1172. doi:10.1016/j.mspro.2014.06.190. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.mspro.2014.06.190 ↩
Djukic, M.B.; et al. (2015). "Hydrogen damage of steels: A case study and hydrogen embrittlement model". Engineering Failure Analysis. 58 (Recent case studies in Engineering Failure Analysis): 485–498. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.05.017. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩
Ambat, Rajan; Dwarakadasa (February 1996). "Effect of Hydrogen in aluminium and aluminium alloys: A review". Bulletin of Materials Science. 19 (1): 103–114. doi:10.1007/BF02744792. https://doi.org/10.1007%2FBF02744792 ↩
Eberhart, Mark (2003). Why Things Break. New York: Harmony Books. p. 65. ISBN 978-1-4000-4760-4. 978-1-4000-4760-4 ↩
Tartaglia, John; Lazzari, Kristen; et al. (March 2008). "A Comparison of Mechanical Properties and Hydrogen Embrittlement Resistance of Austempered vs Quenched and Tempered 4340 Steel". Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 39 (3): 559–76. Bibcode:2008MMTA...39..559T. doi:10.1007/s11661-007-9451-8. ISSN 1073-5623. S2CID 136866718. /wiki/Bibcode_(identifier) ↩
Marchi, C. San (2012). "Technical Reference for Hydrogen Compatibility of Materials" (PDF). https://www.sandia.gov/app/uploads/sites/158/2021/12/SAND2012_7321.pdf ↩
Fracture Mechanics Techniques for Assessing the Effects of Hydrogen on Steel PropertiesM J Cheaitani and R J Pargeter, TWI, paper presented at the International Steel and Hydrogen Conference 28 September 2011. https://www.twi-global.com/technical-knowledge/published-papers/fracture-mechanics-techniques-for-assessing-the-effects-of-hydrogen-on-steel-properties ↩
Fernandez-Sousa, Rebeca (2020). "Analysis of the influence of microstructural traps on hydrogen assisted fatigue". Acta Materialia. 199: 253. arXiv:2008.05452. Bibcode:2020AcMat.199..253F. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.030. S2CID 221103811. /wiki/ArXiv_(identifier) ↩
Francis, Rob (November 2018). "A Failure Analysis of Hydrogen Embrittlement in Bridge Fasteners". Corrosionpedia. Retrieved 18 December 2020. https://www.corrosionpedia.com/a-failure-analysis-of-hydrogen-embrittlement-in-bridge-fasteners/2/6877 ↩
Ferraz, M. Teresa; Oliveira, Manuela (2008). "Steel fasteners failure by hydrogen embrittlement" (PDF). Ciência e Tecnologia dos Materiais. 20 (1/2): 128–133. Retrieved 18 December 2020. http://www.scielo.mec.pt/pdf/ctm/v20n1-2/20n1-2a19.pdf ↩
Yun Chung (2 December 2014). "Validity of Caltrans' Environmental Hydrogen Embrittlement Test on Grade BD Anchor Rods in the SAS Span" (PDF). http://www.sacbee.com/news/investigations/bay-bridge/article4254712.ece/BINARY/Validity%20of%20Caltrans%27%20EHE%20Tests.pdf ↩
Weman, Klas (2011). Welding Processes Handbook. Elsevier. p. 115. ISBN 978-0-85709-518-3. 978-0-85709-518-3 ↩
"Standard Test Method for Process Control Verification to Prevent Hydrogen Embrittlement in Plated or Coated Fasteners". Astm.org. Retrieved 24 February 2015. http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/DATABASE.CART/REDLINE_PAGES/F1940.htm?L+mystore+yvst4574+1196145312 ↩
Federal Engineering and Design Support. "Embrittlement" (PDF). Fastenal. Fastenal Company Engineering Department. Retrieved 9 May 2015. http://www.fastenal.com/content/feds/pdf/Article%20-%20Embrittlement.pdf ↩
"Addressing hydrogen permeation and embrittlement". 2023. https://zircotec.com/resources/news/addressing-hydrogen-permeation-and-embrittlement/ ↩
"ASTM F1459 - 06(2012): Standard Test Method for Determination of the Susceptibility of Metallic Materials to Hydrogen Gas Embrittlement (HGE)". Astm.org. Retrieved 2015-02-24. http://www.astm.org/Standards/F1459.htm ↩
"ASTM G142 - 98(2011) Standard Test Method for Determination of Susceptibility of Metals to Embrittlement in Hydrogen Containing Environments at High Pressure, High Temperature, or Both". Astm.org. Retrieved 2015-02-24. http://www.astm.org/Standards/G142.htm ↩
ASTM STP 543, "Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing" ↩
Raymond L (1974). Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing. ASTM International. ISBN 978-0-8031-0373-3. 978-0-8031-0373-3 ↩
"ASTM F1940 - 07a(2014) Standard Test Method for Process Control Verification to Prevent Hydrogen Embrittlement in Plated or Coated Fasteners". Astm.org. Retrieved 2015-02-24. http://www.astm.org/Standards/F1940.htm ↩
"ASTM F519 - 17a Standard Test Method for Mechanical Hydrogen Embrittlement Evaluation of Plating/Coating Processes and Service Environments". www.astm.org. Retrieved 21 April 2018. http://www.astm.org/Standards/F519.htm ↩
Mair, Lucy (14 January 2015). "British Land to replace 'a number of bolts' on Leadenhall Building". constructionnews.co.uk. Retrieved 21 April 2018. https://www.constructionnews.co.uk/news/contractors-news/third-bolt-breaks-on-cheesegrater-14-01-2015/ ↩
"Cheesegrater bolts to cost Severfield £6m after Leadenhall building loses five". cityam. 17 June 2015. Retrieved 22 December 2020. https://www.cityam.com/cheesegrater-bolts-cost-severfield-6m/ ↩