Menu
Home
People
Places
Arts
History
Plants & Animals
Science
Life & Culture
Technology
Reference.org
Space Competitiveness Index
open-in-new
<h2 id="overview">Overview</h2> <p>Traditionally, the report included the top 10 leading markets which included Brazil, Canada, China, Europe, India, Israel, Japan, Russia, South Korea, and the United States. In the 2012, the report introduced 5 more countries which include Argentina, Australia, <a href="/facts/Iran/24yukge8">Iran</a>, <a href="/facts/South_Africa/vvXQpLgq">South Africa</a>, and <a href="/facts/Ukraine/Qof0uqAj">Ukraine</a>. The report treats <a href="/facts/Europe/DTAtrKfh">Europe</a> as integrated whole. </p><p>A set of over 40 metrics that have the greatest economic determinants were compiled for each entity individually. The metrics were separated into three major areas: </p> <ul><li>Government</li> <li>Human Capital</li> <li>Industry</li></ul> <h2 id="report-by-year">Report by year</h2> <h3>2008</h3> <p>The 2008 report was the first edition of the Space Competitiveness Index. The report ranked the top 10 global space participant countries across over 40 greatest economic determinants metrics.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:3" href="#fn:3"><sup>3</sup></a> </p><p>Total Aggregate Scores by Country: </p> <ol><li> <a href="/facts/United_States/P0sCdLe5">United States</a> 91.43</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Europe/DTAtrKfh">Europe</a> 48.07</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Russia/jfkCwyxn">Russia</a> 34.06</li> <li> <a href="/facts/China/lTjIXY5p">China</a> 17.88</li> <li> <a href="/facts/India/1kKHcnxM">India</a> 17.52</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Canada/cWWFM8oc">Canada</a> 16.94</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Japan/U5mz0SRT">Japan</a> 14.46</li> <li> <a href="/facts/South_Korea/pCobAaVw">South Korea</a> 8.89</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Israel/dEe3IcaY">Israel</a> 8.38</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Brazil/QHkG46GL">Brazil</a> 4.96</li></ol> <h3>2009</h3> <p>The second edition of the report was able to contrast with the first edition. While the <a href="/facts/United_States/P0sCdLe5">United States</a> still led the index, they declined marginally based on increase by other countries. </p><p>Total Aggregate Scores by Country: </p> <ol><li> <a href="/facts/United_States/P0sCdLe5">United States</a> 90.32 ()</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Europe/DTAtrKfh">Europe</a> 46.81 ()</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Russia/jfkCwyxn">Russia</a> 32.44 ()</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Japan/U5mz0SRT">Japan</a> 21.17 ( 3)</li> <li> <a href="/facts/China/lTjIXY5p">China</a> 19.46 ( 1)</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Canada/cWWFM8oc">Canada</a> 18.13 ()</li> <li> <a href="/facts/India/1kKHcnxM">India</a> 15.33 ( 2)</li> <li> <a href="/facts/South_Korea/pCobAaVw">South Korea</a> 12.04 ()</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Israel/dEe3IcaY">Israel</a> 8.7 ()</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Brazil/QHkG46GL">Brazil</a> 7.09 ()</li></ol> <h3>2010</h3> <p>The 3rd edition continued to show decline from the dominant players and increase from the smaller countries.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:4" href="#fn:4"><sup>4</sup></a> The report found that countries such as the U.S. and Canada has its technological leadership buoyed by the contribution of the industrial sector, which effectively markets, uses, and sells technology assets to government and commercial clients worldwide.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:5" href="#fn:5"><sup>5</sup></a> Conversely, other countries such as China do not effectively leverage its high space technology achievement capability. some of the factors that influence that are government commercial policy and a limited private-sector industrial activity. </p><p>Total Aggregate Scores by Country: </p> <ol><li> <a href="/facts/United_States/P0sCdLe5">United States</a> ()</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Europe/DTAtrKfh">Europe</a> ()</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Russia/jfkCwyxn">Russia</a> ()</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Japan/U5mz0SRT">Japan</a> ()</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Canada/cWWFM8oc">Canada</a> ( 1)</li> <li> <a href="/facts/India/1kKHcnxM">India</a> ( 1)</li> <li> <a href="/facts/South_Korea/pCobAaVw">South Korea</a> ( 1)</li> <li> <a href="/facts/China/lTjIXY5p">China</a> ( 3)</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Israel/dEe3IcaY">Israel</a> ()</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Brazil/QHkG46GL">Brazil</a> ()</li></ol> <h3>2011</h3> <p>In the 2011, while global activity overall increase, the dominant players continued to decrease for the fourth straight year as middle-tier nations ascend.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:6" href="#fn:6"><sup>6</sup></a> </p> <h3>2012</h3> <p>The 2012 report marks the fifth anniversary edition of the study, which called for a half-decade review of international space trends based on quantitative and qualitative data.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:7" href="#fn:7"><sup>7</sup></a> In the 2012 report, in addition to the 10 traditional leading markets, Futron included a second tier for emerging space leaders. The new tier, which is evaluate alongside the 10 original markets include Argentina, Australia, Iran, South Africa, and Ukraine. Brazil being surpassed by Australia. While the <a href="/facts/United_States/P0sCdLe5">US</a> remains the overall leader in space competitiveness its relative position has fallen for the fifth straight year as other countries enhance their capabilities. In contrast, other countries such as <a href="/facts/China/lTjIXY5p">China</a>, <a href="/facts/Japan/U5mz0SRT">Japan</a>, <a href="/facts/Russia/jfkCwyxn">Russia</a> and <a href="/facts/India/1kKHcnxM">India</a> have improved their space competitiveness by 41 percent, 37, 11 and 10 percent respectively since the first edition of the Space Competitiveness Index.<a class="footnote-ref" id="fnref:8" href="#fn:8"><sup>8</sup></a> </p><p>Total Aggregate Scores by Country: </p> <ol><li> <a href="/facts/United_States/P0sCdLe5">United States</a> 99.67</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Europe/DTAtrKfh">Europe</a> 50.11</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Japan/U5mz0SRT">Japan</a> 48.76</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Russia/jfkCwyxn">Russia</a> 45.29</li> <li> <a href="/facts/China/lTjIXY5p">China</a> 41.85</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Canada/cWWFM8oc">Canada</a> 39.10</li> <li> <a href="/facts/India/1kKHcnxM">India</a> 28.64</li> <li> <a href="/facts/South_Korea/pCobAaVw">South Korea</a> 15.22</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Israel/dEe3IcaY">Israel</a> 9.30</li> <li> <a href="/facts/Australia/qLHpbppq">Australia</a> 5.22</li></ol> <h2 id="external-links">External links</h2> <ul><li><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20131224102452/http://www.futron.com/SCI_2012.xml">2012 Space Competitiveness Index Executive Summary</a> (archive)</li></ul> <h2 id="references">References</h2> <ol> <li id="fn:1"><p>"2011 Space Competitiveness Index: India Overtakes Canada". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 21 December 2013. <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/09/10/space-competitiveness-index-india-overtakes-canada_n_956589.html" target="_blank">http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2011/09/10/space-competitiveness-index-india-overtakes-canada_n_956589.html</a> <a href="#fnref:1" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:2"><p>"Space Competitiveness Index (SCI)". Futron Corporation. Archived from the original on 24 December 2013. Retrieved 21 December 2013. <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20131224102452/http://www.futron.com/SCI_2012.xml" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20131224102452/http://www.futron.com/SCI_2012.xml</a> <a href="#fnref:2" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:3"><p>"INSIGHT: The Futron Space Competitiveness Index". Sat Magazine. Retrieved 22 December 2013. <a href="http://www.satmagazine.com/story.php?number=1972093877" target="_blank">http://www.satmagazine.com/story.php?number=1972093877</a> <a href="#fnref:3" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:4"><p>"U.S. Space Edge Erodes, Non-Traditional Players Ascend, and Competition Intensifies: Futron Announces 2010 Space Competitiveness Index Trends". MobilityTechzone. Retrieved 22 December 2013. <a href="http://www.mobilitytechzone.com/news/2010/07/21/4911501.htm" target="_blank">http://www.mobilitytechzone.com/news/2010/07/21/4911501.htm</a> <a href="#fnref:4" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:5"><p>Messier, Doug. "Futron Report: America, Canada Do Well in Optimizing Space Technology, China Hindered". Parabolic Arc. Retrieved 22 December 2013. <a href="http://www.parabolicarc.com/2010/12/20/futron-report-america-canada-optimizing-space-technology-china-hindered/" target="_blank">http://www.parabolicarc.com/2010/12/20/futron-report-america-canada-optimizing-space-technology-china-hindered/</a> <a href="#fnref:5" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:6"><p>"Futron Corp. Releases Its 2011 Space Competitiveness Index". Moon And Back Media LLC. Retrieved 22 December 2013. <a href="http://moonandback.com/2011/08/17/futron-corp-releases-its-2011-space-competitiveness-index/" target="_blank">http://moonandback.com/2011/08/17/futron-corp-releases-its-2011-space-competitiveness-index/</a> <a href="#fnref:6" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:7"><p>"Futron Corporation Announces Results of Fifth Annual Space Competitiveness Index". PRWeb. Archived from the original on October 23, 2012. Retrieved 21 December 2013. <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20121023141712/http://www.prweb.com/releases/futron/sci2012/prweb10021325.htm" target="_blank">https://web.archive.org/web/20121023141712/http://www.prweb.com/releases/futron/sci2012/prweb10021325.htm</a> <a href="#fnref:7" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> <li id="fn:8"><p>"India has improved space competitiveness by 10 percent". The Hindu. Retrieved 22 December 2013. <a href="http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-in-school/india-has-improved-space-competitiveness-by-10-percent/article3719846.ece" target="_blank">http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-in-school/india-has-improved-space-competitiveness-by-10-percent/article3719846.ece</a> <a href="#fnref:8" class="footnote-back-ref">↩</a></p></li> </ol>