Metalloids are metallic-looking often brittle solids; tend to share electrons when they react with other substances; have weakly acidic or amphoteric oxides; and are usually found naturally in combined states.
Most are semiconductors, and moderate thermal conductors, and have structures that are more open than those of most metals.
The metalloids, as the smallest major category of elements, are not subdivided further.
Nonmetallic elements often have open structures; tend to gain or share electrons when they react with other substances; and do not form distinctly basic oxides.
Most are gases at room temperature; have relatively low densities; are poor electrical and thermal conductors; have relatively high ionisation energies and electronegativities; form acidic oxides; and are found naturally in uncombined states in large amounts.
The characteristic properties of elemental metals and nonmetals are quite distinct, as shown in the table below. Metalloids, straddling the metal-nonmetal border, are mostly distinct from either, but in a few properties resemble one or the other, as shown in the shading of the metalloid column below and summarized in the small table at the top of this section.
Authors differ in where they divide metals from nonmetals and in whether they recognize an intermediate metalloid category. Some authors count metalloids as nonmetals with weakly nonmetallic properties. Others count some of the metalloids as post-transition metals.
Within each category, elements can be found with one or two properties very different from the expected norm, or that are otherwise notable.
For example:
Brinkley[2] writes that boron has weakly nonmetallic properties.
Glinka[3] describes silicon as a weak nonmetal.
Eby et al.[4] discuss the weak chemical behaviour of the elements close to the metal-nonmetal borderline.
Booth and Bloom[5] say "A period represents a stepwise change from elements strongly metallic to weakly metallic to weakly nonmetallic to strongly nonmetallic, and then, at the end, to an abrupt cessation of almost all chemical properties ...".
Cox[6] notes "nonmetallic elements close to the metallic borderline (Si, Ge, As, Sb, Se, Te) show less tendency to anionic behaviour and are sometimes called metalloids."
See, for example, Huheey, Keiter & Keiter[7] who classify Ge and Sb as post-transition metals.
At standard pressure and temperature, for the elements in their most thermodynamically stable forms, unless otherwise noted
Kneen, Rogers & Simpson, 1972, p. 263. Columns 2 (metals) and 4 (nonmetals) are sourced from this reference unless otherwise indicated.
Kneen, Rogers & Simpson, 1972, p. 263. Columns 2 (metals) and 4 (nonmetals) are sourced from this reference unless otherwise indicated.
Russell & Lee 2005, p. 147
Rochow 1966, p. 4
Pottenger & Bowes 1976, p. 138
Askeland, Fulay & Wright 2011, p. 806
Born & Wolf 1999, p. 746
Lagrenaudie 1953
Rochow 1966, pp. 23, 25
Burakowski & Wierzchoń 1999, p. 336
Olechna & Knox 1965, pp. A991‒92
Stoker 2010, p. 62
Chang 2002, p. 304. Chang speculates that the melting point of francium would be about 23 °C.
Copernicium is reported to be the only metal known to be a gas at room temperature.[20] /wiki/Copernicium
Rochow 1966, p. 4
Hunt 2000, p. 256
Sisler 1973, p. 89
Hérold 2006, pp. 149–150
Russell & Lee 2005
Whether polonium is ductile or brittle is unclear. It is predicted to be ductile based on its calculated elastic constants.[25] It has a simple cubic crystalline structure. Such a structure has few slip systems and "leads to very low ductility and hence low fracture resistance".[26] /wiki/Young%27s_modulus#Relation_among_elastic_constants
McQuarrie & Rock 1987, p. 85
Carbon as exfoliated (expanded) graphite,[28] and as metre-long carbon nanotube wire;[29] phosphorus as white phosphorus (soft as wax, pliable and can be cut with a knife, at room temperature);[30] sulfur as plastic sulfur;[31] and selenium as selenium wires.[32] /wiki/Graphite#Expanded_graphite
For polycrystalline forms of the elements unless otherwise noted. Determining Poisson's ratio accurately is a difficult proposition and there could be considerable uncertainty in some reported values.[33]
Beryllium has the lowest known value (0.0476) among elemental metals; indium and thallium each have the highest known value (0.46). Around one third show a value ≥ 0.33.[34]
Boron 0.13;[35] silicon 0.22;[36] germanium 0.278;[37] amorphous arsenic 0.27;[38] antimony 0.25;[39] tellurium ~0.2.[40]
Graphitic carbon 0.25;[41] [diamond 0.0718];[42] black phosphorus 0.30;[43] sulfur 0.287;[44] amorphous selenium 0.32;[45] amorphous iodine ~0.[46]
Donohoe 1982; Russell & Lee 2005
Gupta et al. 2005, p. 502
Walker, Newman & Enache 2013, p. 25
Wiberg 2001, p. 143
Batsanov & Batsanov 2012, p. 275
Clementi & Raimondi 1963; Clementi, Raimondi & Reinhardt 1967
Addison 1964; Donohoe 1982
At atmospheric pressure, for elements with known structures /wiki/Atmospheric_pressure
Vernon 2013, p. 1704
Parish 1977, pp. 34, 48, 112, 142, 156, 178
Emsley 2001, p. 12
Emsley 2001, p. 12
Russell 1981, p. 628
The Goldhammer-Herzfeld criterion is a ratio that compares the force holding an individual atom's valence electrons in place with the forces, acting on the same electrons, arising from interactions between the atoms in the solid or liquid element. When the interatomic forces are greater than or equal to the atomic force, valence electron itinerancy is indicated. Metallic behaviour is then predicted.[58] Otherwise nonmetallic behaviour is anticipated. The Goldhammer-Herzfeld criterion is based on classical arguments.[59] It nevertheless offers a relatively simple first order rationalization for the occurrence of metallic character among the elements.[60] /wiki/Karl_Herzfeld
Edwards & Sienko 1983, p. 691
Edwards et al. 2010
Metals have electrical conductivity values of from 6.9 × 103 S•cm−1 for manganese to 6.3 × 105 for silver.[63] /wiki/Manganese
Choppin & Johnsen 1972, p. 351
Metalloids have electrical conductivity values of from 1.5 × 10−6 S•cm−1 for boron to 3.9 × 104 for arsenic.[65] If selenium is included as a metalloid the applicable conductivity range would start from ~10−9 to 10−12 S•cm−1.[66][67][68] /wiki/Arsenic
Nonmetals have electrical conductivity values of from ~10−18 S•cm−1 for the elemental gases to 3 × 104 in graphite.[69]
Rao & Ganguly 1986
Mott and Davis[71] note however that 'liquid europium has a negative temperature coefficient of resistance' i.e. that conductivity increases with rising temperature
Edwards & Sienko 1983, p. 691
Antia 1998
Cverna 2002, p.1
McQuarrie & Rock 1987, p. 85
Cordes & Scaheffer 1973, p. 79
Hill & Holman 2000, p. 42
Tilley 2004, p. 487
At or near room temperature
Russell & Lee 2005, p. 466
Orton 2004, pp. 11–12
Zhigal'skii & Jones 2003, p. 66: 'Bismuth, antimony, arsenic and graphite are considered to be semimetals ... In bulk semimetals ... the resistivity will increase with temperature ... to give a positive temperature coefficient of resistivity ...'
Jauncey 1948, p. 500: 'Nonmetals mostly have negative temperature coefficients. For instance, carbon ... [has a] resistance [that] decreases with a rise in temperature. However, recent experiments on very pure graphite, which is a form of carbon, have shown that pure carbon in this form behaves similarly to metals in regard to its resistance.'
Reynolds 1969, pp. 91–92
Wilson 1966, p. 260
Wittenberg 1972, p. 4526
Habashi 2003, p. 73
Wilson 1966, p. 260
Bailar et al. 1989, p. 742
Cox 2004, p. 27
Hiller & Herber 1960, inside front cover; p. 225
Beveridge et al. 1997, p. 185
Young & Sessine 2000, p. 849
Bailar et al. 1989, p. 417
Metcalfe, Williams & Castka 1966, p. 72
Chang 1994, p. 311
Pauling 1988, p. 183
Mann et al. 2000, p. 2783
Chedd[94] defines metalloids as having electronegativity values of 1.8 to 2.2 (Allred-Rochow scale). He included boron, silicon, germanium, arsenic, antimony, tellurium, polonium and astatine in this category. In reviewing Chedd's work, Adler[95] described this choice as arbitrary, given other elements have electronegativities in this range, including copper, silver, phosphorus, mercury, and bismuth. He went on to suggest defining a metalloid simply as, 'a semiconductor or semimetal' and 'to have included the interesting materials bismuth and selenium in the book'.
Young & Sessine 2000, p. 849
Hultgren 1966, p. 648
Bassett et al. 1966, p. 602
Phosphorus is known to form a carbide in thin films.
Rochow 1966, p. 34
Martienssen & Warlimont 2005, p. 257
Sidorov 1960
Brasted 1974, p. 814
Rochow 1966, p. 4
Atkins 2006 et al., pp. 8, 122–23
Rao 2002, p. 22
See, for example, the sulfates of the transition metals,[104] the lanthanides[105] and the actinides.[106] /wiki/Transition_metal
Sulfates of osmium have not been characterized with any great degree of certainty.[107]
Common metalloids: Boron is reported to be capable of forming an oxysulfate (BO)2SO4,[108] a bisulfate B(HSO4)3[109] and a sulfate B2(SO4)3.[110] The existence of a sulfate has been disputed.[111] In light of the existence of silicon phosphate, a silicon sulfate might also exist.[112] Germanium forms an unstable sulfate Ge(SO4)2 (d 200 °C).[113] Arsenic forms oxide sulfates As2O(SO4)2 (= As2O3.2SO3)[114] and As2(SO4)3 (= As2O3.3SO3).[115] Antimony forms a sulfate Sb2(SO4)3 and an oxysulfate (SbO)2SO4.[116] Tellurium forms an oxide sulfate Te2O3(SO)4.[117] Less common: Polonium forms a sulfate Po(SO4)2.[118] It has been suggested that the astatine cation forms a weak complex with sulfate ions in acidic solutions.[119]
Hydrogen forms hydrogen sulfate H2SO4. Carbon forms (a blue) graphite hydrogen sulfate C+24HSO–4 • 2.4H2SO4.[120] Nitrogen forms nitrosyl hydrogen sulfate (NO)HSO4 and nitronium (or nitryl) hydrogen sulfate (NO2)HSO4.[121] There are indications of a basic sulfate of selenium SeO2.SO3 or SeO(SO4).[122] Iodine forms a polymeric yellow sulfate (IO)2SO4.[123] /wiki/Hydrogen_sulfate
Holtzclaw, Robinson & Odom 1991, pp. 706–07; Keenan, Kleinfelter & Wood 1980, pp. 693–95
layer-lattice types often reversibly so
Kneen, Rogers & Simpson 1972, p. 278
Heslop & Robinson 1963, p. 417
Rochow 1966, pp. 28–29
Bagnall 1966, pp. 108, 120; Lidin 1996, passim
Smith 1921, p. 295; Sidgwick 1950, pp. 605, 608; Dunstan 1968, pp. 408, 438
Smith 1921, p. 295; Sidgwick 1950, pp. 605, 608; Dunstan 1968, pp. 408, 438
Dunstan 1968, pp. 312, 408
Based on a table of the elemental composition of the biosphere, and lithosphere (crust, atmosphere, and seawater) in Georgievskii,[131] and the masses of the crust and hydrosphere give in Lide and Frederikse.[132] The mass of the biosphere is negligible, having a mass of about one billionth that of the lithosphere.[citation needed] "The oceans constitute about 98 percent of the hydrosphere, and thus the average composition of the hydrosphere is, for all practical purposes, that of seawater."[133]
Perkins 1998, p. 350
Hydrogen gas is produced by some bacteria and algae and is a natural component of flatus. It can be found in the Earth's atmosphere at a concentration of 1 part per million by volume. /wiki/Algae
Fluorine can be found in its elemental form, as an occlusion in the mineral antozonite[135] /wiki/Antozonite
Brown et al. 2009, p. 137
Bresica et al. 1975, p. 137
Jansen 2005
Russell & Lee 2005, p. 246
Russell & Lee 2005, p. 244–5
Russell & Lee 2005, p. 246
Donohoe 1982, pp. 191–196; Russell & Lee 2005, pp. 244–247
Jackson 2000
Stoye 2014
Witt 1991; Endicott 1998
Dumé 2003
Benedict et al. 1946, p. 19
In 1934, a team led by Enrico Fermi postulated that transuranic elements may have been produced as a result of bombarding uranium with neutrons, a finding which was widely accepted for a few years. In the same year Ida Noddack, a German scientist and subsequently a three-time Nobel prize nominee, criticised this assumption, writing "It is conceivable that the nucleus breaks up into several large fragments, which would of course be isotopes of known elements but would not be neighbors of the irradiated element."[147][emphasis added] In this, Noddak defied the understanding of the time without offering experimental proof or theoretical basis, but nevertheless presaged what would be known a few years later as nuclear fission. Her paper was generally ignored as, in 1925, she and two colleagues claimed to have discovered element 43, then proposed to be called masurium (later discovered in 1936 by Perrier and Segrè, and named technetium). Had Ida Noddack's paper been accepted it is likely that Germany would have had an atomic bomb and, 'the history of the world would have been [very] different.'[148] /wiki/Enrico_Fermi
Hecker, Siegfried S. (2000). "Plutonium and its alloys: from atoms to microstructure" (PDF). Los Alamos Science. 26: 290–335. Archived (PDF) from the original on February 24, 2009. Retrieved February 15, 2009. https://fas.org/sgp/othergov/doe/lanl/pubs/00818035.pdf
Tsiovkin, Yu.Yu.; Lukoyanov, A.V.; Shorikov, A.O.; Tsiovkina, L.Yu.; Dyachenko, A.A.; Bystrushkin, V.B.; Korotin, M.A.; Anisimov, V.I.; Dremov, V.V. (2011). "Electrical resistivity of pure transuranium metals under pressure". Journal of Nuclear Materials. 413 (1): 41–46. Bibcode:2011JNuM..413...41T. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.03.053. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022311511003369
Dalhouse University 2015; White et al. 2015
DuPlessis 2007, p. 133
Gösele & Lehmann 1994, p. 19
Chen, Lee & Bosman 1994
Kovalev et al. 2001, p. 068301-1
Mikulec, Kirtland & Sailor 2002
Kovalev et al. 2001, p. 068301-1
DuPlessis 2007, p. 133
Bychkov 2012, pp. 20–21; see also Lazaruk et al. 2007
Slezak 2014
Wiberg 2001, p. 758; see also Fraden 1951
Sacks 2001, p. 204
Sacks 2001, pp. 204–205
Cerkovnik & Plesničar 2013, p. 7930
Emsley 1994, p. 1910
Wiberg 2001, p. 497
Cerkovnik & Plesničar 2013, p. 7930
Wiberg 2001, p. 497
Cross, Saunders & Prinzbach; Chemistry Views 2015
Sun, Xu & Gao 2013; Anthony 2013
Nakao 1992