• Images
• Videos
• Documents
• Books
• Articles

Related Image Collections Add Image

Profiles

1 Image

We don't have any YouTube videos related to 2019 United Kingdom general election yet.

You can add one yourself here.

We don't have any PDF documents related to 2019 United Kingdom general election yet.

You can add one yourself here.

We don't have any Books related to 2019 United Kingdom general election yet.

You can add one yourself here.

Archived Web Articles Add Article

Corbyn was big factor in Lib Dem election failure, says Davey

Jan 20 2020

Brexit: MPs pass withdrawal agreement bill by 124 majority

Dec 20 2019

Tactical voting was set to be Remainers’ saviour, so what went wrong?

Dec 14 2019

Scottish independence vote a 'democratic right', says Sturgeon

Dec 13 2019

Conservatives dismiss Andrew Neil's demands for Johnson interview

Dec 6 2019

Our guide to election night 2019: Seats to watch, declaration times, and TV coverage

Nov 29 2019

Lib Dems lambasted over fake newspapers campaign material

Nov 27 2019

'It reflects the despair': chief rabbi's criticism of Labour strikes a chord

Nov 26 2019

Tories suspend election candidate after JC exposed his claim British Jews were 'brainwashed extremists'

Nov 20 2019

View all

Background

In July 2016, Theresa May was elected Prime Minister to succeed David Cameron, who had resigned following the 2016 Brexit referendum. The Conservative Party had governed since the 2010 general election, initially in coalition with the Liberal Democrats and then alone with a small majority following the 2015 general election. In the 2017 general election, May lost her majority but was able to resume office as a result of a confidence and supply agreement with Northern Ireland's Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), known as the Conservative–DUP agreement. In the face of opposition from the DUP and Conservative backbenchers, the second May ministry was unable to pass its Brexit withdrawal agreement by 29 March 2019, so some political commentators considered that an early general election was likely.¹⁵

The opposition Labour Party called for a 2019 vote of confidence in the May ministry but the motion, held in January, failed.¹⁶ May resigned following her party's poor performance in the 2019 European Parliament election during the first extension granted by the European Union for negotiations on the withdrawal agreement. Boris Johnson won the 2019 Conservative leadership election and became the prime minister on 24 July 2019. Along with attempting to revise the withdrawal agreement arranged by his predecessor's negotiations, Johnson made three attempts to hold a snap election under the process defined in the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011,¹⁷ which required a two-thirds supermajority in order for an election to take place.¹⁸¹⁹²⁰

All three attempts to call an election failed to gain support; Parliament insisted that Johnson "take a no-deal Brexit off the table first" and secure a negotiated Withdrawal Agreement, expressed in particular by its enactment against his will of the European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019, often called the Benn Act, after Labour MP Hilary Benn, who introduced the bill. After failing to pass a revised deal before the first extension's deadline of 31 October 2019, Johnson agreed to a second extension on negotiations with the European Union and finally secured a revised withdrawal agreement.²¹²²

Parliament agreed to an election through a motion proposed by the Liberal Democrats and the Scottish National Party (SNP) on 28 October. The Early Parliamentary General Election Act 2019 (EPGEA) was passed in the House of Commons by 438 votes to 20; an attempt to pass an amendment by opposition parties for the election to be held on 9 December failed by 315 votes to 295.²³²⁴ The House of Lords followed suit on 30 October,²⁵ with royal assent made the day after for the ratification of the EPGEA.²⁶

Date of the election

Further information: Early Parliamentary General Election Act 2019

The deadline for candidate nominations was 14 November 2019,²⁷ with political campaigning for four weeks until polling day on 12 December. On the day of the election, polling stations across the country were open from 7 am, and closed at 10 pm.²⁸ The date chosen for the 2019 general election made it the first to be held in December since the 1923 general election.²⁹³⁰

Voting eligibility

Individuals eligible to vote had to be registered to vote by midnight on 26 November.³¹ To be eligible to vote, individuals had to be aged 18 or over;³²³³ residing as an Irish or Commonwealth citizen at an address in the United Kingdom,³⁴ or be a British citizen overseas who registered to vote in the last 15 years;³⁵³⁶³⁷ and not legally excluded (on grounds of detainment in prison, a mental hospital, or on the run from law enforcement),³⁸ or disqualified from voting.³⁹⁴⁰ Anyone who qualified as an anonymous elector had until midnight on 6 December to register.⁴¹

Timetable

Contesting political parties and candidates

Main article: Candidates in the 2019 United Kingdom general election

Most candidates are representatives of a political party, which must be registered with the Electoral Commission's Register. Those who do not belong to one must use the label Independent or none. In the 2019 election 3,415 candidates stood: 206 being independents, the rest representing one of 68 political parties.

Campaign

Campaign background

Further information: Brexit and Brexit negotiations in 2019

The Conservative Party and Labour Party have been the two biggest political parties, and have supplied every Prime Minister since the 1922 general election. The Conservative Party have governed since the 2010 election, in coalition with the Liberal Democrats from 2010 to 2015. At the 2015 general election, the Conservative Party committed to offering a referendum on whether the United Kingdom should leave the European Union (EU) and won a majority in that election. A referendum was held in June 2016, and the Leave campaign won by 51.9% to 48.1%.⁵⁰⁵¹

United Kingdom invocation of Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union came in March 2017, and Theresa May triggered a snap election in 2017, in order to demonstrate support for her planned negotiation of Brexit. Instead, the Conservative Party lost seats. They won a plurality of MPs but not a majority, and the result was a hung parliament. They formed a minority government, with the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) as their confidence and supply partner. Neither May nor her successor Boris Johnson, the winner of the 2019 Conservative leadership election,⁵²⁵³ was able to secure parliamentary support either for a deal on the terms of the country's exit from the EU, or for exiting the EU without an agreed deal. Johnson later succeeded in bringing his withdrawal agreement to a second reading in Parliament, following another extension until January 2020.⁵⁴

After Johnson's 2019 win, a new Withdrawal Agreement Bill was introduced in 2020. Compared to its 2019 October predecessor, this bill offered, in the words of political scientist Meg Russell, "significantly weaker parliamentary oversight of Brexit ... giving parliament no formal role in agreeing the future relationship negotiating objectives, and a diminished role in approving any resulting treaty."⁵⁵

During the lifespan of the 2017 Parliament, twenty MPs resigned from their parties, mostly due to disputes with their party leaderships; some formed new parties and alliances. In February 2019, eight Labour and three Conservative MPs left their parties to sit together as The Independent Group.⁵⁶ Having undergone a split and two name changes, at dissolution, this group numbered five MPs who sat as the registered party The Independent Group for Change under the leadership of Anna Soubry.⁵⁷⁵⁸

Two MPs sat in a group called The Independents, which at its peak had five members. One MP created the Birkenhead Social Justice Party, while a further 20 MPs who began as Labour or Conservative ended Parliament as unaffiliated independents. Seven MPs, from both the Conservatives and Labour, joined the Liberal Democrats during Parliament, in combination with a gain after the 2019 Brecon and Radnorshire by-election. By the time Parliament was dissolved, the Liberal Democrats had raised their number from 12 at the election to 20 at dissolution.⁵⁹

One reason for the defections from the Labour Party was the ongoing row over alleged antisemitism in the Labour Party. Labour entered the election campaign while under investigation by the Equality and Human Rights Commission.⁶⁰ The Jewish Labour Movement declared that it would not generally campaign for Labour.⁶¹ The Conservative Party was also criticised for not doing enough to tackle the alleged Islamophobia in the Conservative Party.⁶² The Conservatives ended the previous parliamentary period with fewer seats than they had started with because of defections and also saw the 2019 suspension of rebel Conservative MPs for going against the party line by voting to prevent a no-deal Brexit.⁶³ Of the 21 expelled, 10 were subsequently reinstated, while the others continued as independents.⁶⁴

Policy positions

Brexit

The major parties had a wide variety of stances on Brexit. The Conservative Party supported leaving under the terms of the withdrawal agreement as negotiated by Johnson (amending May's previous agreement), and this agreement formed a central part of the Conservative campaign via the slogan "Get Brexit Done".⁶⁵ The Brexit Party was in favour of a no-deal Brexit, with its leader Nigel Farage calling for Johnson to drop the deal.⁶⁶

The Conservative manifesto read "If we elect a majority of Conservative MPs to Parliament, we will start putting our deal through Parliament before Christmas and we will leave the European Union in January" which ultimately happened.

The Labour Party proposed a renegotiation of the withdrawal agreement, towards a closer post-withdrawal relationship with the EU, and would then put this forward as an option in a referendum alongside the option of remaining in the EU.⁶⁷ The Labour Party's campaigning stance in that referendum would be decided at a special conference.⁶⁸ In a Question Time special featuring four party leaders, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said that he would stay neutral in the referendum campaign.⁶⁹

The Liberal Democrats, Scottish National Party, Plaid Cymru, The Independent Group for Change, and the Green Party of England and Wales were all opposed to Brexit, and proposed that a further referendum be held with the option, for which they would campaign, to remain in the EU.⁷⁰ The Liberal Democrats originally pledged that if they formed a majority government, which was considered a highly unlikely outcome by observers,⁷¹ they would revoke the Article 50 notification immediately and cancel Brexit.⁷²⁷³ Part-way through the campaign, the Liberal Democrats dropped the policy of revoking Article 50 after the party realised it was not going to win a majority in the election.⁷⁴

The Democratic Unionist Party was in favour of a withdrawal agreement in principle but opposed the deals negotiated by both May and Johnson, believing that they created too great a divide between Northern Ireland and the rest of the United Kingdom.⁷⁵⁷⁶ Sinn Féin, the Social Democratic and Labour Party, the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP),⁷⁷ and the Alliance Party of Northern Ireland all favoured remaining in the EU. The UUP did not see a second referendum as a necessary route to achieving this goal.⁷⁸

The environment

The Labour Party promised what they described as a green industrial revolution. This included support for renewable energies and a promise to plant 2 billion trees by 2040. The party also promised to transition to electrify the United Kingdom's bus fleet by 2030.⁷⁹ The Liberal Democrats promised to put the environment at the heart of their agenda with a promise to plant 60 million trees a year. They promised to significantly reduce carbon emissions by 2030 and hit zero carbon emissions by 2045. By 2030, they planned to generate 80% of the country's energy needs from renewable energies such as solar power and wind and retrofit 26 million homes with insulation by 2030. They also promised to build more environmentally friendly homes and to establish a new Department for the Climate Crisis.⁸⁰

The Conservatives pledged net zero emissions by 2050 with investment in clean energy solutions and green infrastructure to reduce carbon emissions and pollution. They also pledged to plant 30 million trees and boost wind and solar energy.⁸¹

Tax and spending commitments

In September 2019, the Conservative government performed a spending review, where they announced plans to increase public spending by £13.8 billion a year, and reaffirmed plans to spend another £33.9 billion a year on the National Health Service (NHS) by 2023. Chancellor Sajid Javid said the government had turned the page on 10 years of austerity in the United Kingdom.⁸²

During the election, the parties produced manifestos that outlined spending in addition to that already planned. The Conservative Party manifesto was described as having "little in the way of changes to tax" by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS). The decision to keep the rate of corporation tax at 19%, and not reduce it to 17% as planned, was expected to raise £6 billion a year. The plan to increase the national insurance threshold for employees and self-employed to £9,500 would cost £2 billion a year.⁸³ They committed to not raise rates of income tax, National Insurance, or VAT.⁸⁴

There were increased spending commitments of £3 billion current spending and £8 billion investment spending. Overall, this would have led to the country's debt as a percentage of GDP remaining stable. The IFS assessed that it would rise in the event of a no-deal Brexit.⁸⁵ The Labour Party manifesto planned to raise an extra £78 billion a year from taxes over the course of Parliament, with sources including:⁸⁶

• £24bn – raising the headline rate of corporation tax to 26%
• £6.3bn – tax the global profits of multinationals according to the United Kingdom's share of global employment, assets, and sales, not British profits
• £4.0bn – abolish patent box and R&D tax credit for large companies
• £4.3bn – cutting unspecified corporation tax reliefs
• £9bn – financial transactions tax
• £14bn – dividends and capital gains
• £6bn – anti-avoidance
• £5bn – increases in income tax rates above £80,000 a year
• £5bn – other

In addition, Labour was to obtain income from the Inclusive Ownership Fund, windfall tax on oil companies, and some smaller tax changes. There were increased spending commitments of £98 billion current spending and £55 billion investment spending. Overall, this would have led to the national debt as a percentage of GDP rising.⁸⁷ Labour's John McDonnell said borrowing would only be for investment and one-offs (e.g. compensating WASPI women, not shown above), and not for day-to-day spending.⁸⁸

The Liberal Democrats manifesto planned to raise an extra £36 billion per year from taxes over the course of Parliament, with sources including:⁸⁹

• £10bn – raising corporation tax to 20%
• £7bn – 1% point rise in all rates of income tax
• £5bn – abolish the capital gains tax allowance
• £5bn – air passenger duty on frequent flyers
• £6bn – anti-avoidance
• £3bn – other

There were increased commitments of £37 billion current spending and £26 billion investment spending, which would overall lead to the debt as a percentage of GDP falling, partly due to improved economic conditions which would result from staying in the EU.⁹⁰

Institute for Fiscal Studies analysis

The Institute of Fiscal Studies (IFS), an influential research body, released on 28 November its in-depth analysis of the manifestos of the three main national political parties.⁹¹⁹² The analysis provided a summary of the financial promises made by each party and an inspection of the accuracy of claims around government income and expenditure.⁹³⁹⁴⁹⁵ The IFS reported that neither the Conservatives nor the Labour Party had published a "properly credible prospectus".⁹⁶

Its analysis of the Conservative manifesto concluded there was "essentially nothing new in the manifesto", that there was "little in the way of changes to tax, spending, welfare or anything else", and that they had already promised increased spending for health and education whilst in government. The Labour manifesto was described as introducing "enormous economic and social change", and increasing the role of the state to be bigger than anything in the last 40 years.⁹⁷

The IFS highlighted a raft of changes in including free childcare, university, personal care, and prescriptions, as well as nationalisations, labour market regulations, increases in the minimum wage, and enforcing "effective ownership of 10% of large companies from current owners to a combination of employees and government". The IFS said that Labour's vision "is of a state not so dissimilar to those seen in many other successful Western European economies", and presumed that the manifesto should be seen as "a long-term prospectus for change rather than a realistic deliverable plan for a five-year parliament".⁹⁸ They said that the Liberal Democrats manifesto was not as radical as the Labour manifesto but was a "decisive move away from the policies of the past decade".⁹⁹

The Conservative manifesto was criticised for a commitment not to raise rates of income tax, National Insurance, or VAT, as this put a significant constraint on reactions to events that might affect government finances. One such event could be the "die in a ditch" promise to terminate the Brexit transition period by the end of 2020, which risked harming the economy.¹⁰⁰ The IFS also stated that it is "highly likely" spending under a Conservative government would be higher than in that party's manifesto, partly due to a number of uncosted commitments.¹⁰¹ Outside of commitments to the NHS, the proposals would leave public service spending 14% lower in 2023–2024 than it was in 2010–2011, which the IFS described as "no more austerity perhaps, but an awful lot of it baked in".¹⁰²

The IFS stated it had "serious doubt" that tax rises proposed would raise the amount Labour suggested, and said that they would need to introduce more broad based tax increases. They assessed that the public sector does not have the capacity to increase investment spending as Labour would want. The IFS further assessed the claim that tax rises would only hit the top 5% of earners as "certainly progressive" but "clearly not true", with those under that threshold impacted by changes to the marriage allowance, taxes on dividends, or capital gains, and lower wages or higher prices that might be passed on from corporation tax changes. Some of Labour's proposals were described as "huge and complex undertakings", where significant care is required in implementation.¹⁰³

The IFS was particularly critical of the policy to compensate the WASPI women, announced after the manifesto, which was a £58bn promise to women who are "relatively well off on average" and would result in public finances going off target.¹⁰⁴ They said that Labour's manifesto would not increase UK public spending as a share of national income above Germany.¹⁰⁵ They found that Labour's plan to spend and invest would boost economic growth but that the impact of tax rises, government regulation, nationalisations, and the inclusive ownership fund could reduce growth, meaning the overall impact of Labour's plan on growth was uncertain.¹⁰⁶¹⁰⁷

The IFS described the plans of the Liberal Democrats as a radical tax and spend package, and said that the proposals would require lower borrowing than Conservative or Labour plans. The report said they were the only party whose proposals would put debt "on a decisively downward path", praising their plan to put 1p on income tax to go to the NHS as "simple, progressive and would raise a secure level of revenue". The IFS also said plans to "virtually quintuple" current spending levels on universal free childcare amounted to "creating a whole new leg of the universal welfare state".¹⁰⁸¹⁰⁹ The IFS said that the SNP's manifesto was not costed. Their proposals on spending increases and tax cuts would mean the government would have to borrow to cover day-to-day spending. They concluded that the SNP's plans for Scottish independence would likely require increased austerity.¹¹⁰

Other issues

The Conservatives proposed increasing spending on public services, including the NHS and education.¹¹¹ They also proposed increased funding for childcare and on the environment. They proposed more funding for care services and to work with other parties on reforming how care is delivered. They wished to maintain the triple lock on pensions. They proposed investing in local infrastructure, including rail, bus, cycle, and electric cars. They pledged to build a high speed new rail line between Leeds and Manchester.¹¹²

Labour proposed significantly increasing government spending to 45% of national output, which would be high compared to most of British history.¹¹³ This was to pay for an increased NHS budget; stopping state pension age rises; introducing a National Care Service providing free personal care; move to a net-zero carbon economy by the 2030s; nationalising key industries; scrapping Universal Credit; free bus travel for under-25s; building 100,000 council houses per year; and other proposals.¹¹⁴

Within this, the Labour Party proposed to take rail-operating companies, energy supply networks, Royal Mail, sewerage infrastructure, and England's private water companies back into public ownership. Labour proposed nationalising part of the BT Group and to provide free broadband to everyone,¹¹⁵ along with free education for six years during each person's adult life.¹¹⁶¹¹⁷ Over a decade, Labour planned to reduce the average full-time weekly working hours to 32, with resulting productivity increases facilitating no loss of pay.¹¹⁸ Labour's spending plans were endorsed by more than 160 economists and academics and characterised as a "serious programme" to deal with internal problems.¹¹⁹¹²⁰

The main priority of the Liberal Democrats was opposing Brexit. Other policies included increased spending on the NHS; free childcare for two-to-four-year-olds; recruiting 20,000 more teachers; generating 80% of electricity from renewable sources by 2030; freezing train fares; and legalising cannabis.¹²¹ The Brexit Party was also focused on Brexit. It opposed privatising the NHS. It sought to reduce immigration, cutting net migration to 50,000 per year; cutting VAT on domestic fuel; banning the exporting of waste; free broadband in deprived regions; scrapping the BBC licence fee; and abolishing inheritance tax, interest on student loans, and High Speed 2. It also wanted to move to a United States-style supreme court.¹²²

The policies of the SNP included a second referendum on Scottish independence to be held in 2020, as well as one on Brexit, removing the Trident nuclear deterrent, and devolution across issues like as employment law, drug policy, and migration.¹²³ The Liberal Democrats, the Greens, the SNP, and Labour all supported a ban on fracking in the United Kingdom, whilst the Conservatives proposed approving fracking on a case-by-case basis.¹²⁴¹²⁵

Party positions in the event of a hung parliament

The Conservatives and Labour insisted they were on course for outright majorities, while smaller parties were quizzed about what they would do in the event of a hung parliament. The Liberal Democrats said that they would not actively support Johnson or Corbyn becoming Prime Minister but that they could, if an alternative could not be achieved, abstain on votes allowing a minority government to form if there was support for a second referendum on Brexit.¹²⁶ The SNP ruled out either supporting the Conservatives or a coalition with Labour but spoke about a looser form of support, such as a confidence and supply arrangement with the latter, if they supported a second referendum on Scottish independence.¹²⁷

The DUP previously supported the Conservative government but withdrew that support given their opposition to Johnson's proposed Brexit deal. It said that it would never support Corbyn as prime minister but could work with Labour if that party were led by someone else. Labour's position on a hung parliament was that it would do no deals with any other party, citing Corbyn to say: "We are out here to win it." At the same time, it was prepared to adopt key policies proposed by the SNP and Liberal Democrats to woo them into supporting a minority government.¹²⁸¹²⁹ The UUP said they would never support Corbyn as prime minister, with their leader Steve Aiken also saying that he "can't really see" any situation in which they would support a Conservative government either. Their focus would be on remaining in the EU.¹³⁰

Tactical voting

Under the first-past-the-post electoral system, there is often concern, especially in marginal seats, that if voters of similar ideological leanings are split between multiple different parties they may allow a victory for a candidate with significantly different views.¹³¹¹³² In the early stages of the campaign, there was considerable discussion of tactical voting, generally in the context of support or opposition to Brexit, and whether parties would stand in all seats or not.¹³³

There were various electoral pacts and unilateral decisions. The Brexit Party chose not to stand against sitting Conservative candidates but stood in most other constituencies. The Brexit Party alleged that pressure was put on its candidates by the Conservatives to withdraw, including the offer of peerages, which would be illegal. This was denied by the Conservative Party.¹³⁴ Under the banner of Unite to Remain, the Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru, and the Green Party of England and Wales agreed an electoral pact in some seats; some commentators criticised the Liberal Democrats for not standing down in some Labour seats.¹³⁵

A number of tactical voting websites were set up in an attempt to help voters choose the candidate in their constituency who would be best placed to beat the Conservative one.¹³⁶¹³⁷ The websites did not always give the same advice, which Michael Savage, political editor of The Guardian, said had the potential to confuse voters.¹³⁸ One of the websites, named GetVoting.org and set up by Best for Britain, was accused of giving bogus advice in Labour/Conservative marginal seats.¹³⁹¹⁴⁰ The website, which had links to the Liberal Democrats,¹⁴¹ was criticised for advising pro-Remain voters to back the Liberal Democrats, when doing so risked pulling voters away from Labour candidates and enabling the Conservative candidate to gain most votes.¹⁴²¹⁴³

The website changed their controversial recommendation in Kensington to Labour, which had won it in 2017 by 20 votes,¹⁴⁴ and lined up with Tacticalvote.co.uk in this seat. Describing itself as a progressive grassroots campaign not affiliated with any political party, Tacticalvote.co.uk was previously known as Tactical2017. Gina Miller's Remain United and People's Vote kept their recommendation for the Liberal Democrats. This caused a lot of confusion around tactical voting,¹⁴⁵¹⁴⁶ as it was reported that the sites did not match one another's advice.

Further into the election period, tactical voting websites that relied on multilevel regression with poststratification, such as Best for Britain, People's Vote, Remain United,¹⁴⁷ and Survation,¹⁴⁸ changed their recommendations on other seats because of new data.¹⁴⁹ The effectiveness of their tactical voting has also been questioned,¹⁵⁰ and the loss of Kensington, which was a Labour gain in 2017, was blamed by Labour MPs on Liberal Democrats for splitting the vote.¹⁵¹

In the final weekend before voting, The Guardian cited a poll suggesting that the Conservative Party held a 15% lead over Labour;¹⁵² on the same day, the Conservative-backing Daily Telegraph emphasised a poll indicating a lower 8% lead.¹⁵³ Senior opposition politicians from Labour, the Liberal Democrats, and the SNP launched a late-stage appeal to anti-Conservative voters to consider switching allegiance in the general election, amid signs that tactical voting in a relatively small number of marginal seats could deprive Johnson of a majority in parliament.¹⁵⁴

Shortly before the election, The Observer newspaper recommended Remainers tactically vote for 50 Labour, Liberal Democrats, SNP, and independent candidates across Great Britain;¹⁵⁵ of these, 13 triumphed, 9 of which were SNP gains in Scotland (in line with a broader trend of relative success for the party), along with four in England divided equally between Labour and the Liberal Democrats. The pollster responsible argued in the aftermath that the unpopularity of the Labour leadership limited the effectiveness of tactical voting.¹⁵⁶ Other research suggested it would have taken 78% of people voting tactically to prevent a Conservative majority completely, and it would not have been possible to deliver a Labour majority.¹⁵⁷

Canvassing and leafleting

Predictions of an overall Conservative majority were based on their targeting of primarily Labour-held, Brexit-backing seats in the Midlands and the north of England.¹⁵⁸ At the start of the election period, Labour-supporting organisation Momentum held what was described as "the largest mobilising call in UK history", involving more than 2,000 canvassers.¹⁵⁹ The organisation challenged Labour supporters to devote a week or more to campaigning full-time; by 4 December, 1,400 people had signed up. Momentum also developed an app called My Campaign Map that updated members about where they could be more effective, particularly in canvassing in marginal constituencies. Over one weekend during the campaign period, 700 Labour supporters campaigned in Iain Duncan Smith's constituency, Chingford and Woodford Green, which was regarded as a marginal, with a majority of 2,438 votes at the 2017 general election.¹⁶⁰

The Liberal Democrats were considered possible winners of a number of Conservative-held southern English constituencies; a large swing was postulated that might even topple Dominic Raab in Esher and Walton.¹⁶¹ At the beginning of the 2019 campaign, they had been accused of attempting to mislead voters by using selective opinion polling data,¹⁶² and use of a quotation attributed to The Guardian rather than to their leader Jo Swinson.¹⁶³ They were also accused of making campaign leaflets look like newspapers, although this practice had been used by all major British political parties for many years, including by Labour and the Conservatives during this election.¹⁶⁴

The Liberal Democrats won a court case stopping the SNP from distributing a "potentially defamatory" leaflet in Swinson's constituency over false claims about funding she had received.¹⁶⁵ Two Labour Party campaigners, both in their seventies, were verbally abused and physically assaulted in separate attacks on the weekend of 23–24 November. One attack occurred in Bromyard, Herefordshire, and the other in Rotherham, South Yorkshire. Party officials in Bromyard, where Labour campaigners experienced red-baiting and had been called "Marxists",¹⁶⁶¹⁶⁷ decided that activists should only canvass in pairs.¹⁶⁸¹⁶⁹

Online campaigning

The use of social media advertising was seen as particularly useful to political parties as it could be used to target people of particular demographics.¹⁷⁰ Labour was reported to have the most interactions, with The Times describing Labour's "aggressive, anti-establishment messages" as "beating clever Tory memes". In the first week of November, Labour was reported to have four of the five most liked tweets by political parties, many of the top interactions of Facebook posts, as well as doing very well on Instagram, where younger voters are particularly active.¹⁷¹ Bloomberg News reported that between 6 and 21 November the views on Twitter/Facebook were 18.7/31.0 million for Labour, 10/15.5 million for the Conservatives, 2.9/2.0 million for the Brexit Party, and 0.4/1.4 million for the Liberal Democrats.¹⁷²

Brexit was the most tweeted topic for the Conservative Party (~45% of tweets), the Liberal Democrats, and the Brexit Party (~40% each). Labour focused on health care (24.1%), the environment, and business, mentioning Brexit in less than 5 per cent of its tweets.¹⁷³ Devolution was the topic most tweeted about by the SNP (29.8%) and Plaid Cymru (21.4%), and the environment was the top issue for the Green Party (45.9%) on Twitter. The Conservatives were unique in their focus on taxation (16.2%), and the Brexit Party on defence (14%).¹⁷⁴

Prior to the campaign, the Conservatives contracted New Zealand marketing agency Topham Guerin, which had been credited with helping Australia's Liberal–National Coalition unexpectedly win the 2019 Australian federal election. The agency's social media approach was described as purposefully posting badly-designed social media material that becomes viral and so would be seen by a wider audience.¹⁷⁵ Some of the Conservative social media activity created headlines challenging whether it was deceptive,¹⁷⁶¹⁷⁷ including by the BBC,¹⁷⁸ amid disinformation concerns.¹⁷⁹¹⁸⁰ This included editing a clip of Keir Starmer to give the appearance that he was unable to answer a question about Labour's Brexit policy.¹⁸¹ In response to criticism over the doctored Starmer footage, Conservative Party chairman James Cleverly said the clip of Starmer was satire and "obviously edited".¹⁸²

Veracity of statements by political parties

During the 19 November debate between Johnson and Corbyn hosted by ITV, the press office of the Conservative Campaign Headquarters (CCHQ) re-branded their Twitter account (@CCHQPress) as factcheckUK (with "from CCHQ" in small text appearing underneath the logo in the account's banner image), which critics suggested could be mistaken for that of an independent fact-checking body, and published posts supporting the Conservative's position.^183184185 In defence, Conservative chairman Cleverly stated: "The Twitter handle of the CCHQ press office remained CCHQPress, so it's clear the nature of the site", and as "calling out when the Labour Party put what they know to be complete fabrications in the public domain."¹⁸⁶

In response to the re-branding on Twitter, the Electoral Commission, which does not have a role in regulating election campaign content, called on all campaigners to act "responsibly".^187188189 Fact-checking body Full Fact criticised this behaviour as "inappropriate and misleading", and Twitter stated that it would take "decisive corrective action" if there were "further attempts to mislead people".^190191192

First Draft News released an analysis of Facebook ads posted by political parties between 1 and 4 December. The analysis reported that 88% of the 6,749 posts the Conservatives made had been "challenged" by fact checker Full Fact. 5,000 of these ads related to a "40 new hospitals" claim, of which Full Fact concluded only six had been costed, with the others only receiving money for planning, with building uncosted and due to occur after 2025. 4,000 featured inaccurate claims about the cost of Labour's spending plans to the tax payer. 500 related to a "50,000 more nurses" pledge, consisting of 31,500 new nurses, and convincing 18,500 nurses already in post to remain.¹⁹³¹⁹⁴

16.5% of Liberal Democrats posts were highlighted, which related to claims they are the only party to beat Labour, the Conservatives, or the SNP "in seats like yours".¹⁹⁵ None of the posts made by Labour in the period were challenged, although posts made on 10 December stating that a "Labour government would save households thousands in bills" and the Conservative Party had "cut £8bn from social care" since 2010 were flagged as misleading.¹⁹⁶¹⁹⁷ According to the BBC, Labour supporters had been more likely to share unpaid-for electioneering posts, some of which included misleading claims.¹⁹⁸

Television debates

ITV aired a head-to-head election debate between Johnson and Corbyn on 19 November, hosted by Julie Etchingham.¹⁹⁹ ITV Cymru Wales aired a debate featuring representatives from the Conservatives, Labour, the Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru, and the Brexit Party on 17 November, hosted by Adrian Masters.²⁰⁰ Johnson cancelled his ITV interview with Etchingham, scheduled for 6 December, whilst the other major party leaders agreed to be interviewed.²⁰¹

On the BBC, broadcaster Andrew Neil was due to separately interview party leaders in The Andrew Neil Interviews, and BBC Northern Ireland journalist Mark Carruthers to separately interview the five main Northern Irish political leaders.²⁰² The leaders of the SNP, Labour, Plaid Cymru, the Liberal Democrats, and the Brexit Party were all interviewed by Neil and the leader of the Conservative Party was not,²⁰³ leading Neil to release a challenge to Johnson to be interviewed.²⁰⁴ The Conservatives dismissed Neil's challenge.²⁰⁵ BBC Scotland, BBC Cymru Wales, and BBC Northern Ireland also hosted a variety of regional debates.²⁰⁶

Channel 4 cancelled a debate scheduled for 24 November after Johnson would not agree to a head-to-head with Corbyn.²⁰⁷ A few days later, the network hosted a leaders' debate focused on the climate. Johnson and Farage did not attend and were replaced on stage by ice sculptures with their party names written on them.²⁰⁸ The Conservatives alleged this was part of a pattern of bias at the channel, complained to Ofcom that Channel 4 had breached due impartiality rules as a result of their refusal to allow Michael Gove to appear as a substitute,²⁰⁹ and suggested that they might review the channel's broadcasting licence.²¹⁰ In response, the Conservatives, as well as the Brexit Party, did not send a representative to Channel 4's "Everything but Brexit" on 8 December,²¹¹ and Conservative ministers were briefed not to appear on Channel 4 News.²¹² Ofcom rejected the Conservatives' complaint on 3 December.²¹³

Sky News was due to hold a three-way election debate on 28 November, inviting Johnson, Corbyn, and Swinson.²¹⁴ Swinson confirmed she would attend the debate,²¹⁵ which was later cancelled after agreements could not be made with Corbyn or Johnson.²¹⁶

Campaign events

Before candidate nominations closed, several planned candidates for Labour and for the Conservatives withdrew, principally because of past social media activity. At least three Labour candidates and one Conservative candidate stood down, with two of the Labour candidates doing so following allegedly antisemitic remarks.²⁴⁸ Two other Conservative candidates were suspended from the Conservative Party over antisemitic social media posts, but retained their candidacy for the party.^249250251 The Liberal Democrats removed one of its candidates over antisemitic social media posts, and defended two others.²⁵²

Several former Labour MPs critical of Corbyn endorsed the Conservatives.²⁵³ Meanwhile, several former Conservative MPs, including former deputy prime minister Michael Heseltine, endorsed the Liberal Democrats and independent candidates.²⁵⁴ A week before election day, former Conservative prime minister John Major warned the public against enabling a majority Conservative government, to avoid what he saw as the damage a Johnson-led government could do to the country through Brexit. Major encouraged voters to vote tactically and to back former Conservative candidates instead of those put forward by the Conservative Party.²⁵⁵

The 2019–20 United Kingdom floods started hitting parts of England from 7 to 18 November. Johnson was criticised for what some saw as his late response to the flooding,²⁵⁶²⁵⁷ after he said they were not a national emergency.²⁵⁸ The Conservatives banned Daily Mirror reporters from Johnson's campaign bus.²⁵⁹²⁶⁰ On 27 November, Labour announced it had obtained leaked government documents; they said these showed that the Conservatives were in trade negotiations with the US over the NHS. The Conservatives said Labour was peddling "conspiracy theories",²⁶¹ with Dominic Raab later suggesting this was evidence of Russian interference in the election.²⁶² The election also saw the 2019 London Bridge stabbing, a terrorist stabbing attack that occurred in London on 29 November; owing to this, the political parties suspended campaigning in London for a time.²⁶³

The 2019 London summit of NATO was held in Watford on 3–4 December 2019. It was attended by 29 heads of state and heads of government, including then United States president Donald Trump.²⁶⁴ On 6 December, Labour announced it had obtained leaked government documents that they said showed that Johnson had misled the public about the Conservatives' Brexit deal with the EU, specifically regarding customs checks between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, which are part of the Good Friday Agreement and that Johnson had said would not exist.²⁶⁵

Third-party campaigns

In February 2021, an investigation by openDemocracy found that third-party campaign groups "pushed anti-Labour attack ads to millions of voters ahead of the 2019 general election spent more than £700,000 without declaring any individual donation".²⁶⁶ These included Capitalist Worker and Campaign Against Corbynism, both of which were set up less than three months before the election and quickly disappeared thereafter.²⁶⁷ A further investigation, also reported by the Daily Mirror, found that a group run by Conservative activist Jennifer Powers had spent around £65,000 on dozens of advertisements attacking Corbyn and Labour on housing policy without declaring any donations.²⁶⁸

During the campaign, i had reported that Powers was "a corporate lobbyist who is a former employee of the Conservative Party" and that her group had been one of "16 registrations completed since 5 November".²⁶⁹ Meanwhile, openDemocracy reported on the new phenomenon of United States-style, Super PAC-esque groups in British elections.²⁷⁰ Adam Ramsay, who wrote the article, contacted Powers and got her to admit to being an associate at the trade consultancy firm Competere, which was set up by lobbyist Shanker Singham, who works for the neoliberal think tank, the Institute for Economic Affairs.²⁷¹ Powers' group "Right to Rent, Right to Buy, Right to Own" made claims that Labour wanted to "attack property rights in the UK" and "your mortgage will be harder to pay under Labour".²⁷²²⁷³

Additionally, openDemocracy reported that, during the election campaign, the pro-Labour group Momentum spent more than £500,000, the European Movement for the United Kingdom spent almost £300,000 and the anti-Brexit groups Led By Donkeys and Best for Britain spent £458,237 and more than one million pounds respectively.²⁷⁴ Following these reports, former Liberal Democrats MP Tom Brake, who lost his seat in the election and was now director of the pressure group Unlock Democracy, wrote to the Electoral Commission, urging them to investigate.²⁷⁵ These calls were echoed by John McDonnell, Labour MP and former Shadow Chancellor, who insisted that "a serious and in-depth inquiry into third-party campaigning" was needed.²⁷⁶

Religious groups' opinions on the parties

Many ethnic minority and religious leaders and organisations made statements about the general election. Leaders of the Church of England stated people had a "democratic duty to vote", that they should "leave their echo chambers", and "issues need to be debated respectfully, and without resorting to personal abuse".²⁷⁷

Antisemitism in the Labour Party, especially new antisemitism was persistently covered in the media in the lead up to the election. In his leader's interview with Jeremy Corbyn, Andrew Neil dedicated the first third of the 30-minute programme entirely to discussion of Labour's relationship with the Jewish community.²⁷⁸ This interview drew attention as Corbyn refused to apologise for antisemitism in the Labour Party, despite having done so on previous occasions.²⁷⁹ The British chief rabbi Ephraim Mirvis made an unprecedented intervention in politics, warning that antisemitism was a "poison sanctioned from the top" of the Labour Party, and saying that British Jews were gripped by anxiety about the prospect of a Corbyn-led government.²⁸⁰ Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Muslim Council of Britain and the Hindu Council UK supported Mirvis's intervention, if not entirely endorsing it.²⁸¹²⁸² The Jewish Labour Movement said they would not be actively campaigning for Labour except for exceptional candidates.²⁸³ The pro-Corbyn Morning Star reported that Jewish Voice for Labour and the Jewish Socialist Group said that Mirvis did not represent all Jews, with some people within the religious groups being keen to express that no one person or organisation represents the views of all the members of the faith.²⁸⁴

The Catholic Church in the United Kingdom urged voters to respect the right to life, opposing abortion, euthanasia, and assisted suicide, along with a peaceful solution to Brexit, support the poor, care for the homeless, and attention to human rights.²⁸⁵

The Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) spokesman stated that Islamophobia "is particularly acute in the Conservative Party" and that Conservatives treat it "with denial, dismissal and deceit".²⁸⁶ In addition they released a 72-page document, outlining what they assess are the key issues from a British Muslim perspective. The MCB specifically criticised those who "seek to stigmatise and undermine Muslims"; for example, by implying that Pakistanis ("often used as a proxy for Muslims") vote "en bloc as directed by Imams".²⁸⁷ The Sunday Mirror stated that many of the candidates campaigning for the Brexit Party were Islamophobic.²⁸⁸ This scenario resulted in many Muslim individuals & organisations publicly endorsing the Labour Party.

The Times of India reported that supporters of Narendra Modi's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) were actively campaigning for the Conservatives in 48 marginal seats,²⁸⁹ and the Today programme reported that it had seen WhatsApp messages sent to Hindus across the country urging them to vote Conservative.²⁹⁰²⁹¹ Some British Indians spoke out against what they saw as the BJP's meddling in the election.²⁹² The Hindu Council UK was strongly critical of Labour, going as far as to say that Labour is "anti-Hindu",²⁹³ and objected to Corbyn's condemnation of the Indian government's actions resulting in the revocation of the special status of Jammu and Kashmir.²⁹⁴ Labour's perceived introduction of a white parachute candidate into Leicester East (where both the Conservatives & Liberal Democrats had fielded Hindu candidates) disappointed many with Hindu heritage (who had become the single largest ethnic group in Leicester);²⁹⁵ more specifically, no candidates of Indian descent were interviewed. Jeremy Corbyn was very unpopular among the Hindus due to his anti-Indian sentiments & his past disparaging comments on the caste system,²⁹⁶ with many of the community seeing him to be under the influence of Pakistani Muslims,²⁹⁷ with whom he shared a common pro-Palestinian stance. The party selected or re-selected only one candidate of Indian descent among its 39 safest seats.²⁹⁸ Jeremy Corbyn receiving endorsement by the Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front, a Pakistan sponsored Islamist separatist group designated as a terrorist organisation by the Indian government known for forcibly expelling Kashmiri Hindus out of the Kashmir Valley in the 1990s, also made him unpopular with Hindus, especially those who migrated from Kashmir as a result of this incident.²⁹⁹

Endorsements

Main article: Endorsements in the 2019 United Kingdom general election

Newspapers, organisations, and individuals had endorsed parties or individual candidates for the election.

Media coverage

Party representation

According to Loughborough University's Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (CRCC), media coverage of the first week of the campaign was dominated by the Conservatives and Labour, with the leaders of both parties being the most represented campaigners (Johnson with 20.8%; Corbyn with 18.8%).³⁰⁰³⁰¹ Due to this, the election coverage was characterised as increasingly 'presidential' as smaller parties have been marginalised.³⁰²

In television coverage, Boris Johnson had a particularly high-profile (30.4% against Corbyn's 22.6%). Labour (32%) and the Conservative Party (33%) received about a third of TV coverage each. In newspapers, Labour received two-fifths (40%) of the coverage and the Conservatives 35%. Spokespeople from both parties were quoted near equally, with Conservative sources being the most prominent in both press and TV coverage in terms of frequency of appearance. Sajid Javid and John McDonnell featured prominently during the first week because the economy of the United Kingdom was a top story for the media. McDonnell had more coverage than Javid on both TV and in print.³⁰³

A large proportion of the newspaper coverage of Labour was negative.³⁰⁴ Writing in the British Journalism Review, James Hanning said that, in its leadership reporting and commentary, Conservative supporting newspapers made little mention of Johnson having "a track record that would have sunk any other politician".³⁰⁵ In the Loughborough analysis, during the first week of the campaign, for example, the Conservatives had a positive press coverage score of +29.7, making them the only party to receive a positive overall presentation in the press. Meanwhile, Labour had a negative score of −70, followed by the Brexit Party on −19.7 and the Liberal Democrats on −10.³⁰⁶³⁰⁷ Over the whole campaign, press hostility towards Labour had doubled compared with during the 2017 election, and negative coverage of the Conservatives halved.³⁰⁸

The Liberal Democrats were the party with the most TV coverage in the first week after Labour and the Conservatives, with an eighth of all reporting (13%). In newspapers, they received less coverage than the Brexit Party, whose leader Nigel Farage received nearly as much coverage (12.3%) as Johnson and Corbyn (17.4% each). Most of this coverage regarded the Brexit Party's proposed electoral pact with the Conservatives.³⁰⁹ The Brexit Party (7%) and the SNP (5%) were fourth and fifth in terms of TV coverage, respectively.³¹⁰

Dominant issues

As during the 2017 election and in line for British elections, the electoral process was the most covered media topic for this election at 31% of all coverage.³¹¹ Brexit was the most prominent policy issue on both TV (18%) and in the press (11%), followed by the economy, and health (8% and 7% of all coverage, respectively).³¹² There was little focused analysis of what the implementation of Brexit policies might mean, which contrasted with the more detailed analysis often undertaken of other manifesto commitments, such as those on the economy.³¹³

Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland's place within the United Kingdom received some prominence on TV but little coverage in the press.³¹⁴ "Standards/scandals" and "Minorities/religion" received relatively significant discussion in large part relating to allegations of antisemitism in the Labour party and in the prior case an incident when Johnson was accused of reacting unsympathetically to an image of an ill child without a bed in hospital.³¹⁵ Coverage of immigration and border controls fell overall from to 2017, while focus on environmental issues slightly increased.³¹⁶

Gender balance

Of the 20 most prominent spokespeople in media coverage of the first week of the election period, five were women, with Nicola Sturgeon, the SNP leader and first minister of Scotland, in seventh place, the most featured.³¹⁷ Women including citizens, experts, pollsters, businesspeople, trade union representatives, and the like featured in 23.9% of coverage and men in 76.1%. Men spoke three times as much as women in TV coverage, and five times as much in newspaper coverage.³¹⁸³¹⁹

Members of Parliament not standing for re-election

Main article: List of MPs who stood down at the 2019 United Kingdom general election

74 members of Parliament (MPs) who held seats at the end of Parliament did not stand for re-election. Of these, 32 were Conservative MPs, 20 were Labour, 3 were Liberal Democrats, and 16 were independents. The number of MPs retiring was higher than the 2017 general election, when 31 stood down.³²⁰³²¹

Opinion polling

Main article: Opinion polling for the 2019 United Kingdom general election

The chart below depicts the results of opinion polls, mostly only of voters in Great Britain, conducted from the 2017 general election until the election. The line plotted is the average of the last 15 polls and the larger circles at the end represent the actual results of the election. The graph shows that the Conservatives and Labour polled to similar levels from mid-2017 to mid-2019.

Following Johnson's election in July, the Conservatives established a clear lead over Labour, and simultaneously support for the Brexit Party declined from its peak in summer 2019. The Spreadex columns below cover bets on the number of seats each party would win, with the midpoint between asking and selling price.

Predictions three weeks before the vote

The first-past-the-post system used in the United Kingdom general elections means that the number of seats won is not directly related to vote share. Thus, several approaches are used to convert polling data and other information into seat predictions. The table below lists some of the predictions.

Predictions two weeks before the vote

Note: Elections Etc. does not add up to 650 seats due to rounding, the speaker is shown under "Others" and not "Labour", and majority figures assume all elected members take up their seats.

Predictions one week before the vote

Below are listed predictions based upon polls.

Note: Elections Etc. does not add up to 650 seats due to rounding, the speaker is shown under "Others" and not "Labour", and majority figures assume all elected members take up their seats.

Below are listed predictions based upon betting odds, assuming the favourite wins in each constituency.

Note: The speaker is shown under "Others" and not "Labour", and majority figures assume all elected members take up their seats.

Final predictions

Exit poll

An exit poll conducted by Ipsos MORI for the BBC, ITV, and Sky News was published at the end of voting at 10 pm, predicting the number of seats for each party.³⁵⁶³⁵⁷

Results

For further results, see Results breakdown of the 2019 United Kingdom general election.

For complete results by individual constituency, see Results of the 2019 United Kingdom general election.

The Conservative Party won, securing 365 seats out of 650, giving them an overall majority of 80 seats in the House of Commons. They gained seats in several Labour Party strongholds in Northern England that had been held by the party for decades and which had formed the red wall; for instance, the constituency of Bishop Auckland, which elected a Conservative MP for the first time in its 134-year history. This marked a fourth consecutive general election defeat for the Labour Party. In the worst result for the party in 84 years,³⁵⁸ despite a better vote share than other losses as in 1931, 1983, 1987, and 2010, Labour won 202 seats, which was the lowest number since 1935 and a loss of 60 compared to the previous election.³⁵⁹³⁶⁰

The Liberal Democrats won 11 seats, down 1, despite significantly increasing their share of the popular vote. Ed Davey, former Cameron–Clegg coalition cabinet minister and MP for Kingston and Surbiton, was the winner of the 2020 Liberal Democrats leadership election. This came after Jo Swinson lost her seat to Amy Callaghan of the SNP by 150 votes and was disqualified from continuing as leader of the party. Swinson also became the first party leader to lose their seat since Liberal Party leader Archibald Sinclair in 1945.³⁶¹

While the Conservatives gained support in England and Wales, they lost support in Scotland in the face of a major SNP advance. The Conservatives won in England, advancing by 1.7% and gaining 48 seats to win 345 out of 533, while Labour fell back by 8% and lost 47 seats to win just 180.³⁶² Labour won in Wales but lost 8% of its 2017 vote share and six seats, retaining 22 out of 40, while the Conservatives advanced by 2.5% and gained six seats, winning 14 in total.³⁶³

The SNP advanced by 8.1% and gained 13 seats to win 48 out of 59, gaining several seats from the Conservatives and Labour. The Conservatives lost 3.5% of their 2017 vote share and half their seats, while Labour was reduced to one Scottish seat, Edinburgh South. This is the same Scottish seat that returned Ian Murray in the 2015–17 Parliament as the country's sole Labour MP.³⁶⁴ Among the Labour MPs who lost their seats in Scotland was Lesley Laird, deputy leader of Scottish Labour and Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland.³⁶⁵ In Northern Ireland, nationalist political parties won more seats than unionist ones for the first time. Nigel Dodds, the DUP's leader in Westminster, lost his seat in Belfast North.³⁶⁶

Analysis

The results have been attributed to Leave-supporting areas backing the Conservatives, the Conservatives broadening their appeal to working-class voters, and the Conservatives making gains in the Midlands and the north of England.³⁶⁷ Most notable was the red wall turning blue in the election, which greatly contributed to the Conservative majority. In exit polls conducted by Opinium, 43% of voters who did not vote for the Labour Party cited 'the leadership' as their reason.³⁶⁸ Among those who did not vote for the Conservative Party, the cited reason was equally split between 'their stance on Brexit' and 'the leadership', with both at 26%. Several commentators stated that the party's loss was due to a complicated manifesto and Brexit policy, a poor approach to campaigning, and the unpopularity of Corbyn's leadership.^369370371

A YouGov post-election survey determined that the age over which voters were more likely to opt for the Conservatives than for Labour was 39, down from 47 in the 2017 election. In contrast to previous elections, the YouGov survey additionally found that a plurality of voters in the DE's NRS social grade — comprising the unemployed, state pensioners, and semi-skilled and unskilled workers — had opted for the Conservatives over Labour.³⁷² This change reflects the collapse of the 'Red Wall' which has a plurality of people in the DE classification according to the ONS.³⁷³

Between 26% and 33% of voters engaged in tactical voting, as they said that they were trying to prevent a victory by the party they liked least.³⁷⁴³⁷⁵ Recommendation by tactical voting websites had some benefit for Liberal Democrat candidates.³⁷⁶ The new Parliament reportedly had the highest number of openly LGBT MPs in the world, with 20 Conservative MPs, 15 Labour MPs, and 10 SNP MPs who identify as LGBT. For the first time in both cases, the majority of elected Labour and Liberal Democrat MPs were female. The election also returned a record number of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) MPs, with 65 MPs (10%) describing themselves as BAME.³⁷⁷³⁷⁸

In a post-election review featuring Labour MPs, trade union officials and activists one of several reasons attributed to the electoral defeat was due to the declining popularity of Jeremy Corbyn in relation to the Brexit position and allegations of party antisemitism. The review projected that Labour would have retained 38% of the vote had Corbyn's popularity levels retained at its peak level in 2017.³⁷⁹³⁸⁰

Summary

A summarised results of the parties that won seats at the election is shown below.

Full results

In total, the Green Party of England and Wales, Scottish Greens, and Green Party Northern Ireland received 865,715 votes (2.70%). This may be unclear from the table and sources which cite the total of the Greens in the whole of the United Kingdom rather than by region.

Voter demographics

Ipsos MORI

Below is listed Ipsos MORI's demographic breakdown.

YouGov

Below is listed YouGov's demographic breakdown.

Seats changing hands

Seats which changed allegiance

Main article: List of MPs who lost their seat in the 2019 United Kingdom general election

Reaction and aftermath

In his victory speech, Johnson described the result as a mandate for leaving the EU and promised to do so by 31 January.³⁸⁸ The United Kingdom left the EU on 31 January 2020³⁸⁹ but continued using EU trading rules until 23:00 on 31 December.³⁹⁰

The election led to both Labour and the Liberal Democrats having leadership contests: the former as Corbyn resigned, the latter as Swinson failed to be elected as an MP. Corbyn portrayed the 2019 election results primarily as a consequence of attitudes surrounding Brexit rather than a rejection of Labour's social and economic policies. In an interview held on 13 December 2019, Corbyn said the election was "taken over ultimately by Brexit", and said that he was "proud of the [Labour] manifesto".³⁹¹

The Labour leadership campaign was marked by conflicting analyses of what had gone wrong for the party in the general election.³⁹² There was debate as to whether Corbyn's unpopularity or their position on Brexit was more significant.³⁹³ The 2020 Labour Together report, published by internal Labour party figures after Keir Starmer was elected as leader, highlighted issues like Corbyn's unpopularity, the party's Brexit policy, and poor seat targeting, as well as long-term changes in Labour's electoral coalition.³⁹⁴ In openDemocracy, Jo Michell and Rob Calvert Jump argued that the report underplayed the fact the geographical redistributions, stating that "Labour's decline in the North, Midlands and Wales is not the result of a dramatic collapse in its vote share, but changes in the distribution of votes between parties and constituencies."³⁹⁵

Successful Liberal Democrats MPs were critical in private of how the party had decided to advocate revoking the exercise of Article 50, and the communication of that policy. Some criticised the election campaign for being hubristic, with its initial defining message that Swinson could be the country's next prime minister.³⁹⁶ Ed Davey, the party's co-acting leader after the election, argued that the unpopularity of Corbyn lost the Liberal Democrats votes to the Conservatives.³⁹⁷ Wera Hobhouse, who was re-elected by a majority of 12,322,³⁹⁸ argued that the party had been wrong to pursue a policy of equidistance between Labour and the Conservatives in the general election campaign. Instead, she argued that the party should have concentrated more on campaigning against the Conservatives.³⁹⁹ The SNP's leader Nicola Sturgeon described the result as a clear mandate to hold a new referendum for Scottish independence.⁴⁰⁰ The British government said that it would not agree to a referendum being held and the Scottish government announced a few months later that it would put the issue on hold due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom.⁴⁰¹

See also

• 2010s in United Kingdom political history
• 2019 in politics and government
• 2019 United Kingdom general election in England
• 2019 United Kingdom general election in Scotland
• 2019 United Kingdom general election in Wales
• 2019 United Kingdom general election in Northern Ireland
• Elections in the United Kingdom
• List of United Kingdom general elections

Notes

Further reading

• Bale, Time; Ford, Robert; Jennings, Will; Surridge, Paula (2022). The British General Election of 2019. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-3-030-74256-0. It includes 605 pages and many tables.
• Prosser, Christopher (February 2011). "The End of the EU Affair: The UK General Election of 2019". West European Politics. 44 (2). pp. 450–461.

External links

• House of Commons Briefings: General Election 2019: Full Results and Analysis
• Two years on: What the hell happened in the 2019 general election? (Politico podcast)
• BBC article about the Labour Party history

Early Parliamentary General Election Act 2019

• Early Parliamentary General Election Act 2019 official text
• Early Parliamentary General Election Bill 2019–20, Progress in Parliament Archived 31 October 2019 at the Wayback Machine
• Institute for Government: General Election 2019

Party manifestos

• Unleash Britain's Potential, Conservative Party
  • Accessible Versions
  • Costings Document
• It's Time For Real Change, Labour Party
  • Costings Document
• Stop Brexit and Build a Brighter Future, Liberal Democrats
  • Accessible Versions
  • Costings Document
• Stronger for Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Accessible Versions
• If Not Now, When?, Green Party
  • Accessible Versions
• Contract With The People, The Brexit Party
• Let's Get the UK Moving Again, Democratic Unionist Party
• Demand Better, Alliance Party of Northern Ireland
• Time For Unity, Sinn Féin
• Stop Boris, Stop Brexit, Social Democratic and Labour Party
• Wales, it's us, Plaid Cymru
• Let's Change Together, Ulster Unionist Party
• Yorkshire Deserves Better, Yorkshire Party Archived 13 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine
• Demand Climate Action!, Scottish Greens
• For Brexit and Beyond, UK Independence Party Archived 29 November 2021 at the Wayback Machine
• Put Trust In The People, Liberal Party
• A 2020 vision for change, The Independent Group for Change

References

1. "Electoral statistics, UK – Office for National Statistics". www.ons.gov.uk. Retrieved 23 March 2024. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/elections/electoralregistration/bulletins/electoralstatisticsforuk/2019 ↩

2. The Conservatives effectively had an 87-seat working majority, given that the 7 Sinn Féin MPs practised abstentionism and did not take their seats, and that the speaker and deputies do not vote.[1] /wiki/Working_majority ↩

3. "Election results 2019: Boris Johnson hails 'new dawn' after historic victory". BBC News. 13 December 2019. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50776671 ↩

4. "UK set for 12 December general election". BBC News. 29 October 2019. Retrieved 22 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-50229318 ↩

5. Stewart, Heather (12 December 2019). "Exit poll predicts 86-seat majority for Boris Johnson and Conservatives". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/12/exit-poll-predicts-majority-for-boris-johnson-and-conservatives ↩

6. "Results". BBC News. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2019/results ↩

7. "Share of votes in general elections in the United Kingdom from 1918 to 2017, by political party". Statista. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.statista.com/statistics/717004/general-elections-vote-share-by-party-uk/ ↩

8. "Jeremy Corbyn: 'I will not lead Labour at next election'". BBC News. 13 December 2019. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50766114 ↩

9. Carrell, Severin; Brooks, Libby (13 December 2019). "Scottish independence vote a 'democratic right', says Sturgeon". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/13/nicola-sturgeon-to-publish-independence-referendum-blueprint ↩

10. "Lib Dem leader Jo Swinson to step down". BBC News. 13 December 2019. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50771123 ↩

11. "Sir Ed Davey wins Liberal Democrat leadership race". BBC News. 27 August 2020. Retrieved 6 October 2021. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-53933470 ↩

12. "Jeremy Corbyn: 'I will not lead Labour at next election'". BBC News. 13 December 2019. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50766114 ↩

13. "Labour leadership winner: Sir Keir Starmer". BBC News. 4 April 2020. Retrieved 6 October 2021. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-51049756 ↩

14. Le Vay, Josie (16 December 2019). "Jane Dodds to 'keep on fighting' after election loss". County Times. Retrieved 11 October 2024. https://www.countytimes.co.uk/news/18105431.jane-dodds-keep-fighting-election-loss/ ↩

15. Blitz, James (29 March 2019). "Will the Brexit impasse lead to a UK general election?". Financial Times. Retrieved 30 March 2019. https://www.ft.com/content/2be9f604-5177-11e9-9c76-bf4a0ce37d49 ↩

16. "May's government survives no-confidence vote". BBC News. 16 January 2019. Retrieved 30 March 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-46899466 ↩

17. "Boris Johnson's call for general election rejected by MPs". BBC News. 5 September 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49584907 ↩

18. Stewart, Heather; Elgot, Jessica; Walker, Peter (4 September 2019). "Cornered Boris Johnson suffers triple Commons defeat". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 5 September 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/sep/04/cornered-boris-johnson-suffers-triple-commons-defeat ↩

19. Mason, Rowena (5 September 2019). "Boris Johnson loses sixth vote in six days as election bid fails". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 September 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/sep/09/mps-order-johnson-to-hand-over-aides-messages-about-prorogation ↩

20. Parker, George; Payne, Sebastian (29 October 2019). "Johnson raises stakes in fresh election gambit". Financial Times. Retrieved 29 October 2019. https://www.ft.com/content/2c7e3810-f9a5-11e9-98fd-4d6c20050229 ↩

21. Mason, Rowena (30 October 2019). "Brexit: Parliament breaks deadlock with vote for 12 December election". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 October 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/29/uk-general-election-confirmed-for-12-december-after-brexit-stalemate ↩

22. "MPs close to backing December election". BBC News. 29 October 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-50221856 ↩

23. Mason, Rowena (30 October 2019). "Brexit: Parliament breaks deadlock with vote for 12 December election". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 October 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/29/uk-general-election-confirmed-for-12-december-after-brexit-stalemate ↩

24. "MPs close to backing December election". BBC News. 29 October 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-50221856 ↩

25. "Early Parliamentary General Election Bill – Hansard". hansard.parliament.uk. October 2025. https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2019-10-30/debates/E1BDD564-B642-4D86-A5DC-3EC807BF25DA/EarlyParliamentaryGeneralElectionBill ↩

26. "Royal Assent". Hansard.parliament.uk. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2019-10-31/debates/E095C72C-6D9D-489F-BD54-CB67D51A195E/RoyalAssent ↩

27. "Timetable for UK Parliamentary general election – Thursday 12 December 2019". Electoral Commission. Retrieved 1 November 2019. https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/i-am-a/electoral-administrator/uk-parliamentary-general-election-great-britain ↩

28. "Election schedule: Full timetable as MPs approve Boris Johnson's December 12 vote". Express. 29 October 2019. Retrieved 30 October 2019. https://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1197348/Election-schedule-UK-general-election-timetable-vote-deadline ↩

29. "Government eyes first December general election since 1923". Isle of Wight County Press. 24 October 2019. Retrieved 29 October 2019. https://www.countypress.co.uk/news/national/17992010.government-eyes-first-december-general-election-since-1923/ ↩

30. Hanretty, Chris (29 October 2019). "Why UK election outcome is impossible to predict". Politico Europe. Retrieved 29 October 2019. https://www.politico.eu/article/why-uk-election-outcome-is-impossible-to-predict-boris-johnson-brexit-labour-conservative-party/ ↩

31. Electoral Commission: Deadline for registration ahead of an election. http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/164677/Deadline-for-registration-ahead-of-an-election-detailed-note-January-2014.pdf ↩

32. "Representation of the People Act 1983, Section 1". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 26 April 2017. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/2 ↩

33. "Types of election, referendums, and who can vote". Gov.uk. Retrieved 18 April 2017. https://www.gov.uk/elections-in-the-uk/general-election ↩

34. Persons without a permanent or fixed address can make a declaration of local connection to a particular location in order to register.[34] ↩

35. "Representation of the People Act 1985, Section 1". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 24 May 2019. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/50 ↩

36. "Electoral Office of Northern Ireland – Overseas Elector registration". Archived from the original on 30 October 2019. Retrieved 30 October 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191030181746/http://www.eoni.org.uk/getmedia/cd97dda8-aa42-4ad5-b7dc-0bd7242d872a/Overseas-Elector-Registration-Form-CURRENT-FORM_1 ↩

37. In the case of a British citizen who moved abroad before the age of 18, they can vote if their parent or guardian was on the Electoral Register in the last fifteen years. ↩

38. Representation of the People Act 1983, Sections 3 and 3A ↩

39. "House of Lords Act 1999". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 4 June 2017. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1999/34/contents ↩

40. "House of Lords Reform Act 2014, Section 4". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 4 June 2017. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/24/section/4 ↩

41. The deadline for the receipt and determination of anonymous electoral registration applications is one working day before the publication date of the notice of alteration to the Electoral Register (that is the sixth working day before polling day).[40] ↩

42. "All the key General Election dates and deadlines". i. Retrieved 2 April 2020. https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/general-election-2019-timetable-deadline-voting-results-824989 ↩

43. "Register to vote". GOV.UK. Retrieved 11 November 2019. https://www.gov.uk/register-to-vote ↩

44. "Register to vote". GOV.UK. Retrieved 11 November 2019. https://www.gov.uk/register-to-vote ↩

45. "Register to vote". GOV.UK. Retrieved 11 November 2019. https://www.gov.uk/register-to-vote ↩

46. "Start of a new Parliament". UK Parliament. https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/elections-and-voting/general/start-of-a-new-parliament/ ↩

47. "Orders Approved and Business Transacted at the Privy Council Held by the Queen at Buckingham Palace on 6th November 2019" (PDF). Privycouncil.independent.gov.uk. 6 November 2019. https://privycouncil.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/2019-11-06-List-of-Business.pdf ↩

48. "New Parliament to start on Tuesday December 17". Isle of Wight County Press. 7 November 2019. Retrieved 7 November 2019. https://www.countypress.co.uk/news/national/18021613.new-parliament-start-tuesday-december-17/ ↩

49. Syal, Rajeev (27 February 2020). "Tories raised three times as much as Labour in pre-election donations". The Guardian. Retrieved 29 February 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/feb/27/tories-raised-three-times-as-much-as-labour-in-pre-election-donations ↩

50. "Theresa May to resign as prime minister". BBC News. 24 May 2019. Retrieved 24 May 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-48395905 ↩

51. "Boris Johnson wins race to be Tory leader and PM". BBC News. 23 July 2019. Retrieved 31 October 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49084605 ↩

52. "Theresa May to resign as prime minister". BBC News. 24 May 2019. Retrieved 24 May 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-48395905 ↩

53. "Boris Johnson wins race to be Tory leader and PM". BBC News. 23 July 2019. Retrieved 31 October 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49084605 ↩

54. Stewart, Heather (20 December 2019). "Brexit: MPs pass withdrawal agreement bill by 124 majority". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/20/brexit-pm-asks-britons-to-move-on-as-mps-debate-withdrawal-bill ↩

55. Russell, Meg (4 September 2020). "Boris Johnson and Parliament: an unhappy tale in 13 acts". UK in a changing Europe. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://ukandeu.ac.uk/boris-johnson-and-parliament-an-unhappy-tale-in-13-acts/ ↩

56. "Three Tory MPs join breakaway group". BBC News. 20 February 2019. Retrieved 20 February 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-47306022 ↩

57. Schofield, Kevin (29 March 2019). "The Independent Group becomes 'Change UK' to stand in European elections". PoliticsHome. Retrieved 29 March 2019. https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/news/102876/independent-group-becomes-change-uk-stand-european-elections ↩

58. Woodcock, Andrew (6 August 2019). "Independent Group calls for new members to become 'fully fledged political party'". Independent. Archived from the original on 6 August 2019. Retrieved 5 September 2019. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/conservative-labour-party-independent-group-change-anna-soubry-mps-a9041151.html ↩

59. Walker, Peter (31 October 2019). "Tory rebel Antoinette Sandbach joins Lib Dems ahead of election". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 15 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/31/tory-rebel-antoinette-sandbach-joins-lib-dems-ahead-of-election ↩

60. Mueller, Benjamin (21 November 2019). "At Odds With Labour, Britain's Jews Are Feeling Politically Homeless". The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/21/world/europe/britain-election-antisemitism.html ↩

61. Katz, Mike (1 November 2019). "Our Labour values have not changed but we can't support a leader who has so utterly failed on antisemitism". The Jewish Chronicle. Retrieved 25 November 2019. https://www.thejc.com/comment/comment/jewish-labour-movement-not-campaigning-mike-katz-1.490941 ↩

62. Read, Jonathon. "Tory minister cornered over Islamophobia live on television". The New European. Archived from the original on 30 November 2019. Retrieved 25 November 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191130134253/https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/andy-macdonald-and-dominic-raab-on-sky-news-1-6390585 ↩

63. "Who were the Conservative Brexit rebels?". 5 September 2019. Retrieved 22 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49563357 ↩

64. "Whip restored to 10 Conservative MPs who rebelled against government over Brexit". ITV News. 29 October 2019. https://www.itv.com/news/2019-10-29/whip-restored-to-10-conservative-mps-who-rebelled-against-government-over-brexit ↩

65. "In election pitch, UK PM Johnson backs his deal over no-deal Brexit". CNBC. 2 November 2019. Retrieved 2 November 2019. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/02/in-election-pitch-uk-pm-johnson-backs-his-deal-over-no-deal-brexit.html ↩

66. Stewart, Heather; Proctor, Kate (1 November 2019). "Boris Johnson faces threat of Brexit party battle in every seat". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/01/farage-to-johnson-join-forces-or-brexit-party-will-contest-every-seat ↩

67. Mason, Rowena; Rankin, Jennifer (23 September 2019). "What does Labour vote signify about where it stands on Brexit?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/sep/23/labour-conference-brexit-pro-remain-activists-corbyn ↩

68. McCluskey, Len; Ward, Dave; Whelan, Mick (2 November 2019). "Labour's Brexit policy is clear. The shadow cabinet must get behind it". New Statesman. Retrieved 2 November 2019. /wiki/Len_McCluskey ↩

69. "Corbyn defends 'neutral' Brexit stance". BBC News. 23 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50530163 ↩

70. "General election 2019: Brexit – where do the parties stand?". BBC News. 5 December 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-48027580 ↩

71. Walker, Peter (15 September 2019). "Lib Dems pledge to revoke Brexit without referendum". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/sep/15/lib-dems-pledge-to-revoke-brexit-without-referendum ↩

72. "Brexit". Liberal Democrats. 17 April 2018. https://www.libdems.org.uk/brexit ↩

73. "Party-by-party guide to the UK's European elections". BBC News. 22 May 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-48027580 ↩

74. Evans, Albert (28 November 2019). "Lib Dems have 'gone back to plan A' of a second Brexit referendum instead of revoking Article 50, says Layla Moran". i. https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/bbc-news-lib-dems-breakfast-layla-moran-naha-munchetty-1327026 ↩

75. McCormack, Jayne (28 March 2019). "Brexit: DUP confirms it will not back withdrawal deal". BBC News. Retrieved 8 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-47718367 ↩

76. "DUP says PM 'too eager to get deal at any cost'". BBC News. 17 October 2019. Retrieved 2 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-northern-ireland-50079317 ↩

77. "Can Steve Aiken save the Ulster Unionist Party?". www.newstatesman.com. 25 November 2019. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/11/can-steve-aiken-save-ulster-unionist-party ↩

78. "Can Steve Aiken save the Ulster Unionist Party?". www.newstatesman.com. 25 November 2019. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/11/can-steve-aiken-save-ulster-unionist-party ↩

79. Perraudin, Frances (6 December 2019). "Labour vows to electrify England's entire bus fleet by 2030". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 6 January 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/06/labour-vows-to-electrify-englands-entire-bus-fleet-by-2030 ↩

80. "Plan for Britain's Future". libdems.org. Archived from the original on 16 May 2021. Retrieved 18 December 2021. https://www.libdems.org.uk/plan ↩

81. Shukman, David (16 November 2019). "General election 2019: Tories and Lib Dems in rival tree-planting pledges". BBC News. Retrieved 19 December 2021. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50440867 ↩

82. "Tory spending plans: Sajid Javid's key pledges". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 October 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/sep/30/public-spending-pledges-tories-conservatives-sajid-javid-election ↩

83. "General election analysis 2019" (PDF). Institute of Fiscal Studies. 28 November 2019. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191128203535/https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/IFS-General-election-analysis-2019-Tax-Stuart-Adam.pdf ↩

84. "Tory manifesto 'to forge a new Britain' – Johnson". BBC News. 24 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50532000 ↩

85. "The outlook for the public finances: the Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat manifestos compared" (PDF). Institute of Fiscal Studies. 28 November 2019. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191206080359/https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/Manifesto-analysis-Public-finances-general%20election-2019_V2.pdf ↩

86. "General election analysis 2019" (PDF). Institute of Fiscal Studies. 28 November 2019. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191128203535/https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/IFS-General-election-analysis-2019-Tax-Stuart-Adam.pdf ↩

87. "The outlook for the public finances: the Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat manifestos compared" (PDF). Institute of Fiscal Studies. 28 November 2019. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191206080359/https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/Manifesto-analysis-Public-finances-general%20election-2019_V2.pdf ↩

88. "McDonnell rejects claims Labour would leave people worse off". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/22/mcdonnell-rejects-claims-labour-policy-would-leave-people-worse-off ↩

89. "General election analysis 2019" (PDF). Institute of Fiscal Studies. 28 November 2019. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191128203535/https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/IFS-General-election-analysis-2019-Tax-Stuart-Adam.pdf ↩

90. "The outlook for the public finances: the Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat manifestos compared" (PDF). Institute of Fiscal Studies. 28 November 2019. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191206080359/https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/Manifesto-analysis-Public-finances-general%20election-2019_V2.pdf ↩

91. "IFS manifesto verdict: neither Tories nor Labour have credible spending plan". The Guardian. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/nov/28/ifs-manifesto-verdict-neither-tories-nor-labour-have-credible-spending-plan ↩

92. "UK parties not being 'honest with the electorate', think-tank says". Financial Times. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.ft.com/content/b01a1286-11db-11ea-a225-db2f231cfeae ↩

93. "Party manifestos". Institute of Fiscal Studies. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://election2019.ifs.org.uk/manifestos ↩

94. "Tories and Labour 'lack credible spending plans'". The Times. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/tories-and-labour-lack-credible-spending-plans-say-think-tanks-2fwtlngxq ↩

95. "General election analysis 2019" (PDF). Institute of Fiscal Studies. 28 November 2019. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191128203535/https://www.ifs.org.uk/uploads/IFS-General-election-analysis-2019-Tax-Stuart-Adam.pdf ↩

96. "IFS manifesto verdict: neither Tories nor Labour have credible spending plan". The Guardian. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/nov/28/ifs-manifesto-verdict-neither-tories-nor-labour-have-credible-spending-plan ↩

97. Kibasi, Tom (28 November 2019). "Look closer at the IFS manifesto report. Labour's vision is the only way". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/28/ifs-manifesto-labour-economy-investment ↩

98. Kibasi, Tom (28 November 2019). "Look closer at the IFS manifesto report. Labour's vision is the only way". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/28/ifs-manifesto-labour-economy-investment ↩

99. "IFS manifesto verdict: neither Tories nor Labour have credible spending plan". The Guardian. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/nov/28/ifs-manifesto-verdict-neither-tories-nor-labour-have-credible-spending-plan ↩

100. Kibasi, Tom (28 November 2019). "Look closer at the IFS manifesto report. Labour's vision is the only way". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/28/ifs-manifesto-labour-economy-investment ↩

101. "IFS manifesto verdict: neither Tories nor Labour have credible spending plan". The Guardian. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/nov/28/ifs-manifesto-verdict-neither-tories-nor-labour-have-credible-spending-plan ↩

102. "Tax rises coming whoever wins the election, leading economists warn". Evening Standard. 27 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/tax-rises-coming-whoever-wins-the-election-leading-economists-warn-a4299121.html ↩

103. "Party manifestos". Institute of Fiscal Studies. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://election2019.ifs.org.uk/manifestos ↩

104. "Party manifestos". Institute of Fiscal Studies. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://election2019.ifs.org.uk/manifestos ↩

105. "Party manifestos". Institute of Fiscal Studies. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://election2019.ifs.org.uk/manifestos ↩

106. "Party manifestos". Institute of Fiscal Studies. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://election2019.ifs.org.uk/manifestos ↩

107. Kibasi, Tom (28 November 2019). "Look closer at the IFS manifesto report. Labour's vision is the only way". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/28/ifs-manifesto-labour-economy-investment ↩

108. "IFS key verdicts on the party spending plans". Evening Standard. 28 November 2019. p. 5. ↩

109. "Party manifestos". Institute of Fiscal Studies. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://election2019.ifs.org.uk/manifestos ↩

110. "Why SNP election manifesto is overshadowed by austerity of independent Scotland – IFS". www.scotsman.com. https://www.scotsman.com/news/opinion/columnists/why-snp-election-manifesto-is-overshadowed-by-austerity-of-independent-scotland-ifs-1-5056102 ↩

111. "Your Questions: Are there record numbers of doctors and nurses?". BBC News. 24 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50521323 ↩

112. "Tory manifesto 'to forge a new Britain' – Johnson". BBC News. 24 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50532000 ↩

113. Elliott, Larry (24 November 2019). "Labour's spending plans aren't especially unusual – just look at Sweden". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2019/nov/24/labours-spending-plans-arent-especially-unusual-just-look-at-sweden ↩

114. "What are the 12 key policies in the Labour manifesto?". BBC News. 21 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50501411 ↩

115. Walker, Peter; Syal, Rajeev; Stewart, Heather (15 November 2019). "Labour's free broadband plan fires up the election battle". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/nov/15/free-broadband-essential-uk-compete-john-mcdonnell-labour-policy-openreach ↩

116. Weale, Sally (11 November 2019). "Labour pledge: we would give six years of free study for adults". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/11/labour-pledge-we-would-give-six-years-of-free-study-for-adults ↩

117. Coughlan, Sean (12 November 2019). "Labour promises free jobs retraining for adults". BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/education-50378666 ↩

118. "Praca w Wielkiej Brytanii tylko przez 4 dni w tygodniu. Dla wszystkich!" [Work in the UK only 4 days a week. For everyone!]. Brexit Standard (in Polish). 13 November 2019. Archived from the original on 27 November 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191127183700/https://www.brexitstandard.com/wiadomosci/978,praca-w-wielkiej-brytanii-tylko-przez-4-dni-w-tygodniu-dla-wszystkich ↩

119. "Labour's spending plans backed by more than 160 prominent economists". The Independent. 26 November 2019. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/general-election-labour-economy-spending-corbyn-boris-johnson-a9218041.html ↩

120. Giles, Chris (26 November 2019). "Economists and academics back Labour spending plans". www.ft.com. https://www.ft.com/content/d29b4cbe-0fa4-11ea-a225-db2f231cfeae ↩

121. "What is in the Liberal Democrats manifesto?". BBC News. 20 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50459123 ↩

122. "What are the Brexit Party's 12 key policies?". BBC News. 22 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50515516 ↩

123. "SNP manifesto 2019: 12 key policies explained". BBC News. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50561073 ↩

124. "Educational access digital subscriptions". New Scientist. 12 November 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://institutions.newscientist.com/article/2223106-row-over-whether-fracking-could-resume-in-england-despite-ban ↩

125. Harrabin, Roger (12 November 2019). "Fracking: Have the Conservatives left open the back door?". BBC News. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-50390334 ↩

126. "Lib Dems consider hung Parliament options". BBC News. 20 November 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50497282 ↩

127. Grant, Alistair (5 November 2019). "Nicola Sturgeon leaves open idea of DUP-style deal with Labour". The Herald. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/18016496.nicola-sturgeon-leaves-open-idea-dup-style-deal-labour ↩

128. Read, Jonathon (24 November 2019). "DUP could support a Labour government in the event of a hung parliament, says Foster". The New European. Archived from the original on 27 December 2019. Retrieved 24 November 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191227150055/https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/top-stories/arlene-foster-and-dup-on-jeremy-corbyn-and-election-1-6391635 ↩

129. Wright, Oliver (6 July 2023). "Election 2019: Labour looks at plans for hung parliament". The Times. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.thetimes.com/article/election-2019-labour-looks-at-plans-for-hung-parliament-0g3wds0sv ↩

130. "Can Steve Aiken save the Ulster Unionist Party?". www.newstatesman.com. 25 November 2019. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/11/can-steve-aiken-save-ulster-unionist-party ↩

131. Williams, Zoe (13 September 2019). "An alliance between progressive parties would be fragile, but it could win an election". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 September 2019. Retrieved 6 October 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/sep/13/progressive-alliance-win-election-labour-liberal-democrat ↩

132. Tominey, Camilla; Walters, Jack (11 December 2019). "Revealed: The 49 seats where the Brexit Party is splitting the Leave vote and risking a hung parliament". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 6 October 2021. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/12/11/revealed-49-seats-brexit-party-splitting-leave-vote-risking ↩

133. Sullivan, Willie (14 November 2019). "Electoral pacts show just how broken our voting system is – whoever you support". i. Retrieved 14 November 2019. https://inews.co.uk/opinion/alliances-and-electoral-pacts-show-just-our-broken-our-voting-system-is-whoever-you-support-1000918 ↩

134. Busby, Mattha (16 November 2019). "Police assessing claims that Tories offered peerages to Brexit party". The Guardian – via www.theguardian.com. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/16/police-assessing-claims-that-tories-offered-peerages-to-brexit-party ↩

135. Elledge, John (13 November 2019). "So why aren't the Lib Dems standing down in Canterbury?". New Statesman. Retrieved 13 November 2019. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/staggers/2019/11/so-why-arent-lib-dems-standing-down-canterbury ↩

136. Savage, Michael (10 November 2019). "And then there were three: Remain tactical voting sites fail to agree". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/09/remain-united-tactical-voting-site-gina-miller ↩

137. Stone, Jon (13 November 2019). "It was a mistake to launch tactical voting sites so early in the election campaign". Independent. Archived from the original on 14 November 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tactical-voting-blog/general-election-remain-tactical-voting-brexit-labour-lib-dems-opinion-poll-a9201761.html ↩

138. Savage, Michael (10 November 2019). "And then there were three: Remain tactical voting sites fail to agree". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/09/remain-united-tactical-voting-site-gina-miller ↩

139. Proctor, Kate; Mason, Rowena (30 November 2019). "Tactical voting website criticised for 'bogus' advice". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study ↩

140. Childs, Simon (19 November 2019). "Revealed: The Lib Dem Links to a 'Bogus' Tactical Voting Site". Vice News. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.vice.com/en/article/lib-dem-2019-election-tactical-voting/ ↩

141. Childs, Simon (19 November 2019). "Revealed: The Lib Dem Links to a 'Bogus' Tactical Voting Site". Vice News. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.vice.com/en/article/lib-dem-2019-election-tactical-voting/ ↩

142. Proctor, Kate; Mason, Rowena (30 November 2019). "Tactical voting website criticised for 'bogus' advice". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/30/tactical-voting-could-deliver-remain-victory-in-election-study ↩

143. Childs, Simon (19 November 2019). "Revealed: The Lib Dem Links to a 'Bogus' Tactical Voting Site". Vice News. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.vice.com/en/article/lib-dem-2019-election-tactical-voting/ ↩

144. Hill, Dave (18 November 2019). "Election 2019: How should Remainers vote tactically in Kensington?". OnLondon. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.onlondon.co.uk/election-2019-how-should-remainers-vote-tactically-in-kensington/ ↩

145. Savage, Michael (10 November 2019). "And then there were three: Remain tactical voting sites fail to agree". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/09/remain-united-tactical-voting-site-gina-miller ↩

146. Max Jeffery (12 November 2019). "Can you actually trust tactical voting websites?". Wired. Retrieved 30 December 2020. https://www.wired.co.uk/article/tactical-voting-general-election-2019 ↩

147. Cameron-Chileshe, Jasmine (10 December 2019). "Tactical voting sites: how do they work and should you trust them?". The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2019/12/10/behind-rise-tactical-voting-sites-do-work/ ↩

148. Hanretty, Chris (6 January 2020). "2019 General Election MRP predictions – Survation and Dr Chris Hanretty". Survation. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.survation.com/2019-general-election-mrp-predictions-survation-and-dr-chris-hanretty/ ↩

149. Davies, Dan (29 November 2019). "Tactical voting sites have spread confusion and animosity. In fact, we don't need them". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/29/tactical-voting-sites-confusion-animosity ↩

150. Nicholls, Tom; Hayton, Richard (January 2020). "Splitting the Tactical Vote? Coordination Problems with Polling Model-Driven Tactical Voting Websites". The Political Quarterly. 91 (1): 61–69. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12822. ISSN 0032-3179. S2CID 216204577. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-923X.12822 ↩

151. "Tactical voting's failures brutally exposed by Tory gain in Kensington". The Independent. 13 December 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/election-result-conservative-kensington-tactical-voting-grenfell-a9245016.html ↩

152. Michael Savage (7 December 2019). "Tories hold 15-point lead over Labour with just days until election". The Guardian. Retrieved 8 December 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/07/opinium-poll-tories-15-point-lead-over-labour-four-days-until-election ↩

153. Edward Malnick (7 December 2019). "General election poll: Tories down to eight-point lead". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 8 December 2019. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/12/07/general-election-poll-tories-eight-point-lead ↩

154. Helm, Toby; Savage, Michael (7 December 2019). "Calls grow to stop Boris Johnson with tactical voting as race tightens". The Observer. Retrieved 8 December 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/07/calls-grow-to-stop-boris-johnson-with-tactical-voting-as-race-tightens ↩

155. Kellner, Peter (8 December 2019). "Tactical voting guide 2019: the 50 seats where it is vital to keep the Tories out". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 December 2020. /wiki/Peter_Kellner ↩

156. Kellner, Peter (14 December 2019). "Tactical voting was set to be Remainers' saviour, so what went wrong?". The Guardian. Retrieved 15 December 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/14/tactical-voting-what-went-wrong-general-election-2019 ↩

157. "Tory Landslide, Progressives Split". Datapraxis. https://www.dataprax.is/tory-landslide-progressives-split ↩

158. Kirk, Ashley (9 December 2019). "The 40 Brexit-backing seats that Boris Johnson's Conservatives must win". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 11 December 2019. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/0/conservative-party-seats-general-election-2019-uk ↩

159. Easton, George (4 December 2019). "Inside Momentum: "We're going to be here long after Jeremy Corbyn and I are dead". New Statesman. Archived from the original on 4 December 2019. Retrieved 4 December 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191204134607/https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/12/inside-momentum-we-re-going-be-here-long-after-jeremy-corbyn-and-i-are-dead ↩

160. Easton, George (4 December 2019). "Inside Momentum: "We're going to be here long after Jeremy Corbyn and I are dead". New Statesman. Archived from the original on 4 December 2019. Retrieved 4 December 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191204134607/https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/12/inside-momentum-we-re-going-be-here-long-after-jeremy-corbyn-and-i-are-dead ↩

161. Savage, Michael (30 November 2019). "Dominic Raab in danger of losing seat to Lib Dems, poll suggests". The Observer. Retrieved 10 December 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/30/poll-finds-dominic-raab-risks-losing-seat-to-lib-dems ↩

162. O'Carroll, Lisa (16 November 2019). "Lib Dems criticised for selective use of polling data on leaflets". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 26 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/16/lib-dems-criticised-for-selective-use-of-polling-data-on-leaflets ↩

163. "Lib Dem leaflet falsely attributes pro-Lib Dem quote to The Guardian". Full Fact. 6 November 2019. https://fullfact.org/news/lib-dem-leaflet-false-quote ↩

164. Waterson, Jim (26 November 2019). "Lib Dems lambasted over fake newspapers campaign material". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 26 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/26/lib-dems-lambasted-over-fake-newspapers-campaign-material ↩

165. Mulholland, James (26 November 2019). "Jo Swinson wins court battle with SNP over 'hypocrite' leaflets". The Scotsman. https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/jo-swinson-wins-court-battle-with-snp-over-hypocrite-leaflets-1-5052752 ↩

166. "Labour supporter, 72, left in hospital after being attacked on doorstep while campaigning". The Independent. 25 November 2019. Archived from the original on 25 November 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/labour-campaigner-assault-arrest-election-hellaby-rotherham-yorkshire-a9216646.html ↩

167. Maddren, Matt (26 November 2019). "Labour campaigners to go round in pairs after Bromyard attack". Free Radio. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://planetradio.co.uk/free/local/news/labour-campaigners-to-go-round-in-pairs-after-bromyard-attack ↩

168. Rawlinson, Kevin (25 November 2019). "Labour condemns attacks on two canvassers in their 70s". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/25/labour-condemns-attacks-on-two-canvassers-in-their-70s ↩

169. "General election 2019: 'No solo Labour canvassing' in Bromyard after attack". BBC News. 26 November 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50560366 ↩

170. "General election 2019: Who have parties been targeting on social media?". BBC News. 8 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-50335567 ↩

171. "Labour's simple message is winning social media war". The Times. 7 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/labours-simple-message-is-winning-social-media-war-ckhk3djpx ↩

172. "Jeremy Corbyn's Labour Is Winning the U.K. Election Digital War". Bloomberg. 22 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-11-22/corbyn-leads-the-election-cyber-war-but-tories-improve-on-2017 ↩

173. "General Election 2019 Report 5: 7 November – 11 December 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-5/ ↩

174. "General Election 2019 Report 5: 7 November – 11 December 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-5/ ↩

175. "Tories hire Facebook propaganda pair to run online election campaign". The Guardian. 23 October 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/23/tories-hire-facebook-propaganda-pair-to-run-online-election-campaign ↩

176. Lee, Dave (19 November 2019). "Election debate: Conservatives criticised for renaming Twitter profile 'factcheckUK'". BBC News. Retrieved 19 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50482637 ↩

177. Waterson, Jim; Syal, Rajeev (6 November 2019). "Keir Starmer: Tories' doctored TV footage is 'act of desperation'". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/nov/05/tories-unrepentant-about-doctored-video-of-keir-starmer-tv-appearance ↩

178. Tidy, Joe (28 November 2019). "General election 2019: BBC complains to Tories over Facebook advert". BBC News. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50595930 ↩

179. Gallagher, Fergal (26 November 2019). "Conservative party accused of peddling disinformation ahead of UK election". ABC News. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://abcnews.go.com/International/conservative-party-accused-peddling-disinformation-ahead-uk-election/story?id=67204266 ↩

180. Stone, Jon (1 December 2019). "Google bans eight different Tory election adverts as disinformation concerns mount". Independent. Archived from the original on 1 December 2019. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-general-election-advert-ban-google-fake-news-manifesto-labour-a9223846.html ↩

181. Waterson, Jim; Syal, Rajeev (6 November 2019). "Keir Starmer: Tories' doctored TV footage is 'act of desperation'". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/nov/05/tories-unrepentant-about-doctored-video-of-keir-starmer-tv-appearance ↩

182. Waterson, Jim; Syal, Rajeev (6 November 2019). "Keir Starmer: Tories' doctored TV footage is 'act of desperation'". The Guardian. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/nov/05/tories-unrepentant-about-doctored-video-of-keir-starmer-tv-appearance ↩

183. Waterson, Jim (19 November 2019). "Tories pretend to be factchecking service during leaders' debate". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 19 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/19/tories-tweet-anti-labour-posts-under-factcheckuk-brand ↩

184. "Twitter accuses Tories of misleading public with 'factcheck' foray". The Guardian. 20 November 2019. Retrieved 20 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/20/twitter-accuses-tories-of-misleading-public-in-factcheck-row ↩

185. Barker, Alex; Murphy, Hannah (20 November 2019). "Conservative party's 'factcheckUK' Twitter stunt backfires". Financial Times. Retrieved 3 December 2019. https://www.ft.com/content/0582a0d0-0b1f-11ea-b2d6-9bf4d1957a67 ↩

186. Lee, Dave (19 November 2019). "Election debate: Conservatives criticised for renaming Twitter profile 'factcheckUK'". BBC News. Retrieved 19 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50482637 ↩

187. Perrigo, Billy (20 November 2019). "Boris Johnson's Conservatives Rebranded a Party Twitter Account as 'factcheckUK.' Twitter Wasn't Happy". Time. Retrieved 3 December 2019. https://time.com/5733786/conservative-fact-check-twitter ↩

188. "Tories under fire for 'misleading' public with Twitter 'Fact Check' name change". Sky News. 20 November 2019. Retrieved 3 December 2019. https://news.sky.com/story/tories-criticised-for-misleading-public-with-twitter-fact-check-name-change-11865342 ↩

189. "Statement on @CCHQPress Twitter rebrand" (Press release). Electoral Commission. 20 November 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/media-centre/statement-cchqpress-twitter-rebrand ↩

190. Perrigo, Billy (20 November 2019). "Boris Johnson's Conservatives Rebranded a Party Twitter Account as 'factcheckUK.' Twitter Wasn't Happy". Time. Retrieved 3 December 2019. https://time.com/5733786/conservative-fact-check-twitter ↩

191. "Outrage as Tory press office Twitter rebrands as fact check account". Evening Standard. 19 November 2019. Retrieved 19 November 2019. https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/tory-press-office-twitter-rebrands-as-fact-checking-account-amid-huge-backlash-a4291281.html ↩

192. "Twitter threatens 'corrective action' against Boris Johnson's Conservatives party after it created a fake fact-checking service". Business Insider. 20 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019. https://www.businessinsider.com/twitter-says-conservatives-misled-public-with-factcheckuk-stunt-2019-11 ↩

193. "88% of Conservative ads on Facebook 'misleading'". ITV News. https://www.itv.com/news/2019-12-06/88-of-conservative-ads-on-facebook-misleading ↩

194. "Thousands of misleading Conservative ads side-step scrutiny thanks to Facebook policy". First Draft. 6 December 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://firstdraftnews.org:443/latest/thousands-of-misleading-conservative-ads-side-step-scrutiny-thanks-to-facebook-policy ↩

195. "Thousands of misleading Conservative ads side-step scrutiny thanks to Facebook policy". First Draft. 6 December 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://firstdraftnews.org:443/latest/thousands-of-misleading-conservative-ads-side-step-scrutiny-thanks-to-facebook-policy ↩

196. "Thousands of misleading Conservative ads side-step scrutiny thanks to Facebook policy". First Draft. 6 December 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://firstdraftnews.org:443/latest/thousands-of-misleading-conservative-ads-side-step-scrutiny-thanks-to-facebook-policy ↩

197. "Investigation finds '88% of Tory ads misleading compared to 0% for Labour'". Metro. 10 December 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://metro.co.uk/2019/12/10/investigation-finds-88-tory-ads-misleading-compared-0-labour-11651802 ↩

198. Tidy, Joe; Schraer, Rachel (10 December 2019). "Election ads: 'Indecent, dishonest and untruthful'". BBC News. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-50726500 ↩

199. "Corbyn-Johnson TV debate watched by 6.7 million people". The Guardian. 20 November 2019. Retrieved 21 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/20/jeremy-corbyn-boris-johnson-tv-debate-watched-by-67-million-people ↩

200. "Adrian Masters to host election debate on ITV Wales". ITV News. 15 November 2019. Retrieved 15 November 2019. The programme, which will be filmed from the ITV Wales studios in Cardiff, will air at 8pm on Sunday 17 November. https://www.itv.com/news/wales/2019-11-15/adrian-masters-to-host-election-debate-on-itv-wales ↩

201. "ITV confirms Prime Minister has refused Julie Etchingham interview". ITV News. 5 December 2019. Retrieved 5 December 2019. https://www.itv.com/news/2019-12-05/itv-confirms-prime-minister-has-refused-julie-etchingham-interview ↩

202. "Huw Edwards to lead BBC's Election 2019 coverage". BBC Media Centre. 4 November 2019. Retrieved 4 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/mediacentre/latestnews/2019/election#heading-the-andrew-neil-interviews ↩

203. Greig, Finlay (6 December 2019). "The Andrew Neil Interviews: how Boris Johnson was empty chaired last night, and what Nigel Farage said in his interview". i. https://inews.co.uk/culture/television/the-andrew-neil-interviews-boris-johnson-jo-swinson-nigel-farage-jeremy-corbyn-when-time-1324634 ↩

204. Badshah, Nadeem (5 December 2019). "BBC's Andrew Neil lays down gauntlet to Boris Johnson over interview". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 5 December 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/05/bbcs-andrew-neil-lays-down-gauntlet-to-boris-johnson-over-interview ↩

205. Waterson, Jim (6 December 2019). "Conservatives dismiss Andrew Neil's demands for Johnson interview". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 December 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/dec/06/conservatives-dismiss-andrew-neil-demands-for-johnson-interview ↩

206. "Johnson and Corbyn to face off in live BBC debate". BBC News. 8 November 2019. Retrieved 8 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50347661 ↩

207. Smith, Mikey (21 November 2019). "Channel 4 cancels general election TV debate after Boris Johnson chickens out". Daily Mirror. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/channel-4-cancels-general-election-20931983 ↩

208. Chaplain, Chloe (28 November 2019). "Channel 4 climate debate: Better food, fewer flights and warmer homes – party leaders defend their top climate change pledges". i. https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/channel-4-climate-debate-what-we-learned-election-1327519 ↩

209. Waterson, Jim (3 December 2019). "Channel 4 cleared of bias for replacing PM with ice block in debate". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2019/dec/03/channel-4-cleared-of-bias-for-replacing-pm-with-ice-block-in-debate ↩

210. Landford, Eleanor (28 November 2019). "Tories threaten to pull Channel 4's license [sic] over ice sculpture debate stunt". PoliticsHome. https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/environment/news/108259/tories-threaten-pull-channel-4s-license-over-ice-sculpture-debate ↩

211. Milne, Oliver (8 December 2019). "Tories fail to turn up at another election debate as row with Channel 4 deepens". Daily Mirror. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/breaking-tories-fail-turn-up-21053174 ↩

212. Hanning, James. "Making It up as They Go Along". British Journalism Review 31, no. 1 (March 2020): 19–29. doi:10.1177/0956474820910064 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0956474820910064 ↩

213. Mayhew, Freddy (3 December 2019). "Ofcom rejects Tory complaint over Channel 4 News climate debate with stand-in ice sculpture for Boris Johnson". Press Gazette. https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/ofcom-rejects-tory-complaint-over-channel-4-news-climate-debate-with-stand-in-ice-sculptures ↩

214. Allegretti, Aubrey (5 November 2019). "Sky News invites Corbyn, Johnson and Swinson to live TV debate". Sky News. https://news.sky.com/story/general-election-sky-news-invites-corbyn-johnson-and-swinson-to-live-tv-debate-11854213 ↩

215. Allegretti, Aubrey (4 November 2019). "General election: Swinson urges Johnson and Corbyn to join her at Sky News TV debate". Sky News. Retrieved 4 November 2019. https://news.sky.com/story/general-election-sky-news-invites-corbyn-johnson-and-swinson-to-live-tv-debate-11854213 ↩

216. Daly, Hannah (29 November 2019). "What time is the BBC Election Debate tonight, and who is taking part?". The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 29 November 2019. Earlier this month, Sky News proposed a general election debate between the Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat leaders for Nov 28. The broadcaster was unable to secure agreement from Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn and therefore made the decision to cancel the TV event. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/11/29/general-election-bbc-debate-tonight-time ↩

217. "Welsh politicians clash in first televised election debate". ITV News. 17 November 2019. Retrieved 18 November 2019. https://www.itv.com/news/wales/2019-11-17/itv-wales-debate-adrian-masters-general-election ↩

218. "Adrian Masters to host election debate on ITV Wales". ITV News. 15 November 2019. Retrieved 15 November 2019. The programme, which will be filmed from the ITV Wales studios in Cardiff, will air at 8pm on Sunday 17 November. https://www.itv.com/news/wales/2019-11-15/adrian-masters-to-host-election-debate-on-itv-wales ↩

219. "Jeremy Corbyn and Boris Johnson to go head-to-head in ITV debate". ITV News. 1 November 2019. Retrieved 5 November 2019. https://www.itv.com/news/2019-11-01/jeremy-corbyn-and-boris-johnson-to-go-head-to-head-in-itv-debate ↩

220. Mcilkenny, Stephen (19 November 2019). "Everything you need to know about Johnson v Corbyn: The ITV Debate". HeraldScotland. Retrieved 19 November 2019. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/18045174.johnson-v-corbyn-itv-debate---everything-need-know ↩

221. Walker, Peter (22 November 2019). "BBC Question Time leaders special: who came out on top?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 25 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/22/question-time-leaders-special-who-won-johnson-corbyn-swinson-sturgeon ↩

222. O'Callaghan, Niall (21 November 2019). "Octagon to host party leaders BBC Question Time special tomorrow | Forge". Forge Today. University of Sheffield's Students Union. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 30 November 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191206080401/http://forgetoday.com/2019/11/21/octagon-to-host-party-leaders-bbc-question-time-special-tomorrow ↩

223. Walker, Peter (22 November 2019). "BBC Question Time leaders special: who came out on top?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 25 November 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/22/question-time-leaders-special-who-won-johnson-corbyn-swinson-sturgeon ↩

224. Mayhew, Freddy (22 November 2019). "Channel 4 cancels leaders' debate over Boris Johnson no-show". Press Gazette. Retrieved 30 November 2019. https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/channel-4-cancels-leaders-debate-over-boris-johnson-no-show ↩

225. Stone, Jon (21 November 2019). "Leaders' election TV debate cancelled after Boris Johnson refuses to take part". Independent. Archived from the original on 22 November 2019. Retrieved 30 November 2019. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/election-debate-boris-johnson-party-leaders-tv-cancel-corbyn-a9212926.html ↩

226. "General election 2019: BBC Wales Live election debate". BBC News. 26 November 2019. Retrieved 30 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/live/election-2019-50561916 ↩

227. Daly, Hannah (29 November 2019). "What time is the BBC Election Debate tonight, and who is taking part?". The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on 11 January 2022. Retrieved 29 November 2019. Earlier this month, Sky News proposed a general election debate between the Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat leaders for Nov 28. The broadcaster was unable to secure agreement from Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn and therefore made the decision to cancel the TV event. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2019/11/29/general-election-bbc-debate-tonight-time ↩

228. Ben de Pear [@bendepear] (25 November 2019). "This Thursday 28th @Channel4News will devote its hour @7 to debate climate change. Thus far Jeremy Corbyn, Nicola Sturgeon, Jo Swinson & Sian Berry have confirmed. The invitation remains open to @BorisJohnson & @Nigel_Farage but this debate will go ahead with or without them https://t.co/3bZ0jk3lvN" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 29 September 2021. Retrieved 2 November 2021 – via Twitter. /wiki/Ben_de_Pear ↩

229. "Tories clash with Channel 4 as Michael Gove turned away from climate debate". Evening Express. Press Association. 29 November 2019. Archived from the original on 29 November 2019. Retrieved 30 November 2019. Channel 4 News' General Election climate debate at ITN Studios in Holborn, central London https://web.archive.org/web/20191129072051/https://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/news/uk/tories-clash-with-channel-4-as-michael-gove-turned-away-from-climate-debate ↩

230. Channel 4 described this as a leaders-only debate and refused to accept Michael Gove as substitute.[190] /wiki/Michael_Gove ↩

231. BBC News Press Team [@BBCNewsPR] (27 November 2019). "Here is the line-up for The BBC Election Debate on Friday #GE2019 https://t.co/Pr1KnVbDlf" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 24 June 2021. Retrieved 2 November 2021 – via Twitter. https://x.com/BBCNewsPR/status/1199669183837081601 ↩

232. Mosalski, Ruth (29 November 2019). "Rate the political parties in the BBC General Election debate in Cardiff". Wales Online. Retrieved 30 November 2019. https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/politics/rate-political-parties-bbc-general-17340340 ↩

233. "The ITV Election Debate". ITV News. 14 November 2019. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 14 November 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191206080356/https://www.itv.com/presscentre/ep1week49/itv-election-debate ↩

234. "ITV Election Debate takes place in Salford". ITV News. 1 December 2019. Retrieved 2 December 2019. https://www.itv.com/news/granada/2019-12-01/itv-election-debate-takes-place-in-salford ↩

235. "03/12/2019 – Live Election Debate". BBC One. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/programmes/m000c201 ↩

236. "STV to host General Election debate with Scottish leaders". STV News. 16 November 2019. Retrieved 19 November 2019. https://stv.tv/news/politics/1442443-stv-to-host-general-election-debate-with-scottish-leaders ↩

237. "PM and Corbyn to go head-to-head in Kent". Kent Online. 6 December 2019. Retrieved 6 December 2019. https://www.kentonline.co.uk/maidstone/news/pm-and-corbyn-to-go-head-to-head-in-kent-217888 ↩

238. "Johnson and Corbyn set for head-to-head debate". 6 December 2019. Retrieved 6 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50681321 ↩

239. "BBC debate: Johnson and Corbyn clash over Brexit, NHS and racist language – as it happened". The Guardian. 7 December 2019. Retrieved 17 December 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2019/dec/06/general-election-boris-johnson-jeremy-corbyn-final-tv-debate-live-news ↩

240. Mayhew, Freddy (22 November 2019). "Channel 4 cancels leaders' debate over Boris Johnson no-show". Press Gazette. Retrieved 23 November 2019. https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/channel-4-cancels-leaders-debate-over-boris-johnson-no-show ↩

241. "Britain Decides: Everything But Brexit Debate". Channel 4. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191206080356/https://www.channel4.com/programmes/britain-decides-everything-but-brexit-debate ↩

242. Johnson, Kristian; Hughes, Ian (9 December 2019). "Channel 4 General Election debate in Leeds – as it happened". leedslive. https://www.leeds-live.co.uk/news/leeds-news/live-updates-channel-4-host-17384667 ↩

243. "Who were the winners and losers? Suzanne Breen's verdict on UTV election debate". Belfast Telegraph. 10 December 2019. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 10 December 2019. https://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/politics/general-election-2019/who-were-the-winners-and-losers-suzanne-breens-verdict-on-utv-election-debate-38765190.html ↩

244. "Senior politicians gather at University of York for BBC Election Special". University of York. https://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2019/events/question-time ↩

245. "Election 2019: Scotland". BBC One. BBC. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/programmes/p07tncf7 ↩

246. "Parties clash during TV election debate". BBC News. 8 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50707506 ↩

247. "Election 2019: Northern Ireland". BBC One. BBC. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/programmes/m000cbn6 ↩

248. Morris, Nigel (8 November 2019). "General election 2019: social media comments are proving fatal for candidates' hopes – and raising questions about parties' vetting". i. https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/general-election-social-media-vetting-nick-conrad-kate-ramsden-919904 ↩

249. "Tory candidate for Aberdeen North dropped over anti-Semitic comments". BBC News. 18 November 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-50468770 ↩

250. Learmonth, Andrew (19 November 2019). "Aberdeen Tory candidate Ryan Houghton's sick posts uncovered". The National. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.thenational.scot/news/18044656.aberdeen-tory-candidate-ryan-houghton-racist-tweets-uncovered ↩

251. Halpin, Lee (20 November 2019). "Tories suspend election candidate after JC exposed his claim British Jews were 'brainwashed extremists". The Jewish Chronicle. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.thejc.com/news/uk-news/tories-suspended-election-candidate-after-jc-exposed-his-claim-british-jews-were-brainwashed-extrem-1.493384 ↩

252. Lansman, Jon (20 November 2019). "Focusing only on Labour whitewashes the antisemitism and racism of other parties". The Jewish Chronicle. https://www.thejc.com/comment/comment/focusing-only-on-labour-whitewashes-the-antisemitism-and-racism-of-other-parties-1.493397 ↩

253. Honeycombe-Foster, Matt (13 November 2019). "Former Labour minister backs Tories as he claims Jeremy Corbyn 'can't be trusted with the Union'". PoliticsHome.com. https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/news/107954/former-labour-minister-backs-tories-he-claims ↩

254. "Lord Heseltine urges lifelong Tories to vote Lib Dem in order to stop Brexit". PoliticsHome.com. 26 November 2019. https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/conservative-party/news/108210/lord-heseltine-urges-lifelong-tories-vote ↩

255. Woodcock, Andrew; Cowburn, Ashley (6 December 2019). "General election: Former Tory PM John Major urges people to vote against Boris Johnson's candidates". Independent. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-general-election-campaign-john-major-conservatives-vote-a9235436.html ↩

256. Vinter, Robyn (14 November 2019). "Johnson's slow response to flooding here in Yorkshire could cost him the election". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/14/boris-johnson-flooding-flood-victims-yorkshire ↩

257. "PM Boris Johnson heckled in flood-hit South Yorkshire". BBC News. 13 November 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.bbc.com/news/av/uk-50402483/pm-boris-johnson-heckled-in-flood-hit-south-yorkshire ↩

258. Thornton, Lucy (14 November 2019). "Flood victim tells 'little man' Boris Johnson to 'get on his bike' after photo op". Daily Mirror. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/flood-victim-tells-little-man-20876846 ↩

259. Mayhew, Freddy (21 November 2019). "Mirror barred from Boris Johnson campaign battle bus". Press Gazette. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/mirror-barred-from-boris-johnson-campaign-battle-bus ↩

260. Dunt, Ian (22 November 2019). "Week in Review: Tory disinformation campaign intensifies". Politics.co.uk. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.politics.co.uk/blogs/2019/11/22/week-in-review-tory-disinformation-campaign-intensifies ↩

261. Woodcock, Andrew; Kentish, Benjamin (27 November 2019). "Corbyn reveals secret documents that 'confirm Tory plot to sell off NHS in US trade talks with Trump". Independent. Archived from the original on 27 November 2019. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-nhs-trade-deal-trump-corbyn-brexit-general-election-manifesto-a9219566.html ↩

262. "'Almost certain' Russians sought to interfere in 2019 UK election – Raab". BBC. 16 July 2020. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-53433523 ↩

263. Brazell, Emma (29 November 2019). "Tories and Labour suspend London election campaigning after terror attack". Metro. Retrieved 8 December 2019. https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/29/tories-labour-suspend-london-election-campaigning-terror-attack-11243437 ↩

264. "Annual NATO Meeting". Associated Press. Retrieved 18 September 2019. https://www.ap.org/live-and-location-services/events/annual-nato-meeting ↩

265. Stone, Jon; Buchan, Lizzy (6 November 2019). "Brexit: Corbyn releases leaked government documents that show Boris Johnson 'lied about deal". Independent. Archived from the original on 6 December 2019. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/corbyn-boris-johnson-brexit-deal-leaked-government-documents-election-a9235326.html ↩

266. Geoghegan, Peter (19 February 2021). "Pro-Tory campaigns spent over £700,000 without declaring a single donation". openDemocracy. Retrieved 22 February 2021. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/pro-tory-campaigns-spent-over-700000-without-declaring-a-single-donation ↩

267. Geoghegan, Peter (19 February 2021). "Pro-Tory campaigns spent over £700,000 without declaring a single donation". openDemocracy. Retrieved 22 February 2021. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/pro-tory-campaigns-spent-over-700000-without-declaring-a-single-donation ↩

268. Geoghegan, Peter (21 February 2021). "Fresh evidence prompts calls for probe into anti-Labour 'dark money' groups". openDemocracy. Retrieved 22 February 2021. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/fresh-evidence-prompts-calls-probe-anti-labour-dark-money-groups ↩

269. Milmo, Cahal (21 November 2019). "Sudden rise in big-spending campaign groups seeking to sway voters online". i. Retrieved 22 February 2021. https://inews.co.uk/news/long-reads/general-election-2019-lobbyist-brexit-party-financier-shadow-campaigns-365815 ↩

270. Ramsay, Adam (5 December 2019). "American dirty tricks are corroding British democracy". openDemocracy. Retrieved 22 February 2021. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/american-dirty-tricks-are-corroding-our-democracy ↩

271. Ramsay, Adam (5 December 2019). "American dirty tricks are corroding British democracy". openDemocracy. Retrieved 22 February 2021. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/american-dirty-tricks-are-corroding-our-democracy ↩

272. Geoghegan, Peter (21 February 2021). "Fresh evidence prompts calls for probe into anti-Labour 'dark money' groups". openDemocracy. Retrieved 22 February 2021. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/fresh-evidence-prompts-calls-probe-anti-labour-dark-money-groups ↩

273. Smith, Mikey (18 February 2021). "Ex-Tory intern spent £65k on anti-Corbyn ads and won't say who funded them". Daily Mirror. Retrieved 22 February 2021. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/ex-tory-intern-spent-65000-23524023 ↩

274. Geoghegan, Peter (19 February 2021). "Pro-Tory campaigns spent over £700,000 without declaring a single donation". openDemocracy. Retrieved 22 February 2021. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/pro-tory-campaigns-spent-over-700000-without-declaring-a-single-donation ↩

275. Geoghegan, Peter (21 February 2021). "Fresh evidence prompts calls for probe into anti-Labour 'dark money' groups". openDemocracy. Retrieved 22 February 2021. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/fresh-evidence-prompts-calls-probe-anti-labour-dark-money-groups ↩

276. Geoghegan, Peter (4 March 2021). "UK government faces calls in Parliament for inquiry into third-party campaigns". openDemocracy. Archived from the original on 6 May 2021. Retrieved 3 June 2021. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/dark-money-investigations/uk-government-faces-calls-parliament-inquiry-third-party-campaigns ↩

277. "Church of England urges UK voters to 'leave their echo chambers'". The Guardian. 20 November 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/nov/20/church-of-england-urges-uk-voters-to-leave-their-echo-chambers ↩

278. "Andrew Neil prolongs Jeremy Corbyn's anti-Semitism woes". New Statesman. 26 November 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/11/andrew-neil-prolongs-jeremy-corbyns-anti-semitism-woes ↩

279. Woodcock, Andrew (26 November 2019). "Jeremy Corbyn refuses four times to apologise for his handling of antisemitism in Labour party during interview". Independent. Archived from the original on 28 November 2019. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-interview-andrew-neil-antisemitism-labour-party-election-a9219091.html ↩

280. "'It reflects the despair': chief rabbi's criticism of Labour strikes a chord". The Guardian. 26 November 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/26/it-reflects-despair-chief-rabbi-criticism-of-labour-strikes-a-chord ↩

281. Sherwood, Harriet (26 November 2019). "Justin Welby backs chief rabbi after Labour antisemitism remarks". The Guardian – via www.theguardian.com. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/nov/26/justin-welby-chief-rabbi-labour-antisemitism ↩

282. Burgess, Kaya; Zeffman, Henry; Andrews, Kieran (27 November 2019). "Faith Leaders back Chief Rabbi's Warning on Antisemitism". The Times. https://www.thetimes.com/article/faith-groups-back-chief-rabbi-mirvis-over-labour-antisemitism-j56jmpvv6 ↩

283. "General Election Statement 2019". Jewish Labour Movement. 31 October 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://www.jewishlabour.uk/general_election_statement_2019 ↩

284. Sagir, Ceren (26 November 2019). "Chief Rabbi's 'vote Tory' call condemned by Jewish groups". Morning Star. https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/b/chief-rabbis-vote-tory-call-condemned-by-jewish-groups ↩

285. "As general election nears, bishops across UK stress right to life". Catholic News Agency. https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/43054/as-general-election-nears-bishops-across-uk-stress-right-to-life ↩

286. "Muslim Council of Britain responds to Chief Rabbi's comments". Muslim Council of Britain. 26 November 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://mcb.org.uk/press-releases/muslim-council-of-britain-responds-to-chief-rabbis-comments/ ↩

287. "British Muslim Perspectives at the 2019 General Election" (PDF). Muslim Council of Britain. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://mcb.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/MCB-2019-General-Election-Policy-Platform.pdf ↩

288. "Islamophobic Brexit Party candidates made it onto ballot paper after 20 minute interview; Exclusive: A Sunday Mirror investigation found that some candidates for next month's General Election have even denounced their own party leader, Nigel Farage". Free Online Library. 16 November 2019. Retrieved 14 December 2019. https://www.thefreelibrary.com/Islamophobic+Brexit+Party+candidates+made+it+onto+ballot+paper+after...-a0605955710 ↩

289. "BJP support group bats for Tories in 48 key UK seats". The Times of India. 5 November 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/bjp-supporters-start-campaign-for-tories-in-uk-general-election/articleshow/71911496.cms ↩

290. "What's behind the Labour Party's rift with Hindu voters?". New Statesman. 27 November 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2019/11/whats-behind-labour-partys-rift-hindu-voters ↩

291. "General election 2019: Labour seeks to calm Hindu voters' anger". BBC News. 12 November 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50382791 ↩

292. Siddique, Haroon (11 November 2019). "British Indians warn Hindu nationalist party not to meddle in UK elections". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/nov/11/british-indians-warn-hindu-party-not-to-meddle-in-uk-elections ↩

293. "Fresh blow for Labour as Hindu Council claims party discriminates against community". Politics Home. 27 November 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/jeremy-corbyn/news/108229/fresh-blow-labour-hindu-council ↩

294. "General election 2019: Labour seeks to calm Hindu voters' anger". BBC News. 12 November 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50382791 ↩

295. Sandhu, Serina (19 November 2019). "Kashmir and Keith Vaz leave British Indians in Leicester U questioning Labour vote". i. https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/general-election-2019-kashmir-and-keith-vaz-leave-british-indians-in-leicester-questioning-labour-loyalty-1303515 ↩

296. Ehsaan, Rakib (17 May 2017). "How the Conservatives stole the British Indian vote from Labour". The Conversation. Corbyn's opposition to the caste system also puts him at odds with those British Hindus and Sikhs who object to politicians intervening on culturally sensitive issues. https://theconversation.com/how-the-conservatives-stole-the-british-indian-vote-from-labour-77275 ↩

297. Roy, Amit (13 December 2019). "Indians punish Corbyn over Kashmir". The Telegraph. https://www.telegraphindia.com/amp/world/indians-punish-corbyn-over-kashmir/cid/1726627 ↩

298. "Politics Live, Labour taking Indian-heritage voters for granted?". BBC Two. BBC. 19 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/programmes/p07vdphs ↩

299. "Terrorist body JKLF's letter of support to Labour Party further alienates its member". India Today. 4 December 2019. Retrieved 10 January 2025. https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/terrorist-body-jklf-s-letter-of-support-to-labour-party-further-alienates-its-member-1625014-2019-12-04 ↩

300. "General Election 2019 Report 1: 7 November – 13 November 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-1/ ↩

301. Woodcock, Andrew (26 November 2019). "General election coverage becoming increasingly 'presidential' as smaller parties are sidelined, research finds". Independent. Archived from the original on 27 November 2019. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/general-election-latest-boris-johnson-jeremy-corbyn-trump-presidential-a9218456.html ↩

302. Woodcock, Andrew (26 November 2019). "General election coverage becoming increasingly 'presidential' as smaller parties are sidelined, research finds". Independent. Archived from the original on 27 November 2019. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/general-election-latest-boris-johnson-jeremy-corbyn-trump-presidential-a9218456.html ↩

303. "General Election 2019 Report 1: 7 November – 13 November 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-1/ ↩

304. Peat, Jack (19 November 2019). "The proof we have been waiting for: Jeremy Corbyn has the entire media elite against him". The London Economic. Archived from the original on 27 November 2019. Retrieved 27 November 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191127172153/https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/the-proof-we-have-been-waiting-for-jeremy-corbyn-has-the-entire-media-elite-against-him/19/11/ ↩

305. Hanning, James. "Making It up as They Go Along". British Journalism Review 31, no. 1 (March 2020): 19–29. doi:10.1177/0956474820910064 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0956474820910064 ↩

306. "General Election 2019 Report 1: 7 November – 13 November 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-1/ ↩

307. Stone, Jon (19 November 2019). "British newspapers heap positive coverage on Tories while trashing Labour, study finds". Independent. Archived from the original on 19 November 2019. Retrieved 29 November 2019. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/general-election-british-uk-media-news-bias-tories-labour-a9209026.html ↩

308. "General Election 2019 Report 5: 7 November – 11 December 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-5/ ↩

309. "General Election 2019 Report 1: 7 November – 13 November 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-1/ ↩

310. "General Election 2019 Report 1: 7 November – 13 November 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-1/ ↩

311. "General Election 2019 Report 5: 7 November – 11 December 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-5/ ↩

312. "General Election 2019 Report 5: 7 November – 11 December 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-5/ ↩

313. "General Election 2019 Report 5: 7 November – 11 December 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-5/ ↩

314. "General Election 2019 Report 5: 7 November – 11 December 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-5/ ↩

315. "General Election 2019 Report 5: 7 November – 11 December 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-5/ ↩

316. "General Election 2019 Report 5: 7 November – 11 December 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-5/ ↩

317. "General Election 2019 Report 1: 7 November – 13 November 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-1/ ↩

318. "General Election 2019 Report 1: 7 November – 13 November 2019". Centre for Research in Communication and Culture (Loughborough University). https://www.lboro.ac.uk/news-events/general-election/report-1/ ↩

319. "Gender imbalance in General Election media coverage as women 'marginalised'". ITV News. 15 November 2019. https://www.itv.com/news/2019-11-15/gender-imbalance-in-general-election-media-coverage-as-women-marginalised/ ↩

320. John Bercow stood down as an MP by being appointed steward of the Manor of Northstead before Parliament was dissolved. /wiki/Manor_of_Northstead ↩

321. Sleator, Laurence (15 November 2019). "Which MPs are standing down at the election?". BBC News. Retrieved 15 November 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49607907 ↩

322. "Electoral Calculus". Electoral Calculus.co.uk. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/homepage.html ↩

323. "Parliament: Election Maps UK". ElectionMapsUK. https://electionmaps.uk/parliament ↩

324. "Third combined forecast for the 2019 general election". 20 November 2019. https://electionsetc.com/2019/11/20/third-combined-forecast-for-the-2019-general-election/ ↩

325. "Who's ahead in the polls?". Archived from the original on 2 November 2019. Retrieved 21 November 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191102180133/https://britainelects.com/ ↩

326. DUP with 9, Sinn Féin with 7, and Alliance with 3 ↩

327. DUP with 9, Sinn Féin with 6, SDLP with 2, and Alliance and speaker with 1 ↩

328. "Electoral Calculus". Electoral Calculus.co.uk. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/homepage.html ↩

329. Electoral Calculus [@ElectCalculus] (27 November 2019). "New Prediction: Our latest poll-of-polls has the #Conservative lead over #Labour narrowing to 11pc. That would still be a Con majority, but not so big. Big Q: is this just noise or the signal at the start of a trend? Full numbers at: https://t.co/ipLv6MyHGz https://t.co/6UmpAieCPK" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 12 November 2020. Retrieved 2 November 2021 – via Twitter. /wiki/Electoral_Calculus ↩

330. Election Maps UK [@ElectionMapsUK] (28 November 2019). "#GE2019 Nowcast (28th Nov): CON: 338 (−9), 42.5% (+0.1) LAB: 226 (+12), 31.4% (+1.0) SNP: 45 (=), 3.9% (+0.1) LDM: 16 (−4), 14.1% (−0.8) See the graphics for full results. Changes w/ 25 Nov. Polls from 21–26 November. Support me on https://t.co/8SlnLyh9g4 https://t.co/JfauofMQQR" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 2 November 2021 – via Twitter. https://x.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1200084802067673089 ↩

331. "Fourth combined forecast for the 2019 general election". 27 November 2019. https://electionsetc.com/2019/11/27/fourth-combined-forecast-for-the-2019-general-election/ ↩

332. Francis Elliott; Steven Swinford; Henry Zeffman; Ryan Watts (28 November 2019). "MRP election poll: Boris Johnson heads for big majority". The Times. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/mrp-election-poll-boris-johnson-heads-for-big-majority-qrqsq9f7r ↩

333. "Follow the 2019 UK General Election with YouGov". YouGov.co.uk. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://yougov.co.uk/uk-general-election-2019/ ↩

334. DUP with 8, Sinn Féin with 7, Alliance with 3, and speaker with 1 ↩

335. DUP with 9, Sinn Féin with 6, SDLP with 2, and Alliance and speaker with 1 ↩

336. "Electoral Calculus". Electoral Calculus.co.uk. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/homepage.html ↩

337. Election Maps UK [@ElectionMapsUK] (6 December 2019). "#GE2019 Nowcast (6th Dec): CON: 345 (+2), 42.9% (+0.3) LAB: 224 (−2), 32.7% (−0.2) SNP: 43 (=), 3.9% (=) LDM: 14 (=), 13.0% (−0.3) See the graphics for full results. Changes w/ 1st Dec. Polls from 29 Nov-6 Dec. Support me on https://t.co/8SlnLyh9g4 https://t.co/RBprhDOHBg" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 2 November 2021 – via Twitter. https://x.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1203013267314106373 ↩

338. "Fifth combined forecast for the 2019 general election". 5 December 2019. https://electionsetc.com/2019/12/04/fifth-combined-forecast-for-the-2019-general-election// ↩

339. "UK-Elect General Election Forecast December 8th 2019". www.ukelect.co.uk. https://www.ukelect.co.uk/HTML/forecasts/20191208ForecastUK.html ↩

340. Graphnile [@Graphnile] (11 December 2019). "SNP experiencing tailwind based on sentiment analysis of tweets and news stories. SNP may get 50+ seats. #SNP #Conservatives #Labour @CNNPolitics @UKLabour @Conservatives @theSNP @TheOpinionPoll @KirstySNP @jeremycorbyn @MargaretFerrier https://t.co/cCOY4HWJok" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 8 March 2021. Retrieved 2 November 2021 – via Twitter. https://x.com/Graphnile/status/1204830549912608768 ↩

341. "Politics Spread Betting | Spreadex | The Spread Experts". www.spreadex.com. 5 December 2019. Retrieved 27 July 2020. https://www.spreadex.com/sports/get-started/politics-spread-betting/#uk ↩

342. DUP with 8, Sinn Féin with 7, SDLP with 2, and Alliance and speaker with 1 ↩

343. DUP with 9, Sinn Féin with 6, SDLP with 2, and Alliance and speaker with one ↩

344. Speaker with one, uses 2017 NI results for forecasting ↩

345. Wilson, Kate (5 December 2019). "The latest General Election odds including Bristol seats". Bristol Post. Retrieved 5 December 2019. https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/general-election-odds-2019-betting-3608794 ↩

346. DUP with 9, Sinn Féin with 7, SDLP with 2, and Alliance and speaker with one ↩

347. "Follow the 2019 UK General Election with YouGov". YouGov. Retrieved 11 December 2019. https://yougov.co.uk/uk-general-election-2019/ ↩

348. "General Election Prediction". Electoral Calculus. Retrieved 12 December 2019. https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/homepage.html ↩

349. Election Maps UK [@ElectionMapsUK] (12 December 2019). "#GE2019 Nowcast (12th Dec): CON: 344 (−1), 43.3% (+0.4) LAB: 223 (−1), 33.8% (+1.1) SNP: 45 (+2), 3.7% (−0.2) LDM: 14 (=), 11.7% (−1.3) See the graphics for full results. Changes w/ 6th Dec. Polls from 9–11 Dec. Support me on https://t.co/8SlnLyh9g4 https://t.co/jNVQHYMAUU" (Tweet). Archived from the original on 12 April 2021. Retrieved 2 November 2021 – via Twitter. https://x.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1205161747600019456 ↩

350. "Final combined forecast for the 2019 General Election". Elections Etc. 12 December 2019. Retrieved 12 December 2019. https://electionsetc.com/2019/12/12/final-combined-forecast-for-the-2019-general-election/#more-2658 ↩

351. "UK-Elect General Election Forecast, December 11th 2019". UK-Elect. Retrieved 11 December 2019. https://www.ukelect.co.uk/HTML/forecasts/20191211ForecastUK.html ↩

352. "Afternoon Market Comment 11.12.19 | Spreadex | Financial Spread Betting". www.spreadex.com. 11 December 2019. Retrieved 27 July 2020. https://www.spreadex.com/financials/market-analysis/spreadex-market-update/11-dec-19-120000/ ↩

353. DUP with 10, Sinn Féin with 6, and SDLP with 2 ↩

354. DUP with 10, Sinn Féin with 6, and SDLP with 2 ↩

355. DUP with 10, Sinn Féin with 7, and others with 2 ↩

356. "Conservatives on course to win majority – exit poll". BBC News. 13 December 2019. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50765773 ↩

357. "Check the exit poll forecast for your area". BBC News. 12 December 2019. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50424263 ↩

358. McCann, Allison; Leatherby, Lauren; Migliozzi, Blacki (13 December 2019). "U.K. Election Results Map: How Conservatives Won in a Landslide". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/12/13/world/europe/uk-general-election-results.html ↩

359. "Johnson returns to power with big majority". BBC News. 13 December 2019. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50765773 ↩

360. "Results of the 2019 General Election". BBC News. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election/2019/results ↩

361. Ford, Robert; et al. (2021). The British General Election of 2019. Springer. ISBN 978-3-030-74256-0. 978-3-030-74256-0 ↩

362. "England results". BBC News. 13 December 2019. Retrieved 14 December 2019. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2019/results/england ↩

363. "Wales results". BBC News. 13 December 2019. Retrieved 14 December 2019. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2019/results/wales ↩

364. "Scotland results". BBC News. 13 December 2019. Retrieved 14 December 2019. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/2019/results/scotland ↩

365. "Lesley Laird stands down as Scottish Labour deputy". BBC News. 16 December 2019. Retrieved 22 June 2024. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-50812695 ↩

366. McClements, Freya (13 December 2019). "North returns more nationalist than unionist MPs for first time". The Irish Times. Retrieved 16 May 2020. https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/north-returns-more-nationalist-than-unionist-mps-for-first-time-1.4114260 ↩

367. "Election analysis in maps and charts". BBC News. 13 December 2019. Retrieved 21 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50770798 ↩

368. "Preview of our Day of Poll survey". Opinium. Retrieved 16 January 2024. https://www.opinium.com/resource-center/preview-of-our-day-of-poll-survey/ ↩

369. Helm, Toby (14 December 2019). "I take my share of responsibility for this defeat, says Jeremy Corbyn". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/14/corbyn-takes-share-responsibility-defeat ↩

370. Proctor, Kate (13 December 2019). "Five reasons why Labour lost the election". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/13/five-reasons-why-labour-lost-the-election ↩

371. Proctor, Kate; Murray, Jessica (27 January 2020). "Labour defeat due to gimmicks and division, say members". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jan/27/labour-defeat-due-to-gimmicks-and-division-say-members ↩

372. "General election results: Working class switched to Tories". The Times. 17 December 2019. Retrieved 17 December 2019. https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/general-election-results-working-class-switched-to-tories-kfwptc6cr ↩

373. "Approximated Social Grade, England and Wales – Office for National Statistics". www.ons.gov.uk. Retrieved 16 January 2024. https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/bulletins/approximatedsocialgradeenglandandwales/census2021 ↩

374. "How Britain voted and why: My 2019 general election post-vote poll – Lord Ashcroft Polls". lordashcroftpolls.com. 13 December 2019. https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2019/12/how-britain-voted-and-why-my-2019-general-election-post-vote-poll/#more-16379 ↩

375. "Make Votes Matter – Make Votes Matter statement on the 2019 general election". Make Votes Matter. 13 December 2019. Retrieved 20 December 2019. https://www.makevotesmatter.org.uk/newsroom-2/2019/12/13/make-votes-matter-statement-on-the-2019-general-election ↩

376. Hanretty, Chris (15 December 2019). "The effects of tactical voting sites". Medium. Retrieved 18 December 2019. https://medium.com/@chrishanretty/the-effects-of-tactical-voting-sites-4d264d8ef89e ↩

377. "The new UK Parliament reportedly has the highest number of LGBTQ MPs in the world". Attitude.co.uk. 16 December 2019. Archived from the original on 18 December 2019. Retrieved 18 December 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20191218210553/https://attitude.co.uk/article/the-new-uk-parliament-reportedly-has-the-highest-number-of-lgbtq-mps-in-the-world/22471/ ↩

378. "Election 2019: Britain's most diverse Parliament". BBC News. 17 December 2019. Retrieved 18 December 2019. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2019-50808536 ↩

379. Walker, Peter (18 June 2020). "Key points from review of 2019 Labour election defeat". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/18/key-points-from-review-of-2019-labour-election-defeat ↩

380. "General Election Review 2019". Labour Together. https://www.labourtogether.uk/all-reports/general-election-review-2019 ↩

381. The number includes Neale Hanvey, who was suspended from the party at the time of his election and thus took his seat as an independent. /wiki/Neale_Hanvey ↩

382. "Results of the 2019 General Election". BBC News. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/election/2019/results ↩

383. "General Election 2019: full results and analysis". House of Commons Library. 28 January 2020. Retrieved 1 March 2020. https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8749#fullreport ↩

384. Tench, William. "2019 Election Candidates". Retrieved 15 November 2019. http://williamten.ch/ppcs ↩

385. All valid votes excluding spoiled votes. The official 32,014,110 valid votes is per the HoC Research Briefing ↩

386. "How Britain voted in the 2019 election". Ipsos MORI. Archived from the original on 15 February 2020. Retrieved 18 February 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20200215183515/https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/how-britain-voted-2019-election ↩

387. "How Britain voted in the 2019 general election". YouGov.co.uk. 17 December 2019. Retrieved 10 July 2023. https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/12/17/how-britain-voted-2019-general-election ↩

388. "Election results 2019: Boris Johnson's victory speech in full". BBC News. 13 December 2019. Retrieved 2 November 2022. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-2019-50777071 ↩

389. "Brexit: UK leaves the European Union". BBC News. 31 January 2020. Retrieved 2 November 2022. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-51333314 ↩

390. "Brexit: New era for UK as it completes separation from European Union". BBC News. 31 December 2020. Retrieved 2 November 2022. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-55502781 ↩

391. Mason, Rowena; Walker, Peter (13 December 2019). "Jeremy Corbyn 'very sad' at election defeat but feels proud of manifesto". The Guardian. Retrieved 9 January 2022. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/13/jeremy-corbyn-very-sad-at-election-defeat-but-feels-proud-of-manifesto ↩

392. "The Observer view on why Labour leadership candidates must stop ducking the truth | Observer editorial". The Observer. 19 January 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/jan/19/observer-view-on-why-labour-leadership-candidates-stop-ducking-truth ↩

393. Younge, Gary (13 December 2019). "Labour won't win again until it works out why it lost". The Guardian. /wiki/Gary_Younge ↩

394. Stewart, Heather (18 June 2020). "Labour: dysfunctional 'toxic culture' led to defeat, major report finds". The Guardian. Retrieved 2 July 2020. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jun/18/dysfunctional-toxic-culture-led-to-labour-defeat-major-report-finds ↩

395. Michell, Jo; Calvert Jump, Rob (20 August 2020). "Labour, the 'red wall', and the vicissitudes of Britain's voting system". openDemocracy. Retrieved 30 March 2021. https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/oureconomy/labour-red-wall-and-vicissitudes-britains-voting-system/ ↩

396. "What now for the humbled Liberal Democrats?". New Statesman. 17 January 2020. https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2020/01/what-now-humbled-liberal-democrats ↩

397. Stewart, Heather (19 January 2020). "Corbyn was big factor in Lib Dem election failure, says Davey". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/jan/19/lib-dem-election-failure-was-corbyns-fault-says-acting-leader ↩

398. "Bath parliamentary constituency – Election 2019". BBC News. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/constituencies/E14000547 ↩

399. Hobhouse, Wera (5 February 2020). "Wera Hobhouse MP: The Lib Dems shot ourselves in the foot by attacking Labour. We must fight from the centre-left". PoliticsHome.com. Retrieved 5 February 2020. https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/liberal-democrats/opinion/house-commons/109677/wera-hobhouse-mp-lib-dems ↩

400. Carrell, Severin; Brooks, Libby (13 December 2019). "Scottish independence vote a 'democratic right', says Sturgeon". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 13 December 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/dec/13/nicola-sturgeon-to-publish-independence-referendum-blueprint ↩

401. "Indyref 'paused' for this year due to coronavirus". BBC News. 18 March 2020. Retrieved 2 November 2022. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-51944044 ↩