Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Cold War
1947–1991 geopolitical rivalry between US and USSR

The Cold War was a geopolitical rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union with their respective Western and Eastern Blocs, lasting from the end of the Second World War until the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. It featured no direct combat but intense proxy wars, an arms race, technological competition like the Space Race, and espionage. Key events included the Berlin Blockade, the Korean War, and the Cuban Missile Crisis, the closest nuclear confrontation. Both sides engaged in regime change efforts during global decolonization, often through supporting opposing factions. The period ended as Gorbachev's reforms led to the Eastern Bloc revolutions and ultimately the collapse of the USSR, bringing the Cold War to a close.

Terminology

Main article: Cold war (term)

Writer George Orwell used cold war, as a general term, in his essay "You and the Atomic Bomb", published 19 October 1945. Contemplating a world living in the shadow of the threat of nuclear warfare, Orwell looked at James Burnham's predictions of a polarized world, writing:

Looking at the world as a whole, the drift for many decades has been not towards anarchy but towards the reimposition of slavery... James Burnham's theory has been much discussed, but few people have yet considered its ideological implications—that is, the kind of world-view, the kind of beliefs, and the social structure that would probably prevail in a state which was at once unconquerable and in a permanent state of "cold war" with its neighbours.2

In The Observer of 10 March 1946, Orwell wrote, "after the Moscow conference last December, Russia began to make a 'cold war' on Britain and the British Empire."3

The first use of the term to describe the specific post-war geopolitical confrontation between the Soviet Union and the United States came in a speech by Bernard Baruch, an influential advisor to Democratic presidents,4 on 16 April 1947. The speech, written by journalist Herbert Bayard Swope,5 proclaimed, "we are today in the midst of a cold war."6 Newspaper columnist Walter Lippmann gave the term wide currency with his book The Cold War. When asked in 1947 about the source of the term, Lippmann traced it to a French term from the 1930s, la guerre froide.78

Background and periodization

Main article: Origins of the Cold War

For a chronological guide, see Timeline of the Cold War.

The roots of the Cold War can be traced to diplomatic and military tensions preceding World War II. The 1917 Russian Revolution and the subsequent Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, where Soviet Russia ceded vast territories to Germany, deepened distrust among the Western Allies. Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War further complicated relations, and although the Soviet Union later allied with Western powers to defeat Nazi Germany, this cooperation was strained by mutual suspicions.

In the immediate aftermath of World War II, disagreements about the future of Europe, particularly Eastern Europe, became central. The Soviet Union's establishment of communist regimes in the countries it had liberated from Nazi control—enforced by the presence of the Red Army—alarmed the US and UK. Western leaders saw this as Soviet expansionism, clashing with their vision of a democratic Europe. Economically, the divide was sharpened with the introduction of the Marshall Plan in 1947, a US initiative to provide financial aid to rebuild Europe and prevent the spread of communism by stabilizing capitalist economies. The Soviet Union rejected the Marshall Plan, seeing it as an effort by the US to impose its influence on Europe. In response, the Soviet Union established Comecon (Council for Mutual Economic Assistance) to foster economic cooperation among communist states.

The United States and its Western European allies sought to strengthen their bonds and used the policy of containment against Soviet influence; they accomplished this most notably through the formation of NATO, which was essentially a defensive agreement in 1949. The Soviet Union countered with the Warsaw Pact in 1955, which had similar results with the Eastern Bloc. As by that time the Soviet Union already had an armed presence and political domination all over its eastern satellite states, the pact has been long considered superfluous.9 Although nominally a defensive alliance, the Warsaw Pact's primary function was to safeguard Soviet hegemony over its Eastern European satellites, with the pact's only direct military actions having been the invasions of its own member states to keep them from breaking away;10 in the 1960s, the pact evolved into a multilateral alliance, in which the non-Soviet Warsaw Pact members gained significant scope to pursue their own interests. In 1961, Soviet-allied East Germany constructed the Berlin Wall to prevent the citizens of East Berlin from fleeing to West Berlin, at the time part of United States-allied West Germany.11 Major crises of this phase included the Berlin Blockade of 1948–1949, the Chinese Communist Revolution of 1945–1949, the Korean War of 1950–1953, the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 and the Suez Crisis of that same year, the Berlin Crisis of 1961, the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, and the Vietnam War of 1955–1975. Both superpowers competed for influence in Latin America and the Middle East, and the decolonising states of Africa, Asia, and Oceania.

Following the Cuban Missile Crisis, this phase of the Cold War saw the Sino-Soviet split. Between China and the Soviet Union's complicated relations within the Communist sphere, leading to the Sino-Soviet border conflict, while France, a Western Bloc state, began to demand greater autonomy of action. The Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia occurred to suppress the Prague Spring of 1968, while the United States experienced internal turmoil from the civil rights movement and opposition to United States involvement in the Vietnam War. In the 1960s–1970s, an international peace movement took root among citizens around the world. Movements against nuclear weapons testing and for nuclear disarmament took place, with large anti-war protests. By the 1970s, both sides had started making allowances for peace and security, ushering in a period of détente that saw the Strategic Arms Limitation Talks and the 1972 visit by Richard Nixon to China that opened relations with China as a strategic counterweight to the Soviet Union. A number of self-proclaimed Marxist–Leninist governments were formed in the second half of the 1970s in developing countries, including Angola, Mozambique, Ethiopia, Cambodia, Afghanistan, and Nicaragua.

Détente collapsed at the end of the decade with the beginning of the Soviet–Afghan War in 1979. Beginning in the 1980s, this phase was another period of elevated tension. The Reagan Doctrine led to increased diplomatic, military, and economic pressures on the Soviet Union, which at the time was undergoing the Era of Stagnation. This phase saw the new Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev introducing the liberalizing reforms of glasnost ("openness") and perestroika ("reorganization") and ending Soviet involvement in Afghanistan in 1989. Pressures for national sovereignty grew stronger in Eastern Europe, and Gorbachev refused to further support the Communist governments militarily.

The fall of the Iron Curtain after the Pan-European Picnic and the Revolutions of 1989, which represented a peaceful revolutionary wave with the exception of the Romanian revolution and the Afghan Civil War (1989–1992), overthrew almost all of the Marxist–Leninist regimes of the Eastern Bloc. The Communist Party of the Soviet Union itself lost control in the country and was banned following the 1991 Soviet coup attempt that August. This in turn led to the formal dissolution of the Soviet Union in December 1991 and the collapse of Communist governments across much of Africa and Asia. The Russian Federation became the Soviet Union's successor state, while many of the other republics emerged as fully independent post-Soviet states.12 The United States was left as the world's sole superpower.

Containment, Truman Doctrine, Korean War (1947–1953)

Main articles: Cold War (1947–1948), Cold War (1948–1953), Soviet empire, Containment, and Truman Doctrine

Iron Curtain, Iran, Turkey, Greece, and Poland

Further information: X Article, Iron Curtain, Iran crisis of 1946, and Restatement of Policy on Germany

In February 1946, George F. Kennan's "Long Telegram" from Moscow to Washington helped to articulate the US government's increasingly hard line against the Soviets, which would become the basis for US strategy toward the Soviet Union. The telegram galvanized a policy debate that would eventually shape the Truman administration's Soviet policy.13 Washington's opposition to the Soviets accumulated after broken promises by Stalin and Molotov concerning Europe and Iran.14 Following the World War II Anglo-Soviet invasion of Iran, the country was occupied by the Red Army in the far north and the British in the south.15 Iran was used by the United States and British to supply the Soviet Union, and the Allies agreed to withdraw from Iran within six months after the cessation of hostilities.16 However, when this deadline came, the Soviets remained in Iran under the guise of the Azerbaijan People's Government and Kurdish Republic of Mahabad.17 On 5 March, former British prime minister Winston Churchill delivered his famous "Iron Curtain" speech calling for an Anglo-American alliance against the Soviets, whom he accused of establishing an "iron curtain" dividing Europe.1819

A week later, on 13 March, Stalin responded vigorously to the speech, saying Churchill could be compared to Adolf Hitler insofar as he advocated the racial superiority of English-speaking nations so that they could satisfy their hunger for world domination, and that such a declaration was "a call for war on the USSR." The Soviet leader also dismissed the accusation that the USSR was exerting increasing control over the countries lying in its sphere. He argued that there was nothing surprising in "the fact that the Soviet Union, anxious for its future safety, [was] trying to see to it that governments loyal in their attitude to the Soviet Union should exist in these countries."2021

Soviet territorial demands to Turkey regarding the Dardanelles in the Turkish Straits crisis and Black Sea border disputes were also a major factor in increasing tensions.2223 In September, the Soviet side produced the Novikov telegram, sent by the Soviet ambassador to the US but commissioned and "co-authored" by Vyacheslav Molotov; it portrayed the US as being in the grip of monopoly capitalists who were building up military capability "to prepare the conditions for winning world supremacy in a new war".24 On 6 September 1946, James F. Byrnes delivered a speech in Germany repudiating the Morgenthau Plan (a proposal to partition and de-industrialize post-war Germany) and warning the Soviets that the US intended to maintain a military presence in Europe indefinitely.2526 As Byrnes stated a month later, "The nub of our program was to win the German people ... it was a battle between us and Russia over minds ..." In December, the Soviets agreed to withdraw from Iran after persistent US pressure, an early success of containment policy.

By 1947, US president Harry S. Truman was outraged by the perceived resistance of the Soviet Union to American demands in Iran, Turkey, and Greece, as well as Soviet rejection of the Baruch Plan on nuclear weapons.27 In February 1947, the British government announced that it could no longer afford to finance the Kingdom of Greece in its civil war against Communist-led insurgents.28 In the same month, Stalin conducted the rigged 1947 Polish legislative election which constituted an open breach of the Yalta Agreement. The US government responded by adopting a policy of containment,29 with the goal of stopping the spread of communism. Truman delivered a speech calling for the allocation of $400 million to intervene in the war and unveiled the Truman Doctrine, which framed the conflict as a contest between free peoples and totalitarian regimes.30 American policymakers accused the Soviet Union of conspiring against the Greek royalists in an effort to expand Soviet influence even though Stalin had told the Communist Party to cooperate with the British-backed government.313233

Enunciation of the Truman Doctrine marked the beginning of a US bipartisan defense and foreign policy consensus between Republicans and Democrats focused on containment and deterrence that weakened during and after the Vietnam War, but ultimately persisted thereafter.34 Moderate and conservative parties in Europe, as well as social democrats, gave virtually unconditional support to the Western alliance,35 while European and American Communists, financed by the KGB and involved in its intelligence operations,36 adhered to Moscow's line, although dissent began to appear after 1956. Other critiques of the consensus policy came from anti-Vietnam War activists, the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, and the anti-nuclear movement.37

Marshall Plan, Czechoslovak coup and formation of two German states

Main articles: Marshall Plan, Western Bloc, and 1948 Czechoslovak coup d'état

In early 1947, France, Britain and the United States unsuccessfully attempted to reach an agreement with the Soviet Union for a plan envisioning an economically self-sufficient Germany, including a detailed accounting of the industrial plants, goods and infrastructure already taken by the Soviets.38 In June 1947, in accordance with the Truman Doctrine, the United States enacted the Marshall Plan, a pledge of economic assistance for all European countries willing to participate.39 Under the plan, which President Harry S. Truman signed on 3 April 1948, the US government gave to Western European countries over $13 billion (equivalent to $189 billion in 2016). Later, the program led to the creation of the OECD.

The plan's aim was to rebuild the democratic and economic systems of Europe and to counter perceived threats to the European balance of power, such as communist parties seizing control.40 The plan also stated that European prosperity was contingent upon German economic recovery.41 One month later, Truman signed the National Security Act of 1947, creating a unified Department of Defense, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and the National Security Council (NSC). These would become the main bureaucracies for US defense policy in the Cold War.42

Stalin believed economic integration with the West would allow Eastern Bloc countries to escape Soviet control, and that the US was trying to buy a pro-US re-alignment of Europe.43 Stalin therefore prevented Eastern Bloc nations from receiving Marshall Plan aid.44 The Soviet Union's alternative to the Marshall Plan, which was purported to involve Soviet subsidies and trade with central and eastern Europe, became known as the Molotov Plan (later institutionalized in January 1949 as the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance).45 Stalin was also fearful of a reconstituted Germany; his vision of a post-war Germany did not include the ability to rearm or pose any kind of threat to the Soviet Union.46

In early 1948, Czech Communists executed a coup d'état in Czechoslovakia (resulting in the formation of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic), the only Eastern Bloc state that the Soviets had permitted to retain democratic structures.47 The public brutality of the coup shocked Western powers more than any event up to that point and swept away the last vestiges of opposition to the Marshall Plan in the United States Congress.4849

In an immediate aftermath of the crisis, the London Six-Power Conference was held, resulting in the Soviet boycott of the Allied Control Council and its incapacitation, an event marking the beginning of the full-blown Cold War, as well as ending any hopes at the time for a single German government and leading to formation in 1949 of the Federal Republic of Germany and German Democratic Republic.50

The twin policies of the Truman Doctrine and the Marshall Plan led to billions in economic and military aid for Western Europe, Greece, and Turkey. With the US assistance, the Greek military won its civil war.51 Under the leadership of Alcide De Gasperi the Italian Christian Democrats defeated the powerful CommunistSocialist alliance in the elections of 1948.52

Outside of Europe, the United States also began to express interest in the development of many other countries, so that they would not fall under the sway of Eastern Bloc communism. In his January 1949 inaugural address, Truman declared for the first time in U.S. history that international development would be a key part of U.S. foreign policy. The resulting program later became known as the Point Four Program because it was the fourth point raised in his address.53

Espionage

Main articles: Cold War espionage, American espionage in the Soviet Union and Russian Federation, and Soviet espionage in the United States

All major powers engaged in espionage, using a great variety of spies, double agents, moles, and new technologies such as the tapping of telephone cables.54 The Soviet KGB ("Committee for State Security"), the bureau responsible for foreign espionage and internal surveillance, was famous for its effectiveness. The most famous Soviet operation involved its atomic spies that delivered crucial information from the United States' Manhattan Project, leading the USSR to detonate its first nuclear weapon in 1949, four years after the American detonation and much sooner than expected.[46]55 A massive network of informants throughout the Soviet Union was used to monitor dissent from official Soviet politics and morals.5657 Although to an extent disinformation had always existed, the term itself was invented, and the strategy formalized by a black propaganda department of the Soviet KGB.5859

Based on the amount of top-secret Cold War archival information that has been released, historian Raymond L. Garthoff concludes there probably was parity in the quantity and quality of secret information obtained by each side. However, the Soviets probably had an advantage in terms of HUMINT (human intelligence or interpersonal espionage) and "sometimes in its reach into high policy circles." In terms of decisive impact, however, he concludes:60

We also can now have high confidence in the judgment that there were no successful "moles" at the political decision-making level on either side. Similarly, there is no evidence, on either side, of any major political or military decision that was prematurely discovered through espionage and thwarted by the other side. There also is no evidence of any major political or military decision that was crucially influenced (much less generated) by an agent of the other side.

According to historian Robert L. Benson, "Washington's forte was 'signals' intelligence – the procurement and analysis of coded foreign messages," leading to the Venona project or Venona intercepts, which monitored the communications of Soviet intelligence agents.61 Moynihan wrote that the Venona project contained "overwhelming proof of the activities of Soviet spy networks in America, complete with names, dates, places, and deeds."62 The Venona project was kept highly secret even from policymakers until the Moynihan Commission in 1995.63 Despite this, the decryption project had already been betrayed and dispatched to the USSR by Kim Philby and Bill Weisband in 1946,6465 as was discovered by the US by 1950.66 Nonetheless, the Soviets had to keep their discovery of the program secret, too, and continued leaking their own information, some of which was still useful to the American program.67 According to Moynihan, even President Truman may not have been fully informed of Venona, which may have left him unaware of the extent of Soviet espionage.6869

Clandestine atomic spies from the Soviet Union, who infiltrated the Manhattan Project during WWII, played a major role in increasing tensions that led to the Cold War.70

In addition to usual espionage, the Western agencies paid special attention to debriefing Eastern Bloc defectors.71 Edward Jay Epstein describes that the CIA understood that the KGB used "provocations", or fake defections, as a trick to embarrass Western intelligence and establish Soviet double agents. As a result, from 1959 to 1973, the CIA required that East Bloc defectors went through a counterintelligence investigation before being recruited as a source of intelligence.72

During the late 1970s and 1980s, the KGB perfected its use of espionage to sway and distort diplomacy.73 Active measures were "clandestine operations designed to further Soviet foreign policy goals," consisting of disinformation, forgeries, leaks to foreign media, and the channeling of aid to militant groups.74 Retired KGB Major General Oleg Kalugin described active measures as "the heart and soul of Soviet intelligence."75

During the Sino-Soviet split, "spy wars" also occurred between the USSR and PRC.76

Cominform and the Tito–Stalin Split

Main articles: Cominform and Tito–Stalin Split

In September 1947, the Soviets created Cominform to impose orthodoxy within the international communist movement and tighten political control over Soviet satellites through coordination of communist parties in the Eastern Bloc.77 Cominform faced an embarrassing setback the following June, when the Tito–Stalin split obliged its members to expel Yugoslavia, which remained communist but adopted a non-aligned position and began accepting financial aid from the US.78

Besides Berlin, the status of the city of Trieste was at issue. Until the break between Tito and Stalin, the Western powers and the Eastern bloc faced each other uncompromisingly. In addition to capitalism and communism, Italians and Slovenes, monarchists and republicans as well as war winners and losers often faced each other irreconcilably. The neutral buffer state Free Territory of Trieste, founded in 1947 with the United Nations, was split up and dissolved in 1954 and 1975, also because of the détente between the West and Tito.7980

Berlin Blockade

Main article: Berlin Blockade

The US and Britain merged their western German occupation zones into "Bizone" (1 January 1947, later "Trizone" with the addition of France's zone, April 1949).81 As part of the economic rebuilding of Germany, in early 1948, representatives of a number of Western European governments and the United States announced an agreement for a merger of western German areas into a federal governmental system.82 In addition, in accordance with the Marshall Plan, they began to re-industrialize and rebuild the West German economy, including the introduction of a new Deutsche Mark currency to replace the old Reichsmark currency that the Soviets had debased.83 The US had secretly decided that a unified and neutral Germany was undesirable, with Walter Bedell Smith telling General Eisenhower "in spite of our announced position, we really do not want nor intend to accept German unification on any terms that the Russians might agree to, even though they seem to meet most of our requirements."84

Shortly thereafter, Stalin instituted the Berlin Blockade (June 1948 – May 1949), one of the first major crises of the Cold War, preventing Western supplies from reaching West Germany's exclave of West Berlin.85 The United States (primarily), Britain, France, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and several other countries began the massive "Berlin airlift", supplying West Berlin with provisions despite Soviet threats.86

The Soviets mounted a public relations campaign against the policy change. Once again, the East Berlin communists attempted to disrupt the Berlin municipal elections,87 which were held on 5 December 1948 and produced a turnout of 86% and an overwhelming victory for the non-communist parties.88 The results effectively divided the city into East and West, the latter comprising US, British and French sectors. 300,000 Berliners demonstrated and urged the international airlift to continue,89 and US Air Force pilot Gail Halvorsen created "Operation Vittles", which supplied candy to German children.90 The Airlift was as much a logistical as a political and psychological success for the West; it firmly linked West Berlin to the United States.91 In May 1949, Stalin lifted the blockade.9293

In 1952, Stalin repeatedly proposed a plan to unify East and West Germany under a single government chosen in elections supervised by the United Nations, if the new Germany were to stay out of Western military alliances, but this proposal was turned down by the Western powers. Some sources dispute the sincerity of the proposal.94

Beginnings of NATO and Radio Free Europe

Main articles: NATO, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Eastern Bloc media and propaganda, and Propaganda in the Soviet Union

Britain, France, the United States, Canada and eight other western European countries signed the North Atlantic Treaty of April 1949, establishing the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).95 That August, the first Soviet atomic device was detonated in Semipalatinsk, Kazakh SSR.96 Following Soviet refusals to participate in a German rebuilding effort set forth by western European countries in 1948,9798 the US, Britain and France spearheaded the establishment of the Federal Republic of Germany from the three Western zones of occupation in April 1949.99 The Soviet Union proclaimed its zone of occupation in Germany the German Democratic Republic that October.100

Media in the Eastern Bloc was an organ of the state, completely reliant on and subservient to the communist party. Radio and television organizations were state-owned, while print media was usually owned by political organizations, mostly by the local communist party.101 Soviet radio broadcasts used Marxist rhetoric to attack capitalism, emphasizing themes of labor exploitation, imperialism and war-mongering.102

Along with the broadcasts of the BBC and the Voice of America to Central and Eastern Europe,103 a major propaganda effort began in 1949 was Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, dedicated to bringing about the peaceful demise of the communist system in the Eastern Bloc.104 Radio Free Europe attempted to achieve these goals by serving as a surrogate home radio station, an alternative to the controlled and party-dominated domestic press in the Soviet Bloc.105 Radio Free Europe was a product of some of the most prominent architects of America's early Cold War strategy, especially those who believed that the Cold War would eventually be fought by political rather than military means, such as George F. Kennan.106 Soviet and Eastern Bloc authorities used various methods to suppress Western broadcasts, including radio jamming.107108

American policymakers, including Kennan and John Foster Dulles, acknowledged that the Cold War was in its essence a war of ideas.109 The United States, acting through the CIA, funded a long list of projects to counter the communist appeal among intellectuals in Europe and the developing world.110 The CIA also covertly sponsored a domestic propaganda campaign called Crusade for Freedom.111

German rearmament

Main article: West German rearmament

The rearmament of West Germany was achieved in the early 1950s. Its main promoter was Konrad Adenauer, the chancellor of West Germany, with France the main opponent. Washington had the decisive voice. It was strongly supported by the Pentagon (the US military leadership), and weakly opposed by President Truman; the State Department was ambivalent. The outbreak of the Korean War in June 1950 changed the calculations and Washington now gave full support. That also involved naming Dwight D. Eisenhower in charge of NATO forces and sending more American troops to West Germany. There was a strong promise that West Germany would not develop nuclear weapons.112

Widespread fears of another rise of German militarism necessitated the new military to operate within an alliance framework under NATO command.113 In 1955, Washington secured full German membership of NATO.114 In May 1953, Lavrentiy Beria, by then in a government post, had made an unsuccessful proposal to allow the reunification of a neutral Germany to prevent West Germany's incorporation into NATO, but his attempts were cut short after he was executed several months later during a Soviet power struggle.115 The events led to the establishment of the Bundeswehr, the West German military, in 1955.[94]116

Chinese Civil War, SEATO, and NSC 68

Main article: Cold War in Asia

In 1949, Mao Zedong's People's Liberation Army defeated Chiang Kai-shek's United States-backed Kuomintang (KMT) Nationalist Government in China. The KMT-controlled territory was now restricted to the island of Taiwan, the nationalist government of which exists to this day. The Kremlin promptly created an alliance with the newly formed People's Republic of China.117 According to Norwegian historian Odd Arne Westad, the communists won the Civil War because they made fewer military mistakes than Chiang Kai-Shek made, and because in his search for a powerful centralized government, Chiang antagonized too many interest groups in China. Moreover, his party was weakened during the war against Japan. Meanwhile, the communists told different groups, such as the peasants, exactly what they wanted to hear, and they cloaked themselves under the cover of Chinese nationalism.118

Confronted with the communist revolution in China and the end of the American atomic monopoly in 1949, the Truman administration quickly moved to escalate and expand its containment doctrine.119 In NSC 68, a secret 1950 document, the National Security Council proposed reinforcing pro-Western alliance systems and quadrupling spending on defense.120 Truman, under the influence of advisor Paul Nitze, saw containment as implying complete rollback of Soviet influence in all its forms.121

United States officials moved to expand this version of containment into Asia, Africa, and Latin America, in order to counter revolutionary nationalist movements, often led by communist parties financed by the USSR.122 In this way, this US would exercise "preponderant power," oppose neutrality, and establish global hegemony.123 In the early 1950s (a period sometimes known as the "Pactomania"), the US formalized a series of alliances with Japan (a former WWII enemy), South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand, Thailand and the Philippines (notably ANZUS in 1951 and SEATO in 1954), thereby guaranteeing the United States a number of long-term military bases.124

Korean War

Main articles: Division of Korea, Korean War, and Rollback

One of the more significant examples of the implementation of containment was the United Nations US-led intervention in the Korean War. In June 1950, after years of mutual hostilities,125126127 Kim Il Sung's North Korean People's Army invaded South Korea. Stalin had been reluctant to support the invasion128 but ultimately sent advisers.129 To Stalin's surprise,130 the United Nations Security Council backed the defense of South Korea, although the Soviets were then boycotting meetings in protest of the fact that Taiwan (Republic of China), not the People's Republic of China, held a permanent seat on the council.131 A UN force of sixteen countries faced North Korea,132 although 40 percent of troops were South Korean, and about 50 percent were from the United States.133

The US initially seemed to follow containment, only pushing back North Korea across the 38th Parallel and restoring South Korea's sovereignty while allowing North Korea's survival as a state. However, the success of the Inchon landing inspired the US/UN forces to pursue a rollback strategy instead and to overthrow communist North Korea, thereby allowing nationwide elections under U.N. auspices.134 General Douglas MacArthur then advanced into North Korea. The Chinese, fearful of a possible US invasion, sent in a large army and pushed the U.N. forces back below the 38th parallel.135 The episode was used to support the wisdom of the containment doctrine as opposed to rollback. The Communists were later pushed to roughly around the original border, with minimal changes. Among other effects, the Korean War galvanised NATO to develop a military structure.136 The Korean Armistice Agreement was approved in July 1953.137138

Nuclear Arms Race and escalation (1953–1962)

Main article: Cold War (1953–1962)

Khrushchev, Eisenhower, and de-Stalinization

In 1953, changes in political leadership on both sides shifted the dynamic of the Cold War.139 Dwight D. Eisenhower was inaugurated president that January. During the last 18 months of the Truman administration, the American defense budget had quadrupled, and Eisenhower moved to reduce military spending by a third while continuing to fight the Cold War effectively.140

Joseph Stalin died in 1953. Nikita Khrushchev eventually won the ensuing power struggle by the mid-1950s. In 1956, he denounced Joseph Stalin and proceeded to ease controls over the party and society (de-Stalinization).141

On 18 November 1956, while addressing Western dignitaries at a reception in Moscow's Polish embassy, Khrushchev infamously declared, "Whether you like it or not, history is on our side. We will bury you", shocking everyone present.142 He would later claim he had not been referring to nuclear war, but the "historically fated victory of communism over capitalism."143

Eisenhower's secretary of state, John Foster Dulles, initiated a "New Look" for the containment strategy, calling for a greater reliance on nuclear weapons against US enemies in wartime.144 Dulles also enunciated the doctrine of "massive retaliation", threatening a severe US response to any Soviet aggression. Possessing nuclear superiority, for example, allowed Eisenhower to face down Soviet threats to intervene in the Middle East during the 1956 Suez Crisis.145 The declassified US plans for retaliatory nuclear strikes in the late 1950s included the "systematic destruction" of 1,200 major urban centers in the Soviet Bloc and China, including Moscow, East Berlin and Beijing.146147

In spite of these events, there were substantial hopes for détente when an upswing in diplomacy took place in 1959, including a two-week visit by Khrushchev to the US, and plans for a two-power summit for May 1960. The latter was disturbed by the U-2 spy plane scandal, however, in which Eisenhower was caught lying about the intrusion of American surveillance aircraft into Soviet territory.148149

Warsaw Pact and Hungarian Revolution

Main articles: Warsaw Pact and Hungarian Revolution of 1956

While Stalin's death in 1953 slightly relaxed tensions, the situation in Europe remained an uneasy armed truce.150 The Soviets, who had already created a network of mutual assistance treaties in the Eastern Bloc by 1949, established a formal alliance therein, the Warsaw Pact, in 1955. It stood opposed to NATO.151

The Hungarian Revolution of 1956 occurred shortly after Khrushchev arranged the removal of Hungary's Stalinist leader Mátyás Rákosi.152 In response to a popular anti-communist uprising,153 the new regime formally disbanded the secret police, declared its intention to withdraw from the Warsaw Pact and pledged to re-establish free elections. The Soviet Army invaded.154 Thousands of Hungarians were killed and arrested, imprisoned and deported to the Soviet Union,155 and approximately 200,000 Hungarians fled Hungary.156 Hungarian leader Imre Nagy and others were executed following secret trials.157

From 1957 through 1961, Khrushchev openly and repeatedly threatened the West with nuclear annihilation. He claimed that Soviet missile capabilities were far superior to those of the United States, capable of wiping out any American or European city. According to John Lewis Gaddis, Khrushchev rejected Stalin's "belief in the inevitability of war," however. The new leader declared his ultimate goal was "peaceful coexistence".158 In Khrushchev's formulation, peace would allow capitalism to collapse on its own,159 as well as giving the Soviets time to boost their military capabilities,160 which remained for decades until Gorbachev's later "new thinking" envisioning peaceful coexistence as an end in itself rather than a form of class struggle.161

The events in Hungary produced ideological fractures within the communist parties of the world, particularly in Western Europe, with great decline in membership, as many in both western and socialist countries felt disillusioned by the brutal Soviet response.162 The communist parties in the West would never recover.163

Rapacki Plan and Berlin Crisis of 1958–1959

Further information: Rapacki Plan and Berlin Crisis of 1958–1959

In 1957, Polish foreign minister Adam Rapacki proposed the Rapacki Plan for a nuclear free zone in central Europe. Public opinion tended to be favourable in the West, but it was rejected by leaders of West Germany, Britain, France and the United States. They feared it would leave the powerful conventional armies of the Warsaw Pact dominant over the weaker NATO armies.164

During November 1958, Khrushchev made an unsuccessful attempt to turn all of Berlin into an independent, demilitarized "free city". He gave the United States, Great Britain and France a six-month ultimatum to withdraw their troops from the sectors of West Berlin, or he would transfer control of Western access rights to the East Germans. Khrushchev earlier explained to Mao Zedong that "Berlin is the testicles of the West. Every time I want to make the West scream, I squeeze on Berlin."165 NATO formally rejected the ultimatum in mid-December and Khrushchev withdrew it in return for a Geneva conference on the German question.166

American military buildup

Main article: Flexible response

Like Truman and Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy supported containment. President Eisenhower's New Look policy had emphasized the use of less expensive nuclear weapons to deter Soviet aggression by threatening massive nuclear attacks on all of the Soviet Union. Nuclear weapons were much cheaper than maintaining a large standing army, so Eisenhower cut conventional forces to save money. Kennedy implemented a new strategy known as flexible response. This strategy relied on conventional arms to achieve limited goals. As part of this policy, Kennedy expanded the United States special operations forces, elite military units that could fight unconventionally in various conflicts. Kennedy hoped that the flexible response strategy would allow the US to counter Soviet influence without resorting to nuclear war.167

To support his new strategy, Kennedy ordered a massive increase in defense spending and a rapid build-up of the nuclear arsenal to restore the lost superiority over the Soviet Union. In his inaugural address, Kennedy promised "to bear any burden" in the defense of liberty, and he repeatedly asked for increases in military spending and authorization of new weapons systems. From 1961 to 1964, the number of nuclear weapons increased by 50 percent, as did the number of B-52 bombers to deliver them. The new ICBM force grew from 63 intercontinental ballistic missiles to 424. He authorized 23 new Polaris submarines, each of which carried 16 nuclear missiles. Kennedy also called on cities to construct fallout shelters.168169

Competition in the Third World

Main articles: Decolonization § After 1945, Wars of national liberation, 1953 Iranian coup d'état, 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état, Congo Crisis, 1954 Geneva Conference, and Bandung Conference

Nationalist movements in some countries and regions, notably Guatemala, Indonesia and Indochina, were often allied with communist groups or otherwise perceived to be unfriendly to Western interests.170 In this context, the United States and the Soviet Union increasingly competed for influence by proxy in the Third World as decolonization gained momentum in the 1950s and early 1960s.171 Both sides were selling armaments to gain influence.172 The Kremlin saw continuing territorial losses by imperial powers as presaging the eventual victory of their ideology.173

The United States used the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) to undermine neutral or hostile Third World governments and to support allied ones.174 In 1953, President Eisenhower implemented Operation Ajax, a covert coup operation to overthrow the Iranian prime minister, Mohammad Mosaddegh. The popularly elected Mosaddegh had been a Middle Eastern nemesis of Britain since nationalizing the British-owned Anglo-Iranian Oil Company in 1951. Winston Churchill told the United States that Mosaddegh was "increasingly turning towards Communist influence."175176 The pro-Western shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, assumed control as an autocratic monarch.177 The shah's policies included banning the communist Tudeh Party of Iran, and general suppression of political dissent by SAVAK, the shah's domestic security and intelligence agency.

In Guatemala, a banana republic, the 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état ousted the left-wing President Jacobo Árbenz with material CIA support.178 The post-Arbenz government—a military junta headed by Carlos Castillo Armas—repealed a progressive land reform law, returned nationalized property belonging to the United Fruit Company, set up a National Committee of Defense Against Communism, and decreed a Preventive Penal Law Against Communism at the request of the United States.179

The non-aligned Indonesian government of Sukarno was faced with a major threat to its legitimacy beginning in 1956 when several regional commanders began to demand autonomy from Jakarta. After mediation failed, Sukarno took action to remove the dissident commanders. In February 1958, dissident military commanders in Central Sumatra (Colonel Ahmad Husein) and North Sulawesi (Colonel Ventje Sumual) declared the Revolutionary Government of the Republic of Indonesia-Permesta Movement aimed at overthrowing the Sukarno regime. They were joined by many civilian politicians from the Masyumi Party, such as Sjafruddin Prawiranegara, who were opposed to the growing influence of the communist Partai Komunis Indonesia. Due to their anti-communist rhetoric, the rebels received arms, funding, and other covert aid from the CIA until Allen Lawrence Pope, an American pilot, was shot down after a bombing raid on government-held Ambon in April 1958. The central government responded by launching airborne and seaborne military invasions of rebel strongholds at Padang and Manado. By the end of 1958, the rebels were militarily defeated, and the last remaining rebel guerilla bands surrendered by August 1961.180

In the Republic of the Congo, also known as Congo-Léopoldville, newly independent from Belgium since June 1960, the Congo Crisis erupted on 5 July leading to the secession of the regions Katanga and South Kasai. CIA-backed President Joseph Kasa-Vubu ordered the dismissal of the democratically elected Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba and the Lumumba cabinet in September over massacres by the armed forces during the invasion of South Kasai and for involving Soviets in the country.181182 Later the CIA-backed Colonel Mobutu Sese Seko quickly mobilized his forces to seize power through a military coup d'état,183 and worked with Western intelligence agencies to imprison Lumumba and hand him over to Katangan authorities who executed him by firing squad.184185

In British Guiana, the leftist People's Progressive Party (PPP) candidate Cheddi Jagan won the position of chief minister in a colonially administered election in 1953 but was quickly forced to resign from power after Britain's suspension of the still-dependent nation's constitution.186 Embarrassed by the landslide electoral victory of Jagan's allegedly Marxist party, the British imprisoned the PPP's leadership and maneuvered the organization into a divisive rupture in 1955.187 Jagan again won the colonial elections in 1957 and 1961, despite Britain's shift to a reconsideration of its view of the left-wing Jagan as a Soviet-style communist at this time. The United States pressured the British to withhold Guyana's independence until an alternative to Jagan could be identified, supported, and brought into office.188 In Malaya, the British colonialists suppressed the communist anti-colonial rebellion.

Worn down by the communist guerrilla war for Vietnamese full independence and handed a watershed defeat by communist Viet Minh rebels at the Battle of Dien Bien Phu, the French accepted a negotiated abandonment of their neo-colonial stake in Vietnam right in 1954. On June 4, France granted full sovereignty to the anti-communist State of Vietnam, an independent country within the French Union.189 In the Geneva Conference in July, peace accords were signed, leaving Vietnam divided between a pro-Soviet administration in North Vietnam and a pro-Western administration in South Vietnam at the 17th parallel north. Between 1954 and 1961, Eisenhower's United States sent economic aid and military advisers to strengthen South Vietnam's pro-Western government against communist efforts to destabilize it.190

Many emerging nations of Asia, Africa, and Latin America rejected the pressure to choose sides in the East–West competition. In 1955, at the Bandung Conference in Indonesia, dozens of Third World governments resolved to stay out of the Cold War.191 The consensus reached at Bandung culminated with the creation of the Belgrade-headquartered Non-Aligned Movement in 1961.192 Meanwhile, Khrushchev broadened Moscow's policy to establish ties with India and other key neutral states. Independence movements in the Third World transformed the post-war order into a more pluralistic world of decolonized African and Middle Eastern nations and of rising nationalism in Asia and Latin America.193

Sino-Soviet split

Main article: Sino-Soviet split

After 1956, the Sino-Soviet alliance began to break down. Mao had defended Stalin when Khrushchev criticized him in 1956 and treated the new Soviet leader as a superficial upstart, accusing him of having lost his revolutionary edge.194 For his part, Khrushchev, disturbed by Mao's glib attitude toward nuclear war, referred to the Chinese leader as a "lunatic on a throne".195

After this, Khrushchev made many desperate attempts to reconstitute the Sino-Soviet alliance, but Mao considered it useless and denied any proposal.196 The Chinese-Soviet animosity spilled out in an intra-communist propaganda war.197 Further on, the Soviets focused on a bitter rivalry with Mao's China for leadership of the global communist movement.198 Historian Lorenz M. Lüthi argues:

The Sino-Soviet split was one of the key events of the Cold War, equal in importance to the construction of the Berlin Wall, the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Second Vietnam War, and Sino-American rapprochement. The split helped to determine the framework for the Cold War period 1979–1985 in general, and influenced the course of the Second Vietnam War in particular.199

Space Race

Main article: Space Race

On the nuclear weapons front, the United States and the Soviet Union pursued nuclear rearmament and developed long-range weapons with which they could strike the territory of the other.200 In August 1957, the Soviets successfully launched the world's first intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM),201 and in October they launched the first Earth satellite, Sputnik 1.202 This led to what became known as the Sputnik crisis. The Central Intelligence Agency described the orbit of Sputnik 1 as a "stupendous scientific achievement" and concluded that the USSR had likely perfected an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capable of reaching 'any desired target with accuracy'.203

The launch of Sputnik inaugurated the Space Race. This led to a series of historic space exploration milestones, and most notably the Apollo Moon landings from 1969 by the United States, which astronaut Frank Borman later described as "just a battle in the Cold War."204 The public's reaction in the Soviet Union was mixed. The Soviet government limited the release of information about the lunar landing, which affected the reaction. A portion of the populace did not give it any attention, and another portion was angered by it.205 A major Cold War element of the Space Race was satellite reconnaissance, as well as signals intelligence to gauge which aspects of the space programs had military capabilities.206 The Soviet Salyut programme, conducted in the 1970s and 1980s, put a crewed space station in long term orbit; two of the successful installations to the station were covers for secret military Almaz reconnaissance stations: Salyut 3, and Salyut 5.207208209210

During the whole duration of the cold war, the US and the USSR represented the largest and dominant space powers of the world.211 Despite their fierce competition, both nations signed international space treaties in the 1960s which would limit the militarization of space.212

The first research of anti-satellite weapon technology also came about during this period.213

Later, the US and USSR pursued some cooperation in space as part of détente, notably the Apollo–Soyuz orbital rendezvous and docking.214

Aftermath of the Cuban Revolution

Main articles: Consolidation of the Cuban Revolution and Bay of Pigs Invasion

In Cuba, the 26th of July Movement, led by young revolutionaries Fidel Castro and Che Guevara, seized power in the Cuban Revolution on 1 January 1959.215 Although Fidel Castro's first refused to categorize his new government as socialist and repeatedly denying being a communist, Castro appointed Marxists to senior government and military positions.216217218

Diplomatic relations between Cuba and the United States continued for some time after Batista's fall, but President Eisenhower deliberately left the capital to avoid meeting Castro during the latter's trip to Washington, D.C. in April, leaving Vice President Richard Nixon to conduct the meeting in his place.219 Cuba began negotiating for arms purchases from the Eastern Bloc in March 1960.220 The same month, Eisenhower gave approval to CIA plans and funding to overthrow Castro.221

In January 1961, just prior to leaving office, Eisenhower formally severed relations with the Cuban government. That April, the administration of newly elected American President John F. Kennedy mounted the unsuccessful CIA-organized ship-borne invasion of the island by Cuban exiles at Playa Girón and Playa Larga in Santa Clara Province—a failure that publicly humiliated the United States.222 Castro responded by publicly embracing Marxism–Leninism, and the Soviet Union pledged to provide further support.223 In December, the US government began a violent campaign of terrorist attacks against civilians in Cuba, and covert operations and sabotage against the administration, in an attempt to overthrow the Cuban government.224

Berlin Crisis of 1961

Main article: Berlin Crisis of 1961

Further information: Berlin Wall and Emigration from the Eastern Bloc

The Berlin Crisis of 1961 was the last major incident in the Cold War regarding the status of Berlin and post–World War II Germany. By the early 1950s, the Soviet approach to restricting emigration movement was emulated by most of the rest of the Eastern Bloc.225 However, hundreds of thousands of East Germans annually emigrated to free and prosperous West Germany through a "loophole" in the system that existed between East Berlin and West Berlin.226227

The emigration resulted in a massive "brain drain" from East Germany to West Germany of younger educated professionals, such that nearly 20% of East Germany's population had migrated to West Germany by 1961.228 That June, the Soviet Union issued a new ultimatum demanding the withdrawal of Allied forces from West Berlin.229 The request was rebuffed, but the United States now limited its security guarantees to West Berlin.230 On 13 August, East Germany erected a barbed-wire barrier that would eventually be expanded through construction into the Berlin Wall, effectively closing the loophole and preventing its citizens from fleeing to the West.231

Cuban Missile Crisis and Khrushchev's ousting

Main articles: Operation Mongoose and Cuban Missile Crisis

The Kennedy administration continued seeking ways to oust Castro following the Bay of Pigs invasion, experimenting with various ways of covertly facilitating the overthrow of the Cuban government. Significant hopes were pinned on the program of terrorist attacks and other destabilization operations known as Operation Mongoose, that was devised under the Kennedy administration in 1961. Khrushchev learned of the project in February 1962,232 and preparations to install Soviet nuclear missiles in Cuba were undertaken in response.233

Alarmed, Kennedy considered various reactions. He ultimately responded to the installation of nuclear missiles in Cuba with a naval blockade, and he presented an ultimatum to the Soviets. Khrushchev backed down from a confrontation, and the Soviet Union removed the missiles in return for a public American pledge not to invade Cuba again as well as a covert deal to remove US missiles from Turkey.234

The Cuban Missile Crisis (October–November 1962) brought the world closer to nuclear war than ever before.235 The aftermath led to efforts in the nuclear arms race at nuclear disarmament and improving relations, although the Cold War's first arms control agreement, the Antarctic Treaty, had come into force in 1961.236

The compromise embarrassed Khrushchev and the Soviet Union because the withdrawal of US missiles from Italy and Turkey was a secret deal between Kennedy and Khrushchev, and the Soviets were seen as retreating from circumstances that they had started. In 1964, Khrushchev's Kremlin colleagues managed to oust him, but allowed him a peaceful retirement.237 He was accused of rudeness and incompetence, and John Lewis Gaddis argues that he was also blamed with ruining Soviet agriculture, bringing the world to the brink of nuclear war, and becoming an "international embarrassment" when he authorized construction of the Berlin Wall.238 According to Dobrynin, the top Soviet leadership took the Cuban outcome as "a blow to its prestige bordering on humiliation".239240

From confrontation to détente (1962–1979)

Main articles: Cold War (1962–1979) and Era of Stagnation

In the course of the 1960s and 1970s, Cold War participants struggled to adjust to a new, more complicated pattern of international relations in which the world was no longer divided into two clearly opposed blocs.241 From the beginning of the post-war period, with American help Western Europe and Japan rapidly recovered from the destruction of World War II and sustained strong economic growth through the 1950s and 1960s, with per capita GDPs approaching those of the United States, while Eastern Bloc economies stagnated.242243

The Vietnam War descended into a quagmire for the United States, leading to a decline in international prestige and economic stability, derailing arms agreements, and provoking domestic unrest. America's withdrawal from the war led it to embrace a policy of détente with both China and the Soviet Union.244

Backed by the Kampuchean United Front for National Salvation, an organization of Khmer pro-Soviet Communists and Khmer Rouge defectors, Vietnam invaded Cambodia on 22 December 1978. The invasion succeeded in deposing Pol Pot, but the new state struggled to gain international recognition beyond the Soviet Bloc sphere. Despite the international outcry at Pol Pot regime's gross human rights violations, representatives of the Khmer Rouge were allowed to be seated in the UN General Assembly, with strong support from China, Western powers, and the member countries of ASEAN. Following the destruction of the Khmer Rouge, the national reconstruction of Cambodia was hampered, and Vietnam suffered a punitive Chinese attack.245 Although unable to deter Vietnam from ousting Pol Pot, China demonstrated that its Cold War communist adversary, the Soviet Union, was unable to protect its Vietnamese ally.246 Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger wrote that "China succeeded in exposing the limits of...[Soviet] strategic reach" and speculated that the desire to "compensate for their ineffectuality" contributed to the Soviets' decision to intervene in Afghanistan a year later.247

In the 1973 oil crisis, Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) cut their petroleum output. This raised oil prices and hurt Western economies, but helped the Soviet Union by generating a huge flow of money from its oil sales.248

As a result of the oil crisis, combined with the growing influence of Third World alignments such as OPEC and the Non-Aligned Movement, less powerful countries had more room to assert their independence and often showed themselves resistant to pressure from either superpower.249 Meanwhile, Moscow was forced to turn its attention inward to deal with the Soviet Union's deep-seated domestic economic problems.250 During this period, Soviet leaders such as Leonid Brezhnev and Alexei Kosygin embraced the notion of détente.251

Vietnam War

Main articles: Vietnam War and Opposition to United States involvement in the Vietnam War

Under President John F. Kennedy, US troop levels in Vietnam grew from just under a thousand in 1959 to 16,000 in 1963.252253 South Vietnamese President Ngo Dinh Diem's heavy-handed crackdown on Buddhist monks in 1963 led the US to endorse a deadly military coup against Diem.254 The war escalated further in 1964 following the controversial Gulf of Tonkin incident, in which a US destroyer was alleged to have clashed with North Vietnamese fast attack craft. The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution gave President Lyndon B. Johnson broad authorization to increase US military presence, deploying ground combat units for the first time and increasing troop levels to 184,000.255 Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev responded by reversing Khrushchev's policy of disengagement and increasing aid to the North Vietnamese, hoping to entice the North from its pro-Chinese position. The USSR discouraged further escalation of the war, however, providing just enough military assistance to tie up American forces.256 From this point, the People's Army of Vietnam (PAVN) engaged in more conventional warfare with US and South Vietnamese forces.257

The Tet Offensive of 1968 proved to be the turning point of the war. Despite years of American tutelage and aid, the South Vietnamese forces were unable to withstand the communist offensive and the task fell to US forces instead.258 At the same time, in 1963–1965, American domestic politics saw the triumph of liberalism. According to historian Joseph Crespino:

It has become a staple of twentieth-century historiography that Cold War concerns were at the root of a number of progressive political accomplishments in the postwar period: a high progressive marginal tax rate that helped fund the arms race and contributed to broad income equality; bipartisan support for far-reaching civil rights legislation that transformed politics and society in the American South, which had long given the lie to America's egalitarian ethos; bipartisan support for overturning an explicitly racist immigration system that had been in place since the 1920s; and free health care for the elderly and the poor, a partial fulfillment of one of the unaccomplished goals of the New Deal era. The list could go on.259

Nuclear testing and Use of Outer-Space treaties

The Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty was signed on August 5, 1963, by the United States, the Soviet Union, and over 100 other nations. This treaty banned nuclear weapons tests in the atmosphere, outer space, and underwater, restricting such tests to underground environments.260261262263 The treaty followed heightened concerns over the militarization of space, amplified by the United States' Starfish Prime test in 1962, which involved the detonation of a nuclear device in the upper atmosphere.264265

To further delineate the peaceful use of outer space, the United Nations facilitated the drafting of the Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, commonly known as the Outer Space Treaty. Signed on January 27, 1967, by the United States, the Soviet Union, and the United Kingdom, it entered into force on October 10, 1967. The treaty established space as a domain to be used exclusively for peaceful purposes, prohibiting the placement of nuclear weapons or any other weapons of mass destruction in orbit or on celestial bodies.266267268

Invasion of Czechoslovakia

Main articles: Prague Spring and Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia

In 1968, a period of political liberalization took place in Czechoslovakia called the Prague Spring. An "Action Program" of reforms included increasing freedom of the press, freedom of speech and freedom of movement, along with an economic emphasis on consumer goods, the possibility of a multiparty government, limitations on the power of the secret police,269270 and potential withdrawal from the Warsaw Pact.271

In answer to the Prague Spring, on 20 August 1968, the Soviet Army, together with most of their Warsaw Pact allies, invaded Czechoslovakia.272 The invasion was followed by a wave of emigration, including an estimated 70,000 Czechs and Slovaks initially fleeing, with the total eventually reaching 300,000.273274 The invasion sparked intense protests from Yugoslavia, Romania, China, and from Western European countries.275

Sino-Soviet split and Nixon-China visit

As a result of the Sino-Soviet split, tensions along the Chinese–Soviet border reached their peak in 1969, when the Soviet planned to launch a large-scale nuclear strike against China.276 United States President Richard Nixon intervened,277 and decided to use the conflict to shift the balance of power towards the West in the Cold War through a policy of rapproachment with China, which began with his 1972 visit to China and culminated in 1979 with the signing of the Joint Communiqué on the Establishment of Diplomatic Relations by President Carter and Chinese Communist Party leader Deng Xiaoping.278279

Nixon, Brezhnev, and détente

Main articles: Presidency of Richard Nixon, Détente, Brezhnev Doctrine, Strategic Arms Limitation Talks, Helsinki Accords, Vladivostok Summit Meeting on Arms Control, and Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe

Although indirect conflict between Cold War powers continued through the late 1960s and early 1970s, tensions were beginning to ease.280 Following the ousting of Khrushchev, another period of collective leadership ensued, consisting of Leonid Brezhnev as general secretary, Alexei Kosygin as Premier and Nikolai Podgorny as Chairman of the Presidium, lasting until Brezhnev established himself in the early 1970s as the preeminent Soviet leader.

Following his visit to China, Nixon met with Soviet leaders in Moscow.281 These Strategic Arms Limitation Talks resulted in landmark arms control treaties. These aimed to limit the development of costly anti-ballistic missiles and nuclear missiles.282

Nixon and Brezhnev proclaimed a new era of "peaceful coexistence" and established the groundbreaking new policy of détente (or cooperation) between the superpowers. Meanwhile, Brezhnev attempted to revive the Soviet economy, which was declining in part because of heavy military expenditures. The Soviet Union's military budget in the 1970s was massive, 40–60% of the federal budget and 15% of GDP.283 Between 1972 and 1974, the two sides also agreed to strengthen their economic ties,284 including agreements for increased trade. As a result of their meetings, détente would replace the hostility of the Cold War and the two countries would live mutually.285 These developments coincided with Bonn's "Ostpolitik" policy formulated by the West German Chancellor Willy Brandt,286 an effort to normalize relations between West Germany and Eastern Europe. Other agreements were concluded to stabilize the situation in Europe, culminating in the Helsinki Accords signed at the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe in 1975.287

The Helsinki Accords, in which the Soviets promised to grant free elections in Europe, has been called a major concession to ensure peace by the Soviets. In practice, the Soviet government significantly curbed the rule of law, civil liberties, protection of law and guarantees of property,[237]288 which were considered examples of "bourgeois morality" by Soviet legal theorists such as Andrey Vyshinsky.289 The Soviet Union signed legally-binding human rights documents, such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in 1973 and the Helsinki Accords in 1975, but they were neither widely known or accessible to people living under Communist rule, nor were they taken seriously by the Communist authorities.290 Human rights activists in the Soviet Union were regularly subjected to harassment, repressions and arrests.

The pro-Soviet American business magnate Armand Hammer of Occidental Petroleum often mediated trade relations. Author Daniel Yergin, in his book The Prize, writes that Hammer "ended up as a go-between for five Soviet General Secretaries and seven U.S. Presidents."291 Hammer had extensive business relationship in the Soviet Union stretching back to the 1920s with Lenin's approval.292293 According to Christian Science Monitor in 1980, "although his business dealings with the Soviet Union were cut short when Stalin came to power, he had more or less single-handedly laid the groundwork for the [1980] state of Western trade with the Soviet Union."294

Kissinger and Nixon were "realists" who deemphasized idealistic goals like anti-communism or promotion of democracy worldwide because those goals were too expensive in terms of America's economic capabilities.295 They rejected "idealism" as impractical and too expensive, and neither man showed much sensitivity to the plight of people living under Communism. Kissinger's realism fell out of fashion as idealism returned to American foreign policy with Carter's moralism emphasizing human rights, and Reagan's rollback strategy aimed at destroying Communism.296

Late 1970s deterioration of relations

See also: Soviet reaction to the Polish crisis of 1980–1981, Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Antisemitism in the Soviet Union, and Refuseniks

In the 1970s, the KGB, led by Yuri Andropov, continued to persecute distinguished Soviet dissidents, such as Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Andrei Sakharov, who were criticising the Soviet leadership in harsh terms.297 Indirect conflict between the superpowers continued through this period of détente in the Third World, particularly during political crises in the Middle East, Chile, Ethiopia, and Angola.298

In 1973, Nixon announced his administration was committed to seeking most favored nation trade status with the USSR,299 which was challenged by Congress in the Jackson-Vanik Amendment.300 The United States had long linked trade with the Soviet Union to its foreign policy toward the Soviet Union and, especially since the early 1980s, to Soviet human rights policies. The Jackson-Vanik Amendment, which was attached to the 1974 Trade Act, linked the granting of most-favored-nation to the USSR to the right of persecuted Soviet Jews to emigrate. Because the Soviet Union refused the right of emigration to Jewish refuseniks, the ability of the President to apply most-favored nation trade status to the Soviet Union was restricted.301

Although President Jimmy Carter tried to place another limit on the arms race with a SALT II agreement in 1979,302 his efforts were undermined by the other events that year, including the Iranian Revolution and the Nicaraguan Revolution, which both ousted pro-US governments, and his retaliation against the Soviet coup in Afghanistan in December.303

Renewal of tensions (1979–1985)

Main article: Cold War (1979–1985)

The period in the late 1970s and early 1980s showed an intensive reawakening of Cold War tensions and conflicts. Tensions greatly increased between the major powers with both sides becoming more militant.304 Diggins says, "Reagan went all out to fight the second cold war, by supporting counterinsurgencies in the third world."305 Cox says, "The intensity of this 'second' Cold War was as great as its duration was short."306

Soviet invasion of Afghanistan and end of détente

Main articles: Soviet–Afghan War, Carter Doctrine, Foreign policy of the Ronald Reagan administration, Operation Cyclone, Saur Revolution, and Afghan Civil War (1989–1992)

In April 1978, the communist People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA) seized power in Afghanistan in the Saur Revolution. Within months, opponents of the communist regime launched an uprising in eastern Afghanistan that quickly expanded into a civil war waged by guerrilla mujahideen against government forces countrywide.307 The Islamic Unity of Afghanistan Mujahideen insurgents received military training and weapons in neighboring Pakistan and China,308309 while the Soviet Union sent thousands of military advisers to support the PDPA government.310 Meanwhile, increasing friction between the competing factions of the PDPA—the dominant Khalq and the more moderate Parcham—resulted in the dismissal of Parchami cabinet members and the arrest of Parchami military officers under the pretext of a Parchami coup. By mid-1979, the United States had started a covert program to assist the mujahideen.311312

In September 1979, Khalqist President Nur Muhammad Taraki was assassinated in a coup within the PDPA orchestrated by fellow Khalq member Hafizullah Amin, who assumed the presidency. Distrusted by the Soviets, Amin was assassinated by Soviet special forces during Operation Storm-333 in December 1979. Afghan forces suffered losses during the Soviet operation; 30 Afghan palace guards and over 300 army guards were killed while another 150 were captured.313 In the aftermath of the operation, a total of 1,700 Afghan soldiers who surrendered to Soviet forces were taken as prisoners,314 and the Soviets installed Babrak Karmal, the leader of the PDPA's Parcham faction, as Amin's successor. Veterans of the Soviet Union's Alpha Group have stated that Operation Storm-333 was one of the most successful in the unit's history. Documents released following the dissolution of the Soviet Union in the 1990s revealed that the Soviet leadership believed Amin had secret contacts within the American embassy in Kabul and "was capable of reaching an agreement with the United States";315 however, allegations of Amin colluding with the Americans have been widely discredited.316317318 The PDBA was tasked to fill the vacuum and carried out a purge of Amin supporters. Soviet troops were deployed to put Afghanistan under Soviet control with Karmal in more substantial numbers, although the Soviet government did not expect to do most of the fighting in Afghanistan. As a result, however, the Soviets were now directly involved in what had been a domestic war in Afghanistan.319

Carter responded to the Soviet invasion by withdrawing the SALT II treaty from ratification, imposing embargoes on grain and technology shipments to the USSR, and demanding a significant increase in military spending, and further announced the boycott of the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow, which was joined by 65 other nations.320321322 He described the Soviet incursion as "the most serious threat to the peace since the Second World War".323

Reagan and Thatcher

Further information: Reagan Doctrine and Thatcherism

In January 1977, four years prior to becoming president, Ronald Reagan bluntly stated, in a conversation with Richard V. Allen, his basic expectation in relation to the Cold War. "My idea of American policy toward the Soviet Union is simple, and some would say simplistic," he said. "It is this: We win and they lose."324 In 1980, Ronald Reagan won the 1980 presidential election, vowing to increase military spending and confront the Soviets everywhere.325 Both Reagan and new British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher denounced the Soviet Union and its ideology. Reagan labeled the Soviet Union an "evil empire" and predicted that Communism would be left on the "ash heap of history," while Thatcher inculpated the Soviets as "bent on world dominance."326 In 1982, Reagan tried to cut off Moscow's access to hard currency by impeding its proposed gas line to Western Europe. It hurt the Soviet economy, but it also caused ill will among American allies in Europe who counted on that revenue. Reagan retreated on this issue.327328

By early 1985, Reagan's anti-communist position had developed into a stance known as the new Reagan Doctrine—which, in addition to containment, formulated an additional right to subvert existing communist governments.329 Besides continuing Carter's policy of supporting the Islamic opponents of the Soviet Union and the Soviet-backed PDPA government in Afghanistan, the CIA also sought to weaken the Soviet Union itself by promoting Islamism in the majority-Muslim Central Asian Soviet Union.330 Additionally, the CIA encouraged anti-communist Pakistan's ISI to train Muslims from around the world to participate in the jihad against the Soviet Union.331

Polish Solidarity movement and martial law

Main articles: Solidarity (Polish trade union) and Martial law in Poland

Further information: Soviet reaction to the Polish crisis of 1980–1981

Pope John Paul II provided a moral focus for anti-communism; a visit to his native Poland in 1979 stimulated a religious and nationalist resurgence centered on the Solidarity movement trade union that galvanized opposition, and may have led to his attempted assassination two years later.332333334 In December 1981, Poland's Wojciech Jaruzelski reacted to the crisis by imposing a period of martial law. Reagan imposed economic sanctions on Poland in response.335 Mikhail Suslov, the Kremlin's top ideologist, advised Soviet leaders not to intervene if Poland fell under the control of Solidarity, for fear it might lead to heavy economic sanctions, resulting in a catastrophe for the Soviet economy.336

US and USSR military and economic issues

Further information: Era of Stagnation, Strategic Defense Initiative, RSD-10 Pioneer, and MGM-31 Pershing

The Soviet Union had built up a military that consumed as much as 25 percent of its gross national product at the expense of consumer goods and investment in civilian sectors.337 Soviet spending on the arms race and other Cold War commitments both caused and exacerbated deep-seated structural problems in the Soviet system,338 which experienced at least a decade of economic stagnation during the late Brezhnev years.

Soviet investment in the defense sector was not driven by military necessity but in large part by the interests of the nomenklatura, which was dependent on the sector for their own power and privileges.339 The Soviet Armed Forces became the largest in the world in terms of the numbers and types of weapons they possessed, in the number of troops in their ranks, and in the sheer size of their military–industrial base.340 However, the quantitative advantages held by the Soviet military often concealed areas where the Eastern Bloc dramatically lagged behind the West.341 For example, the Persian Gulf War demonstrated how the armor, fire control systems, and firing range of the Soviet Union's most common main battle tank, the T-72, were drastically inferior to the American M1 Abrams, yet the USSR fielded almost three times as many T-72s as the US deployed M1s.342

By the early 1980s, the USSR had built up a military arsenal and army surpassing that of the United States. Soon after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, President Carter began massively building up the United States military. This buildup was accelerated by the Reagan administration, which increased the military spending from 5.3 percent of GNP in 1981 to 6.5 percent in 1986,343 the largest peacetime defense buildup in United States history.344 The American-Soviet tensions present during 1983 was defined by some as the start of "Cold War II". While in retrospective this phase of the Cold War was generally defined as a "war of words",345 the Soviet's "peace offensive" was largely rejected by the West.346

Tensions continued to intensify as Reagan revived the B-1 Lancer program, which had been canceled by the Carter administration,347 produced LGM-118 Peacekeeper missiles,348 installed US cruise missiles in Europe, and announced the experimental Strategic Defense Initiative, dubbed "Star Wars" by the media, a defense program to shoot down missiles in mid-flight.349 The Soviets deployed RSD-10 Pioneer ballistic missiles targeting Western Europe, and NATO decided, under the impetus of the Carter presidency, to deploy MGM-31 Pershing and cruise missiles in Europe, primarily West Germany.350 This deployment placed missiles just 10 minutes' striking distance from Moscow.351

After Reagan's military buildup, the Soviet Union did not respond by further building its military,352 because the enormous military expenses, along with inefficient planned manufacturing and collectivized agriculture, were already a heavy burden for the Soviet economy.353 At the same time, Saudi Arabia increased oil production,354 even as other non-OPEC nations were increasing production.355 These developments contributed to the 1980s oil glut, which affected the Soviet Union as oil was the main source of Soviet export revenues.356 Issues with command economics,357 oil price decreases and large military expenditures gradually brought the Soviet economy to stagnation.358

On 1 September 1983, the Soviet Union shot down Korean Air Lines Flight 007, a Boeing 747 with 269 people aboard, including sitting Congressman Larry McDonald, an action which Reagan characterized as a massacre. The airliner was en route from Anchorage to Seoul but owing to a navigational mistake made by the crew, it flew through Russian prohibited airspace. The Soviet Air Force treated the unidentified aircraft as an intruding U.S. spy plane and destroyed it with air-to-air missiles.359 The incident increased support for military deployment, overseen by Reagan, which stood in place until the later accords between Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev.360 During the early hours of 26 September 1983, the 1983 Soviet nuclear false alarm incident occurred; systems in Serpukhov-15 underwent a glitch that claimed several intercontinental ballistic missiles were heading towards Russia, but officer Stanislav Petrov correctly suspected it was a false alarm, ensuring the Soviets did not respond to the non-existent attack.361 As such, he has been credited as "the man who saved the world".362 The Able Archer 83 exercise in November 1983, a realistic simulation of a coordinated NATO nuclear release, was perhaps the most dangerous moment since the Cuban Missile Crisis, as the Soviet leadership feared that a nuclear attack might be imminent.363

American domestic public concerns about intervening in foreign conflicts persisted from the end of the Vietnam War.364 The Reagan administration emphasized the use of quick, low-cost counterinsurgency tactics to intervene in foreign conflicts.365 In 1983, the Reagan administration intervened in the multisided Lebanese Civil War, invaded Grenada, bombed Libya and backed the Central American Contras, anti-communist paramilitaries seeking to overthrow the Soviet-aligned Sandinista government in Nicaragua.366 While Reagan's interventions against Grenada and Libya were popular in the United States, his backing of the Contra rebels was mired in controversy.367 The Reagan administration's backing of the military government of Guatemala during the Guatemalan Civil War, in particular the regime of Efraín Ríos Montt, was also controversial.368

Meanwhile, the Soviets incurred high costs for their own foreign interventions. Although Brezhnev was convinced in 1979 that the Soviet war in Afghanistan would be brief, Muslim guerrillas, aided by the US, China, Britain, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan,369 waged a fierce resistance against the invasion.370 The Kremlin sent nearly 100,000 troops to support its puppet regime in Afghanistan, leading many outside observers to dub the war "the Soviets' Vietnam".371 However, Moscow's quagmire in Afghanistan was far more disastrous for the Soviets than Vietnam had been for the Americans because the conflict coincided with a period of internal decay and domestic crisis in the Soviet system.

A senior US State Department official predicted such an outcome as early as 1980, positing that the invasion resulted in part from a:

...domestic crisis within the Soviet system. ... It may be that the thermodynamic law of entropy has ... caught up with the Soviet system, which now seems to expend more energy on simply maintaining its equilibrium than on improving itself. We could be seeing a period of foreign movement at a time of internal decay.372

Final years (1985–1991)

Main article: Cold War (1985–1991)

Gorbachev's reforms

Further information: Mikhail Gorbachev, Perestroika, and Glasnost

By the time the comparatively youthful Mikhail Gorbachev became General Secretary in 1985,373 the Soviet economy was stagnant and faced a sharp fall in foreign currency earnings as a result of the downward slide in oil prices in the 1980s.374 These issues prompted Gorbachev to investigate measures to revive the ailing state.375

An ineffectual start led to the conclusion that deeper structural changes were necessary, and in June 1987 Gorbachev announced an agenda of economic reform called perestroika, or restructuring.376 Perestroika relaxed the production quota system, allowed cooperative ownership of small businesses and paved the way for foreign investment. These measures were intended to redirect the country's resources from costly Cold War military commitments to more productive areas in the civilian sector.377

Despite initial skepticism in the West, the new Soviet leader proved to be committed to reversing the Soviet Union's deteriorating economic condition instead of continuing the arms race with the West.378 Partly as a way to fight off internal opposition from party cliques to his reforms, Gorbachev simultaneously introduced glasnost, or openness, which increased freedom of the press and the transparency of state institutions.379 Glasnost was intended to reduce the corruption at the top of the Communist Party and moderate the abuse of power in the Central Committee.380 Glasnost also enabled increased contact between Soviet citizens and the Western world, particularly with the United States, contributing to the accelerating détente between the two nations.381

Thaw in relations

Further information: Reykjavík Summit, Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, START I, and Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany

In response to the Kremlin's military and political concessions, Reagan agreed to renew talks on economic issues and the scaling-back of the arms race.382 The first summit was held in November 1985 in Geneva, Switzerland.383 A second summit was held in October 1986 in Reykjavík, Iceland. Talks went well until the focus shifted to Reagan's proposed Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), which Gorbachev wanted to be eliminated. Reagan refused.384 The negotiations failed, but the third summit (Washington Summit (1987), 8–10 December 1987) led to a breakthrough with the signing of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF). The INF treaty eliminated all nuclear-armed, ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges between 500 and 5,500 kilometers (310 and 3,420 mi) and their infrastructure.385

During 1988, it became apparent to the Soviets that oil and gas subsidies, along with the cost of maintaining massive troops levels, represented a substantial economic drain.386 In addition, the security advantage of a buffer zone was recognised as irrelevant and the Soviets officially declared that they would no longer intervene in the affairs of satellite states in Central and Eastern Europe.387 George H. W. Bush and Gorbachev met at the Moscow Summit in May 1988 and the Governors Island Summit in December 1988.

In 1989, Soviet forces withdrew from Afghanistan without achieving their objectives.388 Later that year, the Berlin Wall, the Inner German border and the Iron Curtain fell. On 3 December 1989, Gorbachev and Bush declared the Cold War over at the Malta Summit. In February 1990, Gorbachev agreed with the US-proposed Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany and signed it on 12 September 1990, paving the way for the German reunification.389 When the Berlin Wall came down, Gorbachev's "Common European Home" concept began to take shape.390391 The two former adversaries were partners in the Gulf War against Iraq (August 1990 – February 1991).392393 During the final summit in Moscow in July 1991, Gorbachev and Bush signed the START I arms control treaty.394

Eastern Europe breaks away

Main article: Revolutions of 1989

Two developments dominated the decade that followed: the increasingly apparent crumbling of the Soviet Union's economic and political structures, and the patchwork attempts at reforms to reverse that process. Kenneth S. Deffeyes argued in Beyond Oil that the Reagan administration encouraged Saudi Arabia to lower the price of oil to the point where the Soviets could not make a profit selling their oil, and resulted in the depletion of the country's hard currency reserves.395

Brezhnev's next two successors, transitional figures with deep roots in his tradition, did not last long. Yuri Andropov was 68 years old and Konstantin Chernenko 72 when they assumed power; both died in less than two years. In an attempt to avoid a third short-lived leader, in 1985, the Soviets turned to the next generation and selected Mikhail Gorbachev. He made significant changes in the economy and party leadership, called perestroika. His policy of glasnost freed public access to information after decades of heavy government censorship. Gorbachev also moved to end the Cold War. In 1988, the USSR abandoned its war in Afghanistan and began to withdraw its forces. In the following year, Gorbachev refused to interfere in the internal affairs of the Soviet satellite states, which paved the way for the Revolutions of 1989. In particular, the standstill of the Soviet Union at the Pan-European Picnic in August 1989 then set a peaceful chain reaction in motion, at the end of which the Eastern Bloc collapsed. With the tearing down of the Berlin Wall and with East and West Germany pursuing re-unification, the Iron Curtain between the West and Soviet-occupied regions came down.396397398

By 1989, the Soviet alliance system was on the brink of collapse, and, deprived of Soviet military support, the communist leaders of the Warsaw Pact states were losing power.399 Grassroots organizations, such as Poland's Solidarity movement, rapidly gained ground with strong popular bases.

The Pan-European Picnic in August 1989 in Hungary finally started a peaceful movement that the rulers in the Eastern Bloc could not stop. It was the largest movement of refugees from East Germany since the Berlin Wall was built in 1961 and ultimately brought about the fall of the Iron Curtain. The patrons of the picnic, Otto von Habsburg and the Hungarian Minister of State Imre Pozsgay, saw the planned event as an opportunity to test Mikhail Gorbachev's reaction. The Austrian branch of the Paneuropean Union, which was then headed by Otto von Habsburg, distributed thousands of brochures inviting the GDR holidaymakers in Hungary to a picnic near the border at Sopron. But with the mass exodus at the Pan-European Picnic the subsequent hesitant behavior of the ruling Socialist Unity Party of East Germany and the non-interference of the Soviet Union broke the dams. Now tens of thousands of media-informed East Germans made their way to Hungary, which was no longer willing to keep its borders completely closed or to oblige its border troops to use armed force. On the one hand, this caused disagreement among the Eastern European states and, on the other hand, it was clear to the Eastern European population that the governments no longer had absolute power.400401402403

In 1989, the communist governments in Poland and Hungary became the first to negotiate the organization of competitive elections. In Czechoslovakia and East Germany, mass protests unseated entrenched communist leaders. The communist regimes in Bulgaria and Romania also crumbled, in the latter case as the result of a violent uprising. Attitudes had changed enough that US Secretary of State James Baker suggested that the American government would not be opposed to Soviet intervention in Romania, on behalf of the opposition, to prevent bloodshed.[331]

The tidal wave of change culminated with the fall of the Berlin Wall in November 1989, which symbolized the collapse of European communist governments and graphically ended the Iron Curtain divide of Europe. The 1989 revolutionary wave swept across Central and Eastern Europe and peacefully overthrew all of the Soviet-style Marxist–Leninist states: East Germany, Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia and Bulgaria;404 Romania was the only Eastern-bloc country to topple its communist regime violently and execute its head of state.405

Soviet dissolution

Main article: Dissolution of the Soviet Union

Further information: History of the Soviet Union (1982–1991), The Barricades, 1991 Soviet coup d'état attempt, Commonwealth of Independent States, Economy of the Soviet Union, and Baltic Way

At the same time, the Soviet republics started legal moves towards potentially declaring sovereignty over their territories, citing the freedom to secede in Article 72 of the USSR constitution.406 On 7 April 1990, a law was passed allowing a republic to secede if more than two-thirds of its residents voted for it in a referendum.407 Many held their first free elections in the Soviet era for their own national legislatures in 1990. Many of these legislatures proceeded to produce legislation contradicting the Union laws in what was known as the 'War of Laws'. In 1989, the Russian SFSR convened a newly elected Congress of People's Deputies. Boris Yeltsin was elected its chairman. On 12 June 1990, the Congress declared Russia's sovereignty over its territory and proceeded to pass laws that attempted to supersede some of the Soviet laws. After a landslide victory of Sąjūdis in Lithuania, that country declared its independence restored on 11 March 1990, citing the illegality of the Soviet occupation of the Baltic states. Soviet forces attempted to halt the secession by crushing popular demonstrations in Lithuania (Bloody Sunday) and Latvia (The Barricades), as a result, numerous civilians were killed or wounded. However, these actions only bolstered international support for the secessionists.[336]

A referendum for the preservation of the USSR was held on 17 March 1991 in nine republics (the remainder having boycotted the vote), with the majority of the population in those republics voting for preservation of the Union in the form of a new federation. The referendum gave Gorbachev a minor boost. In the summer of 1991, the New Union Treaty, which would have turned the country into a much looser Union, was agreed upon by eight republics. The signing of the treaty, however, was interrupted by the August Coup—an attempted coup d'état by hardline members of the government and the KGB who sought to reverse Gorbachev's reforms and reassert the central government's control over the republics. After the coup collapsed, Russian president Yeltsin was seen as a hero for his decisive actions, while Gorbachev's power was effectively ended. The balance of power tipped significantly towards the republics. In August 1991, Latvia and Estonia immediately declared the restoration of their full independence (following Lithuania's 1990 example). Gorbachev resigned as general secretary in late August, and soon afterwards, the party's activities were indefinitely suspended—effectively ending its rule. By the fall, Gorbachev could no longer influence events outside Moscow, and he was being challenged even there by Yeltsin, who had been elected President of Russia in July 1991.

Later in August, Gorbachev resigned as general secretary of the Communist party, and Russian President Boris Yeltsin ordered the seizure of Soviet property. Gorbachev clung to power as the President of the Soviet Union until 25 December 1991, when the USSR dissolved.408 Fifteen states emerged from the Soviet Union, with by far the largest and most populous one (which also was the founder of the Soviet state with the October Revolution in Petrograd), the Russian Federation, taking full responsibility for all the rights and obligations of the USSR under the Charter of the United Nations, including the financial obligations. As such, Russia assumed the Soviet Union's UN membership and permanent membership on the Security Council, nuclear stockpile and the control over the armed forces.409

In his 1992 State of the Union Address, US President George H. W. Bush expressed his emotions: "The biggest thing that has happened in the world in my life, in our lives, is this: By the grace of God, America won the Cold War."410 Bush and Yeltsin met in February 1992, declaring a new era of "friendship and partnership".411 In January 1993, Bush and Yeltsin agreed to START II, which provided for further nuclear arms reductions on top of the original START treaty.412

Aftermath

Main articles: Effects of the Cold War, International relations since 1989, Post-Soviet states, Post-Soviet conflicts, Yugoslav Wars, Second Cold War, and East–West dichotomy

In summing up the international ramifications of these events, Vladislav Zubok stated: 'The collapse of the Soviet empire was an event of epochal geopolitical, military, ideological, and economic significance.'413 After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia drastically cut military spending, and restructuring the economy left millions unemployed.414 According to Western analysis, the neoliberal reforms in Russia culminated in a recession in the early 1990s more severe than the Great Depression as experienced by the United States and Germany.415 Western analysts suggest that in the 25 years following the end of the Cold War, only five or six of the post-communist states are on a path to joining the rich and capitalist world while most are falling behind, some to such an extent that it will take several decades to catch up to where they were before the collapse of communism.416417

Decommunization

Stephen Holmes of the University of Chicago argued in 1996 that decommunization, after a brief active period, quickly ended in near-universal failure. After the introduction of lustration, demand for scapegoats has become relatively low, and former communists have been elected for high governmental and other administrative positions. Holmes notes that the only real exception was former East Germany, where thousands of former Stasi informers have been fired from public positions.[346]

Holmes suggests the following reasons for the failure of decommunization:[346]

  • After 45–70 years of communist rule, nearly every family has members associated with the state. After the initial desire "to root out the reds" came a realization that massive punishment is wrong and finding only some guilty is hardly justice.
  • The urgency of the current economic problems of postcommunism makes the crimes of the communist past "old news" for many citizens.
  • Decommunization is believed to be a power game of elites.
  • The difficulty of dislodging the social elite makes it require a totalitarian state to disenfranchise the "enemies of the people" quickly and efficiently and a desire for normalcy overcomes the desire for punitive justice.
  • Very few people have a perfectly clean slate and so are available to fill the positions that require significant expertise.

Compared with the decommunization efforts of the other former constituents of the Eastern Bloc and the Soviet Union, decommunization in Russia has been restricted to half-measures, if conducted at all.418 Notable anti-communist measures in the Russian Federation include the banning of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (and the creation of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation) as well as changing the names of some Russian cities back to what they were before the 1917 October Revolution (Leningrad to Saint Petersburg, Sverdlovsk to Yekaterinburg and Gorky to Nizhny Novgorod),419 though others were maintained, with Ulyanovsk (former Simbirsk), Tolyatti (former Stavropol) and Kirov (former Vyatka) being examples. Even though Leningrad and Sverdlovsk were renamed, regions that were named after them are still officially called Leningrad and Sverdlovsk oblasts.420

Nostalgia for the Soviet Union is gradually on the rise in Russia.421 Communist symbols continue to form an important part of the rhetoric used in state-controlled media, as banning on them in other countries is seen by the Russian foreign ministry as "sacrilege" and "a perverse idea of good and evil".422 The process of decommunization in Ukraine, a neighbouring post-Soviet state, was met with fierce criticism by Russia.423 The State Anthem of the Russian Federation, adopted in 2000 (the same year Vladimir Putin began his first term as president of Russia), uses the exact same music as the State Anthem of the Soviet Union, but with new lyrics written by Sergey Mikhalkov.424425

Conversely, decommunization in Ukraine started during and after the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991426 With the success of the Revolution of Dignity in 2014, the Ukrainian government approved laws that outlawed communist symbols.427 In July 2015, President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko signed a set of laws that started a six-month period for the removal of communist monuments (excluding World War II monuments) and renaming of public places named after communist-related themes.428429430 At the time, this meant that 22 cities and 44 villages were set to get new names.431 In 2016, 51,493 streets and 987 cities and villages were renamed, and 1,320 Lenin monuments and 1,069 monuments to other communist figures removed.432 Violation of the law carries a penalty of a potential media ban and prison sentences of up to five years.433434 The Ministry of the Interior stripped the Communist Party of Ukraine, the Communist Party of Ukraine (renewed), and the Communist Party of Workers and Peasants of their right to participate in elections and stated it was continuing the court actions that started in July 2014 to end the registration of communist parties in Ukraine.435 By 16 December 2015, these three parties had been banned in Ukraine; the Communist Party of Ukraine appealed the ban to the European Court of Human Rights.436437438

Collapse of Yugoslavia and Balkan conflicts

The Cold War had provided external stabilizing pressures. Both the United States and the Soviet Union had a vested interest in Yugoslavia's stability, ensuring it remained a buffer state in the East-West divide. This resulted in financial and political support for its regime. When the Cold War ended, this external support evaporated, leaving Yugoslavia more vulnerable to internal divisions.439440

As Yugoslavia fragmented, the wars began after Slovenia and Croatia declared independence in 1991. Serbia, under Slobodan Milošević, opposed these moves.441 The Bosnian War (1992–1995) was the most brutal of the Yugoslav Wars, characterized by ethnic cleansing and genocide. International organizations, including the United Nations, struggled to manage the violence. NATO eventually intervened with airstrikes in Bosnia (1995) as part of Operation Deliberate Force and later in Kosovo (1999) as part of Operation allied force. These interventions marked the transition of NATO as a deterrent to the Soviet Union, to also functioning at the time as an active peacekeeping and conflict-resolution force.442

Influence

The post-Cold War world is considered to be unipolar, with the United States the sole remaining superpower.443444 The Cold War defined the political role of the United States after World War II—by 1989 the United States had military alliances with 50 countries, with 526,000 troops stationed abroad,445 with 326,000 in Europe (two-thirds of which were in West Germany)446 and 130,000 in Asia (mainly Japan and South Korea).447 The Cold War also marked the zenith of peacetime military–industrial complexes and large-scale military funding of science.448

Cumulative US military expenditures throughout the entire Cold War amounted to an estimated $8 trillion. Nearly 100,000 Americans died in the Korean and Vietnam Wars.449 Although Soviet casualties are difficult to estimate, as a share of gross national product the financial cost for the Soviet Union was much higher than that incurred by the United States.450

Millions died in the superpowers' proxy wars around the globe, most notably in eastern Asia.451452 Most of the proxy wars and subsidies for local conflicts ended along with the Cold War; interstate wars, ethnic wars, revolutionary wars, as well as refugee and displaced persons crises have declined sharply in the post-Cold War years.453

However, the aftermath of the Cold War is not considered to be concluded. Many of the economic and social tensions that were exploited to fuel Cold War competition in parts of the Third World remain acute. The breakdown of state control in a number of areas formerly ruled by communist governments produced new civil and ethnic conflicts, particularly in the former Yugoslavia. In Central and Eastern Europe, the end of the Cold War has ushered in an era of economic growth and an increase in the number of liberal democracies, while in other parts of the world, such as Afghanistan, independence was accompanied by state failure.454 It has been posited by several scholars that the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the end of communism as a global force in the post-Cold War era allowed neoliberal capitalism to become the dominant global system, which has resulted in rising economic inequality.455456457458

See also: Culture during the Cold War

The Cold War endures as a popular topic reflected in entertainment media, and continuing to the present with post-1991 Cold War-themed feature films, novels, television and web series, and other media.

Historiography

Main article: Historiography of the Cold War

Interpreting the course and origins of the conflict has been a source of heated controversy among historians, political scientists, and journalists.459 In particular, historians have sharply disagreed as to who was responsible for the breakdown of Soviet–US relations after the Second World War; and whether the conflict between the two superpowers was inevitable or could have been avoided.460 Historians have also disagreed on what exactly the Cold War was, what the sources of the conflict were, and how to disentangle patterns of action and reaction between the two sides.461

Although explanations of the origins of the conflict in academic discussions are complex and diverse, several general schools of thought on the subject can be identified. Historians commonly speak of three different approaches to the study of the Cold War: "orthodox" accounts, "revisionism", and "post-revisionism".462

"Orthodox" accounts place responsibility for the Cold War on the Soviet Union and its expansion further into Europe.463 "Revisionist" writers place more responsibility for the breakdown of post-war peace on the United States, citing a range of US efforts to isolate and confront the Soviet Union well before the end of World War II.464 "Post-revisionists" see the events of the Cold War as more nuanced and attempt to be more balanced in determining what occurred during the Cold War.465 Much of the historiography on the Cold War weaves together two or even all three of these broad categories.466

See also

Notes and quotes

Sources

Books

Reports

Journal articles

Magazine articles

News articles

Web

Further reading

Further information: Bibliography of the Cold War, Cold War in Asia § Further reading, and Bibliography of Stalinism and the Soviet Union

Archives

Bibliography

Educational resource

News

  • "Cold War". BBC. Archived from the original on 18 December 2012. Retrieved 22 December 2005. Video and audio news reports from during the cold war.

Films

References

  1. Service 2015, p. [page needed]: "Historians do not fully agree on its starting and ending points, but the period is generally considered to span from the announcement of the Truman Doctrine on 12 March 1947 to the dissolution of the Soviet Union on 26 December 1991." - Service, Robert (2015). The End of the Cold War: 1985–1991. Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-4472-8728-5.

  2. Orwell 1945. - Orwell, George (19 October 1945). "You and the Atomic Bomb". Tribune.

  3. Orwell 1946. - Orwell, George (10 March 1946). "Russia began to make a 'cold war' on Britain and the British Empire". The Observer.

  4. Gaddis 2005, p. 54. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  5. Safire 2006. - Safire, William (1 October 2006). "Language: Islamofascism, anyone? – Editorials & Commentary – International Herald Tribune". Opinion. The New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 January 2012. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/01/opinion/01iht-edsafire.2988871.html

  6. Glass 2016. - Glass, Andrew (16 April 2016). "Bernard Baruch coins term 'Cold War,' April 16, 1947". Politico. Retrieved 13 November 2022. https://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/bernard-baruch-coins-term-cold-war-april-16-1947-221853

  7. Talbott 2009, p. 441 n. 3. - Talbott, Strobe (2009). The Great Experiment: The Story of Ancient Empires, Modern States, and the Quest for a Global Nation.

  8. Lippmann's own book is Lippmann, Walter (1947). The Cold War. Harper. ISBN 9780598864048. {{cite book}}: ISBN / Date incompatibility (help) 9780598864048

  9. Crump 2015, pp. 1, 17. - Crump, Laurien (2015). The Warsaw Pact Reconsidered: International Relations in Eastern Europe, 1955–1969. Routledge.

  10. Crump 2015, p. 1. - Crump, Laurien (2015). The Warsaw Pact Reconsidered: International Relations in Eastern Europe, 1955–1969. Routledge.

  11. Reinalda 2009, p. 369. - Reinalda, Bob (11 September 2009). Routledge History of International Organizations: From 1815 to the Present Day. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-02405-6. Archived from the original on 1 January 2016. Retrieved 1 January 2016. https://books.google.com/books?id=Ln19AgAAQBAJ&pg=PA369

  12. "INFCIRC/397 – Note to the Director General from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation". 23 November 2003. Archived from the original on 23 November 2003. https://web.archive.org/web/20031123143520/http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf397.shtml

  13. "This Day in History: George Kennan Sends "Long Telegram"". Truman Library Institute. 22 February 2021. Retrieved 27 October 2021. https://www.trumanlibraryinstitute.org/this-day-in-history-2/

  14. Hasanli 2014, pp. 221–222. - Hasanli, Jamil (2014). Khrushchev's Thaw and National Identity in Soviet Azerbaijan, 1954–1959. Lexington Books.

  15. Sebestyen 2014. - Sebestyen, Victor (2014). 1946: The Making of the Modern World. Pan Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-75800-1.

  16. Sebestyen 2014. - Sebestyen, Victor (2014). 1946: The Making of the Modern World. Pan Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-75800-1.

  17. Kinzer 2003, pp. 65–66. - Kinzer, Stephen (2003). All the Shah's men : an American coup and the roots of Middle East terror. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-67878-6. https://archive.org/details/allshahsmenameri00kinz

  18. Schmitz 1999. - Schmitz, David F. (1999). "Cold War (1945–91): Causes [entire chapter]". In Whiteclay Chambers, John (ed.). The Oxford Companion to American Military History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-507198-6. Retrieved 16 June 2008. https://books.google.com/books?id=xtMKHgAACAAJ

  19. Harriman 1987–1988. - Harriman, Pamela C. (Winter 1987–1988). "Churchill and ... Politics: The True Meaning of the Iron Curtain Speech". Winston Churchill Centre. Archived from the original on 15 October 2007. Retrieved 22 June 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20071015163941/http://winstonchurchill.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=711

  20. McCauley 2008, p. 143. - McCauley, Martin (2008). Origins of the Cold War, 1941–1949. Harlow, England; New York: Pearson Longman. ISBN 978-1-4058-7433-5.

  21. "Interview to "Pravda" Correspondent Concerning Mr. Winston Churchill's Speech". Marxists Internet Archive. March 1946. Archived from the original on 31 January 2020. Retrieved 4 April 2017. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1946/03/x01.htm

  22. Hasanli 2014, pp. 221–222. - Hasanli, Jamil (2014). Khrushchev's Thaw and National Identity in Soviet Azerbaijan, 1954–1959. Lexington Books.

  23. Roberts 2011. - Roberts, Geoffrey (2011). "Moscow's Cold War on the Periphery: Soviet Policy in Greece, Iran, and Turkey, 1943–8". Journal of Contemporary History. 46 (1): 58–81. doi:10.1177/0022009410383292. hdl:20.500.12323/1406. ISSN 0022-0094. JSTOR 25764609. S2CID 161542583. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0022009410383292

  24. Kydd 2018, p. 107. - Kydd, Andrew H. (2018). Trust and Mistrust in International Relations. Princeton University Press. pp. 107–. ISBN 978-0-691-18851-5. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 24 October 2019. https://books.google.com/books?id=8_1ZDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA107

  25. Gaddis 2005, p. 30. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  26. "Secretary of State James Byrnes. Restatement of Policy on Germany. September 6, 1946". usa.usembassy.de. Retrieved 5 November 2022. https://usa.usembassy.de/etexts/ga4-460906.htm

  27. Milestones: 1945–1952. - "Milestones: 1945–1952 – Office of the Historian". history.state.gov. Archived from the original on 18 January 2020. Retrieved 25 October 2017. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/truman-doctrine

  28. Iatrides 1996, pp. 373–376. - Iatrides, John O. (1 October 1996). "The British Labour Government and the Greek Civil War: The Imperialism of 'Non-Intervention' (review)". Journal of Modern Greek Studies. 14 (2): 373–376. doi:10.1353/mgs.1996.0020. ISSN 1086-3265. S2CID 142792238. https://doi.org/10.1353%2Fmgs.1996.0020

  29. Gaddis 2005, pp. 28–29. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  30. Gaddis 2005, pp. 28–29. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  31. Gerolymatos 2017, pp. 195–204. - Gerolymatos, André (2017). An International Civil War: Greece, 1943–1949. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-18060-2. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=jJoqDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA376

  32. LaFeber 1993, pp. 194–197. - LaFeber, Walter (1993). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–1992. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-035853-9.

  33. Gaddis 2005, p. 38. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  34. Paterson 1989, pp. 35, 142, 212. - Paterson, Thomas G. (1989). Meeting the Communist Threat: Truman to Reagan. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-504532-1. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 25 October 2019. https://books.google.com/books?id=qGjmCwAAQBAJ

  35. Moschonas 2002, p. 21. - Moschonas, Gerassimos (2002). In the Name of Social Democracy: The Great Transformation, 1945 to the Present. Translated by Elliot, Gregory. Verso. pp. 4–. ISBN 978-1-85984-639-1. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 24 October 2019. https://books.google.com/books?id=_00SKFEabywC&pg=PR4

  36. Andrew & Mitrokhin 2000, p. 276. - Andrew, Christopher; Mitrokhin, Vasili (2000). The Sword and the Shield: The Mitrokhin Archive and the Secret History of the KGB. Basic Books. ISBN 9780465003129.

  37. Crocker, Hampson & Aall 2007, p. 55. - Crocker, Chester A.; Hampson, Fen Osler; Aall, Pamela R. (2007). Leashing the Dogs of War: Conflict Management in a Divided World. US Institute of Peace Press. ISBN 978-1-929223-97-8.

  38. Miller 2000, p. 16. - Miller, Roger Gene (2000). To Save a City: The Berlin Airlift, 1948–1949. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-0-89096-967-0.

  39. Miller 2000, p. 16. - Miller, Roger Gene (2000). To Save a City: The Berlin Airlift, 1948–1949. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-0-89096-967-0.

  40. Gaddis 1990, p. 186. - Gaddis, John Lewis (1990). Russia, the Soviet Union and the United States. An Interpretative History. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-557258-9. https://archive.org/details/russiasovietunio00gadd

  41. Dinan 2017, p. 40. - Dinan, Desmond (2017). Europe Recast: A History of European Union. Macmillan Education UK. pp. 40–. ISBN 978-1-137-43645-0. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 25 October 2019. https://books.google.com/books?id=9JlMDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA40

  42. Karabell 1999, p. 916. - Karabell, Zachary (1999). Architects of Intervention: The United States the Third World and the Cold War 1946–1962. LSU Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-2341-6.

  43. Gaddis 2005, p. 32. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  44. Gaddis 2005, p. 32. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  45. LaFeber 1993, pp. 194–197. - LaFeber, Walter (1993). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–1992. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-035853-9.

  46. Gaddis 2005, pp. 105–106. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  47. Wettig 2008, p. 86. - Wettig, Gerhard (2008). Stalin and the Cold War in Europe. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-5542-6.

  48. Miller 2000, p. 19. - Miller, Roger Gene (2000). To Save a City: The Berlin Airlift, 1948–1949. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-0-89096-967-0.

  49. Grenville 2005, pp. 370–371. - Grenville, John Ashley Soames (2005), A History of the World from the 20th to the 21st Century, Routledge, ISBN 0-415-28954-8

  50. Wettig 2008, pp. 96–100. - Wettig, Gerhard (2008). Stalin and the Cold War in Europe. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-5542-6.

  51. Karabell 1999, p. 916. - Karabell, Zachary (1999). Architects of Intervention: The United States the Third World and the Cold War 1946–1962. LSU Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-2341-6.

  52. Gaddis 2005, p. 162. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  53. Hamilton, Shane (2018). Supermarket USA: Food and Power in the Cold War Farms Race. New Haven: Yale University Press. p. 57. ISBN 9780300232691. 9780300232691

  54. Garthoff 2004. - Garthoff, Raymond L. (2004). "Foreign intelligence and the historiography of the Cold War". Journal of Cold War Studies. 6 (2): 21–56. doi:10.1162/152039704773254759. S2CID 57563600. https://doi.org/10.1162%2F152039704773254759

  55. "8 Spies Who Leaked Atomic Bomb Intelligence to the Soviets". HISTORY. 21 July 2023. https://www.history.com/news/atomic-bomb-soviet-spies

  56. Garthoff 2004. - Garthoff, Raymond L. (2004). "Foreign intelligence and the historiography of the Cold War". Journal of Cold War Studies. 6 (2): 21–56. doi:10.1162/152039704773254759. S2CID 57563600. https://doi.org/10.1162%2F152039704773254759

  57. Hopkins 2007. - Hopkins, Michael F. (2007). "Continuing debate and new approaches in Cold War history". Historical Journal. 50 (4): 913–934. doi:10.1017/S0018246X07006437. https://doi.org/10.1017%2FS0018246X07006437

  58. Taylor 2016. - Taylor, Adam (26 November 2016). "Before 'fake news,' there was Soviet 'disinformation'". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 13 November 2021. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/11/26/before-fake-news-there-was-soviet-disinformation/

  59. Jowett & O'Donnell 2005, pp. 21–23: "In fact, the word disinformation is a cognate for the Russian dezinformatsia, taken from the name of a division of the KGB devoted to black propaganda." - Jowett, Garth; O'Donnell, Victoria (2005). "What Is Propaganda, and How Does It Differ From Persuasion?". Propaganda and Persuasion. Sage Publications. ISBN 978-1-4129-0898-6.

  60. Garthoff 2004, pp. 29–30. - Garthoff, Raymond L. (2004). "Foreign intelligence and the historiography of the Cold War". Journal of Cold War Studies. 6 (2): 21–56. doi:10.1162/152039704773254759. S2CID 57563600. https://doi.org/10.1162%2F152039704773254759

  61. Benson & Warner 1996, pp. vii, xix. - Benson, Robert Louis; Warner, Michael (1996). Venona Soviet Espionage and the American Response 1939–1957. National Security Agency. Retrieved 17 September 2021. https://books.google.com/books?id=c8NIAQAAIAAJ

  62. Moynihan 1998, pp. 15–16. - Moynihan, Daniel Patrick (1998). Secrecy: The American Experience. Yale University Press. pp. 15–16, 70. ISBN 978-0-300-08079-7. https://archive.org/details/secrecyamericane00moyn

  63. Moynihan 1998, pp. 15–16. - Moynihan, Daniel Patrick (1998). Secrecy: The American Experience. Yale University Press. pp. 15–16, 70. ISBN 978-0-300-08079-7. https://archive.org/details/secrecyamericane00moyn

  64. Moynihan 1998, pp. 15–16. - Moynihan, Daniel Patrick (1998). Secrecy: The American Experience. Yale University Press. pp. 15–16, 70. ISBN 978-0-300-08079-7. https://archive.org/details/secrecyamericane00moyn

  65. West 2002. - West, Nigel (1 March 2002). "'Venona': the British dimension". Intelligence and National Security. 17 (1): 117–134. doi:10.1080/02684520412331306440. ISSN 0268-4527. S2CID 145696471. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F02684520412331306440

  66. Benson & Warner 1996, pp. xxvii, xxviii. - Benson, Robert Louis; Warner, Michael (1996). Venona Soviet Espionage and the American Response 1939–1957. National Security Agency. Retrieved 17 September 2021. https://books.google.com/books?id=c8NIAQAAIAAJ

  67. West 2002. - West, Nigel (1 March 2002). "'Venona': the British dimension". Intelligence and National Security. 17 (1): 117–134. doi:10.1080/02684520412331306440. ISSN 0268-4527. S2CID 145696471. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F02684520412331306440

  68. Moynihan 1998, p. 70. - Moynihan, Daniel Patrick (1998). Secrecy: The American Experience. Yale University Press. pp. 15–16, 70. ISBN 978-0-300-08079-7. https://archive.org/details/secrecyamericane00moyn

  69. "Did Truman Know about Venona?". fas.org. Retrieved 12 June 2021. https://fas.org/irp/eprint/truman-venona.html

  70. Benson & Warner 1996, pp. vii, xix. - Benson, Robert Louis; Warner, Michael (1996). Venona Soviet Espionage and the American Response 1939–1957. National Security Agency. Retrieved 17 September 2021. https://books.google.com/books?id=c8NIAQAAIAAJ

  71. Cowley 1996, p. 157. - Cowley, Robert (1996). The Reader's Companion to Military History. Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 978-0-395-66969-3. https://books.google.com/books?id=sefbAAAAMAAJ

  72. Epstein, Edward Jay. "Secrets of the Teheren Archive". www.edwardjayepstein.com. Archived from the original on 17 February 2001. Retrieved 13 November 2021. https://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/teheren.htm

  73. Epstein, Edward Jay. "Secrets of the Teheren Archive (page 2)". edwardjayepstein.com. Archived from the original on 23 February 2001. Retrieved 13 November 2021. https://www.edwardjayepstein.com/archived/teheren2.htm

  74. "KGB Active Measures – Russia / Soviet Intelligence Agencies". irp.fas.org. Retrieved 13 November 2021. https://irp.fas.org/world/russia/kgb/su0523.htm

  75. "Inside the KGB: An interview with retired KGB Maj. Gen. Oleg Kalugin". CNN. Archived from the original on 27 June 2007. https://web.archive.org/web/20070627183623/http://www3.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/episodes/21/interviews/kalugin/

  76. Kovacevic, Filip (22 April 2021). "The Soviet-Chinese Spy Wars in the 1970s: What KGB Counterintelligence Knew, Part II". Wilson Center (blog). Retrieved 13 November 2021. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/blog-post/soviet-chinese-spy-wars-1970s-what-kgb-counterintelligence-knew-part-ii

  77. Gaddis 2005, p. 32. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  78. Papathanasiou 2017, p. 66. - Papathanasiou, Ioanna (5 July 2017). "The Cominform and the Greek Civil War, 1947–49". In Carabott, Philip; Sfikas, Thanasis D. (eds.). The Greek Civil War: Essays on a Conflict of Exceptionalism and Silences. Taylor & Francis. pp. 57–72. ISBN 978-1-351-88865-3. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 25 October 2019. https://books.google.com/books?id=wTorDwAAQBAJ&pg=PR4

  79. Jennings 2017, p. 244. - Jennings, Christian (2017). Flashpoint Trieste: The First Battle of the Cold War. Lebanon, NH: ForeEdge. ISBN 9781512601725.

  80. Ruzicic-Kessler 2014. - Ruzicic-Kessler, Karlo (2014). "Togliatti, Tito and the Shadow of Moscow 1944/45–1948: Post-War Territorial Disputes and the Communist World". Journal of European Integration History. 2: [, pages needed], .

  81. Miller 2000, p. 13. - Miller, Roger Gene (2000). To Save a City: The Berlin Airlift, 1948–1949. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-0-89096-967-0.

  82. Miller 2000, p. 18. - Miller, Roger Gene (2000). To Save a City: The Berlin Airlift, 1948–1949. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-0-89096-967-0.

  83. Miller 2000, p. 31. - Miller, Roger Gene (2000). To Save a City: The Berlin Airlift, 1948–1949. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-0-89096-967-0.

  84. Layne 2007, p. 67. - Layne, Christopher (2007). The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-7411-8. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=3Gzrfmkw80MC&q=roll+back,+nsc+68&pg=PA63

  85. Gaddis 2005, p. 33. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  86. Miller 2000, pp. 65–70. - Miller, Roger Gene (2000). To Save a City: The Berlin Airlift, 1948–1949. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-0-89096-967-0.

  87. Miller 2000, p. 13. - Miller, Roger Gene (2000). To Save a City: The Berlin Airlift, 1948–1949. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-0-89096-967-0.

  88. Turner 1987, p. 29. - Turner, Henry Ashby (1987). The Two Germanies Since 1945: East and West. Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-03865-8. https://archive.org/details/twogermaniessinc00turn

  89. Fritsch-Bournazel 1990, p. 143. - Fritsch-Bournazel, Renata (1990). Confronting the German question: Germans on the East-West divide. Berg. ISBN 978-0-85496-100-9. https://archive.org/details/confrontinggerma0000frit

  90. Miller 2000, p. 26. - Miller, Roger Gene (2000). To Save a City: The Berlin Airlift, 1948–1949. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-0-89096-967-0.

  91. Daum 2008, pp. 11–13, 41. - Daum, Andreas (2008). Kennedy in Berlin. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-85824-3.

  92. Gaddis 2005, p. 34. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  93. Miller 2000, pp. 180–181. - Miller, Roger Gene (2000). To Save a City: The Berlin Airlift, 1948–1949. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-0-89096-967-0.

  94. van Dijk 1996. - van Dijk, Ruud (May 1996). The 1952 Stalin Note Debate: Myth Or Missed Opportunity for German Unification? (Report). Cold War International History Project: Working Paper No. 14. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/the-1952-stalin-note-debate-myth-or-missed-opportunity-for-german-unification

  95. Gaddis 2005, p. 34. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  96. LaFeber 1993, pp. 194–197. - LaFeber, Walter (1993). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–1992. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-035853-9.

  97. Miller 2000, p. 18. - Miller, Roger Gene (2000). To Save a City: The Berlin Airlift, 1948–1949. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 978-0-89096-967-0.

  98. Turner 1987, p. 23. - Turner, Henry Ashby (1987). The Two Germanies Since 1945: East and West. Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-03865-8. https://archive.org/details/twogermaniessinc00turn

  99. Bungert 1994. - Bungert, Heike (July 1994). "A New Perspective on French-American Relations during the Occupation of Germany, 1945? 1948: Behind-the-Scenes Diplomatic Bargaining and the Zonal Merger". Diplomatic History. 18 (3): 333–352. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7709.1994.tb00217.x. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-7709.1994.tb00217.x

  100. Byrd 2003. - Byrd, Peter (2003). "Cold War (entire chapter)". In McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair (eds.). The concise Oxford dictionary of politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280276-7. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 16 June 2008. https://books.google.com/books?id=xLbEHQAACAAJ

  101. O'Neil 1997, pp. 15–25. - O'Neil, Patrick (1997). Post-communism and the Media in Eastern Europe. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-7146-4765-4.

  102. Wood 1992, p. 105. - Wood, James (1992). History of International Broadcasting. IET. ISBN 978-0-86341-302-5. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 19 June 2019. https://books.google.com/books?id=WUO4U8L5N_cC&pg=PA105

  103. Puddington 2003, p. 131. - Puddington, Arch (2003). Broadcasting Freedom: The Cold War Triumph of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-9045-7. https://archive.org/details/broadcastingfree0000pudd

  104. Puddington 2003, p. 9. - Puddington, Arch (2003). Broadcasting Freedom: The Cold War Triumph of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-9045-7. https://archive.org/details/broadcastingfree0000pudd

  105. Puddington 2003, p. 9. - Puddington, Arch (2003). Broadcasting Freedom: The Cold War Triumph of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-9045-7. https://archive.org/details/broadcastingfree0000pudd

  106. Puddington 2003, p. 7. - Puddington, Arch (2003). Broadcasting Freedom: The Cold War Triumph of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-9045-7. https://archive.org/details/broadcastingfree0000pudd

  107. "Exhibit No. 1 – Voice of America and Liberty: Strange Policies". Hearings on Federal Government's Handling of Soviet and Communist Bloc Defectors before the United States Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Governmental Affairs, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, first session, October 8, 9, 21, 1987 (Report). Washington, D.C. 1988. p. 406. https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=pst.000013679477;view=1up;seq=414

  108. Bamford 2003. - Bamford, James (4 July 2003). "Books of The Times; The Labyrinthine Morass of Spying in the Cold War". New York Times. Archived from the original on 9 November 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/04/books/books-of-the-times-the-labyrinthine-morass-of-spying-in-the-cold-war.html

  109. Puddington 2003, p. 7. - Puddington, Arch (2003). Broadcasting Freedom: The Cold War Triumph of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-9045-7. https://archive.org/details/broadcastingfree0000pudd

  110. Puddington 2003, p. 10. - Puddington, Arch (2003). Broadcasting Freedom: The Cold War Triumph of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty. University Press of Kentucky. ISBN 978-0-8131-9045-7. https://archive.org/details/broadcastingfree0000pudd

  111. Cummings 2010. - Cummings, Richard H. (2010). Radio Free Europe's "Crusade for freedom": Rallying Americans behind Cold War Broadcasting, 1950–1960. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Co. ISBN 978-0-7864-4410-6.

  112. Beisner 2006, pp. 356–374. - Beisner, Robert L. (2006). Dean Acheson : a life in the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195045789. https://archive.org/details/deanachesonlifei00beis

  113. Snyder 2002. - Snyder, David R. (April 2002). "Arming the "Bundesmarine": The United States and the Build-Up of the German Federal Navy, 1950–1960". The Journal of Military History. 66 (2): 477–500. doi:10.2307/3093068. JSTOR 3093068. https://doi.org/10.2307%2F3093068

  114. Byrd 2003. - Byrd, Peter (2003). "Cold War (entire chapter)". In McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair (eds.). The concise Oxford dictionary of politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280276-7. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 16 June 2008. https://books.google.com/books?id=xLbEHQAACAAJ

  115. Gaddis 2005, p. 105. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  116. Hershberg 1992. - Hershberg, James G. (1992). "Explosion in the Offing: German Rearmament and American Diplomacy, 1953–1955". Diplomatic History. 16 (4): 511–550. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7709.1992.tb00630.x. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-7709.1992.tb00630.x

  117. Gaddis 2005, p. 39. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  118. Westad 2012, p. 291. - Westad, Odd Arne (2012). Restless Empire: China and the World Since 1750. Basic Books. ISBN 978-0-465-02936-5. https://archive.org/details/restlessempirech0000west

  119. LaFeber 1993, pp. 194–197. - LaFeber, Walter (1993). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–1992. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-035853-9.

  120. LaFeber 1993, pp. 194–197. - LaFeber, Walter (1993). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–1992. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-035853-9.

  121. Layne 2007, pp. 63–66. - Layne, Christopher (2007). The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-7411-8. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=3Gzrfmkw80MC&q=roll+back,+nsc+68&pg=PA63

  122. Gaddis 2005, p. 212. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  123. Layne 2007, pp. 63–66. - Layne, Christopher (2007). The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-7411-8. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=3Gzrfmkw80MC&q=roll+back,+nsc+68&pg=PA63

  124. Byrd 2003. - Byrd, Peter (2003). "Cold War (entire chapter)". In McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair (eds.). The concise Oxford dictionary of politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280276-7. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 16 June 2008. https://books.google.com/books?id=xLbEHQAACAAJ

  125. Matray 2002: "South Korea's President Rhee was obsessed with accomplishing early reunification through military means. The Truman administration's fear that Rhee would launch an invasion prompted it to limit South Korea's military capabilities, refusing to provide tanks, heavy artillery, and combat planes. This did not stop the South Koreans from initiating most of the border clashes with North Korean forces at the thirty-eighth parallel beginning in the summer of 1948 and reaching a high level of intensity and violence a year later. Historians now acknowledge that the two Koreas already were waging a civil conflict when North Korea's attack opened the conventional phase of the war." - Matray, James I. (Summer 2002). "Revisiting Korea: Exposing Myths of the Forgotten War". Prologue Magazine. Vol. 34, no. 2. National Archives. Retrieved 21 June 2019. https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2002/summer/korean-myths-1.html

  126. Haruki 2018, pp. 7–12. - Haruki, Wada (2018). The Korean War: An International History. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-5381-1642-5. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=fHBMDwAAQBAJ

  127. Stueck 2013, pp. 252–256. - Stueck, William (25 April 2013). Rethinking the Korean War: A New Diplomatic and Strategic History. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-4761-7. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=zDvMXm7fHpUC&q=stalin,+korea,+armistice

  128. Matray 2002: "Contradicting traditional assumptions, however, available declassified Soviet documents demonstrate that throughout 1949 Stalin consistently refused to approve Kim Il Sung's persistent requests to approve an invasion of South Korea. The Soviet leader believed that North Korea had not achieved either military superiority north of the parallel or political strength south of that line. His main concern was the threat South Korea posed to North Korea's survival, for example fearing an invasion northward following U.S. military withdrawal in June 1949." - Matray, James I. (Summer 2002). "Revisiting Korea: Exposing Myths of the Forgotten War". Prologue Magazine. Vol. 34, no. 2. National Archives. Retrieved 21 June 2019. https://www.archives.gov/publications/prologue/2002/summer/korean-myths-1.html

  129. Weathersby 1993, pp. 28, 30. - Weathersby, Kathryn (November 1993). Soviet Aims in Korea and the Origins of the Korean War, 1945–50: New Evidence From the Russian Archives (Report). Cold War International History Project: Working Paper No. 8. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Archived from the original on 25 May 2017. Retrieved 4 June 2017. http://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/soviet-aims-korea-and-the-origins-the-korean-war-1945-50-new-evidence-the-russian

  130. LaFeber 1993, pp. 194–197. - LaFeber, Walter (1993). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–1992. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-035853-9.

  131. Malkasian 2001, p. 16. - Malkasian, Carter (2001). The Korean War: Essential Histories. Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84176-282-1.

  132. Fehrenbach 2001, p. 305. - Fehrenbach, T. R. (2001). This Kind of War: The Classic Korean War History (15th Anniversary ed.). Washington, D.C.: Potomac Books. ISBN 978-1-57488-334-3.

  133. Craig & Logevall 2012, p. 118. - Craig, Campbell; Logevall, Fredrik (2012). America's Cold War: The Politics of Insecurity. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-05367-0.

  134. Matray 1979. - Matray, James I (September 1979). "Truman's Plan for Victory: National Self-Determination and the Thirty-Eighth Parallel Decision in Korea". Journal of American History. 66 (2). JStor: 314–333. doi:10.2307/1900879. JSTOR 1900879. https://doi.org/10.2307%2F1900879

  135. Paterson et al. 2014, pp. 286–289. - Paterson, Thomas; Clifford, J. Garry; Brigham; Donoghue, Michael; Hagan, Kenneth (1 January 2014). American Foreign Relations: Volume 2: Since 1895. Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-1-305-17722-2. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=hkjAAgAAQBAJ

  136. Isby & Kamps 1985, pp. 13–14. - Isby, David C.; Kamps, Charles Tustin (1985). Armies of NATO's Central Front. Jane's. ISBN 978-0-7106-0341-8.

  137. Oberdorfer 2001, pp. 10–11. - Oberdorfer, Don (2001). Tet!: The Turning Point in the Vietnam War. JHU Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-6703-3. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=r6lQ-430NL0C&q=Oberdorfer+2001

  138. No & Osterholm 1996. - No, Kum-Sok; Osterholm, J. Roger (1996). A MiG-15 to Freedom: Memoir of the Wartime North Korean Defector who First Delivered the Secret Fighter Jet to the Americans in 1953. McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-0210-6.

  139. Karabell 1999, p. 916. - Karabell, Zachary (1999). Architects of Intervention: The United States the Third World and the Cold War 1946–1962. LSU Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-2341-6.

  140. LaFeber 1993, pp. 194–197. - LaFeber, Walter (1993). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–1992. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-035853-9.

  141. Karabell 1999, p. 916. - Karabell, Zachary (1999). Architects of Intervention: The United States the Third World and the Cold War 1946–1962. LSU Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-2341-6.

  142. "We Will Bury You!". Time magazine. 26 November 1956. Archived from the original on 24 January 2007. Retrieved 26 June 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20070124152821/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,867329,00.html

  143. Gaddis 2005, p. 84. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  144. Karabell 1999, p. 916. - Karabell, Zachary (1999). Architects of Intervention: The United States the Third World and the Cold War 1946–1962. LSU Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-2341-6.

  145. LaFeber 1993, pp. 194–197. - LaFeber, Walter (1993). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–1992. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-035853-9.

  146. Bradner 2015. - Bradner, Eric (2015). "Newly released documents reveal U.S. Cold War nuclear target list". CNN Politics. Archived from the original on 22 October 2019. Retrieved 23 October 2019. https://www.cnn.com/2015/12/23/politics/cold-war-u-s-nuclear-target-list/index.html

  147. Burr, William, ed. (22 December 2015). "U.S. Cold War Nuclear Target Lists Declassified for First Time". National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 538. National Security Archive. http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb538-Cold-War-Nuclear-Target-List-Declassified-First-Ever/

  148. Schudson 2015. - Schudson, Michael (2015). The Rise of the Right to Know: Politics and the Culture of Transparency, 1945–1975. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-91580-0. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=Dm93CgAAQBAJ&q=francis+powers,+lying,+scandal&pg=PT114

  149. Paterson et al. 2014, pp. 306–308. - Paterson, Thomas; Clifford, J. Garry; Brigham; Donoghue, Michael; Hagan, Kenneth (1 January 2014). American Foreign Relations: Volume 2: Since 1895. Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-1-305-17722-2. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=hkjAAgAAQBAJ

  150. Khanna 2013, p. 372. - Khanna, V.N. (2013). International Relations (5th ed.). Vikas. ISBN 978-93-259-6836-3.

  151. Byrd 2003. - Byrd, Peter (2003). "Cold War (entire chapter)". In McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair (eds.). The concise Oxford dictionary of politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280276-7. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 16 June 2008. https://books.google.com/books?id=xLbEHQAACAAJ

  152. "1956: Soviet troops overrun Hungary". On This Day: 4 November. BBC. 4 November 1956. Archived from the original on 7 April 2008. Retrieved 11 June 2008. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/november/4/newsid_2739000/2739039.stm

  153. "Revolt in Hungary". Archived from the original on 17 November 2007. Narrator: Walter Cronkite, producer: CBS (1956) – Fonds 306, Audiovisual Materials Relating to the 1956 Hungarian Revolution, OSA Archivum, Budapest, Hungary ID number: HU OSA 306-0-1:40 https://web.archive.org/web/20071117094223/http://files.osa.ceu.hu/holdings/selection/rip/4/av/1956-44.html

  154. Report of the Special Committee on the Problem of Hungary (PDF) (Report). UN General Assembly. 1957. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 May 2017. Retrieved 14 May 2009. http://mek.oszk.hu/01200/01274/01274.pdf

  155. Holodkov 1956. - "Report by Soviet Deputy Interior Minister M.N. Holodkov to Interior Minister N. P. Dudorov (15 November 1956)" (PDF). The 1956 Hungarian Revolution, A History in Documents. George Washington University: The National Security Archive. 4 November 2002. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 September 2006. Retrieved 2 September 2006. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB76/doc8.pdf

  156. Cseresnyés 1999, pp. 86–101. - Cseresnyés, Ferenc (Summer 1999). "The '56 Exodus to Austria". The Hungarian Quarterly. XL (154): 86–101. Archived from the original on 27 November 2004. Retrieved 9 October 2006. https://web.archive.org/web/20041127172402/http://www.hungarianquarterly.com/no154/086.html

  157. "1989: Hungary reburies fallen hero Imre Nagy". On This Day: 16 June. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). Retrieved 13 October 2006. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/june/16/

  158. Gaddis 2005, p. 70. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  159. Perlmutter 1997, p. 145. - Perlmutter, Amos (1997). Making the World Safe for Democracy: A Century of Wilsonianism and Its Totalitarian Challengers. Univ of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-2365-1. https://archive.org/details/makingworldsafef0000perl

  160. Njølstad 2004, p. 136. - Njølstad, Olav (2004). The Last Decade of the Cold War. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-7146-8371-3.

  161. Breslauer 2002, p. 72. - Breslauer, George W. (2002). Gorbachev and Yeltsin as Leaders. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-89244-5.

  162. Lendvai 2008, p. 196. - Lendvai, Paul (2008). One Day that Shook the Communist World: The 1956 Hungarian Uprising and Its Legacy. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-13282-2.

  163. Lendvai 2008, p. 196. - Lendvai, Paul (2008). One Day that Shook the Communist World: The 1956 Hungarian Uprising and Its Legacy. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-13282-2.

  164. Stefancic 1987. - Stefancic, David (Winter 1987). "The Rapacki Plan: A Case Study of European Diplomacy". East European Quarterly. 21 (4): 401–412.

  165. Gaddis 2005, p. 71. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  166. Taubman 2004, pp. 488–502. - Taubman, William (2004). Khrushchev: The Man and His Era. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-32484-6.

  167. Herring 2008, pp. 704–705. - Herring, George C. (2008). From Colony to Superpower; U.S. Foreign Relations Since 1776. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-507822-0. https://archive.org/details/fromcolonytosupe00herr

  168. Nash 1993. - Nash, Philip (1 December 1993). "Nuclear Weapons in Kennedy's Foreign Policy". The Historian. 56 (2): 285–300. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6563.1994.tb01309.x. S2CID 145808004. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1540-6563.1994.tb01309.x

  169. Warren & Siracusa 2021. - Warren, Aiden; Siracusa, Joseph M. (2021). "Kennedy's Nuclear Dilemma". US Presidents and Cold War Nuclear Diplomacy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature / Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 95–124. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-61954-1. ISBN 978-3-030-61954-1. S2CID 234294333. https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-030-61954-1

  170. Karabell 1999, p. 916. - Karabell, Zachary (1999). Architects of Intervention: The United States the Third World and the Cold War 1946–1962. LSU Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-2341-6.

  171. Gaddis 2005, pp. 121–124. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  172. Towle 2000, p. 160. - Towle, Philip (2000). "Cold War". In Charles Townshend (ed.). The Oxford History of Modern War. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 160. ISBN 978-0-19-285373-8. https://archive.org/details/oxfordhistoryofm00town/page/160

  173. Tucker 2010, p. 1566. - Tucker, Spencer C (2010). The Encyclopedia of Middle East Wars: The United States in the Persian Gulf, Afghanistan, and Iraq Conflicts, Volume 1. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-8510-9947-4.

  174. Karabell 1999, pp. 64, 916. - Karabell, Zachary (1999). Architects of Intervention: The United States the Third World and the Cold War 1946–1962. LSU Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-2341-6.

  175. Gasiorowski & Byrne 2004, p. 125. - Gasiorowski, Mark J.; Byrne, Malcolm (2004). Mohammad Mosaddeq and the 1953 Coup in Iran. Syracuse University Press. ISBN 978-0-8156-3018-0. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=yW2slrVAb5kC

  176. Smith 1953. - Smith, Walter B. (20 March 1953). "First Progress Report on Paragraph 5-1 of NSC 136/1, 'U.S. Policy Regarding the Current Situation in Iran'" (PDF) (Memo). Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 January 2015. Retrieved 7 November 2007 – via George Washington University. http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB126/iran530320.pdf

  177. Watson 2002, p. 118. - Watson, Cynthia A. (2002). U.S. National Security: A Reference Handbook. Santa Barbara, California: ABL-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-57607-598-2. Archived from the original on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 20 June 2015. https://books.google.com/books?id=Nj2monE0y4cC

  178. Stone 2010, pp. 199, 256. - Stone, Norman (2010). The Atlantic and Its Enemies: A History of the Cold War. Basic Books Press. ISBN 978-0-465-02043-0.

  179. Bulmer-Thomas 1987, p. 142. - Bulmer-Thomas, Victor (1987). The Political Economy of Central America since 1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-34284-1.

  180. Roadnight 2002. - Roadnight, Andrew (2002). United States Policy towards Indonesia in the Truman and Eisenhower Years. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-79315-2.

  181. Nzongola-Ntalaja 2011, p. 108. - Nzongola-Ntalaja, Georges (17 January 2011). "Patrice Lumumba: the most important assassination of the 20th century". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 23 October 2019. Retrieved 26 October 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/jan/17/patrice-lumumba-50th-anniversary-assassination

  182. Schraeder 1994, p. 57. - Schraeder, Peter J. (1994). United States Foreign Policy Toward Africa: Incrementalism, Crisis, and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-46677-6. Archived from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 20 June 2015. https://books.google.com/books?id=goKxyUia-7UC

  183. Schraeder 1994, p. 57. - Schraeder, Peter J. (1994). United States Foreign Policy Toward Africa: Incrementalism, Crisis, and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-46677-6. Archived from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 20 June 2015. https://books.google.com/books?id=goKxyUia-7UC

  184. Nzongola-Ntalaja 2011. - Nzongola-Ntalaja, Georges (17 January 2011). "Patrice Lumumba: the most important assassination of the 20th century". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 23 October 2019. Retrieved 26 October 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2011/jan/17/patrice-lumumba-50th-anniversary-assassination

  185. Gerard 2015, pp. 216–218. - Gerard, Emmanuel (2015). Death in the Congo. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-74536-0. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=pvVqBgAAQBAJ&q=lumumba.+cold+war.+assassination

  186. Rose 2002, p. 57. - Rose, Euclid A. (2002). Dependency and Socialism in the Modern Caribbean: Superpower Intervention in Guyana, Jamaica, and Grenada, 1970–1985. Lexington Books. ISBN 978-0-7391-0448-4.

  187. Mars & Young 2004, p. xviii. - Mars, Perry; Young, Alma H (2004). Caribbean Labor and Politics: Legacies of Cheddi Jagan and Michael Manley. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. ISBN 978-0-8143-3211-5. Archived from the original on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 20 June 2015. https://books.google.com/books?id=F4lJBFU-k1wC

  188. Palmer 2010, pp. 247–248. - Palmer, Colin A. (2010). Cheddi Jagan and the Politics of Power: British Guiana's Struggle for Independence. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-3416-9. Archived from the original on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 20 June 2015. https://books.google.com/books?id=NHd1sxVg4XwC

  189. Turner 1975, p. 93. - Turner, Robert F. (1975). Vietnamese Communism: Its Origins and Development. Stanford: Hoover Institution Publications. ISBN 978-0-8179-1431-8.

  190. LaFeber 1993, pp. 194–197. - LaFeber, Walter (1993). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–1992. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-035853-9.

  191. Gaddis 2005, p. 126. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  192. Karabell 1999, p. 916. - Karabell, Zachary (1999). Architects of Intervention: The United States the Third World and the Cold War 1946–1962. LSU Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-2341-6.

  193. LaFeber 1993, pp. 194–197. - LaFeber, Walter (1993). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–1992. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-035853-9.

  194. Gaddis 2005, p. 142. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  195. Kempe 2011, p. 42. - Kempe, Frederick (2011). Berlin 1961. Penguin Group (US). ISBN 978-0-399-15729-5. https://archive.org/details/berlin1961kenned0000kemp

  196. Gaddis 2005, p. 142. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  197. Lüthi 2010, pp. 273–276. - Lüthi, Lorenz M. (2010). The Sino-Soviet Split: Cold War in the Communist World. Princeton UP. ISBN 978-1-4008-3762-5. Archived from the original on 9 June 2019. Retrieved 20 June 2015. https://books.google.com/books?id=dl4TRDxqexMC

  198. Gaddis 2005, pp. 140–142. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  199. Lüthi 2010, p. 1. - Lüthi, Lorenz M. (2010). The Sino-Soviet Split: Cold War in the Communist World. Princeton UP. ISBN 978-1-4008-3762-5. Archived from the original on 9 June 2019. Retrieved 20 June 2015. https://books.google.com/books?id=dl4TRDxqexMC

  200. Byrd 2003. - Byrd, Peter (2003). "Cold War (entire chapter)". In McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair (eds.). The concise Oxford dictionary of politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280276-7. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 16 June 2008. https://books.google.com/books?id=xLbEHQAACAAJ

  201. McMahon 2003, pp. 75–76. - McMahon, Robert (2003). The Cold War: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280178-4.

  202. "1957: Sputnik satellite blasts into space". On This Day: 4 October. BBC. 4 October 1957. Archived from the original on 3 February 2020. Retrieved 11 June 2008. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/october/4/newsid_2685000/2685115.stm

  203. "DOC_0000124270" (PDF). cia.gov. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000124270.pdf

  204. Klesius 2008. - Klesius, Mike (19 December 2008). "To Boldly Go". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 5 November 2022. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/air-space-magazine/to-boldly-go-133005480/

  205. Das 2009. - Das, Saswato R. (16 July 2009). "The Moon Landing through Soviet Eyes: A Q&A with Sergei Khrushchev, son of former premier Nikita Khrushchev". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 25 February 2021. Retrieved 7 January 2019. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/apollo-moon-khrushchev/

  206. Richelson, Jeffrey T. (4 February 2015). "National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 501". U.S. INTELLIGENCE AND THE SOVIET SPACE PROGRAM. National Security Archive. Retrieved 27 October 2021. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB501/

  207. "The Almaz program". www.russianspaceweb.com. Retrieved 8 December 2024. https://www.russianspaceweb.com/almaz.html

  208. "The USSR begins enduring space station program". www.russianspaceweb.com. Retrieved 8 December 2024. https://www.russianspaceweb.com/salyut1-origin.html

  209. Budanovic, Nikola (17 July 2018). "Space Force - The Soviets Launched the Only Known Armed Spacecraft | The Vintage News". thevintagenews. Retrieved 8 December 2024. https://www.thevintagenews.com/2018/07/17/almaz/

  210. Avilla, Aeryn (25 June 2020). "Diamond in the Rough: The USSR's Military Space Station Almaz". SpaceflightHistories. Retrieved 8 December 2024. https://www.spaceflighthistories.com/post/military-space-station-almaz

  211. Jha, Martand (27 July 2017). "This is How the Space Race Changed the Great Power Rivalry Forever". The National Interest. Retrieved 8 December 2024. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/how-the-space-race-changed-the-great-power-rivalry-forever-21690

  212. "UNODA Treaties Database". treaties.unoda.org. Retrieved 8 December 2024. https://treaties.unoda.org/t/outer_space

  213. "The Historic Beginnings Of The Space Arms Race". www.spacewar.com. Retrieved 8 December 2024. https://www.spacewar.com/reports/The_Historic_Beginnings_Of_The_Space_Arms_Race_999.html

  214. "U.S.-Soviet Cooperation in Outer Space, Part 1: From Yuri Gagarin to Apollo-Soyuz". National Security Archive. Retrieved 27 October 2021. https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2021-04-12/us-soviet-cooperation-in-outer-space-part-1-1961-1975

  215. Blumberg 1995, pp. 23–24. - Blumberg, Arnold (1995). Great Leaders, Great Tyrants?: Contemporary Views of World Rulers Who Made History. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-28751-0.

  216. Bourne 1986, pp. 181–183. - Bourne, Peter G. (1986). Fidel: A Biography of Fidel Castro. New York: Dodd, Mead & Company. ISBN 978-0-396-08518-8. https://archive.org/details/fidelbiographyof0000bour

  217. Quirk 1993, pp. 248–252. - Quirk, Robert E. (1993). Fidel Castro. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-03485-1. https://archive.org/details/fidelcastro00robe

  218. Coltman 2003, p. 162. - Coltman, Leycester (2003). The Real Fidel Castro. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-10760-9. https://archive.org/details/realfidelcastro00colt_0

  219. Lechuga Hevia 2001, p. 142. - Lechuga Hevia, Carlos (2001). Cuba and the Missile Crisis. Melbourne, Australia: Ocean Press. ISBN 978-1-876175-34-4. https://archive.org/details/cubamissilecrisi0000lech

  220. Dominguez 1989, p. 22. - Dominguez, Jorge I. (1989). To Make a World Safe for Revolution: Cuba's Foreign Policy. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-89325-2.

  221. "It's Time to Stop Saying that JFK Inherited the Bay of Pigs Operation from Ike". History News Network. 5 December 2015. Archived from the original on 26 July 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020. https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/161188

  222. Smith 1998, p. 95. - Smith, Joseph (1998). The Cold War 1945–1991. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-19138-4. Archived from the original on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 20 June 2015. https://books.google.com/books?id=FnnF9NKMJdkC

  223. Smith 1998, p. 95. - Smith, Joseph (1998). The Cold War 1945–1991. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 978-0-631-19138-4. Archived from the original on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 20 June 2015. https://books.google.com/books?id=FnnF9NKMJdkC

  224. [H][I][180][181][182][183]

  225. Dowty 1989, p. 114. - Dowty, Alan (1989). Closed Borders: The Contemporary Assault on Freedom of Movement. Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-04498-4.

  226. "Berlin Wall". Encyclopaedia Britannica. 9 August 2023. https://www.britannica.com/topic/Berlin-Wall

  227. Harrison 2003, p. 99. - Harrison, Hope Millard (2003). Driving the Soviets Up the Wall: Soviet-East German Relations, 1953–1961. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-09678-3.

  228. Dowty 1989, p. 122. - Dowty, Alan (1989). Closed Borders: The Contemporary Assault on Freedom of Movement. Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-04498-4.

  229. Gaddis 2005, p. 114. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  230. Daum 2008, p. 27. - Daum, Andreas (2008). Kennedy in Berlin. New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-85824-3.

  231. Pearson 1998, p. 75. - Pearson, Raymond (1998). The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Empire. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-312-17407-1.

  232. Zubok 1994. - Zubok, Vladislav M. (1994). "Unwrapping the Enigma: What was Behind the Soviet Challenge in the 1960s?". In Kunz, Diane B. (ed.). The Diplomacy of the Crucial Decade: American Foreign Relations During the 1960s. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-08177-1. Archived from the original on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 20 June 2015. https://books.google.com/books?id=SiVTA31wrzEC

  233. Zubok 1994. - Zubok, Vladislav M. (1994). "Unwrapping the Enigma: What was Behind the Soviet Challenge in the 1960s?". In Kunz, Diane B. (ed.). The Diplomacy of the Crucial Decade: American Foreign Relations During the 1960s. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-08177-1. Archived from the original on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 20 June 2015. https://books.google.com/books?id=SiVTA31wrzEC

  234. Jones, H. 2009, p. 122. - Jones, Howard (2009). Crucible of Power: A History of American Foreign Relations from 1945. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-0-7425-6454-1.

  235. Gaddis 2005, p. 82. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  236. National Research Council Committee on Antarctic Policy and Science, p. 33

  237. Gaddis 2005, pp. 119–120. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  238. Gaddis 2005, p. 119. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  239. Taubman 2004, p. 579. - Taubman, William (2004). Khrushchev: The Man and His Era. W.W. Norton & Company. ISBN 978-0-393-32484-6.

  240. Naftali 2012. - Naftali, Timothy (Fall 2012). "The Malin Notes: Glimpses Inside the Kremlin during the Cuban Missile Crisis" (PDF). Cold War International History Project Bulletin (17/18). Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/publication/CWHIP_Bulletin_17-18_Cuban_Missile_Crisis_v2_s3_Soviet_Union.pdf

  241. Karabell 1999, p. 916. - Karabell, Zachary (1999). Architects of Intervention: The United States the Third World and the Cold War 1946–1962. LSU Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-2341-6.

  242. Karabell 1999, p. 916. - Karabell, Zachary (1999). Architects of Intervention: The United States the Third World and the Cold War 1946–1962. LSU Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-2341-6.

  243. Hardt & Kaufman 1995, p. 16. - Hardt, John Pearce; Kaufman, Richard F., eds. (1995). East-Central European Economies in Transition. United States Congress, Joint Economic Committee. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-1-56324-613-5. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 23 October 2019. https://books.google.com/books?id=Yv-ehBPBdgYC&pg=PA714

  244. Milestones: 1969–1976. - "Milestones: 1969–1976 – Office of the Historian". history.state.gov. Archived from the original on 11 June 2019. Retrieved 21 June 2019. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/detente

  245. Slocomb 2001. - Slocomb, Margaret (2001). "The K5 Gamble: National Defence and Nation Building under the People's Republic of Kampuchea". Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 32 (2): 195–210. doi:10.1017/S0022463401000091. ISSN 1474-0680. S2CID 162956030. https://doi.org/10.1017%2FS0022463401000091

  246. Elleman 2001, p. 297. - Elleman, Bruce A. (2001). Modern Chinese Warfare, 1795–1989. Routledge. ISBN 0415214742. https://archive.org/details/modernchinesewar00elle

  247. Kissinger 2011, pp. 304–305. - Kissinger, H. (2011). On China. New York: Penguin Press. ISBN 9781101445358.

  248. Painter 2014. - Painter, D. S. (2014). "Oil and geopolitics: the oil crises of the 1970s and the Cold War". Historical Social Research. 39 (4): 186–208. doi:10.12759/hsr.39.2014.4.186-208. https://doi.org/10.12759%2Fhsr.39.2014.4.186-208

  249. Gaddis 2005, p. 212. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  250. Karabell 1999, p. 916. - Karabell, Zachary (1999). Architects of Intervention: The United States the Third World and the Cold War 1946–1962. LSU Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-2341-6.

  251. Karabell 1999, p. 916. - Karabell, Zachary (1999). Architects of Intervention: The United States the Third World and the Cold War 1946–1962. LSU Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-2341-6.

  252. "Military Advisors in Vietnam: 1963". JFK Library. Retrieved 21 June 2019. https://www.jfklibrary.org/learn/education/teachers/curricular-resources/high-school-curricular-resources/military-advisors-in-vietnam-1963

  253. "Vietnam War Statistics and Facts 1". 25th Aviation Battalion. Archived from the original on 5 June 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190605212621/http://25thaviation.org/facts/id430.htm

  254. Miller & Wainstock 2013, pp. 315–325. - Miller, Robert; Wainstock, Dennis D. (2013). Indochina and Vietnam: The Thirty-five Year War, 1940–1975. Enigma Books. pp. 101–102. ISBN 978-1-936274-66-6. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=jexmAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT101

  255. Koven 2015, p. 93. - Koven, Steven G. (2015). Responsible Governance: A Case Study Approach. M.E. Sharpe. pp. 93–. ISBN 978-0-7656-2932-6. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 21 June 2019. https://books.google.com/books?id=LUXRg7YBWiIC&pg=PA93

  256. Tucker 2011, p. 131. - Tucker, Spencer C. (2011). The Encyclopedia of the Vietnam War: A Political, Social, and Military History. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-85109-960-3. Archived from the original on 18 May 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=qh5lffww-KsC

  257. Glass 2017. - Glass, Andrew (14 October 2017). "McNamara becomes Vietnam War skeptic, Oct. 14, 1966". Politico. Archived from the original on 9 May 2019. Retrieved 1 June 2018. https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/14/this-day-in-politics-oct-14-1966-243670

  258. Kalb 2013. - Kalb, Marvin (22 January 2013). "It's Called the Vietnam Syndrome, and It's Back". Brookings Institution. Archived from the original on 13 June 2015. Retrieved 12 June 2015. http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/up-front/posts/2013/01/22-obama-foreign-policy-kalb

  259. Crespino 2020, p. 123. - Crespino, Joseph (March 2020). "A Nation Ruled by Its Fears". Reviews in American History. 48 (1): 119–123. doi:10.1353/rah.2020.0016. https://doi.org/10.1353%2Frah.2020.0016

  260. Singh, Nagendra; MacWhinney, Edward (1989). Nuclear Weapons and Contemporary International Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. ISBN 978-90-247-3637-9. 978-90-247-3637-9

  261. "Peaceful Uses of Outer Space and International Law". 18 March 2008. Archived from the original on 18 March 2008. Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://web.archive.org/web/20080318143550/http://www.inesap.org/bulletin17/bul17art22.htm

  262. "Limited or Partial Test Ban Treaty (LTBT/PTBT) - Nuclear Museum". ahf.nuclearmuseum.org. Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/history/limited-or-partial-test-ban-treaty-ltbtptbt/

  263. "Limited Test Ban Treaty". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/isn/4797.htm

  264. "Operation Dominic". nuclearweaponarchive.org. Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Tests/Dominic.html

  265. "OPERATION DOMINIC 1962" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 August 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20200813004557/https://www.dtra.mil/Portals/61/Documents/NTPR/2-Hist_Rpt_Atm/1962_DNA_6040F.pdf

  266. "UNODA Treaties Database". treaties.unoda.org. Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://treaties.unoda.org/t/outer_space/signature/asc

  267. "UK Government Web Archive". webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk. Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20130104161243/http://www.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/3706546/3892723/TrPrinciplesOuterSpace

  268. "Space Law". www.unoosa.org. Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/index.html

  269. Ello 1968, pp. 32, 54. - Ello, Paul, ed. (1968). "Action Plan of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia (Prague, April 1968)". Dubcek's Blueprint for Freedom: His original documents leading to the invasion of Czechoslovakia. Control Committee of the Communist Party of Czechoslovakia. William Kimber & Co.

  270. Von Geldern & Siegelbaum. - Von Geldern, James; Siegelbaum, Lewis. "The Soviet-led Intervention in Czechoslovakia". Soviethistory.org. Archived from the original on 17 August 2009. Retrieved 7 March 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20090817200255/http://soviethistory.org/index.php?action=L2&SubjectID=1968czechoslovakia&Year=1968

  271. Gaddis 2005, p. 150. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  272. "1968: Russia brings winter to Prague Spring". On This Day: 21 August. BBC. 21 August 1968. Archived from the original on 21 July 2008. Retrieved 10 June 2008. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/21/newsid_2781000/2781867.stm

  273. Čulík 1998. - Čulík, Jan (21 August 1998). "Den, kdy tanky zlikvidovaly české sny Pražského jara". Britské Listy. Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 23 January 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20070928050554/http://www.britskelisty.cz/9808/19980821h.html

  274. "Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia". 31 July 2017. Archived from the original on 31 July 2017. Retrieved 5 November 2022. https://web.archive.org/web/20170731024148/http://www.enrs.eu/en/news/1255-invasion-of-czechoslovakia

  275. Gaddis 2005, p. 154. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  276. O'Neill, Mark (12 May 2010). "Nixon intervention saved China from Soviet nuclear attack". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 12 September 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20150912221259/https://www.scmp.com/article/714064/nixon-intervention-saved-china-soviet-nuclear-attack

  277. O'Neill, Mark (12 May 2010). "Nixon intervention saved China from Soviet nuclear attack". South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 12 September 2015. https://web.archive.org/web/20150912221259/https://www.scmp.com/article/714064/nixon-intervention-saved-china-soviet-nuclear-attack

  278. "People's Republic of China-United States: Establishment of Diplomatic Relations". International Legal Materials. 18 (1): 272–275. January 1979. doi:10.1017/s0020782900043886. ISSN 0020-7829. S2CID 249005911. /wiki/Doi_(identifier)

  279. Gaddis 2005, pp. 149–152. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  280. "Détente and Arms Control, 1969–1979". U.S. State Department. Retrieved 9 November 2023. https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/detente

  281. "1972: President Nixon arrives in Moscow". On This Day: 22 May. BBC. 22 May 1972. Archived from the original on 23 October 2012. Retrieved 10 June 2008. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/may/22/newsid_4373000/4373149.stm

  282. Karabell 1999, p. 916. - Karabell, Zachary (1999). Architects of Intervention: The United States the Third World and the Cold War 1946–1962. LSU Press. ISBN 978-0-8071-2341-6.

  283. Kalabekov, I.G. "Расходы на оборону и численность вооруженных сил СССР" [Defense spending and size of the Armed Forces of the USSR]. СССР и страны мира в цифрах, 2008 – 2023 [USSR and countries of the world in figures, 2008 – 2023] (in Russian). https://su90.ru/defence.html

  284. LaFeber 1993, pp. 194–197. - LaFeber, Walter (1993). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–1992. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-035853-9.

  285. Litwak 1986. - Litwak, Robert (1986). Détente and the Nixon doctrine : American foreign policy and the pursuit of stability, 1969–1976. Cambridge Cambridgeshire New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-25094-8.

  286. Gaddis 2005, p. 154. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  287. Gaddis 2005, p. 188. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  288. Pipes 1994, pp. 401–403. - Pipes, Richard (1994). Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime. Vintage. ISBN 0-679-76184-5.

  289. Wyszyński 1949, pp. 153, 162. - Wyszyński, Andrzej (1949). Teoria dowodów sądowych w prawie radzieckim (PDF). Biblioteka Zrzeszenia Prawników Demokratów. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 July 2018. Retrieved 29 March 2023. https://web.archive.org/web/20180729141510/https://echelon.pl/files/echelon/Wyszy%C5%84ski%20-%20Teoria%20dowod%C3%B3w%20s%C4%85dowych%20%28OCR%29.pdf

  290. Thomas 2005, p. 117. - Thomas, Daniel C. (2005). "Human Rights Ideas, the Demise of Communism, and the End of the Cold War". Journal of Cold War Studies. 7 (2): 110–141. doi:10.1162/1520397053630600. S2CID 57570614. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/cws/summary/v007/7.2thomas.html

  291. Yergin 2011, p. 557. - Yergin, Daniel (5 April 2011). The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & Power. Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-1-4391-3483-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=WiUTwBTux2oC

  292. McCormick 1980. - McCormick, Lynde (3 July 1980). "Deal-maker Armand Hammer Moscow's capitalist comrade". Christian Science Monitor. ISSN 0882-7729. Retrieved 7 November 2021. https://www.csmonitor.com/1980/0703/070362.html

  293. "The Riddle of Armand Hammer". The New York Times Magazine. 29 November 1981. Section 6, Page 69. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 7 November 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/1981/11/29/magazine/the-riddle-of-armand-hammer.html

  294. McCormick 1980. - McCormick, Lynde (3 July 1980). "Deal-maker Armand Hammer Moscow's capitalist comrade". Christian Science Monitor. ISSN 0882-7729. Retrieved 7 November 2021. https://www.csmonitor.com/1980/0703/070362.html

  295. Caldwell, Dan (2009). "The Legitimation of the Nixon-Kissinger Grand Design and Grand Strategy". Diplomatic History. 33 (4): 633–652. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7709.2009.00801.x. https://academic.oup.com/dh/article-abstract/33/4/633/449706

  296. Schwartz 2011. - Schwartz, Thomas A. (2011). "Henry Kissinger: Realism, Domestic Politics, and the Struggle Against Exceptionalism in American Foreign Policy". Diplomacy & Statecraft. 22 (1): 121–141. doi:10.1080/09592296.2011.549746. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F09592296.2011.549746

  297. Gaddis 2005, p. 186. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  298. Gaddis 2005, p. 178. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  299. "NIXON IN APPEAL ON SOVIET TRADE". The New York Times. 5 October 1973. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 7 December 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/1973/10/05/archives/nixon-in-appeal-on-soviet-trade-urges-congress-to-include.html

  300. Herring 2008, p. 804. - Herring, George C. (2008). From Colony to Superpower; U.S. Foreign Relations Since 1776. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-507822-0. https://archive.org/details/fromcolonytosupe00herr

  301. Pomeranz 2010. - Pomeranz, William E. (4 February 2010). The Legacy and Consequences of Jackson-Vanik: Reassessing Human Rights in 21st Century Russia (Report). Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Retrieved 21 October 2021. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/the-legacy-and-consequences-jackson-vanik-reassessing-human-rights-21st-century-russia-0

  302. "1979: Leaders agree arms reduction treaty". On This Day: 18 June. BBC. 18 June 1979. Archived from the original on 27 April 2008. Retrieved 10 June 2008. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/june/18/newsid_4508000/4508409.stm

  303. LaFeber 1993, pp. 194–197. - LaFeber, Walter (1993). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–1992. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-035853-9.

  304. Halliday 2001, p. 2e. - Halliday, Fred (2001). "Cold War". The Oxford Companion to the Politics of the World. Oxford University Press Inc.

  305. Diggins 2007, p. 267. - Diggins, John P. (2007). Ronald Reagan: Fate, Freedom, And the Making of History. W.W. Norton. ISBN 978-0-393-06022-5. https://archive.org/details/ronaldreaganfate00digg

  306. Cox 1990, p. 18. - Cox, Michael (1990). Beyond the Cold War: Superpowers at the Crossroads. University Press of America. ISBN 978-0-8191-7865-7. Archived from the original on 6 September 2015. Retrieved 20 June 2015. https://books.google.com/books?id=cUsOYWpQZbAC&pg=PR18

  307. Hussain 2005, pp. 108–109. - Hussain, Rizwan (2005). Pakistan and the emergence of Islamic militancy in Afghanistan. Aldershot, England Burlington, VT: Ashgate. ISBN 978-0-7546-4434-7.

  308. Starr 2004, pp. 157–158. - Starr, S. Frederick (2004). Xinjiang: China's Muslim Borderland. M E Sharpe Inc. ISBN 978-0-7656-1318-9.

  309. Kinsella 1992. - Kinsella, Warren (1992). Unholy Alliances. Lester Publishing. ISBN 978-1-895555-24-0. https://archive.org/details/unholyalliancest0000kins

  310. Hussain 2005, pp. 108–109. - Hussain, Rizwan (2005). Pakistan and the emergence of Islamic militancy in Afghanistan. Aldershot, England Burlington, VT: Ashgate. ISBN 978-0-7546-4434-7.

  311. Meher 2004, pp. 68–69, 94. - Meher, Jagmohan (2004). America's Afghanistan war : the success that failed. Delhi: Kalpaz. ISBN 978-81-7835-262-6.

  312. Tobin 2020. - Tobin, Conor (April 2020). "The Myth of the "Afghan Trap": Zbigniew Brzezinski and Afghanistan, 1978–1979". Diplomatic History. 44 (2). Oxford University Press: 237–264. doi:10.1093/dh/dhz065. https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fdh%2Fdhz065

  313. McCauley 2008b, p. 142. - McCauley, Martin (2008b). Russia, America and the Cold War: 1949–1991 (Revised 2nd ed.). Harlow, UK: Pearson Education. ISBN 978-1-4058-7430-4. https://books.google.com/books?id=r0V-Oxmy9FQC&q=Hafizullah+Amin+personal+guard&pg=PA142

  314. "Afghanistan: Lessons from the Last War". nsarchive2.gwu.edu. Retrieved 23 March 2023. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB57/essay.html

  315. Cooley 2002, p. 8. - Cooley, John K. (2002). Unholy Wars. Pluto Press. ISBN 978-0745319179.

  316. Blight 2012, p. 70. - Blight, James G. (2012). Becoming Enemies: U.S.-Iran Relations and the Iran-Iraq War, 1979–1988. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 978-1-4422-0830-8.

  317. Coll 2004, pp. 47–49: "Frustrated and hoping to discredit him, the KGB initially planted false stories that Amin was a CIA agent. In the autumn these rumors rebounded on the KGB in a strange case of "blowback," the term used by spies to describe planted propaganda that filters back to confuse the country that first set the story loose." - Coll, Steve (2004). Ghost Wars: The Secret History of the CIA, Afghanistan, and Bin Laden, from the Soviet Invasion to 10 September 2001. Penguin Group. ISBN 9781594200076.

  318. Jones, S. 2010, pp. 16–17: "'It was total nonsense,' said the CIA's Graham Fuller. 'I would have been thrilled to have those kinds of contacts with Amin, but they didn't exist.'" - Jones, Seth G. (2010). In the Graveyard of Empires: America's War in Afghanistan. W. W. Norton & Company. ISBN 9780393071429. https://archive.org/details/ingraveyardofemp00jone_0

  319. Kalinovsky 2011, pp. 25–28. - Kalinovsky, Artemy M. (2011). A Long Goodbye: The Soviet Withdrawal from Afghanistan. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-05866-8.

  320. Toohey 2007, p. 100. - Toohey, Kristine (8 November 2007). The Olympic Games: A Social Science Perspective. CABI. ISBN 978-1-84593-355-5. Archived from the original on 29 December 2021. Retrieved 21 March 2022. https://books.google.com/books?id=ywy9aslk3M8C&pg=PA100

  321. Eaton 2016. - Eaton, Joseph (November 2016). "Reconsidering the 1980 Moscow Olympic Boycott: American Sports Diplomacy in East Asian Perspective". Diplomatic History. 40 (5): 845–864. doi:10.1093/dh/dhw026. JSTOR 26376807. https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fdh%2Fdhw026

  322. Treadaway 1996. - Treadaway, Dan (5 August 1996). "Carter stresses role of Olympics in promoting global harmony". Emory Report. 48 (37). https://www.emory.edu/EMORY_REPORT/erarchive/1996/August/ERaug.5/8_5_96carter.html

  323. Gaddis 2005, p. 211. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  324. Allen 2000. - Allen, Richard V. (30 January 2000). "The Man Who Won the Cold War". Hoover Institution. Archived from the original on 1 May 2011. Retrieved 3 November 2011. https://web.archive.org/web/20110501052925/http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/7398

  325. Gaddis 2005, p. 189. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  326. Gaddis 2005, p. 197. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  327. Esno 2018, pp. 281–304. - Esno, Tyler (April 2018). "Reagan's Economic War on the Soviet Union". Diplomatic History. 42 (2): 281–304. doi:10.1093/dh/dhx061. ISSN 0145-2096. https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fdh%2Fdhx061

  328. Graebner, Burns & Siracusa 2008, pp. 29–31. - Graebner, Norman A.; Burns, Richard Dean; Siracusa, Joseph M. (2008). Reagan, Bush, Gorbachev: Revisiting the End of the Cold War. Greenwoo. ISBN 978-0-313-35241-6. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2018. https://books.google.com/books?id=r71u_AgE7iYC&pg=PA29

  329. Graebner, Burns & Siracusa 2008, p. 76. - Graebner, Norman A.; Burns, Richard Dean; Siracusa, Joseph M. (2008). Reagan, Bush, Gorbachev: Revisiting the End of the Cold War. Greenwoo. ISBN 978-0-313-35241-6. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2018. https://books.google.com/books?id=r71u_AgE7iYC&pg=PA29

  330. Singh 2005, p. 130. - Singh, Bilveer (2005), "Chapter 11: Jemaah Islamiyah", in Swati, Parashar; Wilson, John (eds.), Terrorism in Southeast Asia: Implications for South Asia, Delhi, India: Pearson Education India, ISBN 978-81-297-0998-1

  331. Singh 2005, p. 130. - Singh, Bilveer (2005), "Chapter 11: Jemaah Islamiyah", in Swati, Parashar; Wilson, John (eds.), Terrorism in Southeast Asia: Implications for South Asia, Delhi, India: Pearson Education India, ISBN 978-81-297-0998-1

  332. "Pope who changed Poland". poland.pl. Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://poland.pl/history/historical-figures/pope-changed-poland/

  333. "Stasi Files Implicate KGB in Pope Shooting – DW – 04/01/2005". dw.com. Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://www.dw.com/en/stasi-files-implicate-kgb-in-pope-shooting/a-1538173

  334. Scotto, Daniel (1 January 2007). "Pope John Paul II, the Assassination Attempt, and the Soviet Union". The Gettysburg Historical Journal. 6 (1). ISSN 2327-3917. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/ghj/vol6/iss1/7/

  335. Gaddis 2005, pp. 219–222. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  336. Gaddis 2005, pp. 219–222. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  337. LaFeber 2002, p. 332. - LaFeber, Walter (2002). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–2002. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-284903-5.

  338. Towle 2000, p. 159. - Towle, Philip (2000). "Cold War". In Charles Townshend (ed.). The Oxford History of Modern War. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 160. ISBN 978-0-19-285373-8. https://archive.org/details/oxfordhistoryofm00town/page/160

  339. LaFeber 2002, p. 335. - LaFeber, Walter (2002). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–2002. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-284903-5.

  340. Odom 2000, p. 1. - Odom, William E. (2000). The Collapse of the Soviet Military. Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-08271-5. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 13 May 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=Wojkd3uzVPgC

  341. LaFeber 2002, p. 340. - LaFeber, Walter (2002). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–2002. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-284903-5.

  342. "Desert Storm Filled Soviet Military With Awe". Chicago Tribune. 10 August 2021 [7 February 1992]. Archived from the original on 10 September 2024. Retrieved 15 October 2017. https://www.chicagotribune.com/1992/02/07/desert-storm-filled-soviet-military-with-awe/

  343. Carliner & Alesina 1991, p. 6. - Carliner, Geoffrey; Alesina, Alberto, eds. (1991). Politics and Economics in the Eighties. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-01281-0.

  344. Feeney 2006. - Feeney, Mark (29 March 2006). "Caspar W. Weinberger, 88; Architect of Massive Pentagon Buildup". The Boston Globe. Archived from the original on 29 May 2014. Retrieved 28 May 2014. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/obituaries/articles/2006/03/29/caspar_w_weinberger_88_architect_of_massive_pentagon_buildup/

  345. Fischer, Ben B. "The 1983 War Scare in US-Soviet Relations" (PDF). National Security Archive. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 March 2015. Retrieved 21 November 2015. http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB426/docs/3.The%201983%20War%20Scare%20in%20U.S.%20Soviet%20Relations-circa%201996.pdf

  346. Kennedy, Bruce. "War Games: Soviets, Fearing Western Attack, Prepared for Worst in '83". CNN. Archived from the original on 19 December 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20081219114101/http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/episodes/22/spotlight/

  347. Lee 2008, p. 13. - Lee, Tae-Woo (2008). Military Technologies of the World. Vol. 1. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-0-275-99535-5. https://archive.org/details/militarytechnolo0000leet/page/12/mode/2up

  348. "LGM-118A Peacekeeper". Federation of American Scientists. Archived from the original on 18 May 2024. Retrieved 10 April 2007. https://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/icbm/lgm-118.htm

  349. "Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) - Nuclear Museum". ahf.nuclearmuseum.org. Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/history/strategic-defense-initiative-sdi/

  350. Gaddis 2005, p. 202. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  351. Garthoff 1994, pp. 881–882. - Garthoff, Raymond (1994). Détente and Confrontation: American-Soviet Relations from Nixon to Reagan. Brookings Institution Press. ISBN 978-0-8157-3041-5.

  352. Lebow & Stein 1994. - Lebow, Richard Ned; Stein, Janice Gross (February 1994). "Reagan and the Russians". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 31 December 2016. Retrieved 28 May 2010. https://www.theatlantic.com/past/politics/foreign/reagrus.htm

  353. Allen 2001. - Allen, Robert C. (November 2001). "The rise and decline of the Soviet economy". Canadian Journal of Economics. 34 (4): 859–881. doi:10.1111/0008-4085.00103. ISSN 0008-4085. https://doi.org/10.1111%2F0008-4085.00103

  354. Gaidar 2007, pp. 190–205. - Gaidar, E. T. (2007). Collapse of an empire: lessons for modern Russia. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. ISBN 9780815731146. https://books.google.com/books?id=bDSfnxYjVwAC&pg=PA102

  355. "Official Energy Statistics of the US Government", EIA – International Energy Data and Analysis. Retrieved on 4 July 2008. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/contents.html

  356. LaFeber 2002, p. 332. - LaFeber, Walter (2002). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–2002. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-284903-5.

  357. Hardt & Kaufman 1995, p. 1. - Hardt, John Pearce; Kaufman, Richard F., eds. (1995). East-Central European Economies in Transition. United States Congress, Joint Economic Committee. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-1-56324-613-5. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 23 October 2019. https://books.google.com/books?id=Yv-ehBPBdgYC&pg=PA714

  358. Gaidar 2007, pp. 190–205. - Gaidar, E. T. (2007). Collapse of an empire: lessons for modern Russia. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. ISBN 9780815731146. https://books.google.com/books?id=bDSfnxYjVwAC&pg=PA102

  359. "KAL Tapes To Be Handed Over To ICAO" (PDF) (Press release). International Civil Aviation Organization. January 1993. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 December 2012. Retrieved 31 January 2009. https://web.archive.org/web/20121209114516/http://legacy.icao.int/icao/en/nr/1993/pio199301_e.pdf

  360. Talbott et al. 1983. - Talbott, Strobe; Hannifin, Jerry; Magnuson, Ed; Doerner, William R.; Kane, Joseph J. (12 September 1983). "Atrocity in the skies". Time. Archived from the original on 12 June 2008. Retrieved 8 June 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20080612215754/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,926169-5,00.html

  361. Hoffman 1999. - Hoffman, David (10 February 1999). "I Had A Funny Feeling in My Gut". The Washington Post. Retrieved 18 April 2006. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/coldwar/shatter021099b.htm

  362. "Stanislav Petrov – the man who quietly saved the world – has died aged 77". Metro. 18 September 2017. Retrieved 11 May 2022. http://metro.co.uk/2017/09/18/stanislav-petrov-the-man-who-quietly-saved-the-world-has-died-aged-77-6937015/

  363. Gaddis 2005, p. 228. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  364. LaFeber 2002, p. 323. - LaFeber, Walter (2002). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–2002. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-284903-5.

  365. LaFeber 2002, p. 323. - LaFeber, Walter (2002). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–2002. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-284903-5.

  366. Gaddis 2005, p. 212. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  367. Reagan 1991. - Reagan, Ronald (1991). Foner, Eric; Garraty, John Arthur (eds.). The Reader's companion to American history. Houghton Mifflin Books. ISBN 978-0-395-51372-9. Retrieved 16 June 2008. https://archive.org/details/readerscompanion00fone

  368. "What Guilt Does the U.S. Bear in Guatemala?". The New York Times. 19 May 2013. Archived from the original on 18 February 2017. Retrieved 23 April 2017. https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2013/05/19/what-guilt-does-the-us-bear-in-guatemala

  369. Kinsella 1992. - Kinsella, Warren (1992). Unholy Alliances. Lester Publishing. ISBN 978-1-895555-24-0. https://archive.org/details/unholyalliancest0000kins

  370. LaFeber 2002, p. 314. - LaFeber, Walter (2002). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–2002. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-284903-5.

  371. LaFeber 2002, p. 314. - LaFeber, Walter (2002). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–2002. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-284903-5.

  372. Dobrynin 2001, pp. 438–439. - Dobrynin, Anatoly (2001). In Confidence: Moscow's Ambassador to Six Cold War Presidents. University of Washington Press. ISBN 978-0-295-98081-2.

  373. Gaddis 2005, p. 197. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  374. LaFeber 2002, pp. 331–333. - LaFeber, Walter (2002). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–2002. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-284903-5.

  375. LaFeber 2002, pp. 331–333. - LaFeber, Walter (2002). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–2002. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-284903-5.

  376. Gaddis 2005, pp. 231–233. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  377. Gaddis 2005, pp. 231–233. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  378. LaFeber 2002, pp. 300–340. - LaFeber, Walter (2002). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–2002. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-284903-5.

  379. Gibbs 1999, p. 7. - Gibbs, Joseph (1999). Gorbachev's Glasnost: The Soviet Media in the First Phase of Perestroika. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 0-89096-892-6.

  380. Gibbs 1999, p. 33. - Gibbs, Joseph (1999). Gorbachev's Glasnost: The Soviet Media in the First Phase of Perestroika. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 0-89096-892-6.

  381. Gibbs 1999, p. 61. - Gibbs, Joseph (1999). Gorbachev's Glasnost: The Soviet Media in the First Phase of Perestroika. Texas A&M University Press. ISBN 0-89096-892-6.

  382. Gaddis 2005, pp. 229–230. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  383. Gaddis 2005, pp. 229–230. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  384. "Toward the Summit; Previous Reagan-Gorbachev Summits". The New York Times. 29 May 1988. Archived from the original on 10 November 2012. Retrieved 21 June 2008. https://www.nytimes.com/1988/05/29/world/toward-the-summit-previous-reagan-gorbachev-summits.html

  385. "Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces". Federation of American Scientists. Archived from the original on 24 July 2008. Retrieved 21 June 2008. https://fas.org/nuke/control/inf/index.html

  386. Shearman 1995, p. 76. - Shearman, Peter (1995). Russian foreign policy since 1990. Westview Press. ISBN 978-0-8133-2633-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=zHuakfpPujQC&pg=PA8

  387. Gaddis 2005, p. 248. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  388. Gaddis 2005, pp. 235–236. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  389. Shearman 1995, p. 76. - Shearman, Peter (1995). Russian foreign policy since 1990. Westview Press. ISBN 978-0-8133-2633-7. https://books.google.com/books?id=zHuakfpPujQC&pg=PA8

  390. European Navigator 1989. - "Address given by Mikhail Gorbachev to the Council of Europe". Centre Virtuel de la Connaissance sur l'Europe. 6 July 1989. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 11 February 2007. https://web.archive.org/web/20070927220033/http://www.ena.lu/?doc=11160

  391. "1989: Malta summit ends Cold War". On This Day: 3 December. BBC. 3 December 1989. Archived from the original on 3 October 2018. Retrieved 19 June 2008. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/december/3/newsid_4119000/4119950.stm

  392. Motin 2025, p. 111–112. - Motin, Dylan (2025). Territorial Expansion and Great Power Behavior During the Cold War: A Theory of Armed Emergence. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-040-38258-5.

  393. Newman 1993, p. 41. - Newman, William W. (1993). "History Accelerates: The Diplomacy of Co-operation and Fragmentation". In Goodby, James E.; Morel, Benoit (eds.). The Limited Partnership: Building a Russian-US Security Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-829161-9. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 26 April 2020. https://books.google.com/books?id=yW_Nu5iOE84C&pg=PA41

  394. Gaddis 2005, p. 255. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  395. Kenneth S. Deffeyes, Beyond Oil: The View from Hubbert's Peak.

  396. Andreas Rödder, Deutschland einig Vaterland – Die Geschichte der Wiedervereinigung (2009).

  397. Thomas Roser: DDR-Massenflucht: Ein Picknick hebt die Welt aus den Angeln (German – Mass exodus of the GDR: A picnic clears the world) in: Die Presse 16 August 2018.

  398. Otmar Lahodynsky: Paneuropäisches Picknick: Die Generalprobe für den Mauerfall (Pan-European picnic: the dress rehearsal for the fall of the Berlin Wall – German), in: Profil 9 August 2014.

  399. Gaddis 2005, pp. 235–236. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  400. Andreas Rödder, Deutschland einig Vaterland – Die Geschichte der Wiedervereinigung (2009).

  401. Thomas Roser: DDR-Massenflucht: Ein Picknick hebt die Welt aus den Angeln (German – Mass exodus of the GDR: A picnic clears the world) in: Die Presse 16 August 2018.

  402. Otmar Lahodynsky: Paneuropäisches Picknick: Die Generalprobe für den Mauerfall (Pan-European picnic: the dress rehearsal for the fall of the Berlin Wall – German), in: Profil 9 August 2014.

  403. Hilde Szabo: Die Berliner Mauer begann im Burgenland zu bröckeln (The Berlin Wall began to crumble in Burgenland – German), in Wiener Zeitung 16 August 1999.

  404. Lefeber, Fitzmaurice & Vierdag 1991, p. 221. - Lefeber, R.; Fitzmaurice, M.; Vierdag, E. W. (1991). The Changing political structure of Europe: aspects of international law. M. Nijhoff. ISBN 978-0-7923-1379-3. https://archive.org/details/changingpolitica0000unse_y9g4

  405. Gaddis 2005, p. 247. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  406. "National Review: The red blues - Soviet politics". 24 March 2005. Archived from the original on 24 March 2005. Retrieved 25 March 2024. https://web.archive.org/web/20050324050607/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_n12_v42/ai_9119705

  407. "РСПП: Статьи". www.rspp.su. Retrieved 25 March 2024. http://www.rspp.su/sobor/conf_2006/istoki_duh_nrav_crisis.html

  408. Greene 2015, pp. 205–206. - Greene, John Robert (2015). The Presidency of George Bush (2nd ed.). University Press of Kansas. ISBN 978-0-7006-2079-1.

  409. "INFCIRC/397 – Note to the Director General from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation". 23 November 2003. Archived from the original on 23 November 2003. https://web.archive.org/web/20031123143520/http://www.iaea.org/Publications/Documents/Infcircs/Others/inf397.shtml

  410. Ambrose & Brinkley 2011, p. xvi. - Ambrose, Stephen E.; Brinkley, Douglas G. (2011). Rise to Globalism: American Foreign Policy Since 1938. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-200494-4. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 23 October 2019. https://books.google.com/books?id=s1u0DgAAQBAJ

  411. Hanhimäki, Soutou & Germond 2010, p. 501. - Hanhimäki, Jussi; Soutou, Georges-Henri; Germond, Basil (2010). The Routledge Handbook of Transatlantic Security. Routledge. ISBN 9781136936074. https://books.google.com/books?id=swfHBQAAQBAJ&pg=PT501

  412. van Dijk 2013, pp. 860–861. - van Dijk, Ruud (2013). Encyclopedia of the Cold War. Routledge. pp. 860–861. ISBN 978-1135923112. https://books.google.com/books?id=QgX0bQ3Enj4C&pg=PA861

  413. Zubok 2009, p. ix. - Zubok, Vladislav M. (2009). A Failed Empire: The Soviet Union in the Cold War from Stalin to Gorbachev. Univ of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-9905-2. Archived from the original on 9 March 2017. Retrieved 1 December 2017. https://books.google.com/books?id=3j2VJj1hs1EC&pg=PR9

  414. "Facts + Stats of the Yeltsin Era". Frontline. PBS. Archived from the original on 17 November 2018. Retrieved 22 August 2019. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/yeltsin/etc/facts.html

  415. Nolan 1995, pp. 17–18. - Nolan, Peter (1995). China's Rise, Russia's Fall. St. Martin's Press. ISBN 978-0-312-12714-5.

  416. Ghodsee 2017, p. 63. - Ghodsee, Kristen (2017). Red Hangover: Legacies of Twentieth-Century Communism. Duke University Press. ISBN 978-0-8223-6949-3. Archived from the original on 7 December 2019. Retrieved 4 August 2018. https://www.dukeupress.edu/red-hangover

  417. Milanović 2015, pp. 135–138. - Milanović, Branko (2015). "After the Wall Fell: The Poor Balance Sheet of the Transition to Capitalism". Challenge. 58 (2): 135–138. doi:10.1080/05775132.2015.1012402. S2CID 153398717. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F05775132.2015.1012402

  418. Ryavec 2003, p. 13. - Ryavec, Karl W. (2003). Russian Bureaucracy: Power and Pathology. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-8476-9503-4.

  419. Shevchenko 2015. - Shevchenko, Vitaly (14 April 2015). "Goodbye, Lenin: Ukraine moves to ban communist symbols". BBC News. Retrieved 17 May 2015. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-32267075

  420. "Что и почему переименовывали в Ленинградской области". og47.ru (in Russian). Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://og47.ru/2018/03/14/Chto-i-pochemu-pereimenovyvali-v-Leningradskoi-oblasti--2381

  421. Rosenberg 2016. - Rosenberg, Steve (19 August 2016). "The Russians with fond memories of the USSR". BBC News. Archived from the original on 21 August 2016. Retrieved 20 August 2016. https://web.archive.org/web/20160821111034/http://www.bbc.com/news/video_and_audio/headlines/37130143

  422. Shevchenko 2015. - Shevchenko, Vitaly (14 April 2015). "Goodbye, Lenin: Ukraine moves to ban communist symbols". BBC News. Retrieved 17 May 2015. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-32267075

  423. Shevchenko 2015. - Shevchenko, Vitaly (14 April 2015). "Goodbye, Lenin: Ukraine moves to ban communist symbols". BBC News. Retrieved 17 May 2015. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-32267075

  424. "DECISION OF THE RSFSR Supreme Council". 12 May 2010. Archived from the original on 12 May 2010. Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://web.archive.org/web/20100512162358/http://pravo.levonevsky.org/baza/soviet/sssr0606.htm

  425. "The Great Britain - Russia Society Reviews". 23 September 2016. Archived from the original on 23 September 2016. Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://web.archive.org/web/20160923021434/http://www.gbrussia.org/reviews.php?id=163

  426. Khotin 2009. - Khotin, Rostyslav (27 November 2009). "Ukraine tears down controversial statue". BBC News. Retrieved 17 October 2017. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8380433.stm

  427. Motyl, Alexander J. (28 April 2015). "Decommunizing Ukraine". Foreign Affairs. Retrieved 19 May 2015. /wiki/Alexander_J._Motyl

  428. Shevchenko 2015. - Shevchenko, Vitaly (14 April 2015). "Goodbye, Lenin: Ukraine moves to ban communist symbols". BBC News. Retrieved 17 May 2015. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-32267075

  429. "Порошенко підписав закони про декомунізацію" [Poroshenko signed the laws about decomunization]. Ukrayinska Pravda (in Ukrainian). 15 May 2015. http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2015/05/15/7068057/

  430. "Poroshenko signs laws on denouncing Communist, Nazi regimes". Interfax-Ukraine. 15 May 2015. http://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/265988.html

  431. "В Україні перейменують 22 міста і 44 селища" [In Ukraine, 22 cities and 44 villages are being renamed]. Ukrayinska Pravda (in Ukrainian). 4 June 2015. http://www.pravda.com.ua/news/2015/06/4/7070191

  432. "Decommunization reform: 25 districts and 987 populated areas in Ukraine renamed in 2016". Ukrinform. 27 December 2016. https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-society_and_culture/2147127-decommunization-reform-25-districts-and-987-populated-areas-in-ukraine-renamed-in-2016.html

  433. "Ukraine lawmakers ban 'Communist and Nazi propaganda'", Deutsche Welle (9 April 2015) http://www.dw.de/ukraine-lawmakers-ban-communist-and-nazi-propaganda/a-18372853

  434. "New laws in Ukraine potential threat to free expression and free media, OSCE Representative says", OSCE (18 May 2015) http://www.osce.org/fom/158581

  435. "Ukraine's Justice Ministry outlaws Communists from elections". Kyiv Post. 24 July 2015. http://www.kyivpost.com/content/ukraine/ukraines-justice-ministry-outlaws-communists-from-elections-394217.html

  436. "The European Court has begun consideration of a complaint against the KPU's ban". Ukrayinska Pravda. 30 December 2016. http://pda.pravda.com.ua/news/id_7131315/

  437. Ishchenko, Volodymyr (18 December 2015). "Kiev has a nasty case of anti-communist hysteria". The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/18/ukraine-communist-party-ban-hysteria

  438. "Ukraine court bans Communist Party". Daily News & Analysis. 17 December 2015. https://www.dnaindia.com/world/report-ukraine-court-bans-communist-party-2157044

  439. Yordanov, Radoslav (1 February 2020). "The Balkans in the Cold War". Journal of Cold War Studies. 22 (1): 253–255. doi:10.1162/jcws_r_00913. ISSN 1520-3972. https://direct.mit.edu/jcws/article-abstract/22/1/253/13844/The-Balkans-in-the-Cold-War?redirectedFrom=fulltext

  440. "Background: Tito's Yugoslavia | CES at UNC". europe.unc.edu. Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://europe.unc.edu/background-titos-yugoslavia/

  441. Hall, Richard C. (2009). "Balkan Wars, 1991–2001". Consumed by War. pp. 226–242. doi:10.5810/kentucky/9780813125589.003.0014. ISBN 978-0-8131-2558-9. {{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help) 978-0-8131-2558-9

  442. "US Intervention in the Balkans: The 1990s Yugoslav Wars Explained". TheCollector. 10 December 2022. Retrieved 11 December 2024. https://www.thecollector.com/1990s-yugoslav-wars-explained/

  443. "Country profile: United States of America". BBC News. Retrieved 11 March 2007. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/country_profiles/1217752.stm

  444. Blum 2006, p. 87. - Blum, William (2006). Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower (3rd ed.). Common Courage Press. ISBN 978-1-56751-374-5. https://archive.org/details/unset0000unse_u2v3

  445. "U.S. Military Deployment 1969 to the present". Frontline. PBS. 26 October 2004. Archived from the original on 15 May 2011. Retrieved 30 November 2010. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/pentagon/maps/5.html

  446. Duke 1989, p. 175. - Duke, Simón (1989). United States Military Forces and Installations in Europe. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-829132-9.

  447. "U.S. Military Deployment 1969 to the present". Frontline. PBS. 26 October 2004. Archived from the original on 15 May 2011. Retrieved 30 November 2010. https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/pentagon/maps/5.html

  448. Calhoun 2002. - Calhoun, Craig (2002). "Cold War (entire chapter)". Dictionary of the Social Sciences. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-512371-5. Retrieved 16 June 2008. https://books.google.com/books?id=SvSZHgAACAAJ&q=Dictionary+of+the+Social+Sciences

  449. LaFeber 2002, p. 1. - LaFeber, Walter (2002). America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–2002. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-284903-5.

  450. Gaddis 2005, p. 213. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  451. Gaddis 2005, p. 266. - Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Press. ISBN 978-1-59420-062-5. https://archive.org/details/coldwarnewhistor00gadd

  452. Kim 2014, p. 45: "With three of the four major Cold War fault lines—divided Germany, divided Korea, divided China, and divided Vietnam—East Asia acquired the dubious distinction of having engendered the largest number of armed conflicts resulting in higher fatalities between 1945 and 1994 than any other region or sub-region. Even in Asia, while Central and South Asia produced a regional total of 2.8 million in human fatalities, East Asia's regional total is 10.4 million including the Chinese Civil War (1 million), the Korean War (3 million), the Vietnam War (2 million), and the Pol Pot genocide in Cambodia (1 to 2 million)." - Kim, Samuel S. (2014). "The Evolving Asian System". International Relations of Asia. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9781442226418.

  453. Marshall & Gurr 2006. - Marshall, Monty G.; Gurr, Ted (2006). Peace and Conflict 2005 (PDF) (Report). Center for Systemic Peace. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 June 2008. Retrieved 14 June 2008. https://web.archive.org/web/20080624210152/http://www.systemicpeace.org/PC2005.pdf

  454. Halliday 2001, p. 2e. - Halliday, Fred (2001). "Cold War". The Oxford Companion to the Politics of the World. Oxford University Press Inc.

  455. Ghodsee, Kristen (2018). Why Women Have Better Sex Under Socialism. Vintage Books. pp. 3–4. ISBN 978-1568588902. Without the looming threat of a rival superpower, the last thirty years of global neoliberalism have witnessed a rapid shriveling of social programs that protect citizens from cyclical instability and financial crises and reduce the vast inequality of economic outcomes between those at the top and bottom of the income distribution. 978-1568588902

  456. Greene, Julie (April 2020). "Bookends to a Gentler Capitalism: Complicating the Notion of First and Second Gilded Ages". The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. 19 (2). Cambridge University Press: 197–205. doi:10.1017/S1537781419000628. /wiki/Julie_Greene

  457. Bartel, Fritz (2022). The Triumph of Broken Promises: The End of the Cold War and the Rise of Neoliberalism. Harvard University Press. pp. 5–6. ISBN 9780674976788. 9780674976788

  458. Gerstle, Gary (2022). The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order: America and the World in the Free Market Era. Oxford University Press. pp. 10–12, 149. ISBN 978-0-19-751964-6. The collapse of communism, then, opened the entire world to capitalist penetration, shrank the imaginative and ideological space in which opposition to capitalist thought and practices might incubate, and impelled those who remained leftists to redefine their radicalism in alternative terms, which turned out to be those that capitalist systems could more, rather than less, easily manage. This was the moment when neoliberalism in the United States went from being a political movement to a political order. 978-0-19-751964-6

  459. Nashel 1999. - Nashel, Jonathan (1999). "Cold War (1945–91): Changing Interpretations (entire chapter)". In Whiteclay Chambers, John (ed.). The Oxford Companion to American Military History. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-507198-6. Retrieved 16 June 2008. https://books.google.com/books?id=xtMKHgAACAAJ&q=The+Oxford+Companion+to+American+Military+History

  460. Ambrose & Brinkley 2011, pp. 789–799. - Ambrose, Stephen E.; Brinkley, Douglas G. (2011). Rise to Globalism: American Foreign Policy Since 1938. Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-200494-4. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 23 October 2019. https://books.google.com/books?id=s1u0DgAAQBAJ

  461. Halliday 2001, p. 2e. - Halliday, Fred (2001). "Cold War". The Oxford Companion to the Politics of the World. Oxford University Press Inc.

  462. Calhoun 2002. - Calhoun, Craig (2002). "Cold War (entire chapter)". Dictionary of the Social Sciences. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-512371-5. Retrieved 16 June 2008. https://books.google.com/books?id=SvSZHgAACAAJ&q=Dictionary+of+the+Social+Sciences

  463. Calhoun 2002. - Calhoun, Craig (2002). "Cold War (entire chapter)". Dictionary of the Social Sciences. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-512371-5. Retrieved 16 June 2008. https://books.google.com/books?id=SvSZHgAACAAJ&q=Dictionary+of+the+Social+Sciences

  464. Calhoun 2002. - Calhoun, Craig (2002). "Cold War (entire chapter)". Dictionary of the Social Sciences. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-512371-5. Retrieved 16 June 2008. https://books.google.com/books?id=SvSZHgAACAAJ&q=Dictionary+of+the+Social+Sciences

  465. Calhoun 2002. - Calhoun, Craig (2002). "Cold War (entire chapter)". Dictionary of the Social Sciences. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-512371-5. Retrieved 16 June 2008. https://books.google.com/books?id=SvSZHgAACAAJ&q=Dictionary+of+the+Social+Sciences

  466. Byrd 2003. - Byrd, Peter (2003). "Cold War (entire chapter)". In McLean, Iain; McMillan, Alistair (eds.). The concise Oxford dictionary of politics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280276-7. Archived from the original on 29 July 2020. Retrieved 16 June 2008. https://books.google.com/books?id=xLbEHQAACAAJ