Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Jacobi theta functions (notational variations)
We don't have any images related to Jacobi theta functions (notational variations) yet.
We don't have any YouTube videos related to Jacobi theta functions (notational variations) yet.
We don't have any PDF documents related to Jacobi theta functions (notational variations) yet.
We don't have any Books related to Jacobi theta functions (notational variations) yet.
We don't have any archived web articles related to Jacobi theta functions (notational variations) yet.

There are a number of notational systems for the Jacobi theta functions. The notations given in the Wikipedia article define the original function

ϑ 00 ( z ; τ ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ exp ⁡ ( π i n 2 τ + 2 π i n z ) {\displaystyle \vartheta _{00}(z;\tau )=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }\exp(\pi in^{2}\tau +2\pi inz)}

which is equivalent to

ϑ 00 ( w , q ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ q n 2 w 2 n {\displaystyle \vartheta _{00}(w,q)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }q^{n^{2}}w^{2n}}

where q = e π i τ {\displaystyle q=e^{\pi i\tau }} and w = e π i z {\displaystyle w=e^{\pi iz}} .

However, a similar notation is defined somewhat differently in Whittaker and Watson, p. 487:

ϑ 0 , 0 ( x ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ q n 2 exp ⁡ ( 2 π i n x / a ) {\displaystyle \vartheta _{0,0}(x)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }q^{n^{2}}\exp(2\pi inx/a)}

This notation is attributed to "Hermite, H.J.S. Smith and some other mathematicians". They also define

ϑ 1 , 1 ( x ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ ( − 1 ) n q ( n + 1 / 2 ) 2 exp ⁡ ( π i ( 2 n + 1 ) x / a ) {\displaystyle \vartheta _{1,1}(x)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }(-1)^{n}q^{(n+1/2)^{2}}\exp(\pi i(2n+1)x/a)}

This is a factor of i off from the definition of ϑ 11 {\displaystyle \vartheta _{11}} as defined in the Wikipedia article. These definitions can be made at least proportional by x = za, but other definitions cannot. Whittaker and Watson, Abramowitz and Stegun, and Gradshteyn and Ryzhik all follow Tannery and Molk, in which

ϑ 1 ( z ) = − i ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ ( − 1 ) n q ( n + 1 / 2 ) 2 exp ⁡ ( ( 2 n + 1 ) i z ) {\displaystyle \vartheta _{1}(z)=-i\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }(-1)^{n}q^{(n+1/2)^{2}}\exp((2n+1)iz)} ϑ 2 ( z ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ q ( n + 1 / 2 ) 2 exp ⁡ ( ( 2 n + 1 ) i z ) {\displaystyle \vartheta _{2}(z)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }q^{(n+1/2)^{2}}\exp((2n+1)iz)} ϑ 3 ( z ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ q n 2 exp ⁡ ( 2 n i z ) {\displaystyle \vartheta _{3}(z)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }q^{n^{2}}\exp(2niz)} ϑ 4 ( z ) = ∑ n = − ∞ ∞ ( − 1 ) n q n 2 exp ⁡ ( 2 n i z ) {\displaystyle \vartheta _{4}(z)=\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }(-1)^{n}q^{n^{2}}\exp(2niz)}

Note that there is no factor of π in the argument as in the previous definitions.

Whittaker and Watson refer to still other definitions of ϑ j {\displaystyle \vartheta _{j}} . The warning in Abramowitz and Stegun, "There is a bewildering variety of notations...in consulting books caution should be exercised," may be viewed as an understatement. In any expression, an occurrence of ϑ ( z ) {\displaystyle \vartheta (z)} should not be assumed to have any particular definition. It is incumbent upon the author to state what definition of ϑ ( z ) {\displaystyle \vartheta (z)} is intended.