Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Koenigs function

In mathematics, the Koenigs function is a function arising in complex analysis and dynamical systems. Introduced in 1884 by the French mathematician Gabriel Koenigs, it gives a canonical representation as dilations of a univalent holomorphic mapping, or a semigroup of mappings, of the unit disk in the complex numbers into itself.

We don't have any images related to Koenigs function yet.
We don't have any YouTube videos related to Koenigs function yet.
We don't have any PDF documents related to Koenigs function yet.
We don't have any Books related to Koenigs function yet.
We don't have any archived web articles related to Koenigs function yet.

Existence and uniqueness of Koenigs function

Let D be the unit disk in the complex numbers. Let f be a holomorphic function mapping D into itself, fixing the point 0, with f not identically 0 and f not an automorphism of D, i.e. a Möbius transformation defined by a matrix in SU(1,1).

By the Denjoy-Wolff theorem, f leaves invariant each disk |z | < r and the iterates of f converge uniformly on compacta to 0: in fact for 0 < r < 1,

| f ( z ) | ≤ M ( r ) | z | {\displaystyle |f(z)|\leq M(r)|z|}

for |z | ≤ r with M(r ) < 1. Moreover f '(0) = λ with 0 < |λ| < 1.

Koenigs (1884) proved that there is a unique holomorphic function h defined on D, called the Koenigs function, such that h(0) = 0, h '(0) = 1 and Schröder's equation is satisfied,

h ( f ( z ) ) = f ′ ( 0 ) h ( z )   . {\displaystyle h(f(z))=f^{\prime }(0)h(z)~.}

The function h is the uniform limit on compacta of the normalized iterates, g n ( z ) = λ − n f n ( z ) {\displaystyle g_{n}(z)=\lambda ^{-n}f^{n}(z)} .

Moreover, if f is univalent, so is h.12

As a consequence, when f (and hence h) are univalent, D can be identified with the open domain U = h(D). Under this conformal identification, the mapping   f becomes multiplication by λ, a dilation on U.

Proof

  • Uniqueness. If k is another solution then, by analyticity, it suffices to show that k = h near 0. Let
H = k ∘ h − 1 ( z ) {\displaystyle H=k\circ h^{-1}(z)} near 0. Thus H(0) =0, H'(0)=1 and, for |z | small, λ H ( z ) = λ h ( k − 1 ( z ) ) = h ( f ( k − 1 ( z ) ) = h ( k − 1 ( λ z ) = H ( λ z )   . {\displaystyle \lambda H(z)=\lambda h(k^{-1}(z))=h(f(k^{-1}(z))=h(k^{-1}(\lambda z)=H(\lambda z)~.} Substituting into the power series for H, it follows that H(z) = z near 0. Hence h = k near 0.
  • Existence. If F ( z ) = f ( z ) / λ z , {\displaystyle F(z)=f(z)/\lambda z,} then by the Schwarz lemma
| F ( z ) − 1 | ≤ ( 1 + | λ | − 1 ) | z |   . {\displaystyle |F(z)-1|\leq (1+|\lambda |^{-1})|z|~.} On the other hand, g n ( z ) = z ∏ j = 0 n − 1 F ( f j ( z ) )   . {\displaystyle g_{n}(z)=z\prod _{j=0}^{n-1}F(f^{j}(z))~.} Hence gn converges uniformly for |z| ≤ r by the Weierstrass M-test since ∑ sup | z | ≤ r | 1 − F ∘ f j ( z ) | ≤ ( 1 + | λ | − 1 ) ∑ M ( r ) j < ∞ . {\displaystyle \sum \sup _{|z|\leq r}|1-F\circ f^{j}(z)|\leq (1+|\lambda |^{-1})\sum M(r)^{j}<\infty .}
  • Univalence. By Hurwitz's theorem, since each gn is univalent and normalized, i.e. fixes 0 and has derivative 1 there , their limit h is also univalent.

Koenigs function of a semigroup

Let ft (z) be a semigroup of holomorphic univalent mappings of D into itself fixing 0 defined for t ∈ [0, ∞) such that

  • f s {\displaystyle f_{s}} is not an automorphism for s > 0
  • f s ( f t ( z ) ) = f t + s ( z ) {\displaystyle f_{s}(f_{t}(z))=f_{t+s}(z)}
  • f 0 ( z ) = z {\displaystyle f_{0}(z)=z}
  • f t ( z ) {\displaystyle f_{t}(z)} is jointly continuous in t and z

Each fs with s > 0 has the same Koenigs function, cf. iterated function. In fact, if h is the Koenigs function of f = f1, then h(fs(z)) satisfies Schroeder's equation and hence is proportion to h.

Taking derivatives gives

h ( f s ( z ) ) = f s ′ ( 0 ) h ( z ) . {\displaystyle h(f_{s}(z))=f_{s}^{\prime }(0)h(z).}

Hence h is the Koenigs function of fs.

Structure of univalent semigroups

On the domain U = h(D), the maps fs become multiplication by λ ( s ) = f s ′ ( 0 ) {\displaystyle \lambda (s)=f_{s}^{\prime }(0)} , a continuous semigroup. So λ ( s ) = e μ s {\displaystyle \lambda (s)=e^{\mu s}} where μ is a uniquely determined solution of e μ = λ with Reμ < 0. It follows that the semigroup is differentiable at 0. Let

v ( z ) = ∂ t f t ( z ) | t = 0 , {\displaystyle v(z)=\partial _{t}f_{t}(z)|_{t=0},}

a holomorphic function on D with v(0) = 0 and v'(0) = μ.

Then

∂ t ( f t ( z ) ) h ′ ( f t ( z ) ) = μ e μ t h ( z ) = μ h ( f t ( z ) ) , {\displaystyle \partial _{t}(f_{t}(z))h^{\prime }(f_{t}(z))=\mu e^{\mu t}h(z)=\mu h(f_{t}(z)),}

so that

v = v ′ ( 0 ) h h ′ {\displaystyle v=v^{\prime }(0){h \over h^{\prime }}}

and

∂ t f t ( z ) = v ( f t ( z ) ) , f t ( z ) = 0   , {\displaystyle \partial _{t}f_{t}(z)=v(f_{t}(z)),\,\,\,f_{t}(z)=0~,}

the flow equation for a vector field.

Restricting to the case with 0 < λ < 1, the h(D) must be starlike so that

ℜ z h ′ ( z ) h ( z ) ≥ 0   . {\displaystyle \Re {zh^{\prime }(z) \over h(z)}\geq 0~.}

Since the same result holds for the reciprocal,

ℜ v ( z ) z ≤ 0   , {\displaystyle \Re {v(z) \over z}\leq 0~,}

so that v(z) satisfies the conditions of Berkson & Porta (1978)

v ( z ) = z p ( z ) , ℜ p ( z ) ≤ 0 , p ′ ( 0 ) < 0. {\displaystyle v(z)=zp(z),\,\,\,\Re p(z)\leq 0,\,\,\,p^{\prime }(0)<0.}

Conversely, reversing the above steps, any holomorphic vector field v(z) satisfying these conditions is associated to a semigroup ft, with

h ( z ) = z exp ⁡ ∫ 0 z v ′ ( 0 ) v ( w ) − 1 w d w . {\displaystyle h(z)=z\exp \int _{0}^{z}{v^{\prime }(0) \over v(w)}-{1 \over w}\,dw.}

Notes

  • Berkson, E.; Porta, H. (1978), "Semigroups of analytic functions and composition operators", Michigan Math. J., 25: 101–115, doi:10.1307/mmj/1029002009
  • Carleson, L.; Gamelin, T. D. W. (1993), Complex dynamics, Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-97942-5
  • Elin, M.; Shoikhet, D. (2010), Linearization Models for Complex Dynamical Systems: Topics in Univalent Functions, Functional Equations and Semigroup Theory, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, vol. 208, Springer, ISBN 978-3034605083
  • Koenigs, G.P.X. (1884), "Recherches sur les intégrales de certaines équations fonctionnelles", Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup., 1: 2–41
  • Kuczma, Marek (1968). Functional equations in a single variable. Monografie Matematyczne. Warszawa: PWN – Polish Scientific Publishers. ASIN: B0006BTAC2
  • Shapiro, J. H. (1993), Composition operators and classical function theory, Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-94067-7
  • Shoikhet, D. (2001), Semigroups in geometrical function theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 0-7923-7111-9

References

  1. Carleson & Gamelin 1993, pp. 28–32 - Carleson, L.; Gamelin, T. D. W. (1993), Complex dynamics, Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-97942-5 https://archive.org/details/complexdynamics0000carl

  2. Shapiro 1993, pp. 90–93 - Shapiro, J. H. (1993), Composition operators and classical function theory, Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-94067-7