In mathematics, the Koenigs function is a function arising in complex analysis and dynamical systems. Introduced in 1884 by the French mathematician Gabriel Koenigs, it gives a canonical representation as dilations of a univalent holomorphic mapping, or a semigroup of mappings, of the unit disk in the complex numbers into itself.
Existence and uniqueness of Koenigs function
Let D be the unit disk in the complex numbers. Let f be a holomorphic function mapping D into itself, fixing the point 0, with f not identically 0 and f not an automorphism of D, i.e. a Möbius transformation defined by a matrix in SU(1,1).
By the Denjoy-Wolff theorem, f leaves invariant each disk |z | < r and the iterates of f converge uniformly on compacta to 0: in fact for 0 < r < 1,
| f ( z ) | ≤ M ( r ) | z | {\displaystyle |f(z)|\leq M(r)|z|}for |z | ≤ r with M(r ) < 1. Moreover f '(0) = λ with 0 < |λ| < 1.
Koenigs (1884) proved that there is a unique holomorphic function h defined on D, called the Koenigs function, such that h(0) = 0, h '(0) = 1 and Schröder's equation is satisfied,
h ( f ( z ) ) = f ′ ( 0 ) h ( z ) . {\displaystyle h(f(z))=f^{\prime }(0)h(z)~.}The function h is the uniform limit on compacta of the normalized iterates, g n ( z ) = λ − n f n ( z ) {\displaystyle g_{n}(z)=\lambda ^{-n}f^{n}(z)} .
Moreover, if f is univalent, so is h.12
As a consequence, when f (and hence h) are univalent, D can be identified with the open domain U = h(D). Under this conformal identification, the mapping f becomes multiplication by λ, a dilation on U.
Proof
- Uniqueness. If k is another solution then, by analyticity, it suffices to show that k = h near 0. Let
- Existence. If F ( z ) = f ( z ) / λ z , {\displaystyle F(z)=f(z)/\lambda z,} then by the Schwarz lemma
- Univalence. By Hurwitz's theorem, since each gn is univalent and normalized, i.e. fixes 0 and has derivative 1 there , their limit h is also univalent.
Koenigs function of a semigroup
Let ft (z) be a semigroup of holomorphic univalent mappings of D into itself fixing 0 defined for t ∈ [0, ∞) such that
- f s {\displaystyle f_{s}} is not an automorphism for s > 0
- f s ( f t ( z ) ) = f t + s ( z ) {\displaystyle f_{s}(f_{t}(z))=f_{t+s}(z)}
- f 0 ( z ) = z {\displaystyle f_{0}(z)=z}
- f t ( z ) {\displaystyle f_{t}(z)} is jointly continuous in t and z
Each fs with s > 0 has the same Koenigs function, cf. iterated function. In fact, if h is the Koenigs function of f = f1, then h(fs(z)) satisfies Schroeder's equation and hence is proportion to h.
Taking derivatives gives
h ( f s ( z ) ) = f s ′ ( 0 ) h ( z ) . {\displaystyle h(f_{s}(z))=f_{s}^{\prime }(0)h(z).}Hence h is the Koenigs function of fs.
Structure of univalent semigroups
On the domain U = h(D), the maps fs become multiplication by λ ( s ) = f s ′ ( 0 ) {\displaystyle \lambda (s)=f_{s}^{\prime }(0)} , a continuous semigroup. So λ ( s ) = e μ s {\displaystyle \lambda (s)=e^{\mu s}} where μ is a uniquely determined solution of e μ = λ with Reμ < 0. It follows that the semigroup is differentiable at 0. Let
v ( z ) = ∂ t f t ( z ) | t = 0 , {\displaystyle v(z)=\partial _{t}f_{t}(z)|_{t=0},}a holomorphic function on D with v(0) = 0 and v'(0) = μ.
Then
∂ t ( f t ( z ) ) h ′ ( f t ( z ) ) = μ e μ t h ( z ) = μ h ( f t ( z ) ) , {\displaystyle \partial _{t}(f_{t}(z))h^{\prime }(f_{t}(z))=\mu e^{\mu t}h(z)=\mu h(f_{t}(z)),}so that
v = v ′ ( 0 ) h h ′ {\displaystyle v=v^{\prime }(0){h \over h^{\prime }}}and
∂ t f t ( z ) = v ( f t ( z ) ) , f t ( z ) = 0 , {\displaystyle \partial _{t}f_{t}(z)=v(f_{t}(z)),\,\,\,f_{t}(z)=0~,}the flow equation for a vector field.
Restricting to the case with 0 < λ < 1, the h(D) must be starlike so that
ℜ z h ′ ( z ) h ( z ) ≥ 0 . {\displaystyle \Re {zh^{\prime }(z) \over h(z)}\geq 0~.}Since the same result holds for the reciprocal,
ℜ v ( z ) z ≤ 0 , {\displaystyle \Re {v(z) \over z}\leq 0~,}so that v(z) satisfies the conditions of Berkson & Porta (1978)
v ( z ) = z p ( z ) , ℜ p ( z ) ≤ 0 , p ′ ( 0 ) < 0. {\displaystyle v(z)=zp(z),\,\,\,\Re p(z)\leq 0,\,\,\,p^{\prime }(0)<0.}Conversely, reversing the above steps, any holomorphic vector field v(z) satisfying these conditions is associated to a semigroup ft, with
h ( z ) = z exp ∫ 0 z v ′ ( 0 ) v ( w ) − 1 w d w . {\displaystyle h(z)=z\exp \int _{0}^{z}{v^{\prime }(0) \over v(w)}-{1 \over w}\,dw.}Notes
- Berkson, E.; Porta, H. (1978), "Semigroups of analytic functions and composition operators", Michigan Math. J., 25: 101–115, doi:10.1307/mmj/1029002009
- Carleson, L.; Gamelin, T. D. W. (1993), Complex dynamics, Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-97942-5
- Elin, M.; Shoikhet, D. (2010), Linearization Models for Complex Dynamical Systems: Topics in Univalent Functions, Functional Equations and Semigroup Theory, Operator Theory: Advances and Applications, vol. 208, Springer, ISBN 978-3034605083
- Koenigs, G.P.X. (1884), "Recherches sur les intégrales de certaines équations fonctionnelles", Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup., 1: 2–41
- Kuczma, Marek (1968). Functional equations in a single variable. Monografie Matematyczne. Warszawa: PWN – Polish Scientific Publishers. ASIN: B0006BTAC2
- Shapiro, J. H. (1993), Composition operators and classical function theory, Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-94067-7
- Shoikhet, D. (2001), Semigroups in geometrical function theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 0-7923-7111-9
References
Carleson & Gamelin 1993, pp. 28–32 - Carleson, L.; Gamelin, T. D. W. (1993), Complex dynamics, Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-97942-5 https://archive.org/details/complexdynamics0000carl ↩
Shapiro 1993, pp. 90–93 - Shapiro, J. H. (1993), Composition operators and classical function theory, Universitext: Tracts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 0-387-94067-7 ↩