• Images
• Videos
• Documents
• Books
• Articles

Measurement and units

Vapor pressure is measured in the standard units of pressure. The International System of Units (SI) recognizes pressure as a derived unit with the dimension of force per area and designates the pascal (Pa) as its standard unit.² One pascal is one newton per square meter (N·m−2 or kg·m−1·s−2).

Experimental measurement of vapor pressure is a simple procedure for common pressures between 1 and 200 kPa.³ The most accurate results are obtained near the boiling point of the substance; measurements smaller than 1kPa are subject to major errors. Procedures often consist of purifying the test substance, isolating it in a container, evacuating any foreign gas, then measuring the equilibrium pressure of the gaseous phase of the substance in the container at different temperatures. Better accuracy is achieved when care is taken to ensure that the entire substance and its vapor are both at the prescribed temperature. This is often done, as with the use of an isoteniscope, by submerging the containment area in a liquid bath.

Very low vapor pressures of solids can be measured using the Knudsen effusion cell method.

In a medical context, vapor pressure is sometimes expressed in other units, specifically millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Accurate knowledge of the vapor pressure is important for volatile inhalational anesthetics, most of which are liquids at body temperature but have a relatively high vapor pressure.

Estimating vapor pressures with Antoine equation

The Antoine equation⁴⁵ is a pragmatic mathematical expression of the relation between the vapor pressure and the temperature of pure liquid or solid substances. It is obtained by curve-fitting and is adapted to the fact that vapor pressure is usually increasing and concave as a function of temperature. The basic form of the equation is:

log ⁡ P = A − B C + T {\displaystyle \log P=A-{\frac {B}{C+T}}}

and it can be transformed into this temperature-explicit form:

T = B A − log ⁡ P − C {\displaystyle T={\frac {B}{A-\log P}}-C}

where:

• P {\displaystyle P} is the absolute vapor pressure of a substance
• T {\displaystyle T} is the temperature of the substance
• A {\displaystyle A} , B {\displaystyle B} and C {\displaystyle C} are substance-specific coefficients (i.e., constants or parameters)
• log {\displaystyle \log } is typically either log 10 {\displaystyle \log _{10}} or log e {\displaystyle \log _{e}} ⁶

A simpler form of the equation with only two coefficients is sometimes used:

log ⁡ P = A − B T {\displaystyle \log P=A-{\frac {B}{T}}}

which can be transformed to:

T = B A − log ⁡ P {\displaystyle T={\frac {B}{A-\log P}}}

Sublimations and vaporizations of the same substance have separate sets of Antoine coefficients, as do components in mixtures.⁷ Each parameter set for a specific compound is only applicable over a specified temperature range. Generally, temperature ranges are chosen to maintain the equation's accuracy of a few up to 8–10 percent. For many volatile substances, several different sets of parameters are available and used for different temperature ranges. The Antoine equation has poor accuracy with any single parameter set when used from a compound's melting point to its critical temperature. Accuracy is also usually poor when vapor pressure is under 10 Torr because of the limitations of the apparatus used to establish the Antoine parameter values.

The Wagner equation⁸ gives "one of the best"⁹ fits to experimental data but is quite complex. It expresses reduced vapor pressure as a function of reduced temperature.

Relation to boiling point of liquids

Further information: Boiling point

As a general trend, vapor pressures of liquids at ambient temperatures increase with decreasing boiling points. This is illustrated in the vapor pressure chart (see right) that shows graphs of the vapor pressures versus temperatures for a variety of liquids.¹⁰ At the normal boiling point of a liquid, the vapor pressure is equal to the standard atmospheric pressure defined as 1 atmosphere,¹¹ 760 Torr, 101.325 kPa, or 14.69595 psi.

For example, at any given temperature, methyl chloride has the highest vapor pressure of any of the liquids in the chart. It also has the lowest normal boiling point at −24.2 °C (−11.6 °F), which is where the vapor pressure curve of methyl chloride (the blue line) intersects the horizontal pressure line of one atmosphere (atm) of absolute vapor pressure.

Although the relation between vapor pressure and temperature is non-linear, the chart uses a logarithmic vertical axis to produce slightly curved lines, so one chart can graph many liquids. A nearly straight line is obtained when the logarithm of the vapor pressure is plotted against 1/(T + 230)¹² where T is the temperature in degrees Celsius. The vapor pressure of a liquid at its boiling point equals the pressure of its surrounding environment.

Liquid mixtures: Raoult's law

Raoult's law gives an approximation to the vapor pressure of mixtures of liquids. It states that the activity (pressure or fugacity) of a single-phase mixture is equal to the mole-fraction-weighted sum of the components' vapor pressures:

P t o t = ∑ i P y i = ∑ i P i s a t x i {\displaystyle P_{\rm {tot}}=\sum _{i}Py_{i}=\sum _{i}P_{i}^{\rm {sat}}x_{i}\,}

where P t o t {\displaystyle P_{\rm {tot}}} is the mixture's vapor pressure, x i {\displaystyle x_{i}} is the mole fraction of component i {\displaystyle i} in the liquid phase and y i {\displaystyle y_{i}} is the mole fraction of component i {\displaystyle i} in the vapor phase respectively. P i s a t {\displaystyle P_{i}^{\rm {sat}}} is the vapor pressure of component i {\displaystyle i} . Raoult's law is applicable only to non-electrolytes (uncharged species); it is most appropriate for non-polar molecules with only weak intermolecular attractions (such as London forces).

Systems that have vapor pressures higher than indicated by the above formula are said to have positive deviations. Such a deviation suggests weaker intermolecular attraction than in the pure components, so that the molecules can be thought of as being "held in" the liquid phase less strongly than in the pure liquid. An example is the azeotrope of approximately 95% ethanol and water. Because the azeotrope's vapor pressure is higher than predicted by Raoult's law, it boils at a temperature below that of either pure component.

There are also systems with negative deviations that have vapor pressures that are lower than expected. Such a deviation is evidence for stronger intermolecular attraction between the constituents of the mixture than exists in the pure components. Thus, the molecules are "held in" the liquid more strongly when a second molecule is present. An example is a mixture of trichloromethane (chloroform) and 2-propanone (acetone), which boils above the boiling point of either pure component.

The negative and positive deviations can be used to determine thermodynamic activity coefficients of the components of mixtures.

Solids

Equilibrium vapor pressure can be defined as the pressure reached when a condensed phase is in equilibrium with its own vapor. In the case of an equilibrium solid, such as a crystal, this can be defined as the pressure when the rate of sublimation of a solid matches the rate of deposition of its vapor phase. For most solids this pressure is very low, but some notable exceptions are naphthalene, dry ice (the vapor pressure of dry ice is 5.73 MPa (831 psi, 56.5 atm) at 20 °C, which causes most sealed containers to rupture), and ice. All solid materials have a vapor pressure. However, due to their often extremely low values, measurement can be rather difficult. Typical techniques include the use of thermogravimetry and gas transpiration.

There are a number of methods for calculating the sublimation pressure (i.e., the vapor pressure) of a solid. One method is to estimate the sublimation pressure from extrapolated liquid vapor pressures (of the supercooled liquid), if the heat of fusion is known, by using this particular form of the Clausius–Clapeyron relation:¹³

ln P s s u b = ln P l s u b − Δ f u s H R ( 1 T s u b − 1 T f u s ) {\displaystyle \ln \,P_{\rm {s}}^{\rm {sub}}=\ln \,P_{\rm {l}}^{\rm {sub}}-{\frac {\Delta _{\rm {fus}}H}{R}}\left({\frac {1}{T_{\rm {sub}}}}-{\frac {1}{T_{\rm {fus}}}}\right)}

where:

• P s s u b {\displaystyle P_{\rm {s}}^{\rm {sub}}} is the sublimation pressure of the solid component at the temperature T s u b < T f u s {\displaystyle T_{\rm {sub}}<T_{\rm {fus}}} .
• P l s u b {\displaystyle P_{\rm {l}}^{\rm {sub}}} is the extrapolated vapor pressure of the liquid component at the temperature T s u b < T f u s {\displaystyle T_{\rm {sub}}<T_{\rm {fus}}} .
• Δ f u s H {\displaystyle \Delta _{\rm {fus}}H} is the heat of fusion.
• R {\displaystyle R} is the gas constant.
• T s u b {\displaystyle T_{\rm {sub}}} is the sublimation temperature.
• T f u s {\displaystyle T_{\rm {fus}}} is the melting point temperature.

This method assumes that the heat of fusion is temperature-independent, ignores additional transition temperatures between different solid phases, and it gives a fair estimation for temperatures not too far from the melting point. It also shows that the sublimation pressure is lower than the extrapolated liquid vapor pressure (ΔfusH > 0) and the difference grows with increased distance from the melting point.

Boiling point of water

Main article: Vapour pressure of water

Like all liquids, water boils when its vapor pressure reaches its surrounding pressure. In nature, the atmospheric pressure is lower at higher elevations and water boils at a lower temperature. The boiling temperature of water for atmospheric pressures can be approximated by the Antoine equation:

log 10 ⁡ ( P 1  Torr ) = 8.07131 − 1730.63   ∘ C 233.426   ∘ C + T b {\displaystyle \log _{10}\left({\frac {P}{1{\text{ Torr}}}}\right)=8.07131-{\frac {1730.63\ {}^{\circ }{\text{C}}}{233.426\ {}^{\circ }{\text{C}}+T_{b}}}}

or transformed into this temperature-explicit form:

T b = 1730.63   ∘ C 8.07131 − log 10 ⁡ ( P 1  Torr ) − 233.426   ∘ C {\displaystyle T_{b}={\frac {1730.63\ {}^{\circ }{\text{C}}}{8.07131-\log _{10}\left({\frac {P}{1{\text{ Torr}}}}\right)}}-233.426\ {}^{\circ }{\text{C}}}

where the temperature T b {\displaystyle T_{b}} is the boiling point in degrees Celsius and the pressure P {\displaystyle P} is in torr.

Dühring's rule

Main article: Dühring's rule

Dühring's rule states that a linear relationship exists between the temperatures at which two solutions exert the same vapor pressure.

Examples

The following table is a list of a variety of substances ordered by increasing vapor pressure (in absolute units).

Substance	Vapor pressure			Temperature(°C)
	(Pa)	(bar)	(mmHg)
Octaethylene glycol14	9.2×10−8 Pa	9.2×10−13	6.9×10−10	89.85
Glycerol	0.4 Pa	0.000004	0.003	50
Mercury	1 Pa	0.00001	0.0075	41.85
Tungsten	1 Pa	0.00001	0.0075	3203
Xenon difluoride	600 Pa	0.006	4.50	25
Water (H2O)	2.3 kPa	0.023	17.5	20
Propanol	2.4 kPa	0.024	18.0	20
Methyl isobutyl ketone	2.66 kPa	0.0266	19.95	25
Iron pentacarbonyl	2.80 kPa	0.028	21	20
Ethanol	5.83 kPa	0.0583	43.7	20
Freon 113	37.9 kPa	0.379	284	20
Acetaldehyde	98.7 kPa	0.987	740	20
Butane	220 kPa	2.2	1650	20
Formaldehyde	435.7 kPa	4.357	3268	20
Propane15	997.8 kPa	9.978	7584	26.85
Carbonyl sulfide	1.255 MPa	12.55	9412	25
Nitrous oxide16	5.660 MPa	56.60	42453	25
Carbon dioxide	5.7 MPa	57	42753	20

Estimating vapor pressure from molecular structure

Several empirical methods exist to estimate the vapor pressure from molecular structure for organic molecules. Some examples are SIMPOL.1 method,¹⁷ the method of Moller et al.,¹⁸ and EVAPORATION (Estimation of VApour Pressure of ORganics, Accounting for Temperature, Intramolecular, and Non-additivity effects).¹⁹²⁰

Meaning in meteorology

In meteorology, the term vapor pressure means the partial pressure of water vapor in the atmosphere, even if it is not in equilibrium.²¹ This differs from its meaning in other sciences.²² According to the American Meteorological Society Glossary of Meteorology, saturation vapor pressure properly refers to the equilibrium vapor pressure of water above a flat surface of liquid water or solid ice, and is a function only of temperature and whether the condensed phase is liquid or solid.²³ Relative humidity is defined relative to saturation vapor pressure.²⁴ Equilibrium vapor pressure does not require the condensed phase to be a flat surface; it might consist of tiny droplets possibly containing solutes (impurities), such as a cloud.²⁵²⁶ Equilibrium vapor pressure may differ significantly from saturation vapor pressure depending on the size of droplets and presence of other particles which act as cloud condensation nuclei.²⁷²⁸

However, these terms are used inconsistently, and some authors use "saturation vapor pressure" outside the narrow meaning given by the AMS Glossary. For example, a text on atmospheric convection states, "The Kelvin effect causes the saturation vapor pressure over the curved surface of the droplet to be greater than that over a flat water surface" (emphasis added).²⁹

The still-current term saturation vapor pressure derives from the obsolete theory that water vapor dissolves into air, and that air at a given temperature can only hold a certain amount of water before becoming "saturated".³⁰ Actually, as stated by Dalton's law (known since 1802), the partial pressure of water vapor or any substance does not depend on air at all, and the relevant temperature is that of the liquid.³¹ Nevertheless, the erroneous belief persists among the public and even meteorologists, aided by the misleading terms saturation pressure and supersaturation and the related definition of relative humidity.³²

See also

• Absolute humidity
• Antoine equation
• Lee–Kesler method
• Osmotic coefficient
• Raoult's law: vapor pressure lowering in solution
• Reid vapor pressure
• Relative humidity
• Relative volatility
• Saturation vapor density
• Triple point
• True vapor pressure
• Vapor–liquid equilibrium
• Vapor pressures of the elements (data page)
• Vapour pressure of water
• High-pressure chemistry

Notes

External links

• Fluid Characteristics Chart, Engineer's Edge
• Vapor Pressure, Hyperphysics
• Vapor Pressure, The MSDS HyperGlossary
• Online vapor pressure calculation tool (Requires Registration)
• Prediction of Vapor Pressures of Pure Liquid Organic Compounds

References

1. Spelled vapour pressure in the UK; see spelling differences. /wiki/American_and_British_English_spelling_differences#-our,_-or ↩

2. Petrucci, Ralph H.; Harwood, William S.; Herring, F.Geoffrey (2002). General Chemistry (8th ed.). Prentice Hall. p. 484. ISBN 978-0-13-014329-7. 978-0-13-014329-7 ↩

3. Růžička, K.; Fulem, M. & Růžička, V. "Vapor Pressure of Organic Compounds. Measurement and Correlation" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-12-26. Retrieved 2009-10-18. https://web.archive.org/web/20101226095004/http://www.capec.kt.dtu.dk/documents/overview/Vapor-pressure-Ruzicka.pdf ↩

4. What is the Antoine Equation? (Chemistry Department, Frostburg State University, Maryland) http://antoine.frostburg.edu/chem/senese/101/liquids/faq/antoine-vapor-pressure.shtml ↩

5. Sinnot, R.K. (2005). Chemical Engineering Design] (4th ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. p. 331. ISBN 978-0-7506-6538-4. 978-0-7506-6538-4 ↩

6. Sinnot, R.K. (2005). Chemical Engineering Design] (4th ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. p. 331. ISBN 978-0-7506-6538-4. 978-0-7506-6538-4 ↩

7. What is the Antoine Equation? (Chemistry Department, Frostburg State University, Maryland) http://antoine.frostburg.edu/chem/senese/101/liquids/faq/antoine-vapor-pressure.shtml ↩

8. Wagner, W. (1973), "New vapour pressure measurements for argon and nitrogen and a new method for establishing rational vapour pressure equations", Cryogenics, 13 (8): 470–482, Bibcode:1973Cryo...13..470W, doi:10.1016/0011-2275(73)90003-9 /wiki/Bibcode_(identifier) ↩

9. Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 7th Ed. pp. 4–15 ↩

10. Perry, R.H.; Green, D.W., eds. (1997). Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-049841-9. 978-0-07-049841-9 ↩

11. Petrucci, Ralph H.; Harwood, William S.; Herring, F.Geoffrey (2002). General Chemistry (8th ed.). Prentice Hall. p. 484. ISBN 978-0-13-014329-7. 978-0-13-014329-7 ↩

12. Dreisbach, R. R. & Spencer, R. S. (1949). "Infinite Points of Cox Chart Families and dt/dP Values at any Pressure". Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 41 (1): 176. doi:10.1021/ie50469a040. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩

13. Moller B.; Rarey J.; Ramjugernath D. (2008). "Estimation of the vapour pressure of non-electrolyte organic compounds via group contributions and group interactions". Journal of Molecular Liquids. 143: 52–63. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2008.04.020. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩

14. Krieger, Ulrich K.; Siegrist, Franziska; Marcolli, Claudia; Emanuelsson, Eva U.; Gøbel, Freya M.; Bilde, Merete (8 January 2018). "A reference data set for validating vapor pressure measurement techniques: homologous series of polyethylene glycols" (PDF). Atmospheric Measurement Techniques. 11 (1). Copernicus Publications: 49–63. Bibcode:2018AMT....11...49K. doi:10.5194/amt-11-49-2018. ISSN 1867-1381. S2CID 41910898. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. Retrieved 7 April 2022. https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/49/2018/amt-11-49-2018.pdf ↩

15. "Thermophysical Properties Of Fluids II – Methane, Ethane, Propane, Isobutane, And Normal Butane" Archived 2016-12-21 at the Wayback Machine (page 110 of PDF, page 686 of original document), BA Younglove and JF Ely. https://www.nist.gov/data/PDFfiles/jpcrd331.pdf ↩

16. "Thermophysical Properties Of Nitrous Oxide" (page 14 of PDF, page 10 of original document), ESDU. http://edge.rit.edu/content/P07106/public/Nox.pdf ↩

17. Pankow, J. F.; et al. (2008). "SIMPOL.1: a simple group contribution method for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of multifunctional organic compounds". Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8 (10): 2773–2796. Bibcode:2008ACP.....8.2773P. doi:10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008. https://doi.org/10.5194%2Facp-8-2773-2008 ↩

18. Moller B.; Rarey J.; Ramjugernath D. (2008). "Estimation of the vapour pressure of non-electrolyte organic compounds via group contributions and group interactions". Journal of Molecular Liquids. 143: 52–63. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2008.04.020. /wiki/Doi_(identifier) ↩

19. "Vapour pressure of Pure Liquid Organic Compounds: Estimation by EVAPORATION". Tropospheric Chemistry Modelling at BIRA-IASB. 11 June 2014. Retrieved 2018-11-26. http://tropo.aeronomie.be/models/evaporation_run.htm ↩

20. Compernolle, S.; et al. (2011). "EVAPORATION: a new vapour pressure estimation method for organic molecules including non-additivity and intramolecular interactions". Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 (18): 9431–9450. Bibcode:2011ACP....11.9431C. doi:10.5194/acp-11-9431-2011. https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/11/9431/2011/acp-11-9431-2011.html ↩

21. American Meteorological Society (2012). "vapor pressure". Glossary of Meteorology. Retrieved 2022-11-28. /wiki/American_Meteorological_Society ↩

22. American Meteorological Society (2012). "vapor pressure". Glossary of Meteorology. Retrieved 2022-11-28. /wiki/American_Meteorological_Society ↩

23. American Meteorological Society (2020). "saturation vapor pressure". Glossary of Meteorology. Retrieved 2022-11-28. /wiki/American_Meteorological_Society ↩

24. Babin, Steven M. (1998). "Relative Humidity & Saturation Vapor Pressure: A Brief Tutorial". Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. Archived from the original on 1998-07-13. Retrieved 2022-11-28. (Alternate title: "Water Vapor Myths: A Brief Tutorial".) https://fermi.jhuapl.edu/people/babin/vapor/vapor.html ↩

25. American Meteorological Society (2012). "equilibrium vapor pressure". Glossary of Meteorology. Retrieved 2022-11-28. /wiki/American_Meteorological_Society ↩

26. Babin, Steven M. (1998). "Relative Humidity & Saturation Vapor Pressure: A Brief Tutorial". Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. Archived from the original on 1998-07-13. Retrieved 2022-11-28. (Alternate title: "Water Vapor Myths: A Brief Tutorial".) https://fermi.jhuapl.edu/people/babin/vapor/vapor.html ↩

27. American Meteorological Society (2012). "equilibrium vapor pressure". Glossary of Meteorology. Retrieved 2022-11-28. /wiki/American_Meteorological_Society ↩

28. Babin, Steven M. (1998). "Relative Humidity & Saturation Vapor Pressure: A Brief Tutorial". Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. Archived from the original on 1998-07-13. Retrieved 2022-11-28. (Alternate title: "Water Vapor Myths: A Brief Tutorial".) https://fermi.jhuapl.edu/people/babin/vapor/vapor.html ↩

29. Raymond, David J. (2011-05-12). "Chapter 5: Cloud Microphysics" (PDF). Atmospheric Convection. New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology. p. 73. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-03-29. Retrieved 2022-11-28. http://kestrel.nmt.edu/~raymond/classes/ph536/notes/microphys.pdf ↩

30. Babin, Steven M. (1998). "Relative Humidity & Saturation Vapor Pressure: A Brief Tutorial". Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. Archived from the original on 1998-07-13. Retrieved 2022-11-28. (Alternate title: "Water Vapor Myths: A Brief Tutorial".) https://fermi.jhuapl.edu/people/babin/vapor/vapor.html ↩

31. Babin, Steven M. (1998). "Relative Humidity & Saturation Vapor Pressure: A Brief Tutorial". Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. Archived from the original on 1998-07-13. Retrieved 2022-11-28. (Alternate title: "Water Vapor Myths: A Brief Tutorial".) https://fermi.jhuapl.edu/people/babin/vapor/vapor.html ↩

32. Babin, Steven M. (1998). "Relative Humidity & Saturation Vapor Pressure: A Brief Tutorial". Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. Archived from the original on 1998-07-13. Retrieved 2022-11-28. (Alternate title: "Water Vapor Myths: A Brief Tutorial".) https://fermi.jhuapl.edu/people/babin/vapor/vapor.html ↩