Menu
Home Explore People Places Arts History Plants & Animals Science Life & Culture Technology
On this page
Usage share of web browsers
Relative market adoption of web browsers

The usage share of web browsers is the portion, often expressed as a percentage, of visitors to a group of web sites that use a particular web browser.

Related Image Collections Add Image
Profiles
1 Image
We don't have any YouTube videos related to Usage share of web browsers yet.
We don't have any PDF documents related to Usage share of web browsers yet.
We don't have any Books related to Usage share of web browsers yet.

Accuracy

Measuring browser usage in the number of requests (page hits) made by each user agent can be misleading.

Overestimation

Not all requests are generated by a user, as a user agent can make requests at regular time intervals without user input. In this case, the user's activity might be overestimated. Some examples:

  • Certain anti-virus products fake their user agent string to appear to be popular browsers. This is done to trick attack sites that might display clean content to the scanner, but not to the browser. The Register reported in June 2008 that traffic from AVG Linkscanner, using an IE6 user agent string, outstripped human link clicks by nearly 10 to 1.1
  • A user who revisits a site shortly after changing or upgrading browsers may be double-counted under some methods; overall numbers at the time of a new version's release may be skewed.2
  • Occasionally websites are written in such a way that they effectively block certain browsers. One common reason for this is that the website has been tested to work with only a limited number of browsers, and so the site owners enforce that only tested browsers are allowed to view the content, while all other browsers are sent a "failure" message, and instruction to use another browser.3 Many of the untested browsers may still be otherwise capable of rendering the content. Sophisticated users who are aware of this may then "spoof" the user agent string in order to gain access to the site.
  • Firefox, Chrome, Safari, and Opera will, under some circumstances, fetch resources before they need to render them, so that the resources can be used faster if they are needed. This technique, prerendering or pre-loading, may inflate the statistics for the browsers using it because of pre-loading of resources which are not used in the end.4

Underestimation

It is also possible to underestimate the usage share by using the number of requests, for example:

  • Firefox 1.5 (and other Gecko-based browsers) and later versions use fast Document Object Model (DOM) caching. JavaScript is executed on page load only from net or disk cache, but not if it is loaded from DOM cache. This can affect JavaScript-based tracking of browser statistics.5
  • While most browsers generate additional page hits by refreshing web pages when the user navigates back through page history, some browsers (such as Opera) reuse cached content without resending requests to the server.67
  • Generally, the more faithfully a browser implements HTTP's cache specifications, the more it will be under-reported relative to browsers that implement those specifications poorly.8
  • Browser users may run site, cookie and JavaScript blockers which cause those users to be under-counted. For example, common AdBlock blocklists such as EasyBlock include sites such as StatCounter in their privacy lists, and NoScript blocks all JavaScript by default. The Firefox Add-ons website reports 15.0 million users of AdBlock variants and 2.2 million users of NoScript.
  • Users behind a caching proxy (e.g. Squid) may have repeat requests for certain pages served to the browser from the cache, rather than retrieving it again via the Internet.

User agent spoofing

Websites often include code to detect the browser version to adjust the page design sent according to the user agent string received. This may mean that less popular browsers are not sent complex content (even though they might be able to deal with it correctly) or, in extreme cases, refused all content.9 Thus, various browsers have a feature to cloak or spoof their identification to force certain server-side content.

  • Default user agent strings of most browsers have pieces of strings from one or more other browsers, so that if the browser is unknown to a website, it can be identified as one of those. For example, Safari has not only "Mozilla/5.0", but also "KHTML" (from which Safari's WebKit was forked) and "Gecko" (the engine of Firefox).
  • Some Linux browsers such as GNOME Web identify themselves as Safari in order to aid compatibility.1011

Differences in measurement

Net Applications, in their NetMarketShare report, uses unique visitors to measure web usage.12 The effect is that users visiting a site ten times will only be counted once by these sources, while they are counted ten times by statistics companies that measure page hits.

Net Applications uses country-level weighting as well.13 The goal of weighting countries based on their usage is to mitigate selection area based sampling bias. This bias is caused by the differences in the percentage of tracked hits in the sample, and the percentage of global usage tracked by third party sources. This difference is caused by the heavier levels of market usage.14

Statistics from the United States government's Digital Analytics Program (DAP) do not represent world-wide usage patterns. DAP uses raw data from a unified Google Analytics account.

Summary tables

The following tables summarize the usage share of all browsers for the indicated months.

Usage share of all browsers
BrowserNetMarketShare15October 2024StatCounter16October 2024Wikimedia17May 2025Cloudflare18 May 2025
Chrome66.64%64.78%56.2%68%
Safari13.92%18.75%24.1%20%
Edge4.55%5.25%5.11%5.7%
Firefox2.18%2.95%5,83%3.6%
Opera3.02%2.59%0.92%1.5%
Samsung Internet3.04%2.5%1.9%1.8%
Others—1.41%——
Usage share of desktop browsers
BrowserW3Counter19 October 2024NetMarketShare20 October 2024StatCounter21October 2024Wikimedia22October 2024
Chrome68.6%79.44%65.24%56.1%
Safari15.2%3.31%9.06%9.4%
Edge3.7%12.19%13.56%11.6%
Firefox2.8%3.27%6.39%15.3%
Opera1.1%0.67%3.2%2.4%
Others——2.55%—
Usage share of mobile browsers
BrowserNetMarketShare23October 2024StatCounter24October 2024Wikimedia25October 2024
Chrome55.78%68%51.4%
Safari33.11%23.01%31.9%
Samsung Internet2.70%3.62%3.5%
UC0.13%1.37%0.1%
Opera0.49%1.64%0.6%
Firefox0.37%0.51%1.6%
Others—0.68%—
Usage share of tablet browsers
BrowserNetMarketShare26

October 2024

Statcounter27

October 2024

Chrome14.90%50.56%
Safari84.83%33.4%
AOSP—13.3%
Edge—0.95%
Opera—0.78%
Others—1.02%

Crossover to smartphones having majority share

See also: Usage share of operating systems § Crossover to smartphones having majority share

According to StatCounter web use statistics (a proxy for all use), in the week from 7–13 November 2016, "mobile" (meaning smartphones) alone (without tablets) overtook desktop for the first time and by the end of the year smartphones were in the majority. Since 27 October, the desktop has not shown a majority, even on weekdays.

Previously, according to StatCounter press release, the world has become desktop-minority;28 as of October 2016, there was about 49% of desktop usage for that month. The two biggest continents, Asia and Africa, have been mobile-majority for a while, and Australia is by now desktop-minority too.2930 A few countries in Europe and South America have also followed this trend of being mobile-majority.

In March 2015, for the first time in the US the number of mobile-only adult internet users exceeded the number of desktop-only internet users with 11.6% of the digital population only using mobile compared to 10.6% only using desktop; this also means the majority, 78%, use both desktop and mobile to access the internet.31

Older reports (2000–2019)

StatCounter (Jan 2009 to October 2019)

StatCounter statistics are directly derived from hits (not unique visitors) from 3 million sites using StatCounter totaling more than 15 billion hits per month.32 No weightings are used.

Global Desktop stats from StatCounter (Top 5 browsers)
DateChromeFirefoxSafariInternetExplorerEdgeLegacyOtherMobile
October 201968.91%9.25%8.68%4.45%4.51%4.20%54.07%
September 201969.08%9.54%7.41%4.99%4.71%4.27%53.75%
August 201971.15%9.52%5.80%4.40%4.71%4.43%53.66%
July 201971.05%9.52%5.41%5.00%4.60%4.41%53.08%
June 201970.71%9.76%5.64%5.03%4.50%4.36%52.69%
May 201969.09%10.01%7.25%5.14%4.32%4.21%49.40%
April 201969.55%9.78%6.91%5.16%4.37%4.23%50.27%
March 201969.52%9.58%6.46%5.44%4.56%4.44%51.01%
February 201971.58%8.72%5.77%5.34%4.34%4.24%49.87%
January 201970.88%9.50%5.15%5.74%4.41%4.32%51.09%
December 201870.95%10.05%5.06%5.40%4.17%4.38%50.97%
November 201872.38%9.10%5.06%5.38%4.00%4.07%45.91%
October 201869.64%10.14%5.61%6.01%4.21%4.38%50.22%
September 201867.88%10.94%5.58%6.45%4.36%4.78%53.95%
August 201867.66%10.96%5.13%6.97%4.24%5.03%54.80%
July 201867.60%11.23%5.01%6.97%4.19%5.00%55.12%
June 201866.87%11.44%5.38%7.13%4.16%5.02%54.62%
May 201866.93%11.55%5.48%6.97%4.15%4.92%54.11%
April 201866.17%11.78%5.48%7.17%4.26%5.14%53.42%
March 201866.93%11.60%5.37%7.02%4.18%4.90%53.80%
February 201867.49%11.54%5.42%6.91%4.04%4.60%54.02%
January 201865.98%11.87%5.87%7.28%4.11%4.88%54.20%
December 201764.72%12.21%6.29%7.71%4.18%4.88%54.81%
November 201764.02%12.55%6.08%8.47%4.29%4.59%52.27%
October 201763.60%13.04%5.89%8.34%4.43%4.69%53.19%
September 201763.98%13.60%5.46%8.21%4.30%4.46%54.71%
August 201763.58%13.73%5.51%8.61%3.95%4.61%55.18%
July 201763.48%13.82%5.04%9.03%3.95%4.68%56.70%
June 201763.23%13.98%5.15%9.28%3.89%4.47%55.69%
May 201763.36%14.17%5.25%9.20%3.74%4.28%54.25%
April 201763.45%14.53%5.20%9.00%3.71%4.11%54.58%
March 201762.81%14.97%5.28%9.39%3.64%3.92%53.36%
February 201762.95%14.81%5.34%9.62%3.68%3.60%52.37%
January 201762.09%14.85%5.28%10.49%3.58%3.71%52.28%
July 201662.38%15.43%4.59%10.67%3.04%3.85%47.18%
DateChromeInternetExplorerFirefoxSafariOperaOtherMobile
January 201657.75%16.00%15.95%4.60%2.03%3.68%41.04%
July 201555.39%18.86%17.24%4.70%1.91%1.90%39.46%
January 201551.72%21.16%18.70%4.94%1.67%1.81%33.24%
July 201448.69%22.52%19.25%4.89%1.45%2.19%29.48%
January 201446.60%24.65%20.39%5.09%1.32%1.96%23.77%
July 201345.40%26.50%21.31%4.80%1.11%1.32%17.35%
January 201338.08%32.25%22.47%5.12%1.22%0.86%14.13%
July 201233.81%32.04%23.73%7.12%1.72%1.58%11.09%
January 201228.40%37.45%24.78%6.62%1.95%0.79%8.49%
July 201122.14%42.45%27.95%5.14%1.66%0.63%7.02%
January 201115.68%46.00%30.68%5.09%2.00%0.55%4.30%
July 20109.88%52.68%30.69%4.09%1.91%0.74%2.86%
January 20106.04%55.25%31.64%3.76%2.00%1.31%1.56%
July 20093.01%60.11%30.50%3.02%2.64%0.72%1.05%
January 20091.38%65.41%27.03%2.57%2.92%0.70%0.67%

W3Counter (May 2007 to December 2022)

This site counts the last 15,000 page views from each of approximately 80,000 websites. This limits the influence of sites with more than 15,000 monthly visitors on the usage statistics. W3Counter is not affiliated with the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C).

Global Web Stats from W3Counter
DateGoogle ChromeSafariInternet Explorer & EdgeFirefoxOpera
December 202271.2%15.1%3.7%3.0%1.3%
November 202267.9%17.2%4.2%3.3%1.5%
October 202266.7%17.7%4.4%3.2%1.5%
September 202269.2%15.6%4.2%3.4%1.2%
August 202269.9%15.7%3.7%3.5%1.1%
July 202268.7%16.9%3.4%3.6%1.3%
June 202268.3%16.3%3.3%3.8%1.3%
May 202271.6%15.2%3.8%2.6%1.1%
April 202270.2%15.4%4.8%2.8%1.1%
March 202264.9%15.4%6.3%4.1%2.5%
February 202267.9%16.2%5.5%3.2%1.4%
January 202264.4%17.0%6.1%4.0%1.4%
December 202166.0%16.9%5.2%3.2%1.5%
November 202166.6%16.4%5.2%3.2%1.3%
October 202165.4%16.5%5.9%3.6%1.2%
September 202163.3%17.7%5.4%5.8%1.3%
August 202162.9%17.7%4.9%4.8%1.1%
July 202165.7%16.6%4.7%2.9%1.1%
June 202165.3%16.7%5.2%3.3%1.4%
May 202165.2%16.6%4.9%3.2%1.4%
April 202165.3%16.7%5.7%4.1%1.6%
March 202165.2%17.5%5.6%4.4%1.6%
February 202165.3%17.1%5.6%4.3%1.5%
January 202165.3%17.0%5.6%4.1%1.5%
December 202065.3%16.7%5.5%4.4%1.5%
November 202066.1%17.1%5.3%4.5%1.5%
October 202063.8%17.9%5.6%4.6%1.6%
September 202062.6%18.0%6.3%4.8%1.6%
August 202061.8%17.3%7.1%4.8%1.5%
July 202061.0%16.1%8.9%5.0%1.6%
June 202063.0%14.4%8.0%5.1%1.8%
May 202063.7%13.6%6.3%4.5%2.1%
April 202062.4%12.2%7.0%4.6%2.5%
March 202059.3%12.3%9.1%4.5%3.0%
February 202058.1%13.0%12.9%5.4%2.7%
January 202058.2%17.7%7.1%5.5%2.6%
December 201956.1%18.1%7.5%5.5%3.7%
November 201959.2%14.6%9.6%6.1%3.5%
October 201957.0%13.4%9.4%6.9%3.3%
September 201958.7%12.5%8.1%6.3%3.0%
August 201956.8%12.3%7.8%5.3%2.1%
July 201955.4%12.5%8.6%6.5%2.8%
June 201956.8%13.3%8.1%6.8%2.4%
May 201957.4%13.5%6.8%6.8%2.4%
April 201960.1%12.7%6.8%6.1%2.8%
March 201965.4%13.6%6.2%6.3%3.0%
February 201963.9%14.1%7.1%6.5%3.1%
January 201964.5%14.3%7.0%6.3%3.0%
December 201864.4%14.6%7.2%6.3%3.0%
November 201864.7%14.2%7.4%6.7%3.0%
October 201861.7%13.1%6.6%6.5%2.8%
September 201862.2%13.4%6.3%7.1%3.0%
August 201860.3%13.1%6.7%7.2%3.1%
July 201857.8%14.0%5.9%6.0%3.7%
June 201855.2%13.5%6.1%5.4%3.2%
May 201856.6%14.7%7.1%6.5%3.5%
April 201858.8%14.6%6.9%6.4%3.5%
March 201860.6%15.4%7.6%7.2%2.9%
February 201859.9%15.7%7.3%8.5%3.4%
January 201858.4%15.3%7.8%9.1%3.9%
December 201758.8%14.5%8.0%9.3%4.0%
November 201759.2%14.3%8.1%9.3%4.0%
October 201758.8%13.4%9.8%9.1%3.2%
September 201757.0%13.2%11.2%9.1%3.2%
August 201756.8%14.9%9.1%8.1%5.0%
July 201764.0%13.6%8.0%6.8%3.2%
June 201762.4%13.5%8.9%7.8%3.2%
May 201758.1%14.9%9.7%9.0%3.0%
April 201761.2%15.9%8.2%6.3%2.9%
March 201758.9%15.2%7.2%7.2%3.8%
February 201757.2%13.2%8.5%9.0%5.0%
January 201758.4%13.3%8.1%9.5%4.4%
July 201659.5%13.1%10.2%10.1%2.6%
January 201647.3%20.7%12.3%11.4%3.2%
July 201546.5%16.5%13.6%13.3%3.9%
January 201543.2%15.2%17.3%15.3%3.1%
July 201438.7%15.4%21.3%15.3%3.1%
January 201434.3%17.9%20.4%18.4%2.7%
July 201333.4%15.2%23.0%19.1%2.4%
January 201330.1%14.8%27.6%20.1%2.3%
July 201228.5%13.4%28.7%23.2%2.2%
January 201225.3%6.7%31.8%25.5%2.5%
July 201120.2%6.6%36.6%28.5%2.4%
January 201114.6%6.0%41.1%31.9%2.1%
July 201010.6%2.1%48.3%34.1%2.3%
January 20106.4%5.5%50.6%32.9%2.2%
July 20093.4%4.8%54.4%32.4%1.8%
January 20090.2%2.8%60.2%32.1%2.0%
July 20082.5%62.3%30.4%2.1%
January 20082.8%63.1%29.1%2.0%
July 20072.2%66.9%25.1%1.8%
May 20072.4%67.7%25.0%1.8%
DateGoogle ChromeSafariInternet ExplorerFirefoxOpera

Net Applications (May 2016 to November 2019)

Net Applications bases its usage share on statistics from 40,000 websites having around 160 million unique visitors per month. The mean site has 1300 unique visitors per day.

Global usage share of desktop browsers data from: Net Applications
PeriodChromeFirefoxInternetExplorerEdgeLegacySafariSogouExplorerQQOperaYandexUC
November 201967.15%8.15%6.81%5.97%5.29%1.78%1.66%1.28%0.81%0.40%
October 201967.38%8.62%6.47%6.10%4.82%1.83%1.66%1.32%0.84%0.31%
September 201968.33%8.68%6.30%5.93%4.26%1.59%1.45%1.42%0.98%0.34%
August 201968.60%8.43%7.50%6.34%3.85%1.72%1.58%1.39%0.86%0.26%
July 201967.22%8.34%7.44%5.80%3.40%1.70%1.52%1.43%0.88%0.34%
June 201966.29%8.86%7.30%6.03%3.32%1.35%1.30%1.54%0.87%0.32%
May 201967.90%9.46%7.70%5.36%3.30%1.47%1.33%1.52%0.95%0.39%
April 201965.64%10.23%8.44%5.53%3.58%1.63%1.40%1.57%0.89%0.37%
March 201967.88%9.27%7.34%5.20%3.69%1.50%1.33%1.65%0.97%0.44%
February 201966.89%9.39%8.23%4.79%3.56%1.49%1.60%1.63%0.83%0.46%
January 201967.29%9.92%7.94%4.61%4.00%1.24%1.31%1.60%0.80%0.44%
December 201867.18%9.58%8.31%4.09%3.71%1.69%1.71%1.68%0.68%0.51%
November 201865.57%8.96%9.64%4.22%3.74%1.73%1.68%1.56%0.67%0.55%
October 201866.43%9.25%9.48%4.28%3.74%1.43%1.53%1.55%0.63%0.49%
September 201866.28%9.62%9.94%4.08%3.59%1.23%1.20%1.61%0.59%0.60%
August 201865.21%9.76%10.86%4.30%3.65%1.15%1.14%1.66%0.64%0.52%
July 201864.67%9.68%11.15%4.21%3.49%1.49%1.55%1.58%0.46%0.60%
June 201862.77%10.12%12.22%4.25%3.70%1.45%1.49%1.58%0.56%0.59%
May 201862.85%9.92%11.82%4.26%3.71%1.47%1.55%1.67%0.58%0.75%
April 201861.77%10.52%12.20%4.46%3.94%1.60%1.72%1.50%0.72%0.80%
March 201861.77%10.52%12.20%4.46%3.94%1.49%1.38%1.45%0.65%0.66%
February 201861.55%11.15%11.66%4.44%4.39%1.32%1.21%1.73%0.72%0.63%
January 201861.41%10.85%11.84%4.67%4.18%1.64%1.20%1.60%0.62%0.71%
December 201760.57%11.02%12.36%4.61%4.00%1.79%1.47%1.56%0.58%0.76%
November 201760.61%11.42%12.04%4.21%3.85%1.84%1.53%1.51%0.77%0.78%
October 201759.99%11.71%12.25%4.06%3.78%1.92%1.80%1.41%0.55%0.70%
September 201760.67%13.26%11.80%3.71%3.54%1.70%1.28%1.38%0.55%0.66%
August 201761.05%12.26%12.07%3.67%3.14%1.74%1.70%1.52%0.59%0.74%
July 201759.65%12.59%12.96%3.78%3.22%1.72%1.64%1.58%0.61%0.82%
June 201760.08%12.53%12.75%3.80%3.24%1.66%1.40%1.55%0.66%0.97%
May 201758.92%12.90%12.91%3.97%3.38%1.81%1.32%1.56%0.91%0.78%
April 201755.95%13.13%14.41%3.97%3.35%1.86%1.98%1.77%1.29%0.72%
March 201755.81%15.50%14.61%3.63%3.26%1.69%0.96%1.93%0.38%0.78%
February 201759.17%14.88%11.82%3.22%3.13%1.32%0.84%1.59%0.52%0.61%
January 201756.65%15.56%14.93%3.32%3.43%1.33%0.85%1.41%0.36%0.52%
July 201655.50%15.27%14.79%2.97%4.57%1.34%0.79%1.61%0.86%0.32%
May 201656.20%14.79%14.89%2.31%4.67%1.05%0.60%2.95%0.50%0.31%

Wikimedia (April 2009 to March 2015)

Wikimedia traffic analysis reports are based on server logs of about 4 billion page requests per month, based on the user agent information that accompanied the requests.33 These server logs cover requests to all the Wikimedia Foundation projects, including Wikipedia, Wikimedia Commons, Wiktionary, Wikibooks, Wikiquote, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wikiversity and others.34

Note: Wikimedia has recently[when?] had a large percentage of unrecognised browsers, previously counted as Firefox, that are now assumed to be Internet Explorer 11 fixed in the February 2014 and later numbers. And February 2014 numbers include mobile for Internet Explorer and Firefox (not included in Android). Chrome did not include the mobile numbers at that time while Android does since there was an "Android browser" that was the default browser at that time.

Usage share data from Wikimedia visitor log analysis report: All Requests
PeriodChromeFirefoxInternetExplorerSafariOperaAndroidMobileTotal
DesktopMobileTotalDesktopMobileTotal
March 201529.61%14.23%10.86%2.97%16.68%19.65%0.65%1.41%2.06%17.45%38.37%
February 201427.94%12.00%17.01%3.83%17.97%21.80%1.50%1.27%2.77%12.59%35.03%
January 201427.32%18.15%11.78%3.88%19.41%23.29%1.51%1.32%2.83%12.89%35.01%
December 201330.70%17.90%11.48%3.45%18.03%21.48%1.54%1.32%2.86%11.52%32.20%
November 201335.04%17.37%13.80%2.52%15.17%17.69%1.49%1.16%2.65%9.45%26.99%
October 201333.93%16.12%15.46%2.36%14.34%16.70%1.53%1.17%2.70%9.00%26.32%
August 201331.07%17.17%15.98%2.69%15.92%18.61%1.87%1.14%3.01%9.18%28.25%
July 201332.33%16.90%15.65%2.63%15.66%18.29%2.06%1.18%3.24%8.56%27.38%
June 201335.16%17.83%15.93%2.37%13.13%15.50%2.18%1.10%3.28%6.45%22.32%
May 201335.23%17.79%16.99%2.19%12.63%14.82%2.41%1.14%3.55%6.32%21.83%
April 201334.16%18.16%16.95%2.31%13.61%15.92%2.42%1.18%3.60%6.55%23.13%
March 201333.22%16.28%17.03%4.34%13.59%17.93%2.55%1.18%3.73%6.51%23.13%
February 201332.21%16.80%18.27%4.56%13.06%17.62%2.57%1.21%3.78%6.25%22.44%
January 201331.34%17.61%18.68%4.64%12.66%17.30%2.72%1.16%3.88%6.01%21.71%
July 201227.20%19.23%23.70%4.88%10.60%15.48%3.00%1.50%4.50%4.55%18.19%
January 201222.20%22.30%29.51%5.87%7.58%13.45%3.94%1.21%5.15%3.21%13.40%
July 201116.81%24.98%36.78%5.44%5.31%10.75%3.32%0.90%4.22%1.71%9.80%
January 201111.75%28.71%41.56%5.53%3.73%9.26%3.55%0.70%4.25%0.90%6.90%
Usage share data from Wikimedia visitor log analysis report
PeriodInternetExplorerFirefoxChromeSafariOperaOtherMozillaMobile
December 201042.12%28.82%11.18%5.70%3.67%0.52%6.4%
July 201047.74%30.43%7.52%5.18%2.89%0.53%4.5%
January 201051.01%30.85%4.81%5.13%3.18%0.56%3.1%
July 200954.55%31.52%2.77%4.51%2.38%0.70%2.4%
April 200957.37%30.71%1.93%3.86%2.57%0.68%1.9%

Clicky (September 2009 to August 2013)

Global usage share data from GetClicky.com
PeriodInternetExplorerChromeFirefoxSafariOperaOther Mozilla
August 201328.76%39.48%20.86%9.55%1.04%0.31%
July 201328.64%39.44%21.27%9.19%1.14%0.31%
June 201329.08%38.92%21.22%9.28%1.17%0.32%
May 201329.14%38.39%21.19%9.86%1.13%0.29%
April 201330.57%37.12%21.36%9.48%1.22%0.27%
March 201331.92%35.83%21.29%9.52%1.21%0.24%
February 201333.10%34.57%21.40%9.51%1.21%0.20%
January 201335.67%32.79%20.79%9.41%1.16%0.19%
July 201235.77%29.87%23.61%9.18%1.43%0.13%
January 201238.59%25.75%24.74%9.55%1.28%0.09%
July 201142.06%20.25%27.35%9.07%1.20%0.07%
January 201146.00%15.25%28.74%8.62%1.27%0.12%
July 201049.26%10.53%30.88%7.89%1.26%0.18%
January 201050.73%6.85%32.89%7.79%1.51%0.23%
September 200954.58%4.25%31.96%7.44%1.34%0.43%

StatOwl.com (September 2008 to November 2012)

US usage share data from StatOwl.com35
PeriodInternetExplorerFirefox,Other MozillaChromeSafariOperaGeckoNetscapeNavigator
November 2012 3643.38%19.42%24.91%9.27%0.75%0.84%
October 2012 3744.40%19.62%24.09%9.42%0.68%0.55%
September 2012 3845.03%19.26%23.31%9.84%0.65%0.78%
August 2012 3945.87%19.49%22.53%10.14%0.59%0.43%
July 2012 4046.95%19.03%22.31%9.96%0.52%0.36%
June 2012 4146.69%19.42%21.76%9.80%0.55%0.30%
May 2012 4246.47%20.47%20.88%10.04%0.55%0.30%
April 2012 4348.28%19.73%19.39%10.51%0.44%0.27%
March 2012 4449.18%19.46%18.10%11.14%0.38%0.29%
February 2012 4550.98%19.00%17.05%11.16%0.33%0.22%
January 2012 4651.81%18.98%16.77%10.93%0.38%0.15%
December 2011 4751.42%19.73%16.78%10.69%0.39%0.16%
November 2011 4851.17%20.15%16.13%11.29%0.38%0.16%
October 2011 4952.59%20.06%15.01%11.13%0.36%0.17%
September 2011 5053.79%20.18%13.79%10.81%0.37%0.21%
August 2011 5153.81%20.61%13.64%10.75%0.39%0.15%
July 2011 5255.26%20.29%12.58%10.68%0.37%0.13%
June 2011 5356.23%20.85%12.04%9.77%0.46%
May 2011 5457.48%20.43%11.06%9.88%0.49%
April 2011 5557.08%21.40%10.85%9.47%0.53%
March 2011 5660.27%19.57%9.60%9.62%0.42%
February 2011 5760.92%19.21%9.13%9.59%0.40%0.42%
January 2011 5861.28%19.57%8.80%9.40%0.39%0.31%
December 2010 5960.98%20.14%8.61%9.33%0.40%0.24%
November 2010 6062.13%19.69%7.46%9.42%0.37%0.18%
October 2010 6162.54%19.76%7.17%9.03%0.36%0.15%
September 2010 6262.68%20.51%6.99%8.83%0.36%0.15%
August 2010 6362.66%20.94%6.83%8.83%0.35%0.14%
July 2010 6461.73%21.66%6.95%8.94%0.36%0.11%
June 2010 6563.37%21.26%6.24%8.52%0.33%
May 2010 6664.17%21.12%5.59%8.31%0.37%
April 2010 6764.55%21.35%5.23%8.12%0.40%
March 2010 6866.34%19.90%4.39%8.59%0.31%
February 2010 6966.99%19.48%3.98%9.00%0.24%0.06%
January 2010 7066.33%20.31%3.87%8.94%0.26%0.06%
December 2009 7166.12%20.82%3.51%8.73%0.30%0.07%
November 2009 7267.74%20.15%2.88%8.56%0.28%0.10%
October 2009 7368.38%20.32%2.56%8.09%0.27%0.14%
September 2009 7467.25%21.12%2.41%8.46%0.28%0.21%
August 2009 7568.37%21.32%2.21%7.29%0.28%0.23%
July 2009 7669.29%21.06%2.05%6.77%0.30%0.24%
June 2009 7771.44%19.48%1.93%6.30%0.33%0.22%
May 2009 7871.35%20.26%1.64%5.95%0.31%0.21%
April 2009 7971.38%20.46%1.43%5.80%0.31%0.19%
March 2009 8072.03%20.00%1.19%5.91%0.30%0.10%
February 2009 8174.04%18.64%0.97%5.57%0.27%0.10%
January 2009 8273.05%19.39%0.96%5.72%0.29%0.12%
December 2008 8370.89%20.87%0.95%6.32%0.33%0.13%
November 2008 8472.07%19.78%0.68%6.57%0.29%0.13%
October 2008 8573.45%18.88%0.57%6.22%0.26%0.16%
September 2008 8674.53%18.14%0.52%5.98%0.22%0.17%

92% of sites monitored by StatOwl serve predominantly United States market.87

AT Internet Institute (Europe, July 2007 to June 2010)

AT Internet Institute was formerly known as XiTi.

Method: Only counts visits to local sites in 23 European countries and then averages the percentages for those 23 European countries independent of population size.

Europe usage share data from AT Internet Institute
DateInternet ExplorerNetscapeFirefoxOperaSafariChromeSource
June 201053.8%30.6%2.4%6.8%5.7%2010-6
March 201057.1%29.6%2.2%5.2%5.3%2010-3
September 200962.0%28.4%2.2%4.3%2.8%2009–11
April 200963.6%0.6%28.4%2.2%3.4%1.7%2009-5
March 200964.6%0.6%27.8%2.2%3.3%1.4%
February 200965.6%0.5%27.4%2.1%3.0%1.3%
January 200958.1%0.6%32.5%4.1%3.0%1.5%2009-1
December 200858.5%0.6%32.3%4.5%2.7%1.3%
November 200859.5%0.6%31.1%5.1%2.5%1.1%2008-12-22
October 200859.2%0.6%31.1%5.4%2.4%1.1%
September 200860.2%0.4%31.2%4.8%2.4%1.0%2008-10-10
August 200859.4%0.3%33.0%4.5%2.6%
July 200860.4%0.3%32.2%4.5%2.4%
June 200860.5%0.3%31.4%5.1%2.5%
May 200861.7%0.4%30.7%4.7%2.4%
April 200864.5%0.5%28.9%3.6%2.4%
March 200865.0%0.5%28.8%3.3%2.3%2008-04-30
February 200865.6%0.5%28.5%3.2%2.2%
January 200866.1%0.5%28.0%3.2%2.1%
December 200766.1%0.5%28.0%3.3%2.0%
November 200766.9%0.5%27.3%3.2%1.9%
October 200767.5%0.4%27.0%3.1%1.8%
September 200766.6%0.3%27.7%3.4%1.8%2007-10-30
2–8 July 200766.5%0.3%27.8%3.5%1.7%2007-07-18

TheCounter.com (2000 to 2009)

TheCounter.com, a defunct web counter service, identified sixteen versions of six browsers (Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari, Opera, Netscape, and Konqueror). Other browsers are categorised as either "Netscape compatible" (including Google Chrome, which may also be categorized as "Safari" because of its "Webkit" subtag) or "unknown". Internet Explorer 8 is identified as Internet Explorer 7. Monthly data includes all hits from 2008-02-01 until the end of the month concerned. More than the exact browser type, this data identifies the underlying rendering engine used by various browsers, and the table below aggregates them in the same column.

Global usage share data from TheCounter.com (global statistics)
PeriodInternetExplorerNetscape, Other Mozilla, FirefoxSafariOperaNetscapeNavigatorSources
2009 Q466.42%21.13%10.05%1.00%0.05%Oct, Nov, Dec
2009 Q369.07%20.59%8.10%0.89%0.06%Jul, Aug, Sep
2009 Q270.31%20.12%6.44%0.94%0.06%Apr, May, Jun
2009 Q171.25%20.01%5.47%0.92%0.08%Jan, Feb, Mar
2008 Q474.24%18.66%4.52%0.89%0.07%Oct, Nov, Dec
2008 Q376.33%17.97%3.76%0.84%0.07%Jul, Aug, Sep
2008 Q278.30%16.36%3.41%0.81%0.06%Apr, May, Jun
2008 Q178.80%15.87%3.32%0.79%0.06%Jan, Feb, Mar
2007 Q481.14%13.81%3.21%0.67%0.06%Oct, Nov, Dec
2007 Q381.63%13.49%3.00%0.66%0.06%Jul, Aug, Sep
2007 Q282.97%12.41%2.87%0.64%0.06%Apr, May, Jun
2007 Q183.69%11.57%2.92%0.57%0.06%Jan, Feb, Mar
2006 Q484.11%11.13%2.80%0.60%0.05%Nov, Dec 88
2006 Q384.48%10.56%2.27%0.73%0.06%Jul 89
2006 Q286.32%9.03%1.89%0.70%0.05%Apr 90
2006 Q190.01%6.77%1.40%0.58%0.05%Jan 91
2005 Q487.25%8.60%1.83%0.71%0.07%Oct 92
2005 Q387.58%8.42%1.60%0.67%0.07%Jul 93
2005 Q290.90%6.02%0.99%0.51%0.09%Apr 94
2005 Q190.77%5.73%1.00%0.54%0.11%Jan 95
2004 Q490.98%5.10%0.77%0.68%0.18%Oct 96
2004 Q392.70%3.57%0.73%0.65%0.20%Jul 97
2004 Q295.04%2.37%0.67%0.51%0.32%Apr 98
2004 Q194.28%2.70%0.52%0.36%Jan 99
2003 Q4Oct, Nov, Dec
2003 Q3Jul, Aug, Sep
2003 Q294.43%2.22%0.66%1.45%Apr, May, Jun
2003 Q194.18%2.15%0.65%1.77%Jan, Feb, Mar
2002 Q493.94%1.67%0.83%2.31%Oct, Nov, Dec
2002 Q393.32%1.36%0.94%3.04%Jul, Aug, Sep
2002 Q292.47%1.13%0.82%4.13%Apr, May, Jun
2002 Q192.40%0.93%0.52%4.67%Jan, Feb, Mar
2001 Q490.83%0.71%0.36%5.23%Oct, Nov, Dec
2001 Q388.43%0.26%0.31%6.49%Jul, Aug, Sep
2001 Q287.99%0.27%0.28%7.46%Apr, May, Jun
2001 Q186.80%0.30%0.22%9.84%Jan, Feb, Mar
2000 Q483.95%0.14%0.14%12.61%Oct, Nov, Dec
2000 Q382.76%0.04%0.14%14.35%Jul, Aug, Sep
2000 Q280.30%0.02%0.12%17.54%Apr, May, Jun
2000 Q179.09%0.00%0.13%19.25%Jan, Feb, Mar
PeriodInternetExplorerNetscape, Other Mozilla, FirefoxSafariOperaNetscapeNavigatorSources

OneStat.com (April 2002 to March 2009)

Global usage share data from OneStat.com100 (press releases)
PeriodInternetExplorerOther Mozilla, FirefoxSafariChromeOperaNetscapeNetscapeNavigator
March 2009 10179.79%15.59%2.65%0.86%0.54%0.31%
November 2008 10281.36%14.67%2.42%0.54%0.55%0.32%
February 2008 10383.27%13.76%2.18%0.55%0.14%
June 2007 10484.66%12.72%1.79%0.61%0.11%
January 2007 10585.81%11.69%1.64%0.58%0.13%
November 2006 10685.24%12.15%1.61%0.69%0.11%
October 2006 10785.85%11.49%1.61%0.69%0.12%
July 2006 10883.05%12.93%1.84%1.00%0.16%
May 2006 10985.17%11.79%2.02%0.79%0.15%
January 2006 11085.82%11.23%1.88%0.77%0.16%
November 2005 11185.45%11.51%1.75%0.77%0.26%
April 2005 11286.63%8.69%1.26%1.03%1.08%
February 2005 11387.28%8.45%1.21%1.09%1.11%
November 2004 11488.90%7.35%0.91%1.33%
May 2004 11593.9%2.1%0.71%1.02%
January 2004 11694.8%1.8%0.48%0.8%
July 2003 11795.4%1.6%0.25%0.6%1.9%0.6%
February 2003 11895.2%1.2%0.11%0.7%1.9%1.0%
December 2002 11995.0%1.1%0.8%1.9%1.1%
September 2002 12094.9%0.8%0.9%1.8%1.2%
June 2002 12195.3%0.4%0.7%1.5%1.9%
April 2002 12296.6%0.5%0.7%2.1%
US usage share data from OneStat.com123 (press releases)
PeriodInternetExplorerOther Mozilla, FirefoxSafariChromeOperaNetscape
March 2009 12472.69%20.40%4.53%1.05%0.49%0.38%
November 2008 12575.54%18.74%3.95%0.62%0.39%0.50%
June 2007 12675.69%19.65%3.77%0.61%0.17%
January 2007 12778.13%16.11%3.68%0.73%0.18%
Canadian usage share data from OneStat.com128 (press releases)
PeriodInternetExplorerOther Mozilla, FirefoxSafariChromeOperaNetscape
March 2009 12965.55%23.09%7.36%1.32%0.75%0.56%
November 2008 13069.67%20.38%7.56%0.92%0.76%0.56%
June 2007 13175.76%16.47%5.72%0.69%0.13%
January 2007 13279.00%14.13%4.70%0.71%0.14%
UK usage share data from OneStat.com133 (press releases)
PeriodInternetExplorerOther Mozilla, FirefoxSafariChromeOperaNetscape
March 2009 13480.91%15.16%1.94%0.85%0.60%0.36%
November 2008 13583.77%11.45%1.76%0.43%0.60%0.34%
June 2007 13686.00%11.22%1.61%0.53%0.10%
January 2007 13786.72%10.86%1.78%0.49%0.10%
Australian usage share data from OneStat.com138 (press releases)
PeriodInternetExplorerOther Mozilla, FirefoxSafariChromeOperaNetscape
June 2007 13966.42%26.32%1.86%4.05%0.24%
January 2007 14065.71%26.68%1.77%4.28%0.24%
French usage share data from OneStat.com141 (press releases)
PeriodInternetExplorerOther Mozilla, FirefoxSafariChromeOperaNetscape
March 2009 14271.57%23.48%2.90%0.86%0.54%0.46%
November 2008 14371.50%23.45%3.23%0.59%0.56%0.51%

ADTECH (Europe, 2004 to 2009)

Europe usage share data from ADTECH144's press releases; this is an ad serving company
PeriodInternetExplorerFirefoxSafariChromeOperaOther MozillaNetscape
Q4 2009 14563.6%26.7%3.6%2.8%1.7%0.7%
Q1 2009 14667.7%25.3%2.6%1.0%1.4%1.1%
Q1 2008 14776.2%18.1%1.7%1.0%2.6%
Q4 2007 14876.0%18.0%1.6%1.0%2.9%
July 2007 14977.5%15.5%1.6%0.9%3.9%
February 2007 15077.34%14.34%1.63%0.85%5.11%
February–April 2006 15183.36%12.38%1.67%0.77%0.82%0.38%
September 2005 15283.31%12.41%1.40%0.90%1.06%0.61%
June 2005 15385.10%10.11%1.34%1.21%1.05%0.60%
March 2005 15486.73%8.96%1.12%1.14%0.71%
February 2005 15587.57%7.85%1.05%1.26%0.76%
January 2005 15687.13%7.43%1.70%1.33%0.85%
November 2004 15789.47%5.51%1.01%2.50%0.92%
September 2004 15892.63%2.91%1.00%2.10%0.82%
August 2004 15993.08%2.15%0.89%2.18%0.95%
July 2004 16093.08%1.64%0.99%2.62%0.97%
January–April 2004 16194.72%0.73%2.50%1.49%

WebSideStory (US, February 1999 to June 2006)

US usage share data from: WebSideStory
DateInternet ExplorerNetscape, Other MozillaFirefoxSource
June 200686.64%9.95%19 July 2006
5 January 200687.63%8.88%12 January 2006
4 November 200588.16%1.61%8.13%10 November 2005
23 September 200588.46%1.69%7.86%27 September 2005
29 April 200588.86%2.23%6.75%10 May 2005
18 February 200589.85%2.47%5.69%28 February 2005
14 January 200590.28%2.64%4.95%
3 December 200491.80%2.83%4.06%
5 November 200492.89%2.95%3.03%
8 October 200493.21%3.05%2.66%13 December 2004
4 June 200495.48%3.53%
26 August 200295.97%3.39%28 August 2002
25 October 200189.03%10.47%31 October 2001
25 April 200186.61%13.10%1 May 2001
21 February 200187.71%12.01%22 February 2001
18 June 200086.08%13.90%
2 August 199975.31%24.68%9 August 1999
6 April 199968.75%29.46%7 April 1999
1 March 199966.90%31.21%2 March 1999
8 February 199964.60%33.43%22 February 2001

Older reports (pre-2000)

GVU WWW user survey (January 1994 to October 1998)

Usage share data from: GVU WWW user survey
DateMosaicNetscape NavigatorInternet ExplorerSource
October 199864%32.2%Primary Browser in 12 Months
April 199870%22.7%Browser Expected to Use in 12 Months
October 199759.67%15.13%Browser Expected to Use in 12 Months
April 199781.13%12.13%Browser Expected to Use in 12 Months
October 199680.45%12.18%Browser Expected to Use in 12 Months
April 199689.36%3.76%Browser Expected to Use in 12 Months
April 19959%54%Hal Berghel's Cybernautica – "A Web Monopoly"
October 199468%18%Result Graph – Browser
January 199497%General Results Graphs

EWS Web Server at UIUC (1996 Q2 to 1998)

Usage share data from: EWS Web Server at UIUCArchived 8 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine
DateMosaicInternet ExplorerNetscape NavigatorSource
1998 Q450.43%46.87%Oct 1998, Nov 1998, Dec 1998
1998 Q347.90%48.97%Jul 1998, Aug 1998, Sep 1998
1998 Q243.17%53.57%Apr 1998, May 1998, Jun 1998
1998 Q139.67%57.63%Jan 1998, Feb 1998, Mar 1998
1997 Q435.53%62.23%Oct 1997, Nov 1997, Dec 1997
1997 Q332.40%64.93%Jul 1997, Aug 1997, Sep 1997
1997 Q20.37%27.67%69.77%Apr 1997, May 1997, Jun 1997
1997 Q10.60%22.87%74.33%Jan 1997, Feb 1997, Mar 1997
1996 Q41.20%19.07%77.13%Oct 1996, Nov 1996, Dec 1996
1996 Q32.47%13.97%80.37%Jul 1996, Aug 1996, Sep 1996
1996 Q26.93%9.60%82.77%Apr 1996, May 1996, Jun 1996

ZD Market Intelligence (US, January 1997 to January 1998)

Usage share data from: ZD Market Intelligence
DateInternet ExplorerNetscape NavigatorSource
January 199839%54%Behind the numbers: Browser market share
January 199721%63%

Zona Research (US, Jan 1997 to Jan 1998)

Usage share data from: Zona Research
DateInternet ExplorerNetscape NavigatorSource
July 199845%54%Behind the numbers: Browser market share
September 199736%62%
January 199728%70%

AdKnowledge (January 1998 to June 1998)

Usage share data from: AdKnowledge
DateInternet ExplorerNetscape NavigatorSource
June 199846%52%Behind the numbers: Browser market share
March 199842%57%
January 199836%61%

Dataquest (1995 to 1997)

Usage share data from: Dataquest
DateInternet ExplorerNetscape NavigatorSource
199739.4%57.6%Browser wars: High price, huge rewards
199620%73%
19952.9%80.1%

International Data Corporation (US, 1996 to 1997)

Usage share data from: International Data Corporation
DateInternet ExplorerNetscape NavigatorSource
199723%51%Behind the numbers: Browser market share
199616%55%

See also

References

  1. Metz, Cade (26 June 2008). "AVG disguises fake traffic as IE6". The Register. Archived from the original on 20 November 2010. Retrieved 12 January 2011. https://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/06/26/avg_disguises_fake_traffic_as_ie6/ ↩

  2. Keizer, Gregg (23 June 2008). "Firefox 3.0 boosts Mozilla's market share". Computerworld. IDG. Archived from the original on 5 July 2008. Retrieved 12 January 2011. https://web.archive.org/web/20080705122724/http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9102398 ↩

  3. A better option for the webmaster is to validate the HTML code against prevailing standards [1] Archived 6 September 2017 at the Wayback Machine. /wiki/HTML ↩

  4. "Frequently Asked Questions". StatCounter. Archived from the original on 13 April 2019. Retrieved 9 August 2019. https://gs.statcounter.com/faq#prerendering ↩

  5. Cacycle (7 June 2010). "Using Firefox 1.5 caching". Mozilla. Archived from the original on 16 July 2015. Retrieved 3 February 2010. https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Using_Firefox_1.5_caching ↩

  6. Pettersen, Yngve Nys?ter (27 February 2007). "Introducing Cache Contexts, or: Why the browser does not know you are logged out". My Opera. Opera Software. Archived from the original on 4 May 2007. Retrieved 12 January 2011. https://web.archive.org/web/20070504173925/http://my.opera.com/yngve/blog/2007/02/27/introducing-cache-contexts-or-why-the ↩

  7. Sharovatov, Vitaly (3 June 2008). "HTTP History Lists and Back Button". WordPress. Archived from the original on 17 January 2010. Retrieved 3 February 2010. http://sharovatov.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/http-history-lists-and-back-button/ ↩

  8. Sharovatov, Vitaly (3 June 2008). "HTTP History Lists and Back Button". WordPress. Archived from the original on 17 January 2010. Retrieved 3 February 2010. http://sharovatov.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/http-history-lists-and-back-button/ ↩

  9. Burstein complaining "...I've been rejected until I come back with Netscape" Archived 8 September 2018 at the Wayback Machine. 11 January 2011 http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/ ↩

  10. "186272 – [GTK][WPE] Support JPEG 2000 images". Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 25 May 2020. https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=186272 ↩

  11. "On Ubuntu Updates – Michael Catanzaro's Blog". 9 June 2019. Archived from the original on 24 June 2019. Retrieved 25 May 2020. https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2019/06/09/on-ubuntu-updates/ ↩

  12. "Market share for browsers, operating systems and search engines". Netmarketshare.com. Archived from the original on 27 April 2019. Retrieved 30 December 2012. http://www.netmarketshare.com/faq.aspx#Unique ↩

  13. "Market share for browsers, operating systems and search engines". Marketshare.hitslink.com. Archived from the original on 12 November 2017. Retrieved 30 December 2012. http://marketshare.hitslink.com/faq.aspx#Country ↩

  14. "Visual Map of Global usage of Web Browsers by Country". statcounter.com. 1 June 2013. Archived from the original on 26 May 2012. Retrieved 1 January 2014. https://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-ww-monthly-201307-201307-map ↩

  15. "Browser market share". netmarketshare.com. Archived from the original on 2 November 2021. Retrieved 2 November 2021. https://netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?options=%7B%22filter%22%3A%7B%7D%2C%22dateLabel%22%3A%22Custom%22%2C%22attributes%22%3A%22share%22%2C%22group%22%3A%22browser%22%2C%22sort%22%3A%7B%22share%22%3A-1%7D%2C%22id%22%3A%22browsersDesktop%22%2C%22dateInterval%22%3A%22Monthly%22%2C%22dateStart%22%3A%222021-10%22%2C%22dateEnd%22%3A%222021-10%22%2C%22segments%22%3A%22-1000%22%7D ↩

  16. "Browser Market Share Worldwide September 2023 - October 2024". Statcounter. Retrieved 3 November 2024. https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share#monthly-202309-202410-bar ↩

  17. "Dashiki: Simple Request Breakdowns". analytics.wikimedia.org. Retrieved 9 June 2025. https://analytics.wikimedia.org/dashboards/browsers/#all-sites-by-browser ↩

  18. "HTTP requests by user agent family time series: Distribution of HTTP requests by user agent family over time". Cloudflare Radar. Retrieved 9 June 2025.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) https://radar.cloudflare.com/explorer?dataSet=http&groupBy=browser_family&dt=2025-05-01_2025-05-31&filters=botClass%253DLikely_Human ↩

  19. "W3Counter: Web Browser Market Share Trends". www.w3counter.com. Archived from the original on 3 November 2024. Retrieved 3 November 2024. https://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php ↩

  20. "Browser market share". netmarketshare.com. Retrieved 3 November 2024. https://netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?options=%7B%22filter%22%3A%7B%22%24and%22%3A%5B%7B%22deviceType%22%3A%7B%22%24in%22%3A%5B%22Desktop%2Flaptop%22%5D%7D%7D%5D%7D%2C%22dateLabel%22%3A%22Custom%22%2C%22attributes%22%3A%22share%22%2C%22group%22%3A%22browser%22%2C%22sort%22%3A%7B%22share%22%3A-1%7D%2C%22id%22%3A%22browsersDesktop%22%2C%22dateInterval%22%3A%22Monthly%22%2C%22dateStart%22%3A%222021-10%22%2C%22dateEnd%22%3A%222021-10%22%2C%22segments%22%3A%22-1000%22%7D ↩

  21. "Browser Market Share Worldwide September 2023 - October 2024". Statcounter. Retrieved 3 November 2024. https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share ↩

  22. "Dashiki: Simple Request Breakdowns". analytics.wikimedia.org. Archived from the original on 3 May 2017. Retrieved 3 November 2024. https://analytics.wikimedia.org/dashboards/browsers/#desktop-site-by-browser/browser-family-timeseries ↩

  23. "Browser market share". netmarketshare.com. Retrieved 3 November 2024. https://netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?options=%7B%22filter%22%3A%7B%22%24and%22%3A%5B%7B%22deviceType%22%3A%7B%22%24in%22%3A%5B%22Mobile%22%5D%7D%7D%5D%7D%2C%22dateLabel%22%3A%22Custom%22%2C%22attributes%22%3A%22share%22%2C%22group%22%3A%22browser%22%2C%22sort%22%3A%7B%22share%22%3A-1%7D%2C%22id%22%3A%22browsersMobile%22%2C%22dateInterval%22%3A%22Monthly%22%2C%22dateStart%22%3A%222024-10%22%2C%22dateEnd%22%3A%222024-10%22%2C%22segments%22%3A%22-1000%22%7D ↩

  24. "Mobile Browser Market Share Worldwide – StatCounter Global Stats". StatCounter Global Stats. Archived from the original on 3 November 2024. Retrieved 3 November 2024. https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/mobile/worldwide/#monthly-202410-202410-bar ↩

  25. "Dashiki: Simple Request Breakdowns". analytics.wikimedia.org. Archived from the original on 3 May 2017. Retrieved 3 November 2024. https://analytics.wikimedia.org/dashboards/browsers/#mobile-site-by-browser/browser-family-timeseries ↩

  26. "Browser market share". netmarketshare.com. Retrieved 3 November 2024. https://netmarketshare.com/browser-market-share.aspx?options=%7B%22filter%22%3A%7B%22%24and%22%3A%5B%7B%22deviceType%22%3A%7B%22%24in%22%3A%5B%22Tablet%22%5D%7D%7D%5D%7D%2C%22dateLabel%22%3A%22Custom%22%2C%22attributes%22%3A%22share%22%2C%22group%22%3A%22browser%22%2C%22sort%22%3A%7B%22share%22%3A-1%7D%2C%22id%22%3A%22browsersMobile%22%2C%22dateInterval%22%3A%22Monthly%22%2C%22dateStart%22%3A%222024-10%22%2C%22dateEnd%22%3A%222024-10%22%2C%22segments%22%3A%22-1000%22%7D ↩

  27. "Tablet Browser Market Share Worldwide". StatCounter Global Stats. Archived from the original on 3 November 2024. Retrieved 3 November 2024. https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/tablet/worldwide/#monthly-202009-202009-bar ↩

  28. "Mobile and tablet internet usage exceeds desktop for first time worldwide". StatCounter (Press release). Archived from the original on 29 July 2019. Retrieved 9 August 2019. https://gs.statcounter.com/press/mobile-and-tablet-internet-usage-exceeds-desktop-for-first-time-worldwide ↩

  29. "StatCounter Global Stats - Browser, OS, Search Engine including Mobile Usage Share". StatCounter Global Stats. Archived from the original on 26 May 2012. Retrieved 1 August 2019. https://gs.statcounter.com/#all-comparison-AU-monthly-201806-201907 ↩

  30. "StatCounter Global Stats - Browser, OS, Search Engine including Mobile Usage Share". StatCounter Global Stats. Archived from the original on 26 May 2012. Retrieved 1 August 2019. https://gs.statcounter.com/#all-comparison-AU-daily-20190601-20190731 ↩

  31. Number of Mobile-Only Internet Users Now Exceeds Desktop-Only in the U.S. Archived 1 October 2015 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 5 May 2015. http://www.comscore.com/Insights/Blog/Number-of-Mobile-Only-Internet-Users-Now-Exceeds-Desktop-Only-in-the-U.S ↩

  32. "Statcounter statistics methodology". StatCounter. Archived from the original on 13 April 2019. Retrieved 12 January 2011. https://gs.statcounter.com/faq#methodology ↩

  33. Zachte, Erik (28 February 2014). "Wikimedia Traffic Analysis Report – Browsers e.a." Archived from the original on 18 March 2014. Retrieved 24 March 2014. https://stats.wikimedia.org/archive/squid_reports/2014-02/SquidReportClients.htm ↩

  34. Zachte, Erik (15 February 2011). "Wikimedia Traffic Analysis Report – Requests by destination". Archived from the original on 1 October 2022. Retrieved 4 March 2011. https://stats.wikimedia.org/archive/squid_reports/2011-01/SquidReportRequests.htm ↩

  35. Archived 16 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160316120811/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share_trend.php ↩

  36. Archived 13 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20150113131506/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2012-11%7C2012-11&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  37. Archived 13 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20150113133018/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2012-10%7C2012-10&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  38. Archived 13 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20150113133019/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2012-09%7C2012-09&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  39. Archived 13 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20150113131446/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2012-08%7C2012-08&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  40. Archived 2 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160402192333/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2012-07%7C2012-07&interval=month&chart_id=6&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=4 ↩

  41. Archived 4 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160404152752/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2012-06%7C2012-06&interval=month&chart_id=6&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=4 ↩

  42. Archived 13 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20150113131431/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2012-05%7C2012-05&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  43. Archived 6 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160406063603/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2012-04%7C2012-04&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  44. Archived 3 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160403194406/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2012-03%7C2012-03&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  45. Archived 4 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160404140937/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2012-02%7C2012-02&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  46. Archived 4 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160404015848/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2012-01%7C2012-01&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  47. Archived 13 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20150113134551/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2011%E2%80%9312%7C2011%E2%80%9312&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  48. Archived 5 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160405153748/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2011-11%7C2011-11&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  49. Archived 3 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160403011913/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2011-10%7C2011-10&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  50. Archived 3 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160403133909/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2011-09%7C2011-09&interval=month&chart_id=6&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=4 ↩

  51. Archived 5 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160405034518/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2011-08%7C2011-08&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  52. Archived 3 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160403010805/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2011-07%7C2011-07&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  53. Archived 5 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160405183147/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2011-06%7C2011-06&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  54. Archived 4 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160404100354/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2011-05%7C2011-05&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  55. Archived 2 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160402130236/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2011-04%7C2011-04&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  56. Archived 2 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160402125009/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2011-03%7C2011-03&interval=month&chart_id=6&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=4 ↩

  57. Archived 4 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160404080958/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2011-02%7C2011-02&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  58. Archived 4 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160404210812/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&timeframe=custom%7C2011-01%7C2011-01&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&chart_id=6 ↩

  59. Archived 13 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20150113134557/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&timeframe=last_month&timeframe=custom%7C2010%E2%80%9312%7C2010%E2%80%9312 ↩

  60. Archived 13 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20150113131514/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&timeframe=last_month&timeframe=custom%7C2010%E2%80%9311%7C2010%E2%80%9311 ↩

  61. Archived 11 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160311205413/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&timeframe=last_month&timeframe=custom%7C2010-10%7C2010-10 ↩

  62. Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160313051654/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&timeframe=last_month&timeframe=custom%7C2010-09%7C2010-09 ↩

  63. Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160313121010/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2010-08%7C2010-08&timeframe=last_month ↩

  64. Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160313112805/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2010-07%7C2010-07&timeframe=last_month ↩

  65. Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160313200311/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2010-06%7C2010-06&timeframe=last_month ↩

  66. Archived 12 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160312032825/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2010-05%7C2010-05&timeframe=last_month ↩

  67. Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160313044711/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2010-04%7C2010-04&timeframe=last_month ↩

  68. Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160313044804/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2010-03%7C2010-03&timeframe=last_month ↩

  69. Archived 12 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160312031918/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2010-02%7C2010-02&timeframe=last_month ↩

  70. Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160313200305/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2010-01%7C2010-01&timeframe=last_month ↩

  71. Archived 13 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20150113131439/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&timeframe=last_month&timeframe=custom%7C2009%E2%80%9312%7C2009%E2%80%9312 ↩

  72. Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160313121404/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2009%E2%80%9311%7C2009%E2%80%9311&timeframe=last_month ↩

  73. Archived 13 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20150113134558/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&timeframe=last_month&timeframe=custom%7C2009%E2%80%9310%7C2009%E2%80%9310 ↩

  74. Archived 11 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160311172632/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2009-09%7C2009-09&timeframe=last_month ↩

  75. Archived 12 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160312132737/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2009-08%7C2009-08&timeframe=last_month ↩

  76. Archived 11 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160311170131/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2009-07%7C2009-07&timeframe=last_month ↩

  77. Archived 12 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160312130842/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2009-06%7C2009-06&timeframe=last_month ↩

  78. Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160313111228/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2009-05%7C2009-05&timeframe=last_month ↩

  79. Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160313201134/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2009-04%7C2009-04&timeframe=last_month ↩

  80. Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160313200839/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2009-03%7C2009-03&timeframe=last_month ↩

  81. Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160313121414/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2009-02%7C2009-02&timeframe=last_month ↩

  82. Archived 12 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160312174546/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2009-01%7C2009-01&timeframe=last_month ↩

  83. Archived 13 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20150113125921/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&timeframe=last_month&timeframe=custom%7C2008%E2%80%9312%7C2008%E2%80%9312 ↩

  84. Archived 13 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20150113131459/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&timeframe=last_month&timeframe=custom%7C2008%E2%80%9311%7C2008%E2%80%9311 ↩

  85. Archived 13 January 2015 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20150113134547/http://www.statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?1=1&&interval=month&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&fltr_cn=&timeframe=last_month&timeframe=custom%7C2008%E2%80%9310%7C2008%E2%80%9310 ↩

  86. Archived 13 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20160313200629/http://statowl.com/web_browser_market_share.php?&1=1&chart_id=4&fltr_br=&fltr_cn=&fltr_os=&fltr_se=&interval=month&timeframe=custom%7C2008%E2%80%9309%7C2008%E2%80%9309&timeframe=last_month ↩

  87. "About Our Data". Statowl.com. Archived from the original on 23 July 2010. Retrieved 12 January 2011. https://web.archive.org/web/20100723134002/http://www.statowl.com/about_our_data.php ↩

  88. Archived 9 December 2006 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20061209034515/http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2006/December/browser.php ↩

  89. Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Aug Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Sep Archived 2 March 2008 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20111101194851/http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2006/July/browser.php ↩

  90. Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, May Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Jun Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20111101194755/http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2006/April/browser.php ↩

  91. Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Feb Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Mar Archived 3 December 2011 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20111101194830/http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2006/January/browser.php ↩

  92. Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Nov Archived 29 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Dec Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20111101194607/http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2005/October/browser.php ↩

  93. Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Aug Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Sep Archived 29 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20111101195035/http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2005/July/browser.php ↩

  94. Archived 13 August 2008 at the Wayback Machine, May Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Jun Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20080813102040/http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2005/April/browser.php ↩

  95. Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Feb Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Mar Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20111101194824/http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2005/January/browser.php ↩

  96. Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Nov Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Dec Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20111101195101/http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2004/October/browser.php ↩

  97. Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Aug Archived 4 August 2004 at the Wayback Machine, Sep Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20111101194559/http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2004/July/browser.php ↩

  98. Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, May Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Jun Archived 1 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20111101195133/http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2004/April/browser.php ↩

  99. Archived 6 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Feb Archived 14 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Mar Archived 14 June 2011 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20111006024728/http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2004/January/browser.php ↩

  100. Archived 2 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210502092227/http://onestat.com/ ↩

  101. Archived 25 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine Archived 25 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210225070827/http://www.onestat.com/html/press-release-global-browser-market-share-april-2009.html ↩

  102. Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210226141534/http://www.onestat.com/html/press-release-google-chrome-global-usage-share.html ↩

  103. Archived 24 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210224142758/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox57-firefox-mozilla-ie-browser-market-share.html ↩

  104. Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210226040826/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox53-firefox-mozilla-browser-market-share.html ↩

  105. Archived 27 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210227065641/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox50-microsoft-internet-explorer-7-usage.html ↩

  106. Archived 25 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210225130755/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox49-microsoft-internet-explorer-7-usage.html ↩

  107. Archived 4 March 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210304200542/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox48-microsoft-internet-explorer-usage.html ↩

  108. Archived 27 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210427170257/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox44-mozilla-firefox-has-slightly-increased.html ↩

  109. Archived 25 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210225010059/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox42_microsoft_internet_explorer_has_slightly_increased.html ↩

  110. Archived 25 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210225024139/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox41_mozilla_firefox_usage_share.html ↩

  111. Archived 14 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210414092524/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox40_browser_market_firefox_growing.html ↩

  112. Archived 26 January 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210126095725/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox37.html ↩

  113. Archived 24 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210224232208/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox36.html ↩

  114. Archived 25 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210225005934/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox34.html ↩

  115. Archived 27 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210227122607/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox30.html ↩

  116. Archived 12 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210212004757/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox26.html ↩

  117. Archived 11 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210211161917/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox23.html ↩

  118. Archived 25 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210225143407/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox18.html ↩

  119. Archived 25 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210225175726/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox15.html ↩

  120. Archived 25 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210225142055/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox11.html ↩

  121. Archived 11 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210411002141/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox7.html ↩

  122. Archived 24 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210224155400/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox4.html ↩

  123. Archived 2 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210502092227/http://onestat.com/ ↩

  124. Archived 25 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210225070827/http://www.onestat.com/html/press-release-global-browser-market-share-april-2009.html ↩

  125. Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210226141534/http://www.onestat.com/html/press-release-google-chrome-global-usage-share.html ↩

  126. Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210226040826/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox53-firefox-mozilla-browser-market-share.html ↩

  127. Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210226040826/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox53-firefox-mozilla-browser-market-share.html ↩

  128. Archived 2 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210502092227/http://onestat.com/ ↩

  129. Archived 25 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210225070827/http://www.onestat.com/html/press-release-global-browser-market-share-april-2009.html ↩

  130. Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210226141534/http://www.onestat.com/html/press-release-google-chrome-global-usage-share.html ↩

  131. Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210226040826/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox53-firefox-mozilla-browser-market-share.html ↩

  132. Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210226040826/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox53-firefox-mozilla-browser-market-share.html ↩

  133. Archived 2 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210502092227/http://onestat.com/ ↩

  134. Archived 25 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210225070827/http://www.onestat.com/html/press-release-global-browser-market-share-april-2009.html ↩

  135. Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210226141534/http://www.onestat.com/html/press-release-google-chrome-global-usage-share.html ↩

  136. Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210226040826/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox53-firefox-mozilla-browser-market-share.html ↩

  137. Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210226040826/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox53-firefox-mozilla-browser-market-share.html ↩

  138. Archived 2 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210502092227/http://onestat.com/ ↩

  139. Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210226040826/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox53-firefox-mozilla-browser-market-share.html ↩

  140. Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210226040826/http://www.onestat.com/html/aboutus_pressbox53-firefox-mozilla-browser-market-share.html ↩

  141. Archived 2 May 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210502092227/http://onestat.com/ ↩

  142. Archived 25 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210225070827/http://www.onestat.com/html/press-release-global-browser-market-share-april-2009.html ↩

  143. Archived 26 February 2021 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20210226141534/http://www.onestat.com/html/press-release-google-chrome-global-usage-share.html ↩

  144. Archived 18 July 2005 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20050718000623/http://www.adtech.info/ ↩

  145. Archived 25 November 2010 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20101125173807/http://www.adtech.info/news/pr-10-07-01-en.htm ↩

  146. Archived 17 August 2009 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20090817190734/http://www.adtech.info/news/pr-04-01-2009_en.htm ↩

  147. Archived 5 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20090305143608/http://adtech.info/news/pr-08-07_en.htm ↩

  148. Archived 3 March 2009 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20090303094252/http://adtech.info/news/pr-08-03.htm ↩

  149. Archived 21 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20181121190431/http://www.adtech.info/news/pr-07-18.html ↩

  150. Archived 15 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20181215123433/http://www.adtech.info/news/pr-07-7.html ↩

  151. Archived 21 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20181121182300/http://www.adtech.info/news/pr-06-5.html ↩

  152. Archived 21 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20181121182951/http://www.adtech.info/news/pr-05-10.html ↩

  153. Archived 21 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20181121181359/http://www.adtech.info/news/pr-05-5.html ↩

  154. Archived 15 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20181215123639/http://www.adtech.info/news/pr-05-4.html ↩

  155. Archived 15 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20181215123639/http://www.adtech.info/news/pr-05-4.html ↩

  156. Archived 15 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20181215123639/http://www.adtech.info/news/pr-05-4.html ↩

  157. Archived 21 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20181121181302/http://www.adtech.info/news/pr-04-8.html ↩

  158. Archived 21 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20181121192024/http://www.adtech.info/news/pr-04-4.html ↩

  159. Archived 21 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20181121181302/http://www.adtech.info/news/pr-04-8.html ↩

  160. Archived 21 November 2018 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20181121192024/http://www.adtech.info/news/pr-04-4.html ↩

  161. Archived 6 August 2004 at the Wayback Machine https://web.archive.org/web/20040806130959/http://www.adtech.info/NewsPresse/framepresse.php?lang_id=en&node=4¤t=119 ↩