At the core of MICS is the list of indicators. In MICS6 this was a compilation of 200 distinct indicators (237 counting those requiring sex disaggregate).3 The list was not inclusive of all standard tabulations produced in a full survey, but forms those that were central to global monitoring by UNICEF and others. The list of indicators has been a central message in all rounds of MICS, as no question is asked in the questionnaires without directly contributing to an indicator algorithm or a background variable. Thus, survey-specific additional questions are always suggested to follow the same guidelines: No question should be asked without a clear plan for tabulation of results.
The MICS questionnaires4 are:
In MICS, the generic questionnaires include all modules, such that implementers only should remove non-applicable or non-desired modules and questions, e.g., the ITN module in non-malarious countries.
The full set of generic modules in MICS6 included: Household Questionnaire
Individual Questionnaire for Women
Questionnaire for Children Under Five
Individual Questionnaire for Men
Questionnaire for Children Age 5-17
The MICS package also includes data entry program (in CSPro) catering for tablet-based data collection on Android or Windows platforms, standard tabulation plan (in Excel) and syntax (in SPSS), workshop training programmes, in-country capacity building and technical assistance, data dissemination templates, as well as various online resources.
The tools are all compiled on the MICS website, which was launched in a modernised format in mid-2024.
The 6th round of MICS commenced in October 2016 with the initiation of the Programme's Survey Design Workshops and was scheduled to run to 2021 (this has since been extended to 2022, mainly due to COVID-19 related delays of face-to-face surveys). The content is expanded to cover new priorities, including adjustments to cover approximately half of the survey-based SDG indicators (about 40 of about 80).
The 6th round's tools were piloted in Costa Rica in mid-2016, and was preceded by a field test of new or refined questionnaire modules and tools for data collection and processing in Belize end of 2015.5 In November 2017 additional questionnaire modules were tested in Malawi.6 A similar exercise was conducted in Belize in April 2019.7
The MICS Programme is participating in the methodological development of new data collection tools, such as on water quality testing, child disability, external economic support, and impact of emergencies.8 A methodological paper series was launched in 2012.9
The programme has been evaluated following rounds 1,10 3,11 and 4.12
The total cost for MICS3 was about $18.6 million (and about $356,000 per country) according to a 2008 MICS evaluation.13: 7
MICS4 was estimated to cost $31.3 million.14: 10
The countries listed below have conducted (or plan to conduct) a MICS survey. Reports and data are available on the MICS website.15
X: National Survey S: Sub-national Survey
Note: Only countries from UNICEF's official list are included. It appears that some surveys are based on the MICS tools, but not included in the list, e.g. Botswana 2007-08 Family Health Survey16 and Bangladesh 2009 Progotir Pathey (MICS).17
The total number of countries having ever conducted a MICS (or plan to do so) is 123. This includes Yugoslavia, which at the time of MICS1 and MICS2 was the territory now split into Kosovo, Montenegro, and Serbia. In MICS7, five countries are new to the programme: Armenia, The Federated States of Micronesia (FSM), Guatemala, Morocco, and Saudi Arabia. The survey in FSM follows other Pacific nations joining the programme in MICS6: Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Samoa, Tonga, and Tuvalu, many of whom are also participating in the seventh round.
Survey data are widely used, predominantly in multi-country analyses, but also often for simple trend analyses in single countries. An example of use of MICS data is provided by Monasch et al. (2004).18
Due to the near perfect comparability between MICS and DHS, much analysis draws on multiple data sets of both programmes. However, each survey programme have modules specific to their mandates and not often used in both programmes. For example, a recent compilation of evidence on child discipline makes use of surveys that included the Child Discipline Module; these were all MICS.19
Most global statistics, such as on the indicators of the MDGs rely heavily on data collected through MICS (and other household surveys), particularly for countries where administrative reporting systems are not entirely adequate. Other global statistics rely on only household survey data, such as the Multidimensional Poverty Index developed by OPHI and reported by UNDP.
Examples of recent publications are listed under external links.
The Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) 1995-2015: Monitoring the Situation of Children and Women for 20 Years http://54.92.12.252/files?job=W1siZiIsIjIwMTUvMDkvMTQvMTcvNTUvMzcvNTI2LzIwMTUwOTEyX01JQ1MyMF9XRUIucGRmIl1d&sha=da0e0b8ac785c628 ↩
News: MICS partners with the DHS and LSMS survey programs in a collaborative group http://mics.unicef.org/news_entries/9 ↩
"Tools - UNICEF MICS". http://mics.unicef.org/tools ↩
News: Conclusion of the MICS Field Test in Belize http://mics.unicef.org/news_entries/46/CONCLUSION-OF-THE-MICS-FIELD-TEST-IN-BELIZE-AND-THE-WAY-FORWARD:-MICS6 ↩
News: Using MICS to Understand Emergencies http://mics.unicef.org/news_entries/90/Using-MICS-to-Understand-Emergencies:-MICS6 ↩
News: Children's time use - developing a new module in Belize https://mics.unicef.org/news_entries/127/CHILDREN%E2%80%99S-TIME-USE--DEVELOPING-A-NEW-MODULE-IN-BELIZE:-MICS6 ↩
MICS5 Survey Design Workshop standard PowerPoint presentation on "MICS – Past, Present and Future" http://mics.unicef.org/files?job=W1siZiIsIjIwMTUvMDEvMTkvMDcvMTAvNTcvMzIxL01JQ1NfV1MxXzEwMl9NSUNTX19fUGFzdF9fUHJlc2VudF9hbmRfRnV0dXJlLnBwdHgiXV0&sha=26e10bd88ba0610c ↩
"Publications - Methodological - UNICEF MICS". http://mics.unicef.org/publications/reports-and-methodological-papers ↩
UNICEF Evaluation database: 1999 Global: Evaluation of UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys https://www.unicef.org/evaldatabase/index_14381.html ↩
UNICEF Evaluation database: 2009 Global: Evaluation of UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Round 3 (MICS3) https://www.unicef.org/evaldatabase/index_52700.html ↩
UNICEF Evaluation database: 2014 Global: UNICEF Evaluation of the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) -- Parts 1 and 2 https://www.unicef.org/evaldatabase/index_76350.html ↩
Beth Ann Plowman (August 2014). "UNICEF Evaluation of the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS) - Round 4" (PDF). UNICEF. http://www.unicef.org/evaluation/files/UNICEF_Evaluation_of_the_Multiple_Indicator_Cluster_Surveys_Combined.pdf ↩
"Surveys - UNICEF MICS". http://mics.unicef.org/surveys ↩
http://www.cso.gov.bw/templates/cso/file/File/bfhs_report.pdf Archived 2015-09-23 at the Wayback Machine [bare URL PDF] http://www.cso.gov.bw/templates/cso/file/File/bfhs_report.pdf ↩
"Women- - বাংলাদেশ পরিসংখ্যান ব্যুরো-গণপ্রজাতন্ত্রী বাংলাদেশ সরকার". http://www.bbs.gov.bd/site/page/56067433-bdd2-4f62-b2df-7ac875659d64/Women-&-Children ↩
Roeland Monasch, Annette Reinisch, Richard W. Steketee, Eline L. Korenromp, David Alnwick, and Yves Bergevin (2004) "Child Coverage with Mosquito Nets and Malaria Treatment from Population-based Surveys in African Countries: A Baseline for Monitoring Progress in Roll Back Malaria" in: The Intolerable Burden of Malaria II: What's New, What's Needed online book, The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bookshelf/br.fcgi?book=malaria&part=A2416 ↩
UNICEF, Child Disciplinary Practices at Home: Evidence from a Range of Low- and Middle-Income Countries Archived 2015-04-02 at the Wayback Machine, New York, 2010. http://data.unicef.org/corecode/uploads/document6/uploaded_pdfs/corecode/ChildDiscipline_report_Eng_44.pdf ↩