This resulted in the development of a range of horrific chemicals affecting lungs, skin, or eyes. Some were intended to be lethal on the battlefield, like hydrogen cyanide, and efficient methods of deploying agents were invented. At least 124,000 tons were produced during the war. In 1918, about one grenade out of three was filled with dangerous chemical agents. Around 500k-1.3 million casualties of the conflict were attributed to the use of gas, and the psychological effect on troops may have had a much greater effect. A few thousand civilians also became casualties as collateral damage or due to production accidents.
At the 1925 Geneva Conference for the Supervision of the International Traffic in Arms the French suggested a protocol for non-use of poisonous gases. The Second Polish Republic suggested the addition of bacteriological weapons. It was signed on 17 June.
Eric Croddy, assessing the Protocol in 2005, took the view that the historic record showed it had been largely ineffectual. Specifically it does not prohibit:
In light of these shortcomings, Jack Beard notes that "the Protocol (...) resulted in a legal framework that allowed states to conduct [biological weapons] research, develop new biological weapons, and ultimately engage in [biological weapons] arms races".
Several state parties have deployed chemical weapons for combat in spite of the treaty. Italy used mustard gas against the Ethiopian Empire in the Second Italo-Ethiopian War. In World War II, Germany employed chemical weapons in combat on several occasions along the Black Sea, notably in Sevastopol, where they used toxic smoke to force Soviet resistance fighters out of caverns below the city. They also used asphyxiating gas in the catacombs of Odesa in November 1941, following their capture of the city, and in late May 1942 during the Battle of the Kerch Peninsula in eastern Crimea, perpetrated by the Wehrmacht's Chemical Forces and organized by a special detail of SS troops with the help of a field engineer battalion. After the battle in mid-May 1942, the Germans gassed and killed almost 3,000 of the besieged and non-evacuated Red Army soldiers and Soviet civilians hiding in a series of caves and tunnels in the nearby Adzhimushkay quarry.
During the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq War, Iraq is known to have employed a variety of chemical weapons against Iranian forces. Some 100,000 Iranian troops were casualties of Iraqi chemical weapons during the war.
There have been differing interpretations over whether the protocol covers the use of harassing agents, such as adamsite and tear gas, and defoliants and herbicides, such as Agent Orange, in warfare. The 1977 Environmental Modification Convention prohibits the military use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects. Many states do not regard this as a complete ban on the use of herbicides in warfare, but it does require case-by-case consideration. The 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention effectively banned riot control agents from being used as a method of warfare, though still permitting it for riot control.
In recent times, the protocol had been interpreted to cover non-international armed conflicts as well international ones. In 1995, an appellate chamber in the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia stated that "there had undisputedly emerged a general consensus in the international community on the principle that the use of chemical weapons is also prohibited in internal armed conflicts." In 2005, the International Committee of the Red Cross concluded that customary international law includes a ban on the use of chemical weapons in internal as well as international conflicts.
However, such views drew general criticism from legal authors. They noted that much of the chemical arms control agreements stems from the context of international conflicts. Furthermore, the application of customary international law to banning chemical warfare in non-international conflicts fails to meet two requirements: state practice and opinio juris. Jillian Blake & Aqsa Mahmud cited the periodic use of chemical weapons in non-international conflicts since the end of WWI (as stated above) as well as the lack of existing international humanitarian law (such as the Geneva Conventions) and national legislation and manuals prohibiting using them in such conflicts. Anne Lorenzat stated the 2005 ICRC study was rooted in "'political and operational issues rather than legal ones".
To become party to the Protocol, states must deposit an instrument with the government of France (the depositary power). Thirty-eight states originally signed the Protocol. France was the first signatory to ratify the Protocol on 10 May 1926. El Salvador, the final signatory to ratify the Protocol, did so on 26 February 2008. As of April 2021, 146 states have ratified, acceded to, or succeeded to the Protocol, most recently Colombia on 24 November 2015.
Generally, reservations not only modify treaty provisions for the reserving party, but also symmetrically modify the provisions for previously ratifying parties in dealing with the reserving party.: 394 Subsequently, numerous states have withdrawn their reservations, including the former Czechoslovakia in 1990 prior to its dissolution, or the Russian reservation on biological weapons that "preserved the right to retaliate in kind if attacked" with them, which was dissolved by President Yeltsin.
League of Nations Treaty Series, vol. 94, pp. 66–74. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/LON/Volume%2094/v94.pdf
"Disarmament Treaties Database: 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 9 February 2021. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/t/1925
Beard, J. (2007). "The Shortcomings of Indeterminacy in Arms Control Regimes: The Case of the Biological Weapons Convention". American Journal of International Law. 101(2): 271–321. doi:10.1017/S0002930000030098. p., 277 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002930000030098%5B
Haber, L. F. (2002). The Poisonous Cloud: Chemical warfare in the First World War. Oxford University Press. pp. 239–253. ISBN 9780191512315. 9780191512315
"Treaty relating to the Use of Submarines and Noxious Gases in Warfare. Washington, 6 February 1922". International Committee of the Red Cross. 2012. Retrieved 30 April 2013. http://www.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/270
"Treaty relating to the Use of Submarines and Noxious Gases in Warfare. Washington, 6 February 1922". International Committee of the Red Cross. 2012. Retrieved 30 April 2013. http://www.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/270
"The Geneva Protocol at 90, Part 1: Discovery of the dual-use dilemma - The Trench - Jean Pascal Zanders". 17 June 2015. https://www.the-trench.org/geneva-protocol-at-90-1
Eric A. Croddy, James J. Wirtz (2005). Weapons of Mass Destruction: An Encyclopedia of Worldwide Policy, Technology and History, Volume 1. ABC-CLIO. pp. 140–142. ISBN 978-1851094905. Retrieved 28 April 2013. 978-1851094905
Eric A. Croddy, James J. Wirtz (2005). Weapons of Mass Destruction: An Encyclopedia of Worldwide Policy, Technology and History, Volume 1. ABC-CLIO. pp. 140–142. ISBN 978-1851094905. Retrieved 28 April 2013. 978-1851094905
Beard, J. (2007). "The Shortcomings of Indeterminacy in Arms Control Regimes: The Case of the Biological Weapons Convention". American Journal of International Law. 101(2): 271–321. doi:10.1017/S0002930000030098. p., 277 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0002930000030098%5B
Pascal Daudin (June 2023). "The Rif War: A forgotten war?". International Review of the Red Cross. https://international-review.icrc.org/articles/the-rif-war-a-forgotten-war-923
Noguer, Miquel (2 July 2005). "ERC exige que España pida perdón por el uso de armas químicas en la guerra del Rif". El País (in Spanish). ISSN 1134-6582. Retrieved 6 January 2023. https://elpais.com/diario/2005/07/03/catalunya/1120352849_850215.html
"Geneva Protocol: Protocol For the Prohibition of the Use In War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous, or Other Gases, And of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (Geneva Protocol)". Nuclear Threat Initiative. https://www.nti.org/education-center/treaties-and-regimes/protocol-prohibition-use-war-asphyxiating-poisonous-or-other-gasses-and-bacteriological-methods-warfare-geneva-protocol/#:~:text=The%20Geneva%20Protocol%2C%20implicitly%2C%20does,cover%20internal%20or%20civil%20conflicts.
Eric A. Croddy, James J. Wirtz (2005). Weapons of Mass Destruction: An Encyclopedia of Worldwide Policy, Technology and History, Volume 1. ABC-CLIO. pp. 140–142. ISBN 978-1851094905. Retrieved 28 April 2013. 978-1851094905
Bunn, George (1969). "Banning Poison Gas and Germ Warfare: Should the United States Agree" (PDF). Wisconsin Law Review. 1969 (2): 375–420. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 July 2014. Retrieved 5 August 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20140702004808/http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/22365/Bunn_Banning_Poison_Gas_and_Germ_Warfare.pdf
Israelyan, Victor (1 November 2010). On the Battlefields of the Cold War: A Soviet Ambassador's Confession. Penn State Press. p. 339. ISBN 978-0271047737. 978-0271047737
Merridale, Catherine, Ivan's War, Faber & Faber: pp. 148–150. /wiki/Catherine_Merridale
Fassihi, Farnaz (27 October 2002), "In Iran, grim reminders of Saddam's arsenal", New Jersey Star Ledger, archived from the original on 13 December 2007, retrieved 27 July 2023 https://web.archive.org/web/20071213061050/http://www.nj.com/specialprojects/index.ssf?%2Fspecialprojects%2Fmideaststories%2Fme1209.html
Paul Hughes (21 January 2003), "It's like a knife stabbing into me", The Star (South Africa) http://www.thestar.co.za/index.php?fArticleId=39470
Sciolino, Elaine (13 February 2003), "Iraq Chemical Arms Condemned, but West Once Looked the Other Way", The New York Times, archived from the original on 27 May 2013 https://web.archive.org/web/20130527105217/http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0213-05.htm
"2603 (XXIV). Question of chemical and bacteriological (biological) weapons" (PDF). United Nations General Assembly. 16 December 1969. Retrieved 24 August 2013. use in international armed conflicts of: (a) Any chemical agents of warfare - chemical substances, whether gaseous, liquid or solid - which might be employed because of their direct toxic effects on man, animals or plants; (b) Any biological agents of warfare - living organisms, whatever their nature, or infective material derived from them - which are intended to cause disease or death in man, animals or plants, and which depend for their effects on their ability to multiply in the person, animal or plant attacked. http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/UNGARsn/1969/110.pdf
Bunn, George (1969). "Banning Poison Gas and Germ Warfare: Should the United States Agree" (PDF). Wisconsin Law Review. 1969 (2): 375–420. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 July 2014. Retrieved 5 August 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20140702004808/http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/22365/Bunn_Banning_Poison_Gas_and_Germ_Warfare.pdf
Angela Woodward (17 May 2012). "The 1925 Geneva Protocol goes digital". VERTIC. Retrieved 26 August 2013. http://www.vertic.org/pages/posts/the-1925-geneva-protocol-goes-digital-298.php
Bunn, George (1969). "Banning Poison Gas and Germ Warfare: Should the United States Agree" (PDF). Wisconsin Law Review. 1969 (2): 375–420. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 July 2014. Retrieved 5 August 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20140702004808/http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/22365/Bunn_Banning_Poison_Gas_and_Germ_Warfare.pdf
"Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (Geneva Protocol)". U.S. Department of State. 25 September 2002. Retrieved 24 August 2013. https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/isn/4784.htm
"Practice Relating to Rule 76. Herbicides". International Committee of the Red Cross. 2013. Retrieved 24 August 2013. http://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v2_rul_rule76
"Practice Relating to Rule 75. Riot Control Agents". International Committee of the Red Cross. 2013. Retrieved 24 August 2013. http://www.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v2_cha_chapter24_rule75
Scott Spence and Meghan Brown (8 August 2012). "Syria: international law and the use of chemical weapons". VERTIC. Archived from the original on 26 September 2013. Retrieved 26 August 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20130926173659/http://www.vertic.org/pages/posts/syria-international-law-and-the-use-of-chemical-weapons-345.php
Jillian Blake & Aqsa Mahmud (15 October 2013). "A Legal "Red Line"? Syria and the Use of Chemical Weapons in Civil Conflict". UCLA Law Review. https://www.uclalawreview.org/a-legal-red-line-syria-and-the-use-of-chemical-weapons-in-civil-conflict/
Anne Lorenzat (2017–2018). "The Current State of Customary International Law with regard to the Use of Chemical Weapons in Non-International Armed Conflicts". The Military Law and the Law of War Review. http://www.ismllw.org/REVIEW/2017-2018%20ART%20Lorenzat.php
"Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 24 July 2013. https://treaties.unoda.org/t/1925
Bunn, George (1969). "Banning Poison Gas and Germ Warfare: Should the United States Agree" (PDF). Wisconsin Law Review. 1969 (2): 375–420. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 July 2014. Retrieved 5 August 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20140702004808/http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/22365/Bunn_Banning_Poison_Gas_and_Germ_Warfare.pdf
"Czech Republic: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 26 July 2014. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/czechrepublic/suc/paris
Kelly, David (2002). "The Trilateral Agreement: lessons for biological weapons verification]" (PDF). In Findlay, Trevor; Meier, Oliver (eds.). Verification Yearbook 2002 (PDF). London: Verification Research, Training and Information Centre (VERTIC). pp. 93–109. ISBN 978-1-899548-35-4. 978-1-899548-35-4
"Protocole concernant la prohibition d'emploi à la guerre de gaz asphyxiants, toxiques ou similaires et de moyens bactériologiques, fait à Genève le 17 juin 1925" (in French). Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs of France. Archived from the original on 2 December 2008. Retrieved 23 July 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20081202071155/http://www.doc.diplomatie.gouv.fr/BASIS/pacte/webext/multidep/DDW?W%3D+ORDER+BY+DATOP%2FAscend%26M%3D18%26K%3D19250001%26R%3DY%26U%3D1
"Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 24 July 2013. https://treaties.unoda.org/t/1925
"Le traité international en detail". Federal Department of Foreign Affairs of Switzerland. Retrieved 21 May 2018. https://www.eda.admin.ch/eda/fr/dfae/politique-exterieure/droit-international-public/traites-internationaux/banque-donnees-traites-internationaux/detailansicht-staatsvertrag.ggst0_51.contract19250020.html?_charset_=UTF-8
"Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (Geneva Protocol)". United States Department of State. Retrieved 31 July 2013. https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/isn/4784.htm
"Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare. Geneva, 17 June 1925". International Committee of the Red Cross. Retrieved 31 July 2013. http://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/States.xsp?xp_viewStates=XPages_NORMStatesParties&xp_treatySelected=280
"States parties to the Protocol for the prohibition of the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of bacteriological methods of warfare, Done at Geneva 17 June 1925". University of Illinois at Chicago. Archived from the original on 7 April 2015. Retrieved 5 August 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20150407003400/http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/acda/treaties/geneva7.txt
"Protocol for the prohibition of the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of bacteriological methods of warfare". United Nations Treaty Series. Retrieved 5 August 2013. http://treaties.un.org/Pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=0800000280167ca8
"Protocol for the prohibition of the use in war of asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and of bacteriological methods of warfare". Federation of American Scientists. Retrieved 5 August 2013. http://www.fas.org/nuke/control/geneva/text/geneva1.htm
"Protocole concernant la prohibition d'emploi à la guerre de gaz asphyxiants, toxiques ou similaires et de moyens bactériologiques". Government of Switzerland. 15 August 2013. Retrieved 13 July 2014. http://www.admin.ch/opc/fr/classified-compilation/19250020/index.html
"Protocole du 17 juin 1925 concernant la prohibition d'emploi à la guerre de gaz asphyxiants, toxiques ou similaires et de moyens bactériologiques" (PDF). Government of Switzerland. 2004. Retrieved 13 July 2014. http://www.admin.ch/opc/fr/official-compilation/2005/1209.pdf
"Protocole concernant la prohibition d'emploi à la guerre de gaz asphyxiants, toxiques ou similaires et de moyens bactériologiques" (PDF). Government of Switzerland. 15 August 2013. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 May 2018. Retrieved 13 July 2014. https://web.archive.org/web/20180523011329/https://www.admin.ch/opc/fr/classified-compilation/19250020/201308150000/0.515.105.pdf
"No. 2138 - Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare. Signed at Geneva, 17 June 1925" (PDF). League of Nations Treaty Series - Publication of Treaties and International Engagements Registered with the Secretariat of the League of Nations. XCIV (1, 2, 3 and 4). League of Nations: 65–74. 1929. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/LON/Volume%2094/v94.pdf
"Protocole concernant la prohibition d'emploi à la guerre de gaz asphyxiants, toxiques ou similaires et de moyens bactériologiques, fait à Genève le 17 juin 1925" (in French). Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs of France. Archived from the original on 2 December 2008. Retrieved 23 July 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20081202071155/http://www.doc.diplomatie.gouv.fr/BASIS/pacte/webext/multidep/DDW?W%3D+ORDER+BY+DATOP%2FAscend%26M%3D18%26K%3D19250001%26R%3DY%26U%3D1
Bunn, George (1969). "Banning Poison Gas and Germ Warfare: Should the United States Agree" (PDF). Wisconsin Law Review. 1969 (2): 375–420. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2 July 2014. Retrieved 5 August 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20140702004808/http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/22365/Bunn_Banning_Poison_Gas_and_Germ_Warfare.pdf
"Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use in War of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare (Geneva Protocol)". United States Department of State. Retrieved 31 July 2013. https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/isn/4784.htm
"Protocol for the Prohibition of the Use of Asphyxiating, Poisonous or Other Gases, and of Bacteriological Methods of Warfare. Geneva, 17 June 1925". International Committee of the Red Cross. Retrieved 31 July 2013. http://www.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/States.xsp?xp_viewStates=XPages_NORMStatesParties&xp_treatySelected=280
"Seventh BWC Review Conference Briefing Book" (PDF). Biological Weapons Convention. 2011. Retrieved 17 November 2014. http://www.bwc2011.info/BB2011-by-doc/1/GP-Res.pdf
"High Contracting Parties to the Geneva Protocol". SIPRI. Retrieved 5 August 2013. http://www.sipri.org/contents/expcon/cbwarfare/cbw_research_doc/cbw_historical/cbw-hist-geneva-parties.html
Schindler, Dietrich; Toman, Jiří (1988). The Laws of Armed Conflicts: A Collection of Conventions, Resolutions, and Other Documents. Brill Publishers. pp. 115–127. ISBN 9024733065. Retrieved 5 August 2013. 9024733065
"Geneva Protocol reservations" (PDF). Biological Weapons Convention Review Conference. Retrieved 5 August 2013. http://www.bwc2011.info/BB2011-by-doc/1/GP-Res.pdf
Papanicolopulu, Irini; Scovazzi, Tullio, eds. (2006). Quale diritto nei conflitti armati? (in Italian). Giuffrè Editore. pp. 231–237. ISBN 9788814130625. Retrieved 5 August 2013. 9788814130625
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Algeria: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 27 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/algeria/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Angola: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 27 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/angola/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Australia: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 20 September 2014. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/australia/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
Does not constitute recognition of, or establishing any relations with, Israel. /wiki/Israel
"Bahrain: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 27 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/bahrain/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Bangladesh: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 27 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/bangladesh/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Barbados: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 27 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/barbados/suc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Belgium: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 27 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/belgium/rat/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Bulgaria: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/bulgaria/rat/paris
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Cambodia: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/cambodia/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Canada: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/canada/rat/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Chile: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/chile/rat/paris
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"China: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/china/suc/paris
"China: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/china/suc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Estonia: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/estonia/rat/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Fiji: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/fiji/suc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"France: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/france/rat/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"India: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/india/rat/paris
Ceases to be binding as to the use of chemical weapons in regards to any enemy state which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Iraq: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/iraq/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Ireland: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/ireland/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Israel: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/israel/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
Does not constitute recognition of, or establishing any relations with, Israel. /wiki/Israel
"Jordan: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/jordan/acc/paris
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Democratic People's Republic of Korea: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 29 August 2017. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/democraticpeoplesrepublicofkorea/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
Does not constitute recognition of, or establishing any relations with, Israel. /wiki/Israel
Ceases to be binding in the case of a violation.
"Kuwait: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/kuwait/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
Does not constitute recognition of, or establishing any relations with, Israel. /wiki/Israel
"Libya: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/libya/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Mongolia: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/mongolia/acc/paris
Ceases to be binding as to the use of chemical weapons in regards to any enemy state which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Netherlands: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 28 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/netherlands/rat/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"New Zealand: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 29 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/newzealand/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Nigeria: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 29 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/nigeria/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Papua New Guinea: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 31 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/papuanewguinea/suc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Romania: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 31 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/romania/rat/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Russian Federation: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 31 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/russianfederation/rat/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
"Seventh Review Conference of Biological Weapons Convention" (PDF). 5 December 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 10 November 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20150924060749/http://www.opbw.org/rev_cons/7rc/BWC_CONF.VII_Press_111205_E.pdf
Sims, Nicholas; Pearson, Graham; Woodward, Angela. "Article VII: Geneva Protocol Obligations and the BTWC" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 10 August 2013. https://web.archive.org/web/20150923194231/http://www.brad.ac.uk/acad/sbtwc/key7rev/article_VIII.pdf
Although the FR Yugoslavia claimed to be the continuator state of the SFR of Yugoslavia, the United Nations General Assembly did not accept this and forced them to reapply for membership. /wiki/United_Nations_General_Assembly
Listed as 28 October 1997 by the United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs.[77] /wiki/United_Nations_Office_of_Disarmament_Affairs
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Solomon Islands: Succession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 31 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/solomonislands/suc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"South Africa: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 31 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/southafrica/acc/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Spain: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 31 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/spain/rat/paris
Does not constitute recognition of, or establishing any relations with, Israel. /wiki/Israel
"Syrian Arab Republic: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 31 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/syrianarabrepublic/acc/paris
Some sources list two reservations by Thailand, but neither the instrument of accession,[1] nor the United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs list,[82] makes any mention of a reservation.
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
According to the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties, states which succeed to a treaty after gaining independence from a state party "shall be considered as maintaining any reservation to that treaty which was applicable at the date of the succession of States in respect of the territory to which the succession of States relates unless, when making the notification of succession, it expresses a contrary intention or formulates a reservation which relates to the same subject matter as that reservation." Any state which has not clarified their position on reservations inherited on succession are listed as "implicit" reservations. /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_Succession_of_States_in_respect_of_Treaties
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Ratification of 1925 Geneva". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 31 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/unitedkingdomofgreatbritainandnorthernireland/rat/paris
Ceases to be binding as to the use of chemical weapons in regards to any enemy state which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"United States of America: Ratification of 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 31 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/unitedstatesofamerica/rat/paris
Binding only with regards to states which have ratified or acceded to the protocol.
Ceases to be binding in regards to any state, and its allies, which does not observe the prohibitions of the protocol.
"Viet Nam: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 31 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/vietnam/acc/paris
Does not constitute recognition of, or establishing any relations with, Israel. /wiki/Israel
According to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, states may make a reservation when "signing, ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to a treaty". /wiki/Vienna_Convention_on_the_Law_of_Treaties
"Yemen: Accession to 1925 Geneva Protocol". United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs. Retrieved 31 July 2013. http://disarmament.un.org/treaties/a/1925/yemen/acc/paris