• Images
• Videos
• Documents
• Books
• Articles

Classification

The extant Permic languages are:

• Udmurt (Votyak)
• Komi (Zyryan)
• Permyak (Komi-Permyak)
• Yazva (Komi-Yazva)

The Permic languages have traditionally been classified as Finno-Permic languages, along with the Finnic, Saami, Mordvin, and Mari languages. The Finno-Permic and Ugric languages together made up the Finno-Ugric family. However, this taxonomy has more recently been called into question, and the relationship of the Permic languages to other Uralic languages remains uncertain.³

History

The word Permian can be traced back philologically to the Russian word Perem (Перемь) or Perm (Пермь) which is found in medieval Russian chronicles.⁴ The word was initially used to designate certain territories, including the lower reaches of the Dvina River, as well as the area bounded by the Pechora, Vychegda and Kama rivers in the north, west and south, and the Urals in the east, which was incorporated into the Russian state in the late 15th century.⁵ The word Permian was then used to designate the non-Russian peoples who lived in there, which mostly included the Zyrians, and the Russians later began using the appellation Zyrian.⁶ From the 19th century, the word Permian was used in scholarly writing to designate the Zyrians and the Udmurts.⁷

Phonology

Proto-Uralic word roots have been subject to particularly heavy reduction in the Permic languages.

• Original geminates *pp, *tt, *kk were reduced to single voiceless stops *p, *t, *k.
• Between vowels, original single *p, *t, *k as well as *w and *x were lost entirely.
• Second-syllable vowels were lost entirely. This was obscured in Udmurt by adding -ы to certain words. (PU *lumi "snow" → Udm лымы /lɯˈmɯ/ vs PU *lämi "broth" → Udm лым /lɯm/).
• The sibilants *s, *ś, *š have remained distinct from each other in all positions, but were voiced to *z, *ž, *ź [z ʒ ʑ] between voiced sounds.
• Consonant clusters were largely simplified: in particular nasal + stop/affricate clusters yield voiced stops/affricates, and stop + sibilant clusters yield voiceless sibilants.

A peculiarity of Permic is the occurrence of the voiced consonants such as *b, *g word-initially even in inherited vocabulary, apparently a development from original PU voiceless consonants.

The Proto-Permic consonant inventory is reconstructed as:⁸⁹¹⁰

This inventory is retained nearly unchanged in the modern-day Permic languages.

Komi has merged original *w into /ʋ/ and undergone a word-final a change *l → /ʋ/ ~ /w/ in many dialects, while Udmurt has changed word-initially *r → /d͡ʒ/ or /d͡ʑ/. *ŋ is retained only in some Udmurt dialects; in other Permic varieties it has become /m/ next to back vowels, /n/ next to central vowels, /ɲ/ next to front vowels.

In later Russian loanwords, the consonants /f x t͡s/ may occur.

The consonant *w was marginal and occurred only word-initially or after a word-initial *k, generally traceable to diphthongization of the close back vowel of the 2nd series. An exceptional word is the numeral "six", *kwatʲ, which in Komi is the only native word root with an initial cluster.¹¹

Literary Komi and literary Udmurt both possess a seven-vowel system /i ɯ u e ə o a/. These are however not related straightforwardly, and numerous additional vowels are required for Proto-Permic, perhaps as many as 15 altogether. The reconstruction of Proto-Permic vocalism and its development from Proto-Uralic has always been a puzzling topic, for which there are several models. There is general agreement on the existence of two series of close vowels, one of which results in modern /i ɯ u/ in literary Udmurt and literary Komi-Zyryan, the other in correspondences of Udmurt /e ɯ u/ to Komi /e ə o/ (but /i ʉ u/ in the Komi-Yazva language). Proposed distinguishing factors for these include length (*u, *uː), tenseness (*ʊ, *u) and height (*u, *o).¹²

Here is the vowel table used in Wiktionary:

Morphophonology

Noun roots in the Permic languages are predominantly monosyllabic and invariable with the canonical shape (C)VC. CV roots, such as Udmurt ву /ʋu/, Komi and Permyak ва /ʋa/ 'water', and (C)VCC roots, such as Udmurt урт /urt/, Komi орт /ort/ 'soul', exist as well. In Udmurt, there are furthermore a number of bisyllabic roots, mostly of the shape (C)VCɯ.¹³

In noun roots with certain final clusters, the second consonant surfaces only when followed with a vowel in inflected or derived forms :

Udmurt has similar alternation for a number of other clusters of the shape voiced consonant+/m/, while Komi-Zyryan adds a number of clusters of the shape voiced consonant+/j/.¹⁴

The verb root for 'to come': Udmurt лыкты- /lɯktɯ-/, Komi локты- /loktɯ-/ also shows alternation to plain /k/ in e.g. the imperative (in Udmurt only dialectally).¹⁵

Notes

Bibliography

• Lytkin, Vasily (1957). Историческая грамматика коми языка (in Russian). Syktyvkar: Коми книжное издательство.
• Lytkin, Vasily (1964). Исторический вокализм пермских языков (in Russian). Moscow: Наука.
• Lytkin, Vasily (1970). Краткий этимологический словарь коми языка (in Russian). Moscow: Наука.
• Bartens, Raija (2000). Permiläisten kielten rakenne ja kehitys (in Finnish). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura. ISBN 952-5150-55-0.
• Csúcs, Sándor (2005). Die Rekonstruktion der permischen Grundsprache. Bibliotheca Uralica (in German). Vol. 13. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. ISBN 963-05-8184-1.
• Riese, Timothy (8 April 2015). Abondolo, Daniel (ed.). The Uralic Languages. Routledge. pp. 249–275. ISBN 978-1-136-13500-2.

Further reading

• Ante, Aikio. "Studies in Uralic Etymology V: Permic Etymologies". In: Linguistica Uralica LVII, nr. 3 (2021): 161–179. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3176/lu.2021.3.01
• Fedjunjova, Galina. "Etnitsheskije kontakty i divergentsija permskich jazykov" [Ethnic Contacts and the Divergence of the Permic Languages]. In: Linguistica Uralica 50, nr. 2 (2014). pp. 109–121. DOI: 10.3176/lu.2014.2.03

External links

• S. K. Belykh. Swadesh list for Permic languages
• Permic languages

References

1. Scheucher, Bernhard. "The Permic Languages". LanguageServer - the Languages of the World. The University of Graz. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 22, 2012. https://web.archive.org/web/20160304023117/http://languageserver.uni-graz.at/ls/desc?id=154&type=r ↩

2. Scheucher, Bernhard. "The Permic Languages". LanguageServer - the Languages of the World. The University of Graz. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved August 22, 2012. https://web.archive.org/web/20160304023117/http://languageserver.uni-graz.at/ls/desc?id=154&type=r ↩

3. Kittilä, Seppo; Västi, Katja; Ylikoski, Jussi (2011). Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles. John Benjamins Publishing. p. 354. ISBN 9789027206800. Retrieved 2012-08-23. 9789027206800 ↩

4. Riese2015, p. 249. - Riese, Timothy (8 April 2015). Abondolo, Daniel (ed.). The Uralic Languages. Routledge. pp. 249–275. ISBN 978-1-136-13500-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=VWDxBwAAQBAJ ↩

5. Riese2015, p. 249. - Riese, Timothy (8 April 2015). Abondolo, Daniel (ed.). The Uralic Languages. Routledge. pp. 249–275. ISBN 978-1-136-13500-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=VWDxBwAAQBAJ ↩

6. Riese2015, p. 249. - Riese, Timothy (8 April 2015). Abondolo, Daniel (ed.). The Uralic Languages. Routledge. pp. 249–275. ISBN 978-1-136-13500-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=VWDxBwAAQBAJ ↩

7. Riese2015, p. 249. - Riese, Timothy (8 April 2015). Abondolo, Daniel (ed.). The Uralic Languages. Routledge. pp. 249–275. ISBN 978-1-136-13500-2. https://books.google.com/books?id=VWDxBwAAQBAJ ↩

8. Bartens 2000, p. 33. - Bartens, Raija (2000). Permiläisten kielten rakenne ja kehitys (in Finnish). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura. ISBN 952-5150-55-0. ↩

9. Csúcs 2005, pp. 101–102. - Csúcs, Sándor (2005). Die Rekonstruktion der permischen Grundsprache. Bibliotheca Uralica (in German). Vol. 13. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. ISBN 963-05-8184-1. ↩

10. Lytkin 1970, pp. 10–21. - Lytkin, Vasily (1970). Краткий этимологический словарь коми языка (in Russian). Moscow: Наука. ↩

11. Bartens 2000, p. 51-52 ↩

12. Bartens 2000, p. 55-56 ↩

13. Bartens 2000, p. 66 ↩

14. Bartens 2000, p. 69-71 ↩

15. Bartens 2000, p. 178 ↩